PU - ALS Scan - All Activity

RE: Breakdown of Content?

Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:12:46 PST

ALS Scan (20)

11-09-08 03:12am

COMMENT REPLY by elephant (22)

To Jeffrey99 (11):

I like the site too, stunning girls on there, I only am not keen on vids of photoshoots and don't really see the point in them, just seems fake watching two girls together posing for snaps when I'd much rather just watch the girls having sex

View Thread (4)

RE: Breakdown of Content?

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:36:04 PST

ALS Scan (20)

11-08-08 05:36am

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (7)

To Jeffrey99 (11):

Sarah is right on target. The site is worth a peek and ALSAngels too I plan on another tour this winter.

View Thread (4)

RE: Breakdown of Content?

Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:48:34 PST

ALS Scan (20)

11-07-08 11:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

Agreed, Sarah - this is absolutely my fave site - and I'm not a huge fan of the gape and crazy insertion shots - they have PLENTY of shots of gorgeous young models, clothed, semi-clothed and nude, besides the crazy insertion shots - and they have EASILY the hottest girl/girl vids I've seen anywhere - fantastic stuff that makes Sapphic Erotica look like paint drying in comparison.

View Thread (4)

RE: Breakdown of Content?

Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:37:00 PST

ALS Scan (20)

11-07-08 05:37am

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To Jeffrey99 (11):

Hi Jeffrey99 -

About 80-85% of the pictures are glamour like
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/franziska2/a...ska2_pr_032hires.jpg
and then every scene ends with some kind of crazy
object insertion. There is plenty of soft and harder
shots to please everybody. Photo are released in
full sets and are very large, usually between 200-400
hi-res pictures per scene.
Hope this helps.

Sarah

View Thread (4)

ALS Scan Comment

Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:53:29 PST

ALS Scan (20)

11-07-08 04:53am

COMMENT by Jeffrey99 (11)

Breakdown of Content?

Was wondering if anyone could give me a break down of how much of each content there is on ALS Scan? I'm not really a fan of fisting, large toys, using everyday objects like hotdogs, bananas, etc, Speculum use, Pussy gapin. Is that most of the content on here?

Some reviews make it sound like that's all every set is, while others make it out more as it's a smaller sub category of stuff available. So just wondering which is it?

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:24:41 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-31-08 11:24am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To badandy400 (77):

You say that you were a member several months ago and you thought that the layout sucked - if that's the case, you wouldn't see any improvement. If you were a member over a year ago and were looking for some improvement, there has been considerable. They stopped taking vids off the network - they all stay up except for bonuses, which are for limited time only.

They also changed the layout so that all pic sets and vids can be accessed under the model's name.

They also put the polls in their own section, so if there are any open polls as to which older sets they should upgrade first or which sets of new models they should release first, you can find them easily and vote rather than e-mailing Alex.

I love this site, so I just want them to keep on going - and upgrading as the technology gets better, which they are very committed to.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:31:27 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-30-08 01:31pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (77)

To xbigvmanx (10):

Not a problem. Half the time I write reviews the site yells at me because I forget to set that and have to go back and do it so the review goes through.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:29:15 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-30-08 01:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (10)

To badandy400 (77):

OOO my bad. I didn't read that portion of the current member or previous member thing carefully. Thought it meant something else. Don't worry I changed it to what it is. Thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:20:02 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-30-08 01:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (77)

To xbigvmanx (10):

Your review states you are a current member! You cant say you are a current member if in fact you have not been for several months, that is very misleading (that is your cue to fix that in your review).

It is a site i will rejoin in the future, they have a lot of good videos and great looking girls. The navigation is the only real issue I had.

I posted a full review of this site, so you can read that and get my take on the site as it was as i was a member. Keep in mind that the site was changing while I was a member.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:07:31 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-30-08 01:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (10)

To badandy400 (77):

I can't really change your opinion if you think its not a good purchase. No I am not a member anymore and like you its been a while since I last joined. But I am considering coming back to it just to so I can download the movies as well as the new photos. Other then the layout what did you not like about it?

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:00:56 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-30-08 01:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (77)

To xbigvmanx (10):

You can download everything in one month! :)

As you are a current member, can you tell me more about the site layout? I was a member several months ago and it sucked, but I know they were working on it.

