<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Dream Kelly - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49374</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49374</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-31-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:32am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 71&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;Gazette Risque&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;49&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* A website devoted to a very cute girl who has been around for about 5 years now!&lt;br /&gt;
* Loads of videos, about 200+&lt;br /&gt;
* Videos available in WMV, MOV and &quot;WMVHD-ish&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many bonus sites that come with it&lt;br /&gt;
* A nice mix of videos with her being either a brunette or blond&lt;br /&gt;
* Gives access to the entire network.&lt;br /&gt;
* Updates are although not very often, pretty frequent. About 1 every other week on average&lt;br /&gt;
* Still the same Dream Kelly, this can be good as well as bad. She just hasn't changed much repertoire-wise.&lt;br /&gt;
* All exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
* Talks more in videos, though usually the same stuff over and over again of her wanting you (inside her), it's an improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
* No more videos in 2 parts which made for 2 half updates each other week.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* A girl with a little identity crisis, blond to brunette to blond...&lt;br /&gt;
* She does the same things she did in videos 3 years ago, maybe a bit more close up masturbation.&lt;br /&gt;
* No big changes in the site in 3 years. Think navigation, type of videos etc.&lt;br /&gt;
* Download speed limit, about 1700-1800 KBps.&lt;br /&gt;
* Certainly not download manager friendly, the links expire within 5 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
* No upload dates with the videos or galleries. So I'm not quite sure on the updates anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
* The HD videos were 720p videos for about 100 videos. They now recently switched back to 960x540 which is quite strange.&lt;br /&gt;
* Still advertises with the cute blond and pink streaked Kelly while she looked like that 4-5 years ago&lt;br /&gt;
* Navigation could use a make over, still no search function which is quite annoying with 200+ videos.&lt;br /&gt;
* Older videos aren't worth it&lt;br /&gt;
* Still no interaction with Kelly. &lt;br /&gt;
* Talks more during videos&lt;br /&gt;
* Galleries aren't zipped.&lt;br /&gt;
* Videos start playing automatically&lt;br /&gt;
* No platinum blond hair with pink streaks
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					DreamKelly is a website devoted to the awesome Kelly who has been around for almost 5 years now!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I wanted to wait doing this review until July because that will be her 5 year anniversary on this website. I've done a review on her site before, some 3 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if things have changed a bit since...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's start off with the homepage. They still advertise with the hot young Kelly with the platinum blond hair and cute pink streaks. Really? She hasn't looked like in 4 years now! In the meantime she has gone brunette to blond again. Ok, so we know now that's a lie. No biggie but it's something to think of before subscribing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's go inside!&lt;br /&gt;
On the homepage you can see which new videos and galleries they have put up. The only thing missing is the dates which they used to messed with a couple of years ago. They had the tendency to change the upload dates so it would seem they had updated quite frequently. They obviously decided to leave new subscribers in the dark now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The video page isn't all that better. Same old layout which wouldn't have been a problem if the navigation was good. They offer 41 pages with 5 videos each. This makes for 200+ videos.&lt;br /&gt;
No search function and 40+ pages with 200+ videos makes for lousy navigation. Oh well, let's watch a video to get an idea of the quality...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first 50 videos you can just skip as the quality is really bad. Even for 5 years ago. When you hit around page 28-29, you're in HD country. This is where they began with WMVHD, though maybe not all of them are 720, most of them are. They kept this up until about half a year go when they decided to quit making videos in 2 parts. They now make full videos of Kelly still doing the same masturbation routine but more closeup and with her talking more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When you want to download a movie, you have to open the page for each video. It then starts playing automatically in Windows Media Player.&lt;br /&gt;
This is not only annoying but can be hard on your PC as well. If you want to download you have the option of WMV, MOV and &quot;WMVHD&quot;. If you intend on using a download manager, be aware that the download links expire within 5 minutes! Also, the speed gets capped off at 1700-1800 Kilobytes per second.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The galleries you ask? Three words: Not worth it. Not zipped, rarely updated, in the last update she's still a brunette.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, the website hasn't changed much. The videos are a bit more close up and more talking which is a plus. Also, no more videos in 2 parts. But other than that there's not really an improvement. &lt;br /&gt;
Better yet they got a little worse in some parts. The quality of the videos went down, the update dates are gone, galleries are neglected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a personal note, I loved this site. But after 5 years it might be time for a little change. And I really miss that platinum blonde hair with the pink streaks which she still advertises with...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it worth the money? Maybe for a month if you haven't seen her before...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49374&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=49374&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 04:32:16 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_40184</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40184</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-18-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:14pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;dracken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;213&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- About 190 videos available as WMV (320x 240) or quicktime. A lot of the more recent scenes also available in HD (1200x 720).Very fast download speeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Around 270 photo galleries with more or less 400 images each (1024px × 682px). No zipped files though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Good looking model, with a wonderful smile. She also has a bunch of different hairstyles and dresses up a lot. However, her back kinda put me off (her spine is very pronounced and looks kinda reptile like in some videos... only a few though)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- A decent variation of dildo, vibrator, strip and some photoshoot videos. But no sex scenes and no anal that I could find.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Access to a whole network of 7 other solo girls and around 50 other websites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Really good HD in the more recent videos. The content is very good in terms of quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Although the site is a solo model type it doesn't really connect the girl to the audience. No forums or chats, no special request videos section or web-chats. It's good content but why not go the extra step and make it an interactive experience?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- It's only one model who doesn't have sex or do anal. How often can you see the same girl play with herself? On the positive side the network access compensates more than enough, offering access to many sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Lack of a search function is bothersome at times. A category search (strip, play with self, roleplay, etc. ) would have helped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- An update schedule would have also been nice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Many of the videos are cut after 12 minutes in several parts. This can get frustrating as you have to download 3 videos for one scene. