<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Donny&#39;s Girls - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/donnysgirls/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_50078</guid>
		<title>Donny&#39;s Girls Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50078</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/donnysgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/donnysgirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Donny's Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/donnysgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Donny's Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-24-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:09pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2881&quot;&gt;rayone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2881&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very little in terms of positives here.&lt;br /&gt;
Image quality is good. Largest image resolution is 1200x1600. Standard is 1024x768.  Large amount of models (if you are new to the site). There are about 80 videos in windows format, 640x468 at 2200K. Donny lists some as HD but it is a joke since they are at 640x360 resolution and slight higher bit rate (2500K instead of 2200K).Laughable.  The costs has been dropped to $ 19.95 from 29.95 as of this writing.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have been a member of this site in the past. Nothing new here since 2007. That's 3 years without any new content. Donny recycles the old content and posts it as new updates. So if you have never been to his site, you may want to check it out, otherwise it is not worth it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Donny is a photographer from Northern California (Sacramento, Chico area) His content has appeared in the ATK sites, particularly atkgalleria and atkexotics. Lately (last 3 years) his site has not really been updated. The old material is shamelessly recirculated as new but no new models have made it to the web site for years. The price of $19.95 is still to high. I think $10.95/month  is probably what the site is worth right now. I gave him a rating of 50 because that is the lowest score allowed. It really should be more like 45.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.donnysgirls.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Donny's Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50078&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=50078&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:09:03 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3373</guid>
		<title>Donny&#39;s Girls Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3373</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/donnysgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/donnysgirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Donny's Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/donnysgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Donny's Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-30-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:43am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=853&quot;&gt;qualsite34&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=853&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Photography by the sites founder (Donavan Philips) is top notch.  Very sharp photos, with natural skin colors.  Girls for the most part were attractive girl next door types. Detailed biographies of the models added depth and character to the photos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The sites founder appears to have left the porn business.   Site is still updated regularly, but much of the &amp;quot;newer&amp;quot; material is just technically enhanced older stuff.  The actual new material is not up to the standards set by the sites founder.  To be specific, the girls are not as attractive and lack the girl next door quality which made the site a success in the beginning.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A mixed bag. Recommended for an initial subscription to view the top notch photography and fresh faced amateurs featured by the sites founder. Not recommended for subsequent subscription due to the&lt;br /&gt;
lower quality of the sites new operators.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.donnysgirls.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Donny's Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3373&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3373&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:43:23 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
