PU - Teen Dreams - All Activity

RE: Photos

Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:28:59 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

11-30-09 02:28am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To greg909 (1):

"Ultra HD Resolution," if it meant anything, would mean the best possible image quality between here and the nearest spy satellite. Suffice it to say that there's better image quality at other sites than at TeenDreams, of which I'm currently a member -- because the image quality is generally good as far as I'm concerned. But it might not satisfy a more expert eye.

View Thread (2)

RE: Photos

Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:45:10 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

11-29-09 03:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To greg909 (1):

Landscape typically around 2500 x 1600
Portrait 1700 x 2500

Ultra Hi Res? A few months.

I would say it was worth your while taking another look. ;0)

View Thread (2)

Teen Dreams Comment

Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:30:36 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

11-29-09 03:30pm

COMMENT by greg909 (1)

Photos

So what's the actual dimensions of the photos here? And how far back in time do the "ultra HD resolution" photos go? Are they riddled with excessive false sharpening, which I seem to remember from a couple years ago.

Just wondering if it's worth a revisit, although I don't care about the videos.

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:29:30 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

10-16-09 02:29am

COMMENT REPLY by Andrea (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Thats ok, it was good of you to bring it to our attention. The problem was fixed about 30 mins ago :)

View Thread (4)

RE: Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:59:42 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

10-16-09 12:59am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Andrea (Webmaster):

OK, that's great news. I'll revise my comment. Thanks for contacting me.

View Thread (4)

RE: Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:50:04 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

10-16-09 12:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Andrea (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Hi Drooler

That was caused by a bug when we added our new flash movie system. Non members can now view a preview of every single movie in the site on the tour also, so this is a major step forward, as no movie preview was available before.

Our programmer is just fixing the bug with the image gallery pages not showing thumbs, by the time you read this it wil be back to usual - in other words you can view all the pages as before.

View Thread (4)

RE: Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:24:21 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

10-15-09 02:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To Drooler (194):

They are messing about with the headers on the thumbnail pages at the moment as well.
They haven't got it fully sorted.

TBH I wish they hadn't bothered. I preferred how it was before.

Cap'n. :0(

View Thread (4)

Teen Dreams Comment

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:42:10 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

10-15-09 12:42pm

COMMENT by Drooler (194)

Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

The webmaster got in touch with me about a problem they were having during a revision of the site (see replies). I thought that they had decided to discontinue previews of the gallery thumbs for visitors -- a great feature that I wish more sites had. Turns out that hasn't changed. Hurray!

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Nice Site for Photosets

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:38:38 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

09-07-09 03:38pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To Drooler (194):

Thanks for the support.

I didn't mean to come over apologetic, just that is seems the norm to get geek about videos & TBH they usually leave me cold.

I sincerely hope you are right.

:0)

View Thread (2)

RE: Nice Site for Photosets

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:31:52 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

09-07-09 03:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Capn (11):

Capn! Hold your head high when telling us that you like photosets! There's absolutely no need to be apologetic about it. It's not "out of fashion."

There will always be photos, babes, and photo lovers!

View Thread (2)

Teen Dreams Comment

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:10:09 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

09-07-09 01:10pm

COMMENT by Capn (11)

Nice Site for Photosets

Yes, I know I am out of fashion for liking photosets. ;0/

This site is a recent discovery for me, & I was very pleased by the quantity of models & the overall decent quality of the photography.
The model selection streches the Teen label somewhat, with models making return visits years after their initial sets.
I like the fact that they do though. They vary from striking to average to stunning.

Navigation I find intuitive & layout good. There is also a user forum now, but it is not heavily used.
Zip sets are available, but I would advise renaming as they just have a sequential number.

I won't pass comment on the videos becuse I seldom, if ever, look at them.

I like it & will probably maintain membership for some time.

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:55:21 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-29-09 02:55am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To MargulisAZ (82):

Thanks...
This will be an estimate: 90-95% of the solo-videos has masturbation - a very few just posing.
And somewhere between 60-65% of the mas-videos are with toys.
Check out the preview at 'members area tour' - here you get a pretty good idea of all models and which has videos/pix - a small amount of the newer models have only pix - but they also seems to get videos along the updates.
I have not checked out the lez-material...

View Thread (2)

RE: Worst BG "Porn" Ever!