View Thread (6)

RE: Impressive Download Speeds

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:34:06 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-22-08 02:34pm

COMMENT REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To badandy400 (77):

Interesting - perhaps it was the time at which I was downloading that was a factor, more than their servers. Still, nobody should complain about their servers being slow, that's for sure, lol

View Thread (2)

RE: Impressive Download Speeds

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:44:04 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-22-08 09:44am

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (77)

To Toadsith (48):

I actually see these kind of speeds from most places, not at home of course. Even during afternoons and evening I always seen these sort of speeds. Brazzers, Videobox, Incredible pass, and even fairly small sites could sustainover 1 MByte/s.

From those sites I was able to have 3 or 4 downloads at a time all getting that speed.. Videobox was usually able to get around 45 MBit, and this was a year ago. Incredible Pass one day (the day I downloaded half their site) was sending 80 MBit/s to as an average for about 3.5 hours and was going as high at 95 MBit/s. Worth noting that my download manager is set for a single connection per file, so no acceleration. Anymore I only download from home and still use no acceleration.

The point is that ALS is nothing special for being capable of doing this. What might be special is you being able to get that connection from here you are. I have a 3 MBit connection at home and I not found a site yet that can not with a single connection top out my connection. It is sites that can not keep these sort of speeds are the ones I worry about.

I have found the best way to speed things up is to not use accelerator but rather to download multiple files.

View Thread (2)

ALS Scan Comment

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:13:18 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

10-22-08 04:13am

COMMENT by Toadsith (48)

Impressive Download Speeds

While I hardly ever have complaints about download speeds, this site is moving bits so quickly that I thought it worthy of comment. Since all of their new video is High Definition, the size of the videos means downloads could be lengthy, but right now I'm holding a sustained download speed of:

1.10 MB/s (8.80 mbps)

It is also important to note that this is without any form of multiple connection download acceleration. I rarely see speeds this high from anything other than large businesses like Microsoft. Granted this is occurring at a very low traffic time for my area and I'm not using my internet connection for anything else, but even when traffic spikes up some I still maintain speeds above 700 KB/s (5600 kbps). Really impressive speeds.

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: clyde's Review

Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:39:09 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

09-28-08 10:39am

REVIEW REPLY by turboshaft (8)

To clyde (13):

This is one of my favorite sites too, navigation aside. Their videos, including older standard definition, still look great, as well as the newer photos.

I do wish they would redesign some things though. Personally, I am not a big fan of everything being included in a single photoset (outtakes, goofs, etc.). I understand that this makes it much easier to download content, but it also just adds a lot of junk to downloads.

For example, their newest photoshoot releases are quite large, but it ends of being a lot of sloooow stripping and unnecessary shots with the male assistants in the frame. I like seeing just the model, not the dudes sweatin' between her legs with the camera and lights.

On the other hand, going through their older material (say pre-2000), and there is not enough content. Most of their earlier models are just as attractive as their current talent, but they have not released many of their photos or videos to prove it.

View Thread (2)

RE: clyde's Review

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:31:50 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

09-26-08 09:31am

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To clyde (13):

For pure content and HD videos, this is still one of my favorite sites and at the discounts of $25 a month is a great value.

They would benifit from hiring a designer to update the sites look and navigation though.

View Thread (2)

RE: Things need improvement.

Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:53:57 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

08-03-08 11:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To turboshaft (8):

Yeah, that's one of the things I mentioned and wanted people to keep in mind with my comment and updated review. While I am talking about things that I believe could use with a change, it is still a good site. It could be even better in my opinion, but it is in no way bad.

Franziska is a good example, and I agree with what you have to say. And it wouldn't be a big deal to me if she was an anomaly. The scary thing to me is that she is one of 5 out of the last 6 "new girl updates" that are similar in the "not extreme" nature. One here and there and I'm not going to complain, but this is a lot, especially when a "new girl update" only comes once every two weeks, and even then you never know when you'll see a specific set.

