PU - VideoBox - All Activity

RE: Joined, but refered to VIPMOVIEACCESS

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:50:07 PDT

VideoBox (26)

03-19-10 10:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by nestles (0)

To videobox (Webmaster):

Just like to say that you did indeed grant entry to your massive site a day later. Thanks.

View Thread (4)

RE: Joined, but refered to VIPMOVIEACCESS

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:47:36 PDT

VideoBox (26)

03-19-10 10:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by nestles (0)

To Khan (Staff):

Thanks for this Khan, will try next time.

View Thread (4)

RE: Quick Preview gone?

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:52:29 PDT

VideoBox (26)

03-17-10 11:52am

COMMENT REPLY by uscue (35)

To uscue (35):

Am glad to say it looks like today they brought Quick Preview back. Finally. All the other new features they created are great (like the new custom clips and ability to share your custom clips with the network), but at the end of the day Quick Preview was an important feature that I'm guessing the research they did previously gave them a wrong impression on how much it was used/liked.

View Thread (2)

RE: Download speeds

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:49:35 PST

VideoBox (26)

03-12-10 05:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by barnlol (0)

To OneMan (27):

Sorry for the late reply. Yes,download managers work, but no quicker.

View Thread (2)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:33:28 PST

VideoBox (26)

03-04-10 10:33am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (62)

To rearadmiral (24):

This was a great review, I haven't been member in years
but was great.

View Thread (5)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:28:00 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-11-10 03:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To rearadmiral (24):

One of the better PU reviews on this site that otherwise gets way too many reviews.

View Thread (5)

RE: Quick Preview gone?

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:24:37 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-11-10 12:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by videobox (Webmaster)

To uscue (35):

As many of you know, VideoBox has rolled out a few new features and we have many more wonderful surprises lined up and on their way. But we hit a snag in our recent release, and we recognize it�s thrown you for a loop.

We have something �evolutionary� on the horizon, and were all ready to roll this new paradigm shift out last week. We found some issues that made us think twice about it�s maturity and readiness. Part of this involved replacing and evolving the �mouse-over� effects you see on scene pages. While we held back the big change, the removal of the mouse-over went live, and nobody told you. Our statistics indicate it�s not a highly used feature, but those of you who do use it let us know that you were surprised to see it disappear.

We�re sorry. It�s not our intention or game plan to change functionality without advising you when it changed. This one slipped through earlier than expected.

Let me emphatically assure you that we have features coming out shortly that�ll replace that in ways that�ll rock your world, and you�ll consider the old mouse-over as having been antiquated and outdated.

Yet for the time being, they�ve disappeared, and we�ve left you hanging. Perhaps literally.

Again, we apologize for any confusion or frustration. It was not intentional, it�s certainly not permanent, and in the coming weeks you�ll see new capabilities that�ll raise the bar and make your VB experience top notch and industry leading.

View Thread (2)

VideoBox Comment

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:20:19 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-11-10 10:20am

COMMENT by uscue (35)

Quick Preview gone?

What happened to the "quick preview" option on the six caps when you're a member? It disappeared this week. Is it just me or did it disappear for everyone that's a member? Shame, it was a great feature and quick way to decide if I liked a scene.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:05:05 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-11-10 07:05am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To rearadmiral (24):

Well founded review here - but the score?
Still: no matter - what matters is this accurate statement:

'Anal or not, one issue is that they really seem to focus on quantity over quality. Some of the videos are really bad.'

Cannot agree more - VideoBox seems to have this deal in my mind: Give the suckers a LOT - video-QUALITY - what's that?

View Thread (5)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:28:20 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-10-10 06:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (24)

To Monahan (34):

Monahan:

I agree with you on this issue. The search function isn't as good as it could be simply because of some errors in entering the information. I suspect that this is a result of the sheer volume of files being added each day. VB has five updates as you know, and I'm assuming that both bonus sites have a least one update each day. I'm a VB fan, but this site is more about quantity (and value) than quality.

View Thread (5)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:49:34 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-10-10 03:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (34)

To rearadmiral (24):

Good review and I agree that VB is the baseline site for any horndog into web porn.

One issue I've raised before and that I consider to be a major failing is their accuracy in their search capabilities with many misspellings and worse, their genre tags. (Gianna Michaels - small tits?????) Gianna Michaels spelled 10 different ways rendering a search for her stuff to be much messier tha n necessary, etc.)

