<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Footjob Models - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/footjobmodels/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13158</guid>
		<title>Footjob Models Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13158</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/footjobmodels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/footjobmodels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Footjob Models&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/footjobmodels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Footjob Models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-05-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:49pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1710&quot;&gt;LAmahogany&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1710&quot;&gt;33&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Access to a LOAD of other websites&lt;br /&gt;
- Hot, hot models&lt;br /&gt;
- Pro-Am Videography &amp;amp; Editing - nothing amazing, but not sloppy and annoying&lt;br /&gt;
- Sometimes there's a bit of oral and fucking to go with the footsex; some of the feet get licked, toes getting sucked.  Way hot.&lt;br /&gt;
- You CAN download non-DRM'd (MPGs) of WHOLE videos (not just clips)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- You get access to a lot of websites, but each site only has a hand-full of videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Many videos cut up into 15 segments you have to manually click through to advance&lt;br /&gt;
- Some broken links&lt;br /&gt;
- Some soft cocks, no pre-cum (obvious excitement), QUICK cuts to the male performers just jerking off onto the feet.&lt;br /&gt;
- Obnoxious misdirection (i.e. &amp;quot;amateur&amp;quot; section really takes you to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/adultfriendfinder/&quot;&gt;adultfriendfinder.com&lt;/a&gt;, a personals site--not a porn site)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nothing special; I've seen lower quality videos, heard worse audio mixes, worse videography, but honestly I was bored.  There were a few special videos, and, again, you get to try out all sorts of other sites, with different specialties.  But none of them seemed to have very enthusiastic male models.  Everybody seemed like they needed to work extra hard for an orgasm.  It doesn't look good in porno, so, I wouldn't recommend this site to others.  I was disappointed.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=5907&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Footjob Models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13158&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13158&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:49:00 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