Enough about my bitching about the release format, onto solutions. I believe that the way to handle the situation is to completely scrap the current system and move onto something more organized and reasonable. So a new model is added every two weeks right? Well then I propose her content to be COMPLETELY released within 2 weeks to a month. That is still longer than some other sites who fully release all girl's content the second they come on (FTV for example), but it's much better than what it is now. You can still have remastered material take up half of the updates, so that leaves the need for about 15 new vid and pic sets per month. As it is 2 new girl's content (the amount of girl's released per month) wouldn't quite fill that quota, but it would be close. With the remaining updates to fill the month they could continue to release unreleased material from past girls, or maybe even say take a Sunday off of updates. Maybe update Monday-Saturday, or at worst Monday-Friday. That would fill the update requirements, get a model's content out in a reasonable and dependable amount of time, and still leave room for all the remastered material. Voila, problem solved. :)

View Thread (5)

RE: Things need improvement.

Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:21:12 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

08-03-08 09:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (8)

To MargulisAZ (64):

I am huge fan of Alsscan too but I am afraid you are probably right on some of these points.

1. It does seem slightly less extreme lately, but it's hard to tell if it really turns out to be softer content in the long run. Franziska is a good example; yes, she is really hot, and Alex says she is really popular but I have just not been interested, regardless of the braces or tan lines or whatever people thought was interesting. No fisting, not even a speculum scene (at least that I am aware of) -- pointless indeed.

I think it may be an excess of the fluff content rather than a lack of hardcore content that�s the problem. By this I mean all the cars, candy, and glamour shots they have started adding. If I wanted to see cars I would look on a car site, and the lollipops seem to be what everyone else is doing as well so it gets boring fast. The softer or glamour shots can be a little much sometimes and I think this was mentioned in relation to ALS Angels and in response they were adding some more establishing shots before a model goes straight for the toy or insertion. This is fine but it quickly adds a lot of boring repetitive stuff, especially now that they release a whole scene at once, including all bloopers and outtakes.

2. I disagree here, to me they release new models (or rerelease archived material) frequently enough, especially considering how big a release usually is, but...

3. ...I do wish they would release the majority of a model's shoot within 6 to 9 months. I hate it when there are random releases from a model they shot more than a year ago, then only to say "well, she wasn't very popular so we didn't release any of her stuff." I understand it can be hard to agree on whom, or what scene, is really the most popular -- even with a voting system -- but it is frustrating to see something on a promo page but nowhere else simply because a model is "unpopular."

This is still a great site and I think it can remain that way with a few tweaks to the formula.

View Thread (5)

RE: wiild1's Review

Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:53:44 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

08-02-08 02:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by wiild1 (10)

To MargulisAZ (64):

No taste is alike, but it's important to clearly state that ALS have pretty extreme content. Porn users that like extreme content like fisting and fruit in pussies, clearly love ALS: they should sign up, stay members and be happy. But people that do not like more extreme stuff should be informed before wasting their money.

I personally do enjoy some other niche type of content that I am sure 90% of all pornusers would dislike, so I am not generalizing the public to have the same likes and dislikes as myself: ALS is a niche site that successfully cater for a 10% niche market.

View Thread (5)

RE: wiild1's Review

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:38:30 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-31-08 02:38pm

REVIEW REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To wiild1 (10):

I agree that the site isn't perfect but for different reasons than you state. Appreciate the honesty, but I also believe you are generalizing the public to have the same likes and dislikes as you. To say that 9 out of 10 porn browsers would think the site is crap because of the extreme content is what I mean. It may not be your cup of tea, but it doesn't mean it isn't others. Actually, sites such as Alsscan, FTV girls, teach me fisting, fist flush, etc. cater to that market and have a lot of success. FTV had a poll a year back or so that listed all the types of content on the site (about 40 categories) and had members rate what they enjoyed the most. Results ended with #2 being fisting and #4 was using one of the huge toys on the site. So clearly there is a taste for it out there and it isn't minimal.

View Thread (5)

RE: Things need improvement.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:02:42 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-31-08 02:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

I'm sorry but my opinions stand. I understand you need to defend your site, but I disagree with you.

1. There have always been some models who fist and who do not, but lately the ratio is more to who do not than who does. I believe I remember a blog where Alex said that he used to make it a point to NOT shoot girls that couldn't do most of the extreme stuff, so I'm assuming he lowered his standards on that. You can quote what's happened over the last 2 years, I'm talking about over the last few months, and that's what matters to me. I'm not saying there is no hard content anymore, or that there is no fisting, I'm just saying there is less than there used to be and I don't like the trend. Your latest model updates: Franziska, Sabrina Sweet, Cherry Potter, Megan Malone, Molly shoot 2, upcoming Mia Ross. One of them, Molly, has a fisting set. That's what I'm talking about.

