PU - TNV Girls - All Activity

TNV Girls Comment

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:11:39 PDT

TNV Girls (0)

09-22-09 04:11pm

COMMENT by dracken (107)

quick impression

Worth the membership at least for a month, especially if you like softcore/ lesbian scenes. I ended up with many videos and some photos.

There is a lot of outdoors stuff and most of the scenes only hit at more sexual stuff (wet panties are preferred over a naked vagina)

I think it works and makes for a very hot site.

Visit TNV Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

TNV Girls Comment

Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:49:59 PDT

TNV Girls (0)

07-20-08 02:49pm

COMMENT by pantycleft (0)

tnv - so much like the curate's egg . .

. . good in parts. Okay very good in some parts, but in others, pretty piss-poor tbh.

I've just finished a month's membership having previously subscribed several years ago, and to my dismay discovered that most of the best content remains the stuff I'd seen before.

Most disappointing were the pics, which for size, quality and erotic content seemed way off the standard you'd expect from a pay site. Maybe this is because as the name implies, TNV is mainly a vid site, but that's surely no excuse.

However some of the uppie vids, though quite dated now, remain erotic classics, eg Alicia's sizzling schoolgirl scenes and Kelly's wonderful worm's eye wowzers.

I agree with others that navigation is poor. It's easy to overlook sections or pages because of the way they're indexed and you get just one tiny thumbnail per video or set of videos, so you really have little idea which are worth downloading, which not. I guess they'll trot out the excuse that the site is primarily mail-order but again, this won't wash when paying good money to subscribe.

All-in all though, for the panties and uppie fan there's probably enough here to leave you feeling reasonably satisfied -if also somewhat irritated.

It could easily be so much better.

Visit TNV Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:26:37 PST

TNV Girls (0)

01-08-08 07:26am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (53)

To WeeWillyWinky (82):

Hey, WeeWillie,

Thanks for the clarification. I love groups of beautiful nude females, but hate DRM. Appreciate the info!

View Thread (3)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:03:33 PST

TNV Girls (0)

01-07-08 09:03pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (82)

To Jay G (53):

Hi Jay,

Thanks for the reply, but I think maybe my review is giving the wrong impression.

While the site is no doubt softcore, it's most definitely not non-nude. There is plenty of nudity; in fact, there's even a section for nude galleries and videos, though that isn't the only place nudity happens. The action between the girls is often very erotic and it seems very genuine most of the time.

About the DRM protected vids: I believe there is only one small section containing these. I would estimate at least 85-90 percent of the video here is not DRM protected. I do agree with you, though, and I avoid DRM sites as well.

View Thread (3)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:00:26 PST

TNV Girls (0)

01-07-08 12:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (53)

To WeeWillyWinky (82):

Thanks for the warning.

The tempting pictures on the homepage of groups of very pretty & very naked females is tempting, but DRM means "Downloading Really Messed-up" (Just joking, "Digital Rights Management" simply means that the videos play remarkably poorly, then disappear after a short period of time).

I've never belonged to a DRM site without lots of problems. Now I just stay away.

View Thread (3)