PU - POV Porn - New Reviews

POV Porn Review

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:18:44 PST

POV Porn (1)

12-18-10 07:18am

REVIEW = 88 by rearadmiral (141)

Pros:
- Good quality POV scenes
- Part of a bigger (but relatively small) network
- Mostly amateur models
- Some porn stars, before they were stars
- Good selection of scenes
- Updates (I�m unsure of the schedule though)
- Pictures (but no zips)
- The scenes aren�t over-produced; they have a �fun� feel to them
- Good value when joining at the TPB / PU price

Cons:
- Download speeds aren�t up to industry standards

Bottom Line:
Two things to start: 1) this review pretty much applies entirely to Peter Girls too. They are part of the same network. POVPorn.com is hardcore-themed, while Peter Girls is more softcore, with some oral and handjobs. 2) I wouldn�t normally submit two reviews for a network, but I joined through Lap Dance Gone Bad which turned out to be just a small secondary network site. POVPorn.com and Peter Girls are the main sites and deserve a separate review.

I drafted this review a few days ago but didn�t post it. I�m glad I gave it some time since I�ve completely changed my position on this after watching many of the scenes again. This review may be a lot more subjective than I�d usually write. I really like this network. Peter Romero makes some excellent porn. It isn�t technically superior, but that adds to some of the amateur allure. He reminds me of the early days of gonzo porn when it was being shaped by guys like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. This porn looks like it was fun to make, and that makes it fun to watch too. (Peter � If you read this, PLEASE make more Lap Dance Gone Bad scenes! That is an under-served niche.)

It is difficult to say precisely how many scenes are on this one site because there is a lot of cross-linking between the two main sites. The sites appear to date back to 2001 and some of the scenes date back to then. Needless to say, the quality of those scenes is low as was the standard then. Most of the older scenes are also broken into smaller files. Between the two sites there are easily over a hundred scenes. The site says they update frequently and they do update though I�m not certain as to the schedule. The newer scenes are available in three sizes, with the best being 3300kbps. Download speeds aren�t up to industry standards. Average speeds are 250KB/sec. I can report that the medium quality scenes (1000kbps, 640x480) look good.

There are also photos available for most of the scenes, but there is no option for zips.

The best feature of the site is the models that they have. The site is not skewed to professional porn models, though some are here. Of those, most of them seem to appear very early in their careers. For example, Taryn Thomas appears in 2004 (her career began that year) as Brynne. It�s fun to see her and others so fresh in the early days of her career. Many of the other models are unknown to me and appear to be true amateurs.

I�m not a big fan of the POV genre, but Peter makes it work and is able to capture the action well without making himself the star of the scene or shaking the camera so badly that the scene is unwatchable. For POV, this is well done.

Joining the network through TPB / PU gets you a reduced price. For that price you get some really decent porn. It has a true amateur feel to it � and I mean that in a good sense. If you like amateurs, porn stars before they were stars or POV, this site is worth a membership.

Visit POV Porn - View Replies - Add Reply

POV Porn Review

Tue, 19 May 2009 03:00:36 PDT

POV Porn (1)

05-19-09 03:00am

REVIEW = 88 by tikkit (3)

Pros:
+ Models of recent updates are more than average attractive
+ Haven't seen most recent update models on other sites
+ HD video quality of recent updates
+ even older videos well filmed and with nice looking models

Cons:
- older videos are poor quality
- relatively small collection of videos
- no quality bonus sites
- no zip picture files
- seems to be large discrepency between newer and older content, regarding updates

Bottom Line:
A previous review states that this site may be a buzzkill when you join up, due to the fact that there is some New,New content mixed with some Old, Old content, but to me there is enough to justify the $30 price for a one month subscription. At first, I didn�t think this site was worth a damn either, but it grew on me.
Who doesn�t want to watch Danica (or Sasha Von) in a POV scene, that�s awesome. There is some GOOD stuff here, some pornstars who are hot and I have not seen anywhere else.
Yeah, this site may not have the content AMOUNT that can stand up to Bang Bros or Brazzers, but the quality of the content is sufficient for a month�s worth, don�t worry, if you download and keep this stuff, you won�t be disappointed, regardless of the ratio of video to picture sets.
If you need a Steroid Dude banging a Fake Titted Blonde chick, this site is not for you, but if you live in the real world, this site is worth at least one month of your free time.

Visit POV Porn - View Replies - Add Reply

POV Porn Review

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:30:00 PST

POV Porn (1)

01-14-08 08:30am

REVIEW = 60 by Thagnut (12)

Pros:
Maybe 15-20 good, new POV scenes worthy of download.

Cons:
There are a lot of dead links in this site.

A large fraction of the girls here that have nothing but photos. He produced scenes - but only using a lousy low-res single-shot camera. What an idiot.

Most of the girls have maybe 7 clips that combine to make up 50+ mb worth of video.

There are girls in the intro that I can't find in the site.

For the few good scenes that are high-res, he's so paranoid about people stealing his stuff that he put his logo right in the middle of the picture - what a douchebag.

Bottom Line:
I signed up, naive and curious - hopeful even. Here I am 1/2 an hour later, jaded and annoyed.

Basically this site is a scam. All the money went into the front page/intro. The moment you're inside you know you've been screwed.

The guy has a lot of talent finding and banging the girls, and I think he may be an agent out there in porn-land.

But he's just a total hack at filming scenes & building out a website. This is a mature industry. He could have bought a web-template or hired someone to help, but he didn't. And everything before 2007 is so low-res as to be throw-away anyway.

The point here is to get the $30 out of folks' initial sign-up. I've taken one for the team here - Beware!

Visit POV Porn - View Replies - Add Reply