<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - New Sensations - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_53132</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=53132</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-25-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:30pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 60&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6019&quot;&gt;insomniacxxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6019&quot;&gt;13&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Quality video (would love HD options but not bad)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Thorough: newer content has videos, stills, and screens, all downloadable&lt;br /&gt;
+ Newer scenes downloadable as WMV or QT&lt;br /&gt;
+ File name includes movie title
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- RECYCLED CONTENT&lt;br /&gt;
- No really good central spot for finding updates&lt;br /&gt;
- Older scenes have no full-scene DL&lt;br /&gt;
- Older scenes difficult to download even clips from&lt;br /&gt;
- Somewhat repetitive content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have been a member off and on for a couple years now. I reviewed them very favorably before despite a few annoying flaws. But my most recent trip back there has been seriously disappointing. Most &quot;new&quot; content is recycled. Not from other networks, but from these network sites. I already have most of this content, because I downloaded it last year. I hope they start producing new content again, but until then I won't be going back.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=53132&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=53132&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:30:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_33779</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33779</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-13-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:41pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6019&quot;&gt;insomniacxxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6019&quot;&gt;13&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ A decent amount of EXCELLENT content&lt;br /&gt;
+ Downloadable scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+ Newer scenes are very good quality&lt;br /&gt;
+ Downloadable image sets (both stills and screenshots)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Some absolutely amazing girls&lt;br /&gt;
+ File naming recently updated to include movie title!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No really good central spot for finding updates&lt;br /&gt;
- Older scenes have no full-scene DL&lt;br /&gt;
- Older scenes difficult to download even clips from&lt;br /&gt;
- Somewhat repetitive content&lt;br /&gt;
- WMV only
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is an excellent network. The few flaws are just really not that bad, in my opinion. Take the schoolgirl stuff for example. Yes, it's tired, and yes the scenes all go pretty much exactly the same. But it's sort of tried-and-true, and when someone like Dani Cole comes along and does a schoolgirl scene... I'm all over it. Or Renna Ryan. I have almost every scene she has released, and her scene from Naughty College School Girls (released on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jizzbomb/&quot;&gt;Jizzbomb&lt;/a&gt;) is HOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be easy to miss scenes if you don't know how to really dig. If you go to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt; home, you'll see updates from the whole network. But only three, so if you don't check for a few days, you're likely to miss something. And if you use the model dropdown on that site to search for a model, you get results from across sites. But not ALL sites. So it's very easy to get confused, and to miss content. Also, some models appear more than once under different names. My advice: if you have a girl you're looking for, find out what her aliases are and look for them too. On every single site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, quite a few of the sites are crap. Just old, non-exclusive content that's hardly ever updated. I didn't include this in the cons because really, they give you plenty of good content to make up for it. The other sites are essentially bonus content that i don't like. No big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A note about video quality: For newer videos, it's fantastic. It shows on my system as 888x480. For some reason the picture is slightly stretched horizontally on my system (Mac, using either MPlayer, VLC, or QuickTime the result is the same) but if your player allows you to force 16:9 it's perfect. This may only be on a Mac, have not tested in Windows. Unfortunately, the only file format option is WMV. While this is not a deal-breaker, it's highly irritating that so many content providers opt for the proprietary format designed for Windows. There are just so many platform-neutral formats, I don't get it. So if you have Mac, you'll need to download some third-party components, and it's still kinda crappy. But oh well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For older videos the quality gets lower. And you don't get that full download link. In order to download you actually have to open a popup for each clip, which prompts you for a password (which as far as I can tell only works in Windows), wherein you will find a streaming video (if you're running Windows) and a link to download that clip. I have been banned from the site a few times for failing at this password prompt a few times in a row so if you're on a Mac, you may find the older videos to be a pain. Again, this would be easily remedied but like many adult sites, this one is clearly designed for Windows. Newer videos do not have the download issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion: This is an awesome network and highly recommended. It's not without its flaws, but i am perfectly happy to accept those flaws and keep renewing my registration.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33779&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=33779&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:22 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_28963</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28963</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:58am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5994&quot;&gt;TrashMan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5994&quot;&gt;103&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Each site shows list of updates&lt;br /&gt;
+Site search engine&lt;br /&gt;
+Most movies are provided as one big file. Most of the older stuff used to be available only as split files but they have taken the time to rejoin them and provide a full length, one file download. However you will find some movies that have not been converted yet (mostly the older stuff earlier than 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
+LQ and HQ downloads available. HQ is 640x480 - THANK YOU!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
+Good amount of network sites, none of which require a secondary login.&lt;br /&gt;
+All movies include addition dates&lt;br /&gt;
+Includes PluginFeeds bonus access. I like these sites as they are updated rather regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
+Includes access to NSFullOnVideo DVD site where you can find downloads to about 260+ dvds&lt;br /&gt;
