PU - Kscans - All Activity

RE: anyone joined recently?

Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:18:39 PDT

Kscans (0)

03-13-14 09:18am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (0)

To littlejoe (0):

I get the feeling that you really want to join this site so simply go ahead. The worse that will happen is that you wasted 30$.

View Thread (6)

RE: anyone joined recently?

Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:01:17 PDT

Kscans (0)

03-12-14 07:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by littlejoe (0)

To Drooler (0):

i know, thats why i said for a single month membership, implying i wouldnt stick around for updates

View Thread (6)

RE: anyone joined recently?

Wed, 12 Mar 2014 18:16:22 PDT

Kscans (0)

03-12-14 06:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To littlejoe (0):

Go here. Scroll down. It shows that there haven't been any updates since 2011, as Pat362 said.

View Thread (6)

RE: anyone joined recently?

Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:33:14 PDT

Kscans (0)

03-10-14 08:33am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (0)

To littlejoe (0):

I also remember downloading a couple of clips but we are talking stuff that I downloaded about 6-7 years ago. If the site was 10$ than that might be one thing but it's worth 30$. I don't believe their updates schedule is accurate. I believe the content which is dated 2011 and before is older than the posted date but even if it isn't then you are still talking about paying 30$ for content that is 3 years old with no possibility of getting newer stuff.

It's your money so if you want to spend it on this site than go ahead but I fear that you will be very disappointed with what you get for your investment.

View Thread (6)

RE: anyone joined recently?

Sun, 09 Mar 2014 16:09:50 PDT

Kscans (0)

03-09-14 04:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by littlejoe (0)

To pat362 (0):

i remember having a few clips back in the day and loving it. just wondering if its worth it for a single month?

View Thread (6)

RE: anyone joined recently?

Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:13:02 PST

Kscans (0)

03-08-14 06:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (0)

To littlejoe (0):

Why would anyone want to join this network? I mean it' been dead for at least 3 years and I suspect that it's even longer. Just click on the TBP/PU link and then click on updates and check the date on the last update...2011.

They had some kinky stuff but they were already dead prior to the recession.

View Thread (6)

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:02:24 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 07:02am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

I totally forgot about the Lexa aliases (foolish)...but just hit her on EBI - here she is Melisa with one 's'..... have you browsed her anywhere else as Melissa...? (Now I hunt her anywhere, ho, ho).
Thanks for the hints on SweetAndNude and Hegre.....(got some fine sets from MetArt).

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:44:17 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 06:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

There are plenty of Melissa's around, and Lexa's, too, but when I see "the butt" attached to the name, I know immediately who it is! And she's got such a sweet face, too!

I'll keep the ITC in mind. There's a slowly growing collection of her at SweetAndNude, too, that's pretty outtasite. Plus the MetArt, HegreArt, etc.

Yes, she's The Ultimate Czech Butt, and that's saying something!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:52:34 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 05:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Just a BTW - ITC:

Have you seen the latest Lexa-update (Sep. 15.) - Lexa in a light blue dress at St. Thomas, the Virgin Islands - it's just, yes: 'wauw'.....probably the best full body vid/pixset I've seen in a long time - Lexa strollin' around stark nekid at this nice scenery - man, those hips, that ass - in my years of porn only British Misty McCain had such fine hips...so, yes, by all means ITC keeps getting better.

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:24:18 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-16-10 08:24am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

'allo,'allo Ze Droolah
Took a look at that new site - nice models, very nice indeed. But one objection: Never been crazy about those pix-sets with 'no background' - and they seem to have a lot of it..
BTW: She Don't Blush - that's not grammatical right, is it - LOL.

TorridArt - good tip - just went back to that one for a look again - not bad, certainly not bad!
ITC - it was great in some ways - but...I seldom watch those many Gbs of download - a few ones, like Lexa, Zara and they did some fine vids of Lana Lopez which is miles away from any other productions...

Wished I had some news for you, but hanging low a bit on new sites - just went back and rejoined Babespotting - and it's well, well, well - not a big deal, really.

Cheers!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:26:16 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-15-10 04:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey Denner,
You might want to check out a new find I just got listed: shedontblush.com

It's kinda small, but the content looks good and it's all exclusive. You might want to put it on your back burner until it grows some more. And they charge in Euros -- so there won't be any of that "regional pricing shit." ;)

I've dove back into TorridArt recently. The photo quality has really gotten great. And it's only 19.95 for a month, in greenbacks, anyway. (Hopefully, they don't do that "rpS.") ;)

Read your review of InTheCrack. Too bad they don't do the backside like TorridArt does. If they did, I'd be gettin' a hand cramp for sure, with that fast typing and mousing and all. But ITC has just two approaches to the booty: full body or "I, the viewer, am a housefly passing over a fragrant valley."

