<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Matrix Nudes - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/matrixnudes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24608</guid>
		<title>Matrix Nudes Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24608</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/matrixnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/matrixnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Matrix Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/matrixnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Matrix Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-19-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:50am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;154&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Older VirtuaGirl Photosets&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I paid (literally) a visit recently to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/matrixnudes/&quot;&gt;MatrixNudes&lt;/a&gt; and found that they've been adding photosets from the older Virtuagirl (the site that was pre-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/virtuagirlhd/&quot;&gt;VirtuagirlHD&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two nice things about that.  First, there's no watermark, something that really annoyed me at the older Virtuagirl.  (Didn't like that watermark layered on top of Nikky Case's fine behind, nosirree!) Second, the photos are in the current standard MatrixNude choice of sizes:  1024, 1600, and 2000 pixels.  That got me updating some of my older sets, of Sandra H/KristynaS, Nikky Case, Liliane Tiger, Katy/Denise (of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/europeanglamourgirls/&quot;&gt;EuropeanGlamourGirls&lt;/a&gt;), Monika S., and Katy Gold.  Alas, there was no Mia Stone or Lucy Stratilova -- not yet anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are downsides.  One for sure is that there are no zips -- anywhere on the site.  And some folks might prefer new and exclusive &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/matrixnudes/&quot;&gt;MatrixNudes&lt;/a&gt; content only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was quite a lot of that: Brand new stuff of Georgia Jones, Jamie Lynn, the deliciously brown Zeina Hart and Mimi Allen, and Heather Vandeven, who despite the obviously fake balloons is stunningly beautiful.  And that's just my &quot;short list.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HC shows up every week, too. (NB: The videos are still just streaming, small window.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site still requires patience.  There have been no improvements in interactivity since my review last year.  Click &quot;Home&quot; from a gallery and you have to wait for the entire page to load into RAM until *poof* it's all there at once.  And of course, no zips.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matrixnudes.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Matrix Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24608&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24608&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:50:11 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>