PU - ALS Scan - All Activity

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:17:38 PST

ALS Scan (4)

12-11-11 09:17pm

REVIEW REPLY by RLane (2)

To rearadmiral (141):

Great review on this site, you made me more go to this site now.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:32:10 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 01:32pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

Sarah, thanks for taking the time to reply. I think you'd agree that your site has a lot of fans here.

Based on your reply and on a reply to an email I received from Alex it looks like I made a mistake in my review regarding older sets. I'll edit the review to remove that reference.

And given that you stepped in to provide some information, and Alex emailed me back, that level of customer service makes this excellent site that much better.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:27:19 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 01:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To exotics4me (431):

Good luck with this - it looks like from Sarah the webmaster's post they'll be able to help you out. I really wasn't looking for the ALS Angels sign up offer so I can't say for sure, but I think it came after I had submitted my credit card information for ALS Scan.

And a big thumbs up to ALS for not making this a pre-checked cross sell.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:24:33 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 01:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To elephant (47):

I know it's a personal thing, but I've always liked the interaction between the model and the crew where it's appropriate. Obviously in a plot-based movie (do they still make those?) it wouldn't work, but it works really well at ALS Scan.

File sizes may be a problem for you, but the trade-off is unbelievable quality - for both pics and video. This really is impressive stuff.

I agree that there will always be a subjective element in a score, but as long as a reviewer explains the score then I'm okay with something very low or very high. And honestly, while there is a subjective element in my high score, there is a lot of objectivity too. This could be a site with obese, hairy senior women and I may not like it much, but I'd still have to give credit for the technical near-perfection.

And jusr in case anyone from ALS Scan reads this, please don't start using obese, hairy senior women as models. I was just using that as an example. :-)

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 06:58:04 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 06:58am

REVIEW REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To rearadmiral (141):

Thanks for the very thorough review Realadmiral. I do want to let you know that our older videos are available. We started re-mastering them around 2007 and when these older videos were re-released we listed them with the new release dates. Just take a look under some of our more popular models from the early 2000's like Sophie, Liz Honey, Roxanne, Taylor Rain, etc and you'll see their videos.
Exotics4Me - email me at webmaster@s2.alsscan.com and I'll get you hooked up with the special Angel's deal.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:21:51 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 03:21am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To Monahan (37):

Andie is on ALS Angels, really good content of her, maybe the best I've seen of her.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:20:07 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 03:20am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To rearadmiral (141):

I tried it out, but not getting the offer. The only options I got besides the standard join is to join for long-term. The worst part, I never can get my card approved through their billing system so it ends up sending me to ccbill. Maybe I'll send them an email and ask what's going on with both problems. I wouldn't have ever complained about it if Angels updated more frequently. I still really like their content, but my subscriptions have dropped off since I usually prefer Angels. At one time, maybe 2007, I was joining both about every 3 months. As of right now, I don't think I've been a member this year of either. Just like Monahan's post below shows.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:05:07 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-08-11 01:05am

REVIEW REPLY by elephant (47)

To rearadmiral (141):

Yeah I guess I neverreally looked at it like that " a fly on the wall documentary style video of the the models" I guess you do see more personality from them in these vids than normal sex scenes.

Yeah as much as I like high quality vids I do like to not go above 1gb on a movie, that's good quality for me really, I don't watch them on a big tv really only on a 24" monitor. Some of the downloads on the site I'm at now Reality Kings at full 1080p ones are in excess of 2.8 gb, just don't have he hard drive space for vids this size so just downloading the smaller ones.

Yeah about scores, its all about your prefrences isn't it, if your expectations and tastes are catered for then you have to rate high, its a very personal thing scoring.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 22:54:48 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 10:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To rearadmiral (141):

rearadmiral, terrific review, as always. I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALS Scans, especially after reading your review of ALS Scans today. The site has been on the top of my bucket list for a long time; one reason is because it had good preview stuff on Andie Valentino. (She's not in the model list right now, which means I should jump in before others disappear.

I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.

One question. Can you tell from the site if ALS Angels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?

View Thread (19)

RE: Audition Videos!