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:50:53 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-28-09 12:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To exotics4me (365):

I agree that it must be hard for a young woman to get aroused in front of a camera crew, lights, etc. especially if the stunt cock isn't attractive to her, and in any case is rushed and mechanical. I would be interested if you list specific videos or actresses representing "the most aroused females in porn ... in solo or girl/girl sets". Then I could take a look without sifting thru hundreds where they aren't aroused! I have been providing such lists in my reviews and I hope others will begin doing the same. Anyway, there are plenty of aroused young females in porn, but you have to look hard sometimes to find them. Again, see the lists in my reviews for some winners. As for your Viv Thomas tip, too bad my TeenDreams subscription has already expired.

View Thread (3)

RE: Denner's Review

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:55:05 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-27-09 08:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by MargulisAZ (82)

To Denner (200):

Nice review Denner. I have a question for you, what types of videos are the newer vids like? Are they mostly solo or lesbian? For solo scenes, is it masturbation with toys and fingers or just very softcore type scenes of stripping and so forth? Also, I noticed on the preview that a lot of the newer models seem "new", as you said. Do they also have a good amount of movies or are these newer models mostly just made up of pic sets? Finally, are the frequent movie updates ALL for the newer models or is it just old content being uploaded frequently?

View Thread (2)

RE: Worst BG "Porn" Ever!

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:36:19 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-24-09 07:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To BabyGetReal (13):

I wouldn't recommend this site to anybody as a source of boy-girl porn - which doesn't mean I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. Sorry you made the wrong choice for boy-girl porn. Check out some of the DDF sites - especially with their great August deal.

View Thread (3)

RE: Worst BG "Porn" Ever!

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:35:17 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-24-09 07:35pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To BabyGetReal (13):

I had read your profile right after reading this comment. If I could throw a tip, check out the Viv Thomas bonus content that Teen Dreams has. His movies are some of the most believable on the internet. The other thing, I've often wondered how much arousal or excitement a younger woman can show in front of a camera crew and someone giving her directions. I've been a member on TD many times over the years, but I prefer solo videos and pictures. Of all of my experiences with porn sites, I came away believing the most aroused females in porn are in solo or girl/girl sets. Maybe try out some of the DVD sites like Videobox and go for the "Classic" videos, though not exactly classic, these are still usually from the 80s and 90s.

View Thread (3)

Teen Dreams Comment

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:19:32 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-24-09 07:19pm

COMMENT by BabyGetReal (13)

Worst BG "Porn" Ever!

I joined this site in July, 2009. My interest is solely in BG (boy/girl) videos, not solos and not still photos. See my profile for my tastes. Anyway, I found NOTHING the least bit erotic here. The BG videos were mechanical, and the actors looked bored. The girls never had orgasms. There was no intimacy, and no creativity. Although the same was true of most videos at YoungModels and at KarupsHA, I found enough great gems at each of those (see them listed in my reviews) that my subscriptions were worthwhile. I did not save any of the videos that I downloaded from TeenDreams, and I feel that my money was wasted there.

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Progress

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:50:06 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-20-09 03:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To Wittyguy (71):

I know, I know....was just a bit impressed/exited by the newer updates..

View Thread (2)

RE: Progress

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:37:15 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-19-09 05:37pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To Denner (200):

Sounds like your sort of schizophrenic about this site; bashing it one month and falling back in love the next :) Any chance that you'll finally do a review on this place and put us all at ease over your variations on a theme ;)

View Thread (2)

Teen Dreams Comment

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:21:20 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-19-09 09:21am

COMMENT by Denner (200)

Progress

Sometimes a sudden impulse can be ok.
In this case with Teendreams - I check out this site regularly and have done that over the years. Once it was a favorite, then it went downhill - especially concerning videos of newer models.
Thanks to a relativly good preview, you can get an ok info about updates - AND it's much better now.
Just joined again - and do not regret - danm fine solo-videos of some known og some not so well known teenmodels..
Hope this is a new trend at Teendreams - but, still looking for videos of others fine teens - who are only in photosets.

