Ultimate Fantasy Girls Review

Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:45:32 PST

Ultimate Fantasy Girls (1)

01-26-08 09:45am

REVIEW = 70 by creampiefan (6)

Pros:
Lots of content; solos, girl-girl, boy-girl; they seem to really focus on BJ's in the boy-girl shoots.
Hi-Res Photos w/Zip download.
Hi-Res Vids.
Unlimited downloads, no DRM on Vids
Fairly frequent updates.

Cons:
Not all exclusive content.
Photography is mediocre in some cases, particularly true on the FanasyGirlCarmella site pages. I say mediocre because their photogs and/or direcors just can't get poses done correctly to get focus in some shots, so you end up with half the model in focus and half fuzzy. Either their photogs & directors (if they use them) or their equipment is the problem. Don't know. I wrote them about it, no response. What I expected!
They have a primitive "voting" mechanism, viewers of both still shoots & vids on SOME of their sites can "vote" using a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 10 (Excellent). But they provide no capability for the member to tell WHY they voted the way they did. So, what's the point of having a "voting mechanism"? And only SOME of the sites within their network have this option, others don't. Inconsistent.

Bottom Line:
My guess is that the entire "network" of sites originally spun off from the CatalinaCruz.com site. There are numerous early photos of OTHER MODELS with the CatalinaCruz "watermark" on their affiliate sites.
Pretty pricy considering the mediocrity of their photography; they definitely ain't in the same league as Earl Miller, Suze Randall, or the many other top-notch photogs in the business.
Given the amount of content and fairly frequent updates, I recommend the site(s) in the Ultimate Fantasy Girls network for a couple of months. But you really don't want to pay them $30/month for a long period unless you're just really into their type of stuff. There's better material on the net.

Visit Ultimate Fantasy Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

PU - Ultimate Fantasy Girls - New Reviews

Ultimate Fantasy Girls Review