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:24:28 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 07:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To turboshaft (24):

"Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!"

Oh, yeah!! :-)

View Thread (8)

RE: Audition Videos!

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:10:28 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 07:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To messmer (123):

No worries, I didn't even realize I had asked a question! :-)

I sort of knew the answer anyway as I think Alex had mentioned on ALS' blog that they wouldn't allow members to actually choose the models. I think we've also discussed it here in the reviews or in the forum somewhere that ALS doesn't do this, and basically no site lets its members make hiring decisions.

The only "voting" that goes on is in e-mail correspondence, and possibly sites like this as well, where a model is popular enough to come back for a second shoot. Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!

View Thread (8)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:29:27 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 04:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To exotics4me (431):

Thanks for the comments, and thanks for the information on the difference between the two sites. I figured that it had to be something like that. The models at Angels are certainly 'curvier' but they are still amazingly beautiful. I hope that Alex is representing them as inferior to the models at Scan becasue they aren't.

When I joined a year ago during the signup process I was offered Angels for $9.95. Same thing happened this time. It's possible but not probably that I just got lucky both times and signed up when there was a special offer. I susepct that it's a standard offer now. And if it is, you get your wish of both sites for just under $40.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:25:25 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 04:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To gaypornolover (14):

Thanks! Let's just say I spent a lot of time there over the past couple of weeks. It's a huge site.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 14:11:46 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 02:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by gaypornolover (14)

To rearadmiral (141):

Wow excellent review as usual rear, very impressive - I don't think you could know the site better!

View Thread (19)

RE: Audition Videos!

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:59:36 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 01:59pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To turboshaft (24):

Turboshaft, my sincerest apologies. I never realized that I had failed to respond to your question. I just came across it today as I looked in on the site because of a new review. And four months later: The BTS selection process was published after the fact so I don't think there was any voting! :-)

View Thread (8)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:39:34 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 01:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To rearadmiral (141):

Very good review RearAdmiral. I've been a big fan of both ALS sites for a good while. The main thing I'm going to comment on is the ALS Angels site being available for $9.95 with ALS Scan. This originally was the only major problem I had with the ALS sites.

The difference between the two. ALS Angels are models, ALS' webmaster Alex felt were "too curvy" for ALS Scan. If he has made Angels available for $9.95 to Scan members then I probably wouldn't complain too much, but for years, including up to the last membership I had, Scan was $29.95, Angels was $24.95 no matter whether you joined them both or not and it had me almost saying "scam". Various reasons for it, my favorite Euro model, Eve Angel is on Angels only, she is listed as 5'6" 115. not really for sure on what world a 115 pound woman is "too curvy". I think my most recent reviews of the two scored Angels higher than Scan just because I preferred the models, though Angels only updates 7-10 times a month, compared to Scan's much more frequent updates.

It became such a frustrating point for me that I stopped joining either site. Don't remember how I exactly worded it, either in a review or comment, but at one point, it cost nearly $55 to join both and the only bonus from joining both was receiving all the models all other sites offer for one price. This became more frustrating when I signed up for both sites with the same username/password and sure enough, they were going through the same server. I think I've even posted I would be willing to join both for $39.95 combo price, so it at least shows how much I liked the content. I'll have to make a note to join both if Alex keeps giving a discount to Angels for Scan members.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:14:44 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 01:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

Thanks messmer! As I said to elephant, while I can understand that some people would have no interest in the photo shoot videos, they work for me. I can't really say why, but they do. I downloaded more of those than masturbation scenes.

And thanks for supporting the high score. Based on the scoring criteria here, I think it is justified and I hope that anyone reading the review will see why I scored it so high. They may not agree, but as long as they see where I'm coming from.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:08:58 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 01:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To tangub (101):

Thanks tangub. I'm not a big fan of the fisting and peeing either. That's a bit strange for me to say that because in other contexts I do have a bit of an interest in those. I think that here it seems a little out of place in that the site is more about glamout than raw sex. But these things on ALS Scan don't get in the way of the scenes and they certainly don't detract from the site.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:01:06 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 01:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To elephant (47):

Thanks for the comments, elephant. I can't explain why, but I'm one of the people who really like the photo shoot videos. I can see why some people wouldn't like them because they aren't as overtly sexual as a video, and I can see that some people wouldn't like the director talking through it the whole time, but for some reason I really like all aspects of these scenes. I like the 'fly-on-the-wall" thing and being able to see the interaction between the model and the camera.

