Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/fembombcom/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_36744 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=36744 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fembombcom/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/fembombcom.jpg" alt="Enter Fembomb.com" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fembombcom/"><b>Fembomb.com</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 06-27-09&nbsp;&nbsp;11:52pm</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 80</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7542">ntccsb</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7542">1</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> -Updated weekly<br /> -Hot model<br /> -A number of the videos are nice, especially those where the model role plays or acts out scenes <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> Site layout is kind of lame and outmoded. The site should be reworked so that things are easier to find<br /> Many of the videos are silent and are rehashed chat videos. Webcam chats seem to be prerecorded with a stand-in doing the chatting. I believe this for a few reasons. The model seems to type much slower than text appears to users. There seems to be a lot of cut-and-paste comments back to users. The model takes no cues or requests from users. I think many of the chat participants are clueless to this though. <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> Join this site once or periodically to gather content as videos (with sound) aren't too frequent.<br /> <br /> Content is R rated or Playboy rated. <br><br> <a href="http://www.fembomb.com"><b>Visit Fembomb.com</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=36744">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=36744">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:52:34 PDT