+HQ images provided for scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+$24.95/mo is not bad especially since you are getting access to most of NS DVD content. Package discount deals are available.&lt;br /&gt;
+I checked out all the sites and saw they added 3 movies per day for the last year...not bad for $24.95.&lt;br /&gt;
+Monthly package deal
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-The updates listed are only for the current site. Only 3 network updates are shown, no way to see a longer list of the entire network updates. Forces you to go through every site to determine updates&lt;br /&gt;
-Site search engine only searches the site you are on, not all network sites (e.g. a search on jizzbomb will not return results from mrbiggz)&lt;br /&gt;
-Most downloads use generic filenames even though they are from titled DVDs. Would prefer the title in the file.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some of the 260+ DVD's on NSFullOnVideo are not in the listing and can only be accessed by guessing the link (about 1/3 of them)&lt;br /&gt;
-Site will not support most download managers thanks to the PHP downloading system. Free Download Manager will work.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some network sites have not been updated in 2 years or more. This is because of the nature of the site, hosting videos from a particular series of DVDs (e.g. Nachos Killer Pussy) that has ceased production&lt;br /&gt;
-Each site only shows ONE upcoming addition.&lt;br /&gt;
-Movies missing from series added, read below
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Overall, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;NewSensations&lt;/a&gt; is a good buy.  They have since updated their layout for the better.  The old layout was rather dated looking and you had to login to every network site even after logging into the main site.  This has since changed and you only have to login once.  Their layout has changed to allow them to better compete with sites like BangBros, Brazzers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naughtyamerica/&quot;&gt;NaughtyAmerica&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;RealityKings&lt;/a&gt;, all of whose layouts are strikingly similar.  The only place that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;NewSensations&lt;/a&gt; fails with regards to this change is that they did not link all the sites together when talking about their search engine and their updates list.  When you visit the aforementioned competing sites the updates list includes additions to all network sites.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;NewSensations&lt;/a&gt; on the other hand shows only updates for the current site, not all the network sites.  Thus to determine updates to your preferred network site you have to actually visit the site.  (If you want to do like I did and determine the total number of updates added to ALL the network sites over a certain time period, say a year like I chose, you have to visit all the sites, one after another).  But it is a minor qualm for those of us who don't mind browsing through all the network sites, and who end up finding some girl they will ultimately like that they would otherwise not found without browsing those sites.  $24.95/mo is a pretty good price, but you can buy monthly packages to reduce the price as low as $18.95/mo, which is darn good.  And yes, I do recommend a monthly subscription seeing as how they are pretty good at providing 3 updates per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, in determining the number of updates over the rolling 365 days, I found there to be a little over 1100 movies added, or a little over 3 movies added per day (on average), which is where that number comes from.  It took about 10 minutes, but it was worth it for readers' sake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to give major props to the site for not giving into the craze that is &amp;quot;offering HD video when your source is not HD&amp;quot;, meaning video with a native resolution of 640x480 stretched to 720x480. All HQ videos are 640x480, no stretching, perfect looking.  Good job &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;NewSensations&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the &amp;quot;missing movies&amp;quot; comment.  If you are savvy and are able to figure out the source for these movies (e.g. Nachos Killer Pussy videos come from the DVD Series &amp;quot;Nachos Killer Pussy&amp;quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/papaloads/&quot;&gt;Papa Loads&lt;/a&gt; videos come from the DVD Series &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/papaloads/&quot;&gt;Papa Loads&lt;/a&gt; Blowjob Babes&amp;quot;, etc.) you will ultimately determine that they are missing a few movies from the series that they represent.  It is really annoying when you goto IAFD, find a movie in the series you are looking for and goto &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;NewSensations&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; only to find out they have not provided the movie.  Hey, maybe they are going to add it at some point, but who wants to wait for porn?  Last year I went and looked for Naughty College School Girls 1, only to find they didnt have it. I come back this year, and low and behold they now have it. Go figure...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28963&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28963&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:58:34 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14232</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14232</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-29-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:50pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3281&quot;&gt;morecumplay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3281&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1. has nice females and fair video quality&lt;br /&gt;
2. I like the little miniskirt look that is in alot of the videos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1. most earlier seens can't be downloaded&lt;br /&gt;
2. seens end do soon, there needs to be more action after the money shot which I'm sure many enjoy
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I like the network because of the lil latinas site with gorgeous latins. but would like better quality vids
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14232&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14232&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:50:55 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13716</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13716</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-18-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=176&quot;&gt;jake07621&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=176&quot;&gt;41&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					There is a great deal of content on this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of videos, lots of hot pornstars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of hardcore action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Large, solid network at a really good price.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of material with extras.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I found the site to be not very well organized.  I found it difficult to navigate and find what I was looking for.  Materials seems scattered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer video quality was very good and you're able to download an entire video.  Older quality isn't as  good and much of it is streamed on other corresponding sites.  