If you go back (and I'd highly recommend that you do) plan to stay a while. The HD video files are huge and look amazing.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:23:04 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 11:23am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

Super, detailed review, rearadmiral. I do agree with elephant when he writes: "Only thing that doesn't really do it for me is the photoshoot videos, I just can't watch these at all, I find them lacking in that fluid element you get from a normal sex video. I guess though they must have their fans though cause they wouldn't make them otherwise,"

However I loved everything else about this site and your score is eminently fair. They are exceptional in models and quality.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 09:22:35 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 09:22am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (101)

To rearadmiral (141):

An excellent thorough review as usual rearadmiral. I'm not normally into the wierd insertions, gyno and fisting stuff the models get up to here but as you say the models are so hot and the quality of the photos top notch that i'm prepared to overlook those issues for this site. Not had a membership here for about two and a half years though so maybe time for a revisit soon. A shame if they've removed a lot of the pre 2007 stuff but luckily i grabbed most of that on my last visit.

View Thread (19)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:45:24 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

08-07-11 08:45am

REVIEW REPLY by elephant (47)

To rearadmiral (141):

Nice in depth review man, I do like the look and the models are super hot, I also love their style of lesbian video. Only thing that doesn't really do it for me is the photoshoot videos, I just can't watch these at all, I find them lacking in that fluid element you get from a normal sex video. I guess though they must have their fans though cause they wouldn't make them otherwise.

Still, good thing is they do lots of non photoshoot sex scenes its maybe due a revisit from me as it's been a while since I was last a member here.

View Thread (19)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 01 May 2011 12:30:05 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

05-01-11 12:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

Because of this chat we've been having, I watched a bunch of ALS stuff again just to remember how good it is. And it is good. One scene I remember getting a laugh out of starred Lexi Belle and another girl I can't remember. It was a photo shoot where the director gives them instructions (I like that) and at one point Lexi was on all fours and the other girl was using a dildo on her. The director said to the chick holding the dildo "Kiss her ass" and the chick gives him this hilarious look as if to say "No freaking way!" Then the director clarifies by saying "Just kiss her ass cheek." The reason I found that so funny is because I know what my reaction to that command would be! The next direction would be the director telling me to get my face of Lexi's ass because no one will want to see a bunch of pictures of the back of my head.

So the moral of the story is this: if you're a photographer and you want me to kiss Lexi Belle's ass, don't worry about having to ask twice. The problem may be in getting me out of there...

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 01 May 2011 12:21:19 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

05-01-11 12:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

LOL. I'm ogling, I'm ogling! I guess I'll take a walk over to Nubiles to see what they have! :-)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 01 May 2011 12:14:12 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

05-01-11 12:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

Imagine that! You being attracted to an under-40 woman. If I keep the pressure up maybe I can turn you into a complete pervert who ogles the 18-22 crowd! You can never have too many perverts you know...

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:48:47 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-30-11 09:48am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

Yep, I got them. :-) I found the one with Blue Angel the most exciting because she became an instant favorite the moment I laid eyes on her! I normally don't collect models but I got every scene she is in plus most of her photo sets! And she's under forty!!!! I'll have to rethink everything! :-)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:26:13 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-29-11 08:26pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

The public videos with body paint are really fun to watch. Those are all favourites of mine.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:07:15 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-28-11 03:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To turboshaft (24):

LOL. It is a hefty site indeed, turboshaft and I have made full use of the download speeds to add tons of videos to my stash. Time for a new external drive! I really find myself surprised by this site, it contains so many elements I usually don't find all that attractive: shower / bath tub scenes, outdoor shoots, behind the scenes material, and I ask myself what did I ever see wrong in these things because ALSSCAN is doing a really great job of producing exciting material.

