Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_3828 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3826#3828 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swankmag.jpg" alt="Enter Swank Mag" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/"><b>Swank Mag</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 05-15-07 02:13pm </td> <td><b>COMMENT REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=940">Drooler</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=940">154</a>)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=27">King</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=27">27</a>):<br /><br /> I don't know about Swank, but one of company sites is <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/gentonline/">Gent Online</a>, which I joined once about a year and a half ago. <br /> <br /> It also had a nice-looking public area, but once I got inside, it was awful. The pics were small, and some were really small (like a max length of 500px), a lot of them non-exclusive. There was stuff by Stephen Hicks and Dennis DeFrancesco, which is FAR better on their own sites (Digital <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamgirls/">Dreamgirls</a> and <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/1byday/">1byday</a>, respectively).<br /> <br /> And there was no good organization, just a small thumb to each gallery. I spent at least a half hour trying to find anything good on it.<br /> <br /> It was one of the worse sites content-wise I'd ever seen. I got absolutely nothing from it. It was a complete waste of money. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3826#3828"><b>View Thread</b></a> (1)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Tue, 15 May 2007 14:13:52 PDT pornusers_3826 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3826 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swankmag.jpg" alt="Enter Swank Mag" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/"><b>Swank Mag</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 05-15-07&nbsp;&nbsp;12:07pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=27">King</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=27">27</a>)<br> <br> <b>Joining problems</b><br> <br> I was trying to join this site but for some reason my credit card is being rejected. Preview looks good but no TBP or PU review was made yet. Glam lovers, any comments/reviews appreciated <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6381"><b>Visit Swank Mag</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3826">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3826">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:05 PDT