And BTW: They still got currency problems when joining outside USA - but then again: write them, and they'll give you a link to EPOCH where the price is still $ 19.95 in Europe....
AND: I miss modelnames in start of movies (like in the old days - it's fine/helpfull when making archives)

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:44:59 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-16-09 12:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (107)

To xbigvmanx (20):

Good review. I especially enjoyed the suggestions to the webmasters. Many people only criticise without offering a way to solve the problem. My only issue with the whole review was that your Pro's and Con's were so short. You could use those for more info...

Then again everybody has a different style of reviewing and that's what makes this community so interesting.

Thanks for sharing

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:11:30 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-15-09 11:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (99)

To xbigvmanx (20):

I see you added some too, great! It is a bit easier to read, and we all tend to judge things by how the look at a glance. It looks nice now.

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:52:48 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-15-09 09:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (20)

To badandy400 (99):

I went ahead and seperated the text in 4 parts to make it easier for the reader. Thanks for the suggestions.

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:13:51 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-15-09 06:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (42)

To xbigvmanx (20):

Very nice, interesting review.
I read the pros and cons very easily, read the bottom line, and then when I was finished, looked to see where the review was going to continue. It didn't, because it was already over. Wondered if I had read a comment, but no, it was a real review.
A short review, but with good details.
I read it like a snack, and it left me hungry for more. That's not a criticism, just a note that it had a strange effect on me. I don't think it was deliberate, but you have a very interesting style of writing. Something like stream of consciousness.
I give this review a two thumbs up.

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:06:42 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-15-09 05:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (99)

To xbigvmanx (20):

What happened?!?! The first part of this review was so easy to read and pleasant on the eyes. The bottom line was 14 lines of solid text! I am not saying anything at all about the content of the bottom line but a break or two would be very nice. This goes a long way to helping the reader out. It is very easy to lose place in a large block to text, at least for me it is, and if someone needs to look away for a moment it is difficult to find the position again. It does not change the content of the review at all, but it is a courtesy to the reader.

View Thread (5)

RE: Hmm...

Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:47:16 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-06-09 11:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To dracken (107):

Yes, for the most part, that is my opinion. I have very little saved from my 3 memberships there.

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:38:08 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-06-09 11:38am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (107)

To jd1961 (95):

Interesting...do you mean that the girls aren't passionate or the photos lack a certain sexy-ness? I browsed around for a bit and for the most part the models seemed hot, but it's true I don't really know what happens past the first four photos (I hate the thumbs, they are way to small to see what is going on, but then again I guess that's the point :)

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:37:50 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-04-09 07:37am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To dracken (107):

I joined this site 3 times, thinking it would magically turn into a great site, but there's something missing. It's OK, but it's not very erotic.

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:55:15 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-03-09 02:55am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (107)

To exotics4me (365):

Well...damn it really seems like I was unjustly judging this website. Teaches me to listen to friends in the future. I should have paid closer attention.

I will buy a membership and check out the website asap.

Thank you all for your advice and help :)

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:41:31 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-03-09 01:41am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To dracken (107):

Just a note on those two sets. I have a membership to TD right now and checked those out. Set 3 has many hardcore shots in it. There is full penetration, full blowjob shots, cumshot and looks very real. The older man is flush in the face and neck by the end of the set and sweating. I would like to see the movie of the scene. One page of the pictures looks to be setting a story up. They are at a club or bar and it looks like the older man propositions her. By the way, on the preview link that you posted, you can click on the other pages and see the thumbnails of all of the pictures and see the hardcore parts.

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:54:14 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 10:54am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (112)

To dracken (107):

thanks for replying.
No sex made the scene a little weird and pervy.

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:07:30 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 10:07am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (107)

To james4096 (112):

It's a photo set you can see it here(set 3&4): http://tour.teendreams.com/cms/model/view/i=1583.
The model is found in the hardcore section, but there is no action to be had there according to my friend who sent me the link

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:00:15 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 10:00am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (112)

To dracken (107):

There is really a video of an old guy dancing around a young girl kissing her? Now that's weird.

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 08:57:06 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (107)

To Drooler (194):

Interesting info. Thank you very much!