As a matter of fact, I am tempted to up my score a notch or two. And just what's wrong with shaved? I love shaved! :-)

Oh, yes, I also had forgotten all about my love of "puffies" until I subscribed to this site. Between the videos of Faye Reagan and Blue Angel I can gorge on puffies! Now I will have to find a web site that features puffies! I wonder if there is such a thing? :-)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:46:25 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-28-11 01:46pm

REVIEW REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To messmer (123):

Great review Messmer! It can be a very hefty site in terms of disk space, not to mention the hours spent ogling the videos and pics. They have also been one of the fastest downloading sites I have ever subscribed to...so you can spend more time watching instead of waiting.

Loved reading this comment: Tell the truth I am actually starting to get used to shaved. In the words of the Emperor from Star Wars, "Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the Dark Side!" [Evil laughter]. : - )

View Thread (24)

RE: Audition Videos!

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:54 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-28-11 01:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To messmer (123):

Messmer, I couldn't remember from when I was a member but do they allow member voting for these mass auditions, or is it just BTS long after the audition?

It'd be pretty cool if they allowed a democratic audition selection but I bet the webmasters would have some serious disagreements. Hell, they've been selecting ALS-approved models for well over a decade I'm sure they have a more finely tuned wow-factor meter. ; - )

View Thread (8)

RE: Audition Videos!

Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:21:36 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-27-11 02:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

Thanks for the prompt fix, Sarah!

View Thread (8)

RE: Audition Videos!

Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:05:23 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-27-11 12:05pm

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To messmer (123):

Thanks Messmer!

We fixed the problem. I believe you ran into issues because of the numbering of our pics in the latest casting. When downloaded all together in the zip pack, certain pictures may have appeared out of order. Thanks for pointing this out and we'll make sure this doesn't happen again.

View Thread (8)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:56:49 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 06:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

I am completely satisfied myself, rearadmiral, because I found lesbian videos that I like very much, plus the public stuff you mention. Just got finished downloading some of the videos where the model goes for a stroll clad only in body paint. Neat!

Through the Prague public stroll I also discovered a breathtakingly beautiful model, Blue Angel, who is making me forget mature for a while. :-) I stopped being discerning when it comes to her videos and am downloading everything I can. I had forgotten how much I love puffies. She has a sunny disposition as well.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:40:03 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 06:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

I'm with you on the shower/bath thing. When I joined ALS I did it mostly for the public stuff. There was enough of it there that I was completely satisfied even though I didn't download a lot of material.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:24:19 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 04:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To greg909 (2):

Well, you are right and you are wrong, greg909. I would agree when it comes to picture sets, as good as the quality is, but when it comes to the videos the personalty of the girls really shines through and you look at them as distinct individuals.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:53:16 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 01:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by greg909 (2)

To messmer (123):

I, too, checked out this site recently since it gets good ratings here (and like messmer says, there are so few natural pubes sites that one is forced to these shaved-like-window-dummies" sites to get any variety.)

Anyhow, to give ALS some credit, a lot of the images are quite good quality. But the thing that struck me the most was that every single model (aside from all being shaved) has almost exactly the same figure and face. Sure, some are brunettes and some are blondes, but as I looked back through their catalog, I kept thinking that I'd already seen each new model because they are all interchangeable. So boring! This was pretty much confirmed in a couple of sets called "Prague Auditions" (or something like that) where the site posts models that auditioned for the site, stating which were rejected or hired. It seemed that only the ones who fitted their tiny range of looks got through... and all the ones that I found interesting and a little different got rejected.

Oh well, nice if you like that exact look repeated over and over, but it wasn't for me.

View Thread (24)

RE: Audition Videos!

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:00:08 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 10:00am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

Hi Sarah, thanks for taking an interest in our comments and concerns. I can't really tell you which zip file I found the mixed up pictures in because I deleted all of them, all I remember is that this particular zip file might have been the one that was over 3 Gigs big. You would show a number of pictures of one model, then all of a sudden an unconnected picture of another model would pop up, then back to the original one and this kept repeating itself. There were also pictures of a model getting dressed after the audition of what appeared to be a startlingly short set, a new model would come on for a few pictures and then there would once again be a return to the previous model who had just got finished dressing, but this time she was still in the middle of her audition.

