<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Jenny Heart - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennyheart/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2910</guid>
		<title>Jenny Heart Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2910</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennyheart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/jennyheart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Jenny Heart&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennyheart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Jenny Heart&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:28pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;troglodite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;67&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Jenny would be about the only pro here. The site is designed fairly well too for browsing. There are plenty of photosets and videos of Jenny doing everything from friendly interviews to bouncing on some pole. Cameraman/woman does a good job at getting some unique views of the &amp;quot;situations&amp;quot; to keep the videos interesting.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video quality is horrendous - just about the worst I've seen from any sites lately. They are 320x240, but other sites handle even that low resolution better than this network does. It's a shame because the content of the videos looks like it would be great. The pics look much nicer, and the action is hot, but there's no way to download them beyond clicking on each one. I can't imagine many people will take the time to save each one individually to make a set. Convenience is key!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I can't really recommend this unless someone is just dying to see Jenny's content. She really is a great looking girl, and her sex scenes are in some ways better than many others I've seen come out of the major porn studios - I'm not a big fan of the &amp;quot;let's spend 90% of the move in 20x zoom mode&amp;quot; porn that's out there, and thankfully this site doesn't try to do that. Although there's a good number of pics and videos here, I think the site as a whole is missing a lot of small convenience and quality things that will translate into a frustrating experience for the user. It's unfortunate, because Jenny is worthy of much better than what the site currently has to offer.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8285&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Jenny Heart&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2910&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2910&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:28:37 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>