<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - California Pimp - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/californiapimp/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_21703</guid>
		<title>California Pimp Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21703</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/californiapimp/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/californiapimp.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter California Pimp&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/californiapimp/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;California Pimp&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-27-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:00pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4597&quot;&gt;BigbrotherSoul&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4597&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good selection of women. Many famous pornstars when they were just &amp;quot;up and comers&amp;quot;.  Really good looking amatuers, alot are girl next door.  Videos are a variety of mpg and ram.  Provides a link to a movie joiner on his site.  It's been around for a long time. I think they have videos dating back to 2001 to the present.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The updates now are far and few in between.  The movies that are not split are HUGE 220-280 MB.  The quality of the early videos are pretty bad.  He has access to some of them and has updated some to better quality, but the majority are not as clear.  The acting is bad! The girls are perfect, it's the wimpy cameraman who slaps girls one minute and then wimpers when a girl freaks out after he comes.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site is organized by the year.  You will see better quality as the years grow closer to the present.  There are a good chunk of famous pornstars who were practically just starting out on this site.    The videos are cool, but the setup to the sex can be 10-15 minutes long.  If you are downloading parts of the movie, you will have to play a guessing game with which parts are filler and which parts are the real deal.  The final thing is that we are missing alot of stuff on that site.  The webmaster ran it like a video blog so we'll see Girl A and then she her return. The next Girl A video will be Girl Video 8.  So, you start to wonder where are the other 6 videos that weren't posted?  But this is a good site, good original content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=621&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit California Pimp&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21703&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=21703&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:00:46 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6292</guid>
		<title>California Pimp Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6292</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/californiapimp/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/californiapimp.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter California Pimp&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/californiapimp/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;California Pimp&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-20-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:10am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=230&quot;&gt;Bacchus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=230&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Women that are featured are very attractive and willing&lt;br /&gt;
*Interesting pre-sex interview segments with the girls&lt;br /&gt;
*Different media streams available&lt;br /&gt;
*Scenes broken down for slower users
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Site is not updated frequently&lt;br /&gt;
*Users tend to be denied access even with working passwords&lt;br /&gt;
*Slow streams with broadband
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*If you are looking for a cheap site that has plenty of good looking girls that are very sexual and not actors, this is the site for you. Beware though. Content is dated and not updated very frequently
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=621&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit California Pimp&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6292&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6292&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:10:37 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
