<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Panty Amateur - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26881</guid>
		<title>Panty Amateur Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26881</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyamateur.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Panty Amateur&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:01am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;146&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).&lt;br /&gt;
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.&lt;br /&gt;
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.&lt;br /&gt;
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.&lt;br /&gt;
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.&lt;br /&gt;
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)&lt;br /&gt;
No photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.&lt;br /&gt;
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/a&gt; seems like a sister-site to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantymaniacs/&quot;&gt;Panty Maniacs&lt;/a&gt; - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.&lt;br /&gt;
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.&lt;br /&gt;
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.&lt;br /&gt;
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the &quot;mothersite&quot; -  PM.&lt;br /&gt;
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.&lt;br /&gt;
WMV: 960x540.&lt;br /&gt;
No stream.&lt;br /&gt;
And no photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the models - but not the &quot;finest&quot; - apears on for exampel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suburbanamateurs/&quot;&gt;Suburban Amateurs&lt;/a&gt; with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlytease/&quot;&gt;Only Tease&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/a&gt; is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...&lt;br /&gt;
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody knows where - if at all?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7458&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26881&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26881&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:01:17 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16281</guid>
		<title>Panty Amateur Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16281</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyamateur.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Panty Amateur&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:03pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 95&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;68&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site has one mission and carries it out nearly perfectly.&lt;br /&gt;
- Video is top quality, with some HD. All vids, even as far back as 05, are top quality: at least 2000 kbps.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very attractive British models.&lt;br /&gt;
- One new vid every day.&lt;br /&gt;
- Tons of content. There may be over 800 videos at present.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Scenarios are repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download options. People with slow connections will need a lot of time on their hands.&lt;br /&gt;
- Limited nudity.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lighting bad in a few vids.&lt;br /&gt;
- If silicone were tea, this site would have more than China.&lt;br /&gt;
- Longer videos, with a bit more creative thinking, would be an improvement, though five minutes is pretty good for the material as it's currently presented.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you are looking for hardcore, masturbation, toys, etc, you will absolutely loathe this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 If you find that panties just get in the way of the good stuff and feel that they are more of a nuisance than anything else, this site will cause you to become suicidal with boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that the thong is the greatest advancement in the history of women's underwear, this site will cause you to go postal on your monitor, and then you'll have to buy a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that a &amp;quot;panty video&amp;quot; should include: panties around the ankles at all times, panties being sniffed, panties being inserted into various orifices, you are encouraged to avoid this site, in the same way that anyone with taste should avoid a Pauly Shore movie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come to this site looking for porn, you will not find it, unless you're convinced that any woman who would allow herself to be photographed topless is a harlot in service to the Lord of the Underworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't take points off because of the limited scope of this site, because it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is. This is a video site, there are no pics; it's a panty-site, there's no hardcore. It's a site directly aimed at the panty/upskirt video collector, with a touch of voyeurism and mild sapphic play. If you're not interested in those things there is no reason for you to visit.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7458&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16281&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16281&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:03:54 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>