<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Dream Kelly - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4418</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4418</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:16am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 73&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;magman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;29&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Some new videos are in HD widescreen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt; has gone more hardcore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Site has a nice look to it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Very nice picture galleries
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Site does not contain any of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenkelly/&quot;&gt;TeenKelly&lt;/a&gt; website content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt;'s doesn't look as good in all the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Older videos are very low quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Navigation and ways to download can be improved greatly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Site goes down every so often for a minute or two.&lt;br /&gt;
* Updates aren't on a regular basis as they promise.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; is one of those sites that most people hoped would finally go a little bit more hardcore. If you were one of those people, you're in luck!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure she had some masturbation videos, one or two, but that was it. Now that has changed.&lt;br /&gt;
She's doing more masturbation videos with more toys and anal too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;DreamKelly&lt;/a&gt; looks very hot, in some of the newer videos she doesn't really pay much attention to her looks which is kind of a shame at times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the site itself, the downloading is a hassle. The site goes down every so often.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downloading all of the galleries is actually not an option. If you want all of the pictures, you have to download them by hand.&lt;br /&gt;
But the pictures almost make it worth it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new videos are in HD widescreen, sometimes they upload a non-HD video. &lt;br /&gt;
Why? I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can choose with the HD videos between HD and regular too. &lt;br /&gt;
So if you don't want to download the 100 Megabytes HD videos you can always choose to download the smaller videos instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, the website has a great look, the girl looks great, the new content looks great. Only the downloading can be a hassle and the gallery navigation could use some work. And the updating could use some more attention. &lt;br /&gt;
But... exclusive content from an exclusive girl.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4418&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4418&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:16:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3459</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3459</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:11pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1361&quot;&gt;biochemical&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1361&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some good photo sets, some videos are good quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Pics in preview page not in the members site.  Trial membership not allowed access to full site.  Also, like troglodite mentioned, lots of the videos need work.  On one vid, you can hear the TV and phone ringing in the background, which kind of ruins the mood.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I think I'll try a different site next time.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3459&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3459&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:11:49 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2898</guid>
		<title>Dream Kelly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2898</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dreamkelly.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dream Kelly&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamkelly/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;troglodite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1174&quot;&gt;67&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Kelly herself would be the biggest &amp;quot;pro&amp;quot; this site has. Of course it's opinion, but she's one of the best looking porn girls out there, and she doesn't disappoint with extra shyness. The second best thing would be the newest videos. She just recently started adding some hi-res videos that look head and shoulders better than her old ones (mentioned in &amp;quot;cons&amp;quot; below). Pictures are solid, but they're not usually what draws me to a site so I won't comment too strongly either way.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The older videos are horrible quality. 296kb encoded wmvs do not look good on today's larger monitors. I had been a member once before, but decided there was no way I'd join again unless the video quality got much better. Thankfully it did, but the majority of the content is not up to today's standards. The site also seems to die on me sometimes for about 5 minutes (flood protection? I'm not downloading THAT fast lol!)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you're not concerned about getting an overwhelming amount of high-quality video content and you think Kelly is a hottie, you should enjoy her site. It's very corporate, with zero interaction from Kelly herself, but some of that can be excused due to the content, which is undergoing a marked improvement. I wouldn't necessarily say join today (only 4 HQ videos up so far), but I'd keep an eye on the site and plan on a visit in a few months once they've had time to fill out the poor content with more modern multimedia. Score of 79 puts it right on the verge of &amp;quot;recommended&amp;quot;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8282&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dream Kelly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2898&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2898&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:10:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>