2. Voting system or no voting system, the problem stills stands that a model's content is released randomly and over a very long period of time. It's frustrating and disorganized as far as I'm concerned. And at least 3 of the videos released weekly are old videos remastered so it can take forever to see all of a model's content. And again, there are multiple models who date back to over 6 months ago that have not had all their content released.

There have been good things, such as the full photo set releases, no content rotation, high def videos, etc. I agree with you on that. That does not, however, have anything to do with these problems I talk about, or take away from them.

View Thread (5)

RE: Things need improvement.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:00:58 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-31-08 07:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Ooops, I got cut off.....

The owner has a blog and solicits model and scene requests from members on a regular basis. New models are added approximately every 2 weeks but this is because we simply do not just shoot any model
that is willing to spread her legs. We travel the world looking for
only the highest quality models. In addition to all of our NEW daily
updates, we also release remastered sets and videos of our older
material. We are bringing our entire photo and video archive up to
the quality standards that are expected today (and you hold that
against us?).

3) As for your comment about sets being released randomly, we
have just added a members realtime voting system for each new
models scene. This will determine the exact release order of
each models scene and allow all members to participate online.
Again we direct you to the Members Blog for all of the latest
improvements and developments coming to ALS Scan.

View Thread (5)

RE: Things need improvement.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:59:56 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-31-08 06:59am

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Thank you for your comments, but I have to say that virtually
all of the emails we have been receiving lately tell us how much we have improved during the past year (New updates 7 days a week, complete photosets, HD Videos, Public Beach Sex, Members voting systems, Directors Blog, and so much more). So please let me address your comments individually.

1. We get about an equal amount of emails that say our content is
too extreme and ones that say we are not extreme enough. Given
that, we feel we are right where we should be. Are we getting any
less extreme than we were 10 years ago? No Way. Some of our
best fisting photos and videos ever shot have been within the past 2
years. If a new model cannot handle fisting because her pussy is
too tight, or does not enjoy it, then we do not make her do it. I
believe you may be referring to Franziska who we just shot:
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/modelfranziska.html
She is 18 and her pussy was so tight we did not even try
to fist her - it would be pointless. But then if a girl comes in like
Tristan Kingsley who loves to fist, and whom we also just shot,
we will shoot 3 or 4 sets and videos of her doing just that:
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/modeltristankingsley.html

2) We add more new updates than 95% of the web sites out there.
We release a new update every single day - 7 days a week. This
is new content and the updates are not small. Either a full
complete NEW photoset is added (usually between 200-300 hi-res
3000+ pixel photos) or a full length NEW video scene usually 15-30
minutes in length. Not to mention we also release huge photo and
video bonuses and some of the best public nudity and public sex
videos that have ever been produced - no site has ever come close
to matching some of the stuff we shot on the public beaches in the
tropics. We release models and sets based on members
requests. If we shot a model 3 years ago and she is never
requested then we simply do not release her. The owner has a

View Thread (5)

ALS Scan Comment

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:23:27 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-31-08 01:23am

COMMENT by MargulisAZ (64)

Things need improvement.

I've been hanging around Alsscan for years now and I'm seeing problems. I wish I could do my review over actually. Still a good site but needs some change. Problems I see:

1. Content is getting less extreme. New models are rarely fisting anymore or doing as extreme of shoots as used to be the norm. Disappointing to say the least for fans like me who joined the site years ago because of such consistent content such as that.

2. The reality is that new true updates are not frequent. Now I know that sounds crazy since there is a new video and pic set added daily, but hear me out. How often is a new girl added to the site? Maybe once every 1-2 weeks. Ok, but then the model's material is usually broken down into at least 5 photo sets and 5 video sets, each of which are released at totally different times. And those updates in and of themselves are completely random, so there is really no telling when you may see the scene you want to see. Throw in the multiple updates of older stuff re released, and the real updates are indeed infrequent.

3. To my 3rd complaint: the release of material is completely disorganized and chaotic. There are still pic sets and videos of girls not released from over a year ago. This is especially frustrating when you really like a model and want to see all her stuff. I strongly suggest some sort of new release program that gets a model's content out at once, or at least over the course of a few weeks.