I didn't check the whole set because I got annoyed, so you should find the culprits fairly early in the set(s). I watched the sets with the viewer that's built into my zip utility rather than unzipping them, maybe that could be the problem but it would be the first time this sort of thing has happened to me.

Love your site.

View Thread (8)

RE: Audition Videos!

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:04:32 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-26-11 06:04am

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To messmer (123):

Hi Messmer. I was unable to identify any issues with the numbering in our casting sets. Could you please tell me exactly where you saw this problem so I can fix it?

View Thread (8)

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:19:52 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-25-11 05:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

I thought of you when I came across those public nudity scenes, rearadmiral. Outstanding! If I have one complaint it is that I come across too many shower/bathtub scenes, I normally don't care for those even though I must say that ALS manage to make some of them hot.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:11:15 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-25-11 05:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

Some of the ALS stuff I've downloaded remains among my favourite scenes. I'm a big fan of the site. I suspect that I'll take another membership there soon.

View Thread (24)

ALS Scan Comment

Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:39:12 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-25-11 10:39am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Audition Videos!

I really like this site's audition videos. I usually don't care for "Behind The Scenes" material but there's something about all those hopeful young beauties getting undressed, and their reaction to the audition, that makes these videos some of my favorites. Just thought I would mention this because the videos aren't featured under the main updates and might be missed by some. And as an aside, I'd accept every one of the hopefuls! I am glad I didn't have to make the eliminations because to me they'd all look good in ALS SCAN.

There are also High Resolution Picture sets of the auditions available but I found quite a few of the pictures out of place and deleted those sets until their editors straighten things out.

I might have kept them, flaws and all, but one set weighed in at a hefty 3 Gigs plus. So, beside the problem of models ending up in each others audition there was also the problem of having to go through a huge number of pictures to correct the mistakes. As well as the loss of 3.3 Gigs memory on an ever more crowded external hard drive.

P.S. Just came across some audition videos in the main section of the site so if you look long enough you will find them there as well.

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:49:56 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-25-11 09:49am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To slutty (92):

Thanks, slutty!

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:49:23 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-25-11 09:49am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To rearadmiral (141):

I agree with you about the unique stuff, rearadmiral. I mentioned the publice exposure scenes under kinks because I came across two hot scenes within hours of browsing the site. So far I am very pleased with this site because it isn't just the same old, same old even though on the surface it doesn't really look like anything I might enjoy. But I do! :-)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:35:39 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 10:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To messmer (123):

Excellent review messmer, haven't been back here in a while, probably should at some point...

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:37:17 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 08:37pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To messmer (123):

messmer:

I agree with you that this site offers some variety other than indoor photo shoots, but people should be aware that this site offers some pretty unique public stuff too. I haven't been a member at ALS Scan for a while, but the last time I was there they had maybe 10 shoots of girls in Europe where they painted 'clothes' on them and sent them out into the streets. These are some of my favorite scenes of all time.

I might be in a minority here, but I like the scenes where you can here the director giving orders.

Yours was a great review of a great site. Thanks for adding it.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:12:04 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 02:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Khan (Staff):

Not a problem, Khan. :-) Especially since I just noticed that your reply was addressed to the Capn! It is I who should apologize for not looking before I leaped! Boy you guys are tactful! :-)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:55:04 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 01:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To messmer (123):

memmmer, sorry if I confused you. My reply was to Capn. His comment about them all being shaved made me wonder if he was aware of the ALS meaning.

Again, sorry to both of you if I added any confusion.

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:41:39 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 01:41pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Khan (Staff):

Yes I was fully aware of this, Khan, but as I explained to Capn I have run out of interesting hairy sites so I'm branching out. Also, to my surprise, I am actually getting used to the bare look! :-)

PS. Don't be surprised if I end up in a teenie site next, anything is possible these days!

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:51:21 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 12:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To Khan (Staff):

Exactly! ;0)

View Thread (24)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:33:32 PDT

ALS Scan (4)

04-24-11 12:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Capn (27):

errrr ... you are aware that ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved, right?

View Thread (24)