Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/nakednews/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_24142 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24142 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nakednews/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nakednews.jpg" alt="Enter Naked News" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nakednews/"><b>Naked News</b></a> (5)<br> <br> 09-03-08&nbsp;&nbsp;09:19pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708">mbaya</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708">276</a>)<br> <br> <b>Not erotic</b><br> <br> I found the site to be very different from the usual. I enjoyed the concept, but don't expect that you can get off on it. Even at its best it is very soft. Some attractive women who are wasted as there is no tease nor is it explicit. They really need to be one or the other. At least its cheap. I have even gotten it both by itself and as a bonus to joining another site, but don't remember which one. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.nakednews.com"><b>Visit Naked News</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24142">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24142">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:19:14 PDT pornusers_22742 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22742 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nakednews/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nakednews.jpg" alt="Enter Naked News" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nakednews/"><b>Naked News</b></a> (5)<br> <br> 07-26-08&nbsp;&nbsp;01:23pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428">messmer</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428">57</a>)<br> <br> <b>Not for those who get easily bored!</b><br> <br> I just finished a six month subscription to this site. Nostalgia made me do it because I remembered its earliest days when the novelty of naked women reading actual news made you gasp and when the anchor (Victoria Sinclair for the most part) would strip slowly and sensuously from business suit to very sexy lingerie, including nylons and garter belt, down to buff. <br /> <br /> I found out very quickly that times had changed (along with subscribers' tastes?) because many times once that jacket came off the newsreader (model) would already be nude underneath, or, if you were lucky there might be a pair of panties or bra to get rid off. Commentators, too, were often fully nude right from the start.<br /> <br /> The question is how often can one look at a limited pool of (admittedly) beautiful newspersons displaying their shaved pubes without getting bored. After only a few weeks I actually found myself watching the news more than the models and during my entire six month subscription I doubt I watched the show more than three weeks' worth altogether. <br /> <br /> There should be more lingerie, more stripping, more variety in both rather than this confounded modern trend of getting to nude as quickly as possible. I realize it's a bit of a challenge for a model to strip and read the news at the same time but in its early days the site did manage to do just that. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.nakednews.com"><b>Visit Naked News</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22742">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22742">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:23:16 PDT