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Interviews with the girl would have made the site much better, helped us connect to her.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Overall the site is nice for a solo girl site. There is a lot of content and the model looks beautiful, especially with pony tails. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My main problem was that the site doesn't try to establish a connection between the users and the model. Solo sites work well when the girl responds to users, does videos that they ask her to do, chats with them and so on. Even something as simple as adding a brief interview at the beginning of each video would help. Having her say a few silly things about her week would make people feel closer and enjoy the site more, IMO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in many of the videos the soundtrack covers her noises or she doesn't make any...this results in a somewhat awkward video. More natural sounds, maybe let her play with herself until she cums and record that...I think it would make for a much better site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, I feel like the girl used to look a lot better in the older videos, which is a shame since the HD is so crisp and nice, but this could be just me so no points off for that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I am taking points off are the lack of a search function, no photo zipped archives, no easy to access update schedule...small things that gather up to make for a slightly less than satisfying experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What brings the grade back up is that cute smile Kelly has in some videos, the slight awkwardness when she fingers herself and those huge, gorgeous eyes. A great model and a site that could be improved.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40184&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=40184&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:14:02 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4418</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4418</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:16am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 73&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;Gazette Risque&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;49&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Some new videos are in HD widescreen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt; has gone more hardcore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Site has a nice look to it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Very nice picture galleries
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Site does not contain any of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenkelly/&quot;&gt;TeenKelly&lt;/a&gt; website content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt;'s doesn't look as good in all the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Older videos are very low quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Navigation and ways to download can be improved greatly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Site goes down every so often for a minute or two.&lt;br /&gt;
* Updates aren't on a regular basis as they promise.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; is one of those sites that most people hoped would finally go a little bit more hardcore. If you were one of those people, you're in luck!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure she had some masturbation videos, one or two, but that was it. Now that has changed.&lt;br /&gt;
She's doing more masturbation videos with more toys and anal too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt; looks very hot, in some of the newer videos she doesn't really pay much attention to her looks which is kind of a shame at times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the site itself, the downloading is a hassle. The site goes down every so often.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downloading all of the galleries is actually not an option. If you want all of the pictures, you have to download them by hand.&lt;br /&gt;
But the pictures almost make it worth it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new videos are in HD widescreen, sometimes they upload a non-HD video. &lt;br /&gt;
Why? I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can choose with the HD videos between HD and regular too. &lt;br /&gt;
So if you don't want to download the 100 Megabytes HD videos you can always choose to download the smaller videos instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, the website has a great look, the girl looks great, the new content looks great. Only the downloading can be a hassle and the gallery navigation could use some work. And the updating could use some more attention. &lt;br /&gt;
But... exclusive content from an exclusive girl.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4418&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4418&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:16:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3459</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3459</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:11pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1361&quot;&gt;biochemical&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1361&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some good photo sets, some videos are good quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Pics in preview page not in the members site.  Trial membership not allowed access to full site.  Also, like troglodite mentioned, lots of the videos need work.  On one vid, you can hear the TV and phone ringing in the background, which kind of ruins the mood.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I think I'll try a different site next time.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3459&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3459&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:11:49 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2898</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2898</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;troglodite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;69&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Kelly herself would be the biggest &amp;quot;pro&amp;quot; this site has. Of course it's opinion, but she's one of the best looking porn girls out there, and she doesn't disappoint with extra shyness. The second best thing would be the newest videos. She just recently started adding some hi-res videos that look head and shoulders better than her old ones (mentioned in &amp;quot;cons&amp;quot; below). Pictures are solid, but they're not usually what draws me to a site so I won't comment too strongly either way.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The older videos are horrible quality. 296kb encoded wmvs do not look good on today's larger monitors. I had been a member once before, but decided there was no way I'd join again unless the video quality got much better. Thankfully it did, but the majority of the content is not up to today's standards. The site also seems to die on me sometimes for about 5 minutes (flood protection? I'm not downloading THAT fast lol!)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you're not concerned about getting an overwhelming amount of high-quality video content and you think Kelly is a hottie, you should enjoy her site. It's very corporate, with zero interaction from Kelly herself, but some of that can be excused due to the content, which is undergoing a marked improvement. I wouldn't necessarily say join today (only 4 HQ videos up so far), but I'd keep an eye on the site and plan on a visit in a few months once they've had time to fill out the poor content with more modern multimedia. Score of 79 puts it right on the verge of &amp;quot;recommended&amp;quot;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2898&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2898&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:10:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