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Classic Models Poll

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:27:36 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-09-08 02:27am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To turboshaft (8):

Yeah, she was also very beautiful with the shorter hair, but she didn't need the boob job (which got her migrated to ALS Angels). I just loved her natural breasts. Didn't seem too small to me!

View Thread (3)

RE: Classic Models Poll

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:43:19 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-08-08 05:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (8)

To Drooler (156):

Almost forgot about Zoe -- hot, nasty, and willing to try almost anything and actually enjoy it! I think she was actually on an episode of The Wonder Years 10 years before she showed her dirty side for ALS. They shot her again in their New Orleans shot doing girl-girl, and then again for one of their Jamaica trips, though by that time she had shorter hair and "enhanced" breasts.

View Thread (3)

RE: Classic Models Poll

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:18:15 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-08-08 03:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To turboshaft (8):

I noticed that Zoe is in the lead. She is very fine! I'm glad, though it might not matter anyway as far as who gets reposted first.

I once joined the Kathryn Lee site, and that was quite a while back. Would certainly like to see some of that stuff up again, all nicely curated, restored, and enlarged to 3500px or so. What a doll babe!

View Thread (3)

ALS Scan Comment

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:48:42 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-08-08 02:48pm

COMMENT by turboshaft (8)

Classic Models Poll

The site's having another models poll, this time from their early models (1996 - 2001). This brings backs a lot of memories of when I first learned of this site and became an instant fan, and they have only gotten better! I am sure anyone who was a member that far back can't wait to see who they remaster next.

Their older models are sometimes hit and miss (possibly because ALS was not so well known), but quite a few stand out; Michelle, April, Monica, Nicole...the list goes on. Most of them were unknowns then and stayed that way, a few went on to do movies, but none of them were "stars" when ALS shot them so it gave them a sort of freshness compared to now when models appear on dozens of sites at the same time.

Apparently some of them don't have any video, though I am not sure which ones, and the photos are scanned from prints, but there are still plenty of hot classics to be found.

(By the way, was anyone ever a member of Kathryn Lee's or Mia Tyler's individual member sites? None of this material has ever ended up on ALS's sites so it would be cool to see it eventually released.)

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:00:02 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-03-08 09:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To JBDICK (19):

I appreciate the feedback and kind words. I try to provide as much info as I can so my fellow users are as imformed as possible.

View Thread (6)

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:27:24 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-03-08 03:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To TheRizzo (19):

I've just read this review because I had a new trust from TheRizzo. For the record, I don't do reciprocals.

My motto is you earn it for your reviews and I agree with ace of aces

This is a good review and a fair rating as far as I'm concerned so I will be trusting TheRizzo...

thanks

View Thread (6)

RE: European pricing

Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:36:33 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-02-08 09:36am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (19)

To Sarah (Webmaster):

Dear Sarah,

thanks for this feedback. I also received a mail from your colleague Anna today. Seems as if my first mail didn't make it to you/her. Which I believe to be the truth because it never took longer than the usual delay between the US and Germany to receive a reply no matter what person of ALS Scan I wanted to get in contact with.
For some strange reason I now see the old processor when I follow the normal link http://www.alsscan.com/join-noref.html

In any case my problem seems to be solved and as soon as my subscription will have run out I'll join ALS Scan again immediately. I'm a happy customer again and that's the best news for me today.

Thank you and have a nice day!

Greetings from sunny Germany,
Eddie

View Thread (4)

RE: European pricing

Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:13:09 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-02-08 06:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Sarah (Webmaster)

To mr smut (19):

It has come to our attention that some of you are seeing higher pricing to join ALS Scan if you live outside the USA. We added CCBill as an additional billing option for our customers and they provide global currency billing based on your region. For some of you this has resulted in higher pricing when converted to the US Dollar. If you would like to use our old billing processor with our standard pricing, simply click the following link to join ALS Scan.

https://s3.alsscan.com/sky1-cgi-bin/process/merch_cc.cgi?BPCC=Y

View Thread (4)

RE: European pricing

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:39:22 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-01-08 10:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (19)

To TheRizzo (19):

It's still 3 weeks before my old subscription is going to run out but I do see the old prices in dollars again when I hit the join-button on the main page. Before I saw prices in Euros without the lower price for the recurring billing.