I consider that carelessness/sloppiness to be a real problem with a site with as much content as VB has.

View Thread (5)

RE: Joined, but refered to VIPMOVIEACCESS

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:19:57 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-09-10 10:19am

COMMENT REPLY by videobox (Webmaster)

To nestles (0):

Hi Nesties,

My apologies for your poor experience with Videobox. Here is a simplified version of what happened. When CCBill passed us your information after you signed up, it told our system to authorize the wrong site; Vipmovieaccess which is simply a VB clone.

I can rectify this situation and get you access to Videobox if you email myself of customer support (csr2@metainterfaces.com)

Regarding the $14.94 price:

The 14.95 price point isn't recognized with Vipmovieaccess. We only recognize that price point for VB from Best Porn. That said we will certainly honor the reviewers special.

Once I again I apologize for the mix up. However, I hope this clears things up and you will want to come and sign up.

Best

Michael

View Thread (4)

RE: Joined, but refered to VIPMOVIEACCESS

Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:09:58 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-05-10 07:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To nestles (0):

nestles said: Also the 14,95 special no longer applies- 2nd feb 2010 even if you log in via thebestporn link.

FWIW, I'm still seeing the $14.95 Reviewer's Special price.

You profile doesn't say where you're at so ...

If you're in the US, you maight try clearing your cache (temporary Internet files) and any cookies associated with the site and then revisiting the site directly from one of the links here at TBP/PU.

If you're not in the US, it's possible they're using regional pricing in which case, you could try emailing them and asking if they'll honor the TBP Special Price.

View Thread (4)

VideoBox Comment

Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:15:24 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-04-10 05:15pm

COMMENT by nestles (0)

Joined, but refered to VIPMOVIEACCESS

Beware ! I tried to join, but was redirected to pay via ccbill and found that I'd joined vipmovieaccess. The site appears the same, but you can't log in !
I have used CCBill many times, and am surprised they haven't replyed to my emails. VIPmovieaccess does NOT live upto its name- and you can't even email the support - it just sits there.
Also the 14,95 special no longer applies- 2nd feb 2010 even if you log in via thebestporn link.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Premium channel plunge

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:05:35 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-02-10 05:05pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (24)

To exotics4me (365):

Thanks for that information. I never really spent a lot of time looking at the add-on channels. I looked at the number of titles available and the monthly cost and just assumed that it was poor value. But now hearing that there is a lot pf 90's stuff there I will definitely take a look.

Thanks for the tip.

View Thread (3)

RE: Premium channel plunge

Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:09:06 PST

VideoBox (26)

02-01-10 11:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To rearadmiral (24):

Hey rearadmiral,

I've become even happier with the Vivid premium channel as the membership goes on. I'm finding models I had forgotten about like Melissa Hill. The way I'm looking at it is I might join it once a year, maybe twice if an update stands out to me. So far, I've downloaded 27 GB from the Vivid channel, only 7 GB from Videobox, so it has been a good value for me. A lot of those 90s clips are in better quality here than I've ever seen them with standard DVD 640-720 high end resolution and bitrates in the 5000 range. A few still look a little dated, poor lighting/color, but I don't guess they can fix that since it is that way in the originals. Overall though, I expect to have around 50 GB just from the Vivid channel. You also don't see as much of the current nonsense in the hardcore clips, not much slapping, no spitting and probably less than half of the hardcore scenes end with facials. I'm not a fan of facials, so that was a plus too.

View Thread (3)

RE: Premium channel plunge

Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:43:47 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-30-10 05:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (24)

To exotics4me (365):

Thanks for this. I take a VB membership for a month a couple of times a year and have wondered about the value of these new additional memberships. One of the things I always look for are older videos (from the early to mid-90s). Next time I'm renew (which won;t be for six months since I'm in now) I'll be more comfortable considering one or both of the add ons.

But... they seem pretty expensive. How do you think they stand up as value?

M

View Thread (3)

VideoBox Comment

Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:06:53 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-24-10 09:06am

COMMENT by exotics4me (365)

Premium channel plunge

I decided to take the plunge and add the Vivid channel. Two reasons, Taylor Hayes classic scenes and Where the Boys Aren't #1. I consider #1 in the Where the Boys Aren't series to be one of the best lesbian DVDs I've seen. Taylor Hayes was one of the prettiest and dirtiest stars I remember from the 90s, early 2000s. Oh and they have around 20 scenes of Taylor so that combined with the lesbian DVD would be worth the extra $18.