Take it easy ...

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:32:16 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-15-10 08:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

'Lazy' - that's MY name....and Bro: hope you stayed clear of this site - hand cramp or not.
As I see the previews (thanks for that, anyway) - no exclusives at all..
On to better hunting fields!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:50:40 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-14-10 06:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey Denner! Como estas? (Sorry, I'm too lazy to deal with accent marks.)

My well-honed credit-card-number-typing fingers got itchy when I last previewed Kscans, a couple of months ago, but it somehow cleared up. (Maybe it was the hand cramp.)

I've also seen stuff elsewhere that has shown up at Kscans. One, for instance, is "Kya" as she's called at Nubiles, or "Helen F" at MetArt, peeling her bedclothes off in a big bed. That one has made the rounds.

"Advertised as exclusive" is about as reliable a statement as "It really works" or "The check is in the mail." I mean, it COULD be TRUE! ;-)

Best not to "Get two. Just pay separate shipping and handling."

View Thread (7)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:41:22 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 07:41am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (0)

To Capn (0):

I didn't say it but I also thought that the score was a little high for a site that you more or less say scammed you. I'm still waiting to see if what night owl says about the crecit card processor.

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:28:55 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 06:28am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (0)

To night owl (0):

Given the difficulties you have had re cancellation, which is a serious customer service issue, I am surprised you still rate the site so highly.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:18:49 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 06:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (0)

To night owl (0):

I've dealt with both of the payment processors listed for this site, ccbill and verotel, and I've never had a problem canceling free and clear. My advice is to cancel at the processor's site directly and not even bother with the links at the content provider's site.

I haven't been to Kscans myself for nearly 4 years. I've lurked there a bit since, but I'm just not into their kind of content (toys, butt plugs, mouth-to-tampon, etc.).

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:52:50 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 01:52am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (0)

To pat362 (0):

I agree, any site with sketchy cancellation processes is a poor site in my mind and I would skip it. Although, I would skip it anyway given the content...

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:35:04 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-28-10 05:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (0)

To night owl (0):

That fact that you had a very hard time cancelling is an automic pass for me. What credit processor did you use? They have verotel and CCbil listed on their join page. I've never had any problems with either. Strange that you did this review because I actually thought they weren't producing any new content.

View Thread (5)

RE: Old reviews say it's bad, any updated info?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:02:59 PDT

Kscans (0)

07-01-09 09:02am

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (0)

To exotics4me (0):

eww, thanks for the heads up. Just like you stated, their tour is quite well done and sucked me in. I hate sites that have bad practices and this is why I love PU so much, we can discern the good from the bad. While this site may not do the same as FC Nudes, just that the company did this with another site is enough for me to stray away. Great info exotics4me, once again.

View Thread (2)

RE: Old reviews say it's bad, any updated info?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:12:15 PDT

Kscans (0)

07-01-09 06:12am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (0)

To GCode (0):

Hey GCode, I never tried this site because it is owned by the same guys that run FC Nudes. My review has probably expired of FC Nudes, but you can still check it out. To put it mildly, they over-exaggerate in their tours and once on their site as a member. I barely remember FC Nudes, but I do remember that the advertised something like 70 models including my favorite Eve Angel. I joined it. Got inside, the model list starts listing the models...no Eve Angel! I finally find her and click her picture. It says, "Coming soon". There was around 30 of these different models that were "coming soon", so there was really on 35-40 models available. It was probably the worst I had ever been duped by a site. I still didn't give them a 50, I believe a 59, but I really wouldn't recommend their sites unless someone posts and can confirm that they have improved their business practices.

View Thread (2)

RE: A tip

Sat, 10 May 2008 10:38:24 PDT

Kscans (0)

05-10-08 10:38am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To bunnypu (0):

Well, bunnypu
This used to be a site in the "old days" where quite a lot af PUs had one remark:
Kscams

Have not (for the same reason) been there a while, so if you've joined, it'll be good to hear what's happening in general....

View Thread (1)

RE: Jason LV's Review

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:07:00 PDT

Kscans (0)

06-03-07 10:07am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (0)

To Jason LV (0):

If only you could add some more info ...

View Thread (1)