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 08:42:21 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 08:42am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To dracken (107):

Try signing up through TheBestPorn site, or through this site: http://paysitediscounts.com/ (TeenDreams is listed as "CoedDreams" there). Either way, the rate is $19.95

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:59:45 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 06:59am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (107)

To Drooler (194):

This was exactly the kind of clarification I was looking for. My friend is a fan of hardcore videos so no wonder he was disappointed. But after browsing the site a bit and reading the reviews on here I might give it a shot after all. In which case I'll share my experience asahp (as soon as humanly possible :)

Thanks for your input

View Thread (12)

RE: Hmm...

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:54:22 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 06:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To dracken (107):

It's loaded with hardcore, and with content in general. The first time I joined, it was daunting trying to get through it all and now I doubt I'd be able to. And dancing fogies are the exception, not the rule. There's plenty of material with young contemporaries consumating their contracts.

Yet the quality varies, even recently. They've posted some photosets that members have complained about for the same reason you gave. But some things are nice and clear.

If you're primarily into videos, I don't know if I could recommend this site or not in quality terms. They're not HD sharp from what I've seen.

You'd want to check out the VivThomas videos that are available on the site as well, for download. Some of those are pretty hot!

It allows you to browse the listings (with a thumb for each update) as a visitor.

View Thread (12)

Teen Dreams Comment

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:43:33 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

08-02-09 06:43am

COMMENT by dracken (107)

Hmm...

I asked a friend, who has a subscription, about this site and he told me the content is hazzy at best.
Girls that sometimes are described as hardcore only have softcore shots and the videos lack in quality as well as quantity.

I am uncertain what to do (get a subscription or not) I remember he showed me a set where you were promised sex between a teen and an old guy but the whole set was just the guy dancing around her and kissing her...rather disappointing...is the whole site like that? Can you find some nice hardcore on here?

Thank you for your help

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: New video-models, please

Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:10:40 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

06-25-09 07:10am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To GCode (79):

"But, from the looks of your comment, the videos are kind of inferior to maybe some other sites with exclusive stuff?"

Not quite - earlier TeenDreams had maybe the best teen-solo-videos. And some of those early videos I have NOT found anywhere else - and they are still a part of my favorite archived-solo-videos.
I'm really NOT sure if they produce videos, at all - I think Drooler knows more about that.
But lately they seem to have much more non-exclusive videos - and I just miss the idea of getting some of those rather new teen-models thay have on photosets - on videos, too.

BUT if you never been there, it sure is worth a try - and if a video-freak - go back to some of the older stuff - the quality is ok there, too.

View Thread (3)

RE: New video-models, please

Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:51:35 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

06-25-09 12:51am

COMMENT REPLY by Andrea (Webmaster)

To GCode (79):

Im not quite sure what the poster means by no new videos. Every week we add 9 complete moivies (not clips but complete movies) At least 6 of them will be exclusive to TeenDreams, as we shoot many of the models ourselves (we have our own full time photographer) in addition to the many who work for TeenDreams supplying exclusive content to the site. (3 x Russian, 2 x Hungarian and 1 x American photographers)

The majority of the videos we add now are 2mbps HD movies.

View Thread (3)

RE: New video-models, please

Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:37:47 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

06-24-09 07:37pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (79)

To Denner (200):

Does this place have exclusive videos for their site? I'm guessing after reading reviews and comments that it's kind of a super site with a shit load of models with non-exclusive photo sets and videos? But, from the looks of your comment, the videos are kind of inferior to maybe some other sites with exclusive stuff?

View Thread (3)

Teen Dreams Comment

Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:35:37 PDT

Teen Dreams (6)

06-24-09 08:35am

COMMENT by Denner (200)

New video-models, please

Teendreams has updated the preview - where they have put in a small logo to state photo or video - great!
But for months I've been browsing the site to look for all those new - and fine looking - models that has turned up with a number of photosets - BUT NO videos.
The only video-updates are seen elsewhere - or at least the models here are "old" well-known...
It just a pity.

Visit Teen Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Wittyguy's Review

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:43:20 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-27-09 08:43am

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (18)

To lk2fireone (42):

Thanks for the info. It's a site I have considered joining for about 4 years! I never did because there always seems to be a better site about, and because I am mainly a hardcore vid person rather than softcore pic person. The site still sounds pretty good though. As you say, I gotta check it out once.

View Thread (4)

RE: Wittyguy's Review

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:39:11 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-27-09 08:39am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (42)

To TheSquirrel (18):

I was a member a couple of years ago, so you can consider my information dated.

