<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Swank Mag - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26361</guid>
		<title>Swank Mag Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26361</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swankmag.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swank Mag&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swank Mag&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-31-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:28pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5616&quot;&gt;xbigvmanx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5616&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					7 website for the price of one
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video quality could use improvement&lt;br /&gt;
Interactive interface
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					When I turned 18, I bought my first Swank magazine. What I loved about it are the pictures had some of the best photographers back in the day like Suze Randal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/earlmiller/&quot;&gt;Earl Miller&lt;/a&gt; etc just to name a few. I have over 300 issues all properly bagged in my box. Almost 15 years later I finally decided to try an online perspective of my favorite magazine and I have to say I was a bit disappointed.  So lets start off with the good stuff. The majority of the videos are hardcore. You get a pretty decent package of 7 websites to navigate thru which are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/just18/&quot;&gt;Just 18&lt;/a&gt;, Velvet, Gent and D-cup to name a few all are magazines in their own right and are a part of the Swank infrastructure.  The content is pretty decent of what your paying for which is all there is to say on the good part.  Now the bad part is a disappoinntment especially a long time Swank fan like me. The videos a a little grainy I am surprised they having used the dvd movies they have on the market for this website, finding your favorite model with a different alias can be confusing, so navigation between websites can also be confusing when your trying to find out what is a really worth your time to download.  If I had to recommend swank to anyone I would just recommend you subscribe to the magazine instead of this website. I am actually being nice to give them a 75 just because I was a fan their publication.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6381&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swank Mag&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26361&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26361&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:28:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>