Sometimes the streaming failed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found way too many dead links.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is worth a month.  It's part of a large network and that's always a plus.  Recent video quality is very good. There is a great deal of content and it is very much worth the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was, however, disappointed at the organization (or lack thereof) and an inability to do really specific kinds of searches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sites is part of a good network and is a good price.  I have found other networks that I like a lot better.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13716&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13716&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:31:31 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7368</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7368</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:05am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2198&quot;&gt;User&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2198&quot;&gt;32&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A lot of vidoes&lt;br /&gt;
No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
Reasonable price&lt;br /&gt;
Decent quality vids&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of bonus stuff (thru NS-All Access)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video quality can get better.  Some of the older vids are really poor quality and more recent updates are better, but could still improve.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site, if it stood on its own, would not get above an 80, but becasue you get so many other NS sites included with your membership, it is well worth the value.  &lt;br /&gt;
I've enjoyed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt; studio and their stars but some of the stars seem to be missing from the site.(contractual issues???)&lt;br /&gt;
You get a lot of porn for your money here, but a studio with so much power and money behind them could afford to upgrade the quality of the videos for us hi-def users.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7368&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7368&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:05:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6555</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6555</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-30-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:12am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;95&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Great Price&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots And Lots Of NS Material&lt;br /&gt;
- A Lot Of Quality Bonus Material For The Money&lt;br /&gt;
- NS Model Search, Including Greats Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/terapatrick/&quot;&gt;Tera Patrick&lt;/a&gt; Before She Disfigured Herself!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Photos Are Small&lt;br /&gt;
- Video Options Could Be Better
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was a fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt; from the days when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/terapatrick/&quot;&gt;Tera Patrick&lt;/a&gt;, Jewel De'Nyle, and yes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennajameson/&quot;&gt;Jenna Jameson&lt;/a&gt; worked there-all their material is here. And don't forget the great work &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/peternorth/&quot;&gt;Peter North&lt;/a&gt; did for them-he has his own section. They have a search section for all the models that ever worked for them and it's huge. Lots of things I never saw. The bonus sites are almost too good for the price, You can find them listed at the site, it does include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jizzbomb/&quot;&gt;Jizz Bomb&lt;/a&gt; with 51 pages of material. I would say this site has the best bonuses out there. Unfortunately, the photos there are small, even the newer ones, around 500x750. They aren't screencaps either. It's too bad, because there are a lot of stars there suitable for collecting. They still use real media (!) as an option for their videos!! Does anyone have .rm videos!! they've got to lose those! The wmv are 640x480. But you get Taylor St.Claire and her bouncing breasts! wow, talk about the good ol' days! If the photos were hi-res, i would spend many months there. As it is, I think it's a great site for people who have a knowledge of porn, and like seeing their old favorites, and new ones as well.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6555&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6555&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:12:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5954</guid>
		<title>New Sensations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5954</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newsensations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter New Sensations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:21am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 76&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1859&quot;&gt;Schnitzel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1859&quot;&gt;29&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Great price (especially with TBP bonus).&lt;br /&gt;
-Good variety of content for various niches.&lt;br /&gt;
-Content won't be found elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Not the best video quality.&lt;br /&gt;
-Picture quality can be poor.&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates timing seems random.&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation difficult at times.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					All things considered, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt; for me was a pretty average site. One that I didn't let my rebill occur for, and that I haven't rejoined since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some good content there, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nachoskillerpussy/&quot;&gt;Nacho's Killer Pussy&lt;/a&gt;, a site that I'd probably rate higher than 76 on a single review, but the network as a whole can't be focused on one site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major problems for me with the network was the video quality. I like high quality, clear videos. Some of the newer ones were what I would call &amp;quot;OK&amp;quot; quality, but nothing great. The older videos are poor though, and some are in Real format. For me, that's a problem. MPEG/WMV is by far the preferred choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the search engine needs improving. There is content on some of the network sites that fail to show up in a search. This makes it pretty useless as it can't be relied upon.&lt;br /&gt;
But the content is fairly hardcore and doesn't contain DRM, so it is yours to keep after your membership lapses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably worth joining if you like the content on offer, but keep in mind that you may be disappointed by the picture/video quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=64&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit New Sensations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5954&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5954&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:21:33 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