But there were very little tatoos on the models. Most girls are tatoo-free, the others are only modestly tatooed.

This is a mega-site for teens.
-5,600+ models
-1.4+ million pix
-1,400 vids

The quality of the pix is mainly good. The clarity (focus) of the pix is mainly good, the colors of the pix are mainly OK to good. The quality of the pix is not as good as Met-art or MPL Studios, but the quality is still decent for a lot of the pix.

The attractiveness of the models varies, but they do have a lot of the top European models on this site.

The vids I downloaded as a member were mainly soft core solo shoots of each model. There is hardcore on the site, both pix and vids, but as I said before, I'm not into vids that much because it's really hard to find attractively shot vids; quality photo shoots are just easier to make, for a variety of reasons: lighting, make-up, dialog (hearing these models speak destroys the illusion of glamor or style you want them to have), etc.

I do agree that the search feature is poor. I honestly do not know why these mega sites can not have a simple, easy to use search like met-art. Another problem is that different models can have the same name, which adds to the confusion. And the same model can have different names.

I think Teen Dreams is definitely worth joining at least once, to check out the massive collection of models, pix, and vids that are available.

But if you have specific desires that don't fit the simple criteria of a a mega teen site with a lot of pix and vids, then you are better off looking elsewhere to spend your time and money.

View Thread (4)

RE: Wittyguy's Review

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:31:51 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-25-09 10:31am

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To TheSquirrel (18):

Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.

View Thread (4)

RE: Wittyguy's Review

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:04:01 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-25-09 06:04am

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (18)

To Wittyguy (71):

Very informative review. This was a site I was contemplating joining at one time, but there are too many negatives and too many other sites that offer a bit more, especially as I prefer vids to pics. Nowadays before I join a site I always try to work out the TR - tattoo ratio.

View Thread (4)

RE: pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:53:15 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-22-09 05:53am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To Drooler (194):

Drooler, I guess it's the shower-scene with Luciana at 1by your're talking about.
And what I recollect is that the scene with Luciana from january 22 (the lingeri-set) is about the same.
Concerning "replays", "reediting" or whatever at 1by, I got the same notion at the moment - never thought that this site would get tiresome..
Ending my membership this term - and sure, I got the same thing here: It'll take a while before returning...
And, alas - the same goes for Teendreams.
Found some rather special stuff on some british site I'd asked Khan to put on TBP - for a later review. It's mostly with some wellknown ( in Europe anyway) uk-models from the 1990th...WELL, at least it's something new even if it's ten og 15 years old... be back..
Denner

View Thread (7)

RE: pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:36:00 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-22-09 03:36am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Denner (200):

Another,further thing that's bothersome about all of the licensed stuff is that, to avoid duplications, you have to check your personal porn stash to see if you've already got something -- if you can't recognize it as such.

Here's an example: There's a set of Trisha Brill that I first saw on one site. I was very positively impressed by her and her poses, but the pics were only 1200's. I didn't realize that the same thing was going to show at Euro Pornstars, which it eventually did with 3500px, but without my favorite pic of the bunch. Months later still, it shows up at Twistys in 1600 px, with my favorite pic.

So I've got stuff of that set from three different sources!

And then there are the real surprises. Yesterday at 1byday there was a set of Luciana (she has a different name at 1by), a black chick who is just heavenly. I thought it was a redux because it looked familiar, so I got it because I thought my pics were at 1616 with that annoying black border that 1byday used to have.

But no ... it's a reposting of a set that I'd already gotten at 2000px. So it was a waste of my time and money.

I really don't plan to return to 1byday in quite a while once my current 1-year subscription ends. It's weird because although the site is certainly better than it was 2 years ago, I get disappointed too often now. Must be that my tastes have narrowed, for one thing.

View Thread (7)

RE: pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:00:55 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-21-09 04:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To TheRizzo (23):

I agree to some extend (there's fine licensed stuff at Teendreams once in a while) - just getting tired of finding similar stuff on different sites - and that's kind of paying for the same thing more than once..

View Thread (7)

RE: pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:28:21 PST

Teen Dreams (6)

02-21-09 03:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To Denner (200):

I don't mind licensed content of a girl as long as the site also has shoots of her that are exclusive too.

View Thread (7)