I wanted to have an answer as soon as possible because I like this site a lot and since they changed their update schedule to 3 or 4 full scene picture updates per week ALS Scan got even better.

View Thread (4)

RE: European pricing

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:47:12 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-01-08 09:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To mr smut (19):

I am very glad to hear they went back to the old system. I hate the European billing option and I am in North America. I just think its a bad trend.

Did they let you reup at $24.95?

View Thread (4)

ALS Scan Comment

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:51:52 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

07-01-08 04:51pm

COMMENT by mr smut (19)

European pricing

As said elsewhere here I was quite shocked to see, that since my subscription is going to run out - my credit card is a new one as of June 2008 and I didn't see a possibility to update the information on their site - end of July, that I should pay >80% more (�29.95 instead of $24.95) per month since I'm located in Europe. So I wrote a mail to ALS Scan telling them that this was quite shocking to me.

Although I never received a reply I saw tonight that they went back to the old billing system :-).

THUMBS UP for ALS Scan! I'll stay with them as the quality and quantity of content increased a lot ever since I joined this site.

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:39:48 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-30-08 09:39am

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To ace of aces (108):

Thanks Ace of Aces. Appreciate the feedback.

View Thread (6)

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:47:03 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-30-08 01:47am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To TheRizzo (19):

nice review. you "earned" my trust :)

View Thread (6)

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:19:07 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-28-08 11:19am

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To PinkPanther (30):

Interesting I figured they would do some photoshopping for sure but like you said in the videos especially the hd videos alot of the pussies are just as clean and bump free. But if they are photoshopping out all the normal bumps and still make the pictures look that great, then they got some excellent color correctors on staff.

View Thread (6)

RE: TheRizzo's Review

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:22:32 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-28-08 09:22am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To TheRizzo (19):

How do they get the girls so smooth and bump-free? Photo-shopping. Alex once showed some before-and-after pics because members were asking how much photo-shopping they did and he is an honest guy. They just photo-shop the bumps and blemishes etc and leave everything else the way it it. As to the vids, it's an interesting question, since they look just as clean and bump-free - soft lenses?

A videographer have to answer that one.

View Thread (6)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:18:05 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-26-08 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To turboshaft (8):

I just joined the site a few days ago and put up a review of the site. Thanks to those who provided me feedback on the content and convinced me to sign back up. Well worth it!!

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:53:59 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 08:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (8)

To PinkPanther (30):

I couldn't agree more; no direction can equal a good video. Usually it's just the model looking at camera, then talks to herself, "finds" toy under pillow/seat cushion, proceeds to orgasm, goodbye wave. Sometimes this can be pretty cool, like the Amy Lee/ Kacey Jordan fistin' and pumpin' scene, but it was a big relief to see videos without the director's constant influence (minus the goofy male assistants, a growing problem).

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:46:08 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 08:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (8)

To TheRizzo (19):

Their older stuff looks, well, older, but it's not too bad really. It's interesting seeing videos that have never been released, even if they are all photoshoot/BTS. Definitely collector's material, especially compared to the HD quality of current releases.

I am personally looking forward to Joanne's upcoming rerelease since I still own a video and CD of hers from the late '90s (yes, I've been an ALS fan for 10 yrs...time flies).

Their newest photos are supposedly even better and more HD than stuff from a few months ago since they got a new camera. I have only noticed this on hi-res versions of photos, and only ones that are close-ups; wide shots look the same.

The '08 Caribbean shoot is looking pretty good so far, and most of last year's tropics shoot has been released, which by itself is almost worth a month�s subscription. The HD videos are more focused on masturbation than BTS and photoshoot than older ones but tons of selection

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:43:51 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 06:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To PinkPanther (30):

Thanks for the tip on the beach HD movie series. Sounds very good and may just inspire me to join next week sometime. Close to my budget for the month but got a membership expiring next week so frees up some cash for this site.

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:00:22 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 06:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To TheRizzo (19):

If you're in the mood to join in the next week or so, you'll be able to catch their bonus HD 3-part vid of the first beach day on their 2008 Caribbean trip, which I think is absolutely fantastic - just a batch of gorgeous sexy girls running around, getting drunk, playing in the surf and eventually diving on each other's pussies with abandon. I haven't seen girl/girl stuff better than ALS is presenting anywhere else on the web.

Their redone older pics look pretty damned good to me. The redone older vids not so much. There's just no way to make those older vids look anywhere comparable to the new stuff, but it's collector's type material if you like those models, who have moved on or, in many cases, long ago changed their body shape completely or retired.

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:30:58 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 09:30am

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To mr smut (19):

Excellent feedback Mr. Smut. Much appreciated. I think I'll signup in a week or two then for sure and update my collection.

I especially liked how many HD movies you mentioned.

Thanks again!

View Thread (7)

RE: Quality of older content

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:06:56 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-19-08 12:06am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (19)

To TheRizzo (19):

All the new stuff is being shot in HD. The first of the +120 HD movies I downloaded so far is dated from April 2007 (from cute Annabelle Lee) so you can expect to find more than 1 year of HD updates. But beware that they still release older and updated material.

Some of the real old sets (Eva and Jana) have been released in higher resolution but according to the limitations of the older equipment and due to the fact that real old material (pre 2002 I guess) has been shot an analog film it's far away from being as crisp as the new stuff. The old videos are way beyond of what's possible today but the quality is somewhat better than it used to be in the old days. Unfortunately I can't compare old vs. upgraded quality because I lost almost all old videos.

In August they will release Joanne (porn star Victoria Knight) in higher resolution and if you really like the same stuff that I do you will join again in a few weeks time ;-)

View Thread (7)

ALS Scan Comment

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:33:32 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-18-08 07:33pm

COMMENT by TheRizzo (19)

Quality of older content

I see in some of the comments and reviews that Als Scan has been bringing back some of their older content in bigger file sizes and such. I've been a member from time to time but not for awhile now.

My question to other members of the site recently, how good is the quality of the older content? Even though its a bigger file size is the qualiy pretty good or can you tell it was shot in 2003 or something like that?

Considering joining as I saw a special for $24.95 and wouldn't mind getting some of my favorite older sets again in a better resolution that my new monitor would love.

Also is there a good selection of HD movies now?

Visit ALS Scan - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: wiild1's Review

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:06:35 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-18-08 07:06am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To wiild1 (10):

Let me say to start that I absolutely love this site.

I'm adding a comment because I feel that it's incorrect to infer that this site is some one-note site where every vid and pic set is the same. I've spent a fair amount of time watching their new bonus set at the beach from their Caribbean trip this year and it is amazing. Approx 1 1/2 hours of vid - gorgeous nekkid girls cavorting on the beach, playing in the water, playing with each other, very relaxed, very high energy - not trying to conform to any stereotypical thing of what sex acts they need to perform to make the material ALS material.

Just hotter and more relaxed girl/girl play than I've seen at any other site.

View Thread (5)

RE: Read the CONS

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:44:54 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-09-08 02:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (77)

To wiild1 (10):

You are right about that. I just check the front pages and they are not completely clear about what is inside. By that I mean what is inside the site, not the girls! :)

View Thread (4)

RE: wiild1's Review

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:23:52 PDT

ALS Scan (20)

06-09-08 11:23am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To wiild1 (10):

Excellent review.

Your score doesn't match what I'll score it when I've finished my review, but you did an excellent job of explaining why you scored it as you did which, if always done the way you did, adds a lot to the value of P. U. reviews.

I, personally, like a variety of insertions, because that means the girl is enjoying herself, showing off her body and giving me a good opportunity to enjoy looking at her private parts.

While fornication is also fun to watch, seeing a hairy male asshole staring back at me while his sausage is doing its thing in the babe's vagina or butt hole, does nothing at all for me.

That said, each of us has our individual preferences. I really am turned off by excessive and/or poorly located tattoos (example, a lousily oriented script "F" on Friday's lower groin area). I just cannot watch a porn vid with excessive tat's for more than a minute. But some people love tat's.

Your experience with ALS Scans matches mine for an all tattoo site I wasted my money on. The site had good PU reviews and a high average score but it took me about an hour after signing up to put through the cancellation.

It's all about what floats your boat and when people post good descriptive reviews like yours, it really helps the decision process.

View Thread (5)