Once inside the Vivid section, I found there are over 200 Vivid DVDs on it and am downloading to keep. Here are some surprising (to me) finds in those DVDs.

Kayden Kross - Beautiful solo model was how I knew her. She has 14 hardcore scenes on the Vivid channel.

Raylene (90s) - One of the greatest natural bodies in porn history, highly underrated, has 7 scenes.

Meggan Malone - I only knew of her work on ALS sites, she has 20 scenes on the channel, including hardcore.

Sunny Leone - 24 scenes including hardcore

Mimi Miyagi - 3 scenes, retired back around 2000, ran for Nevada governor in 2006. The scenes here show the 90s Mimi when she could put her stomach on the bed and her butt pointed nearly straight up in the air. Amazing back arch and bubble butt for a tiny Filipina model.

There are plenty more but those are the ones that have jumped out at me so far. I'm wondering why there isn't more Sky Lopez. I know she is all weird now, but she was one of the best Vivid girls. I remember having a lesbian clip between her and Raylene that required you to have 4 eyes to watch both of them at the same time. I can't say I will join the Vivid channel each time I join Videobox, but I will be keeping an eye on it. I wouldn't mind to see more of those late 90s Vivid DVDs make their way onto the channel.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Torn4do's Review

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:57:40 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-20-10 07:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (34)

To Torn4do (11):

Makes total sense. I've been a member for 3 years now so I remember way back when they went from 1 update per day to 5 and did not increase the price at all. They did increase the price since then but the PU price brought it back down.

I also remember how awesome I felt the site was when I first joined and would have given these guys a score in the high 90's.

The site hasn't changed much (except for the two integrated pay sites being added) so perhaps I am being a bit rough because the site is still the best for having so much material at such a reasonable price.

View Thread (3)

RE: Torn4do's Review

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:09:23 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-20-10 04:09am

REVIEW REPLY by Torn4do (11)

To Monahan (34):

Thanks for your comment Monahan. You do have a point that they should try to clean it up, and I'm the same as you are in this regard, I wouldn't even mind paying a few extra bucks if that's the cost.

As for rating the site (points), in my opinion it's really a matter of perception. I was considering giving them a lower score, and I probably would have if I paid more for it, but at $14.95 a month I feel I got exactly what I paid for. It's kind of like the same as with Walmart... you don't expect it to be the best looking, nicest and perfectly organized store in the city, but rather to put up with minor inconveniences in order to get a really good value / price on the products you purchase. I hope this makes sense. :-)

View Thread (3)

RE: Torn4do's Review

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:32:38 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-19-10 10:32am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (34)

To Torn4do (11):

Good review. Torn4do. With over 1800 videos added per year, most of them full length with only a few with deleted scenes, the site is a treasure trove of material.

But with over 7,500 videos now and closing in on 10,000 sometime next year, these guys need to have a much better pornstar naming accuracy and a better search function or they'll lose a lot of us. In fact I'd be willing to pay an extra $2 or $3 a month to support cleaning up the misspellings and misidentifications that are rampant on this site. They get an uptick for identifying pornstars in every scene (not done that often on DVD sites where the star list is just for the entire DVD), but they lost that uptick with their carelessness.

That is my only disagreement with your review. I think they should lose a few more points because they can't be bothered with accuracy.

Now that I think of it, maybe I should catalogue the entire site and provide a separate adjunct site for a fee. Now that's a job I'd like to do.

View Thread (3)

RE: Beware in UK - �19.99

Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:40:53 PST

VideoBox (26)

01-08-10 07:40am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (13)

To OneMan (27):

An important thing to flag up!

Thanks.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (2)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:56:41 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-27-09 06:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To PinkPanther (38):

Haha, I didn't download that video. It was just an example of something weird and out there, types of things we'll never see at VB

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:40:17 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-27-09 10:40am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To PinkPanther (38):

Yep, that's what I was referring to in my recent comment at American Vice. The Webmaster got slightly upset over my remarks but as far as I am concerned he's definitely gone more "main stream" over the past few months. I'm not looking for grotesque but more niche content would be an improvement over what he's offering now.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:59:58 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-27-09 06:59am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To uscue (35):

American Vice has "a series with midgets and some deformed guy". That's what I would call a really specialized niche. Personally, I prefer regular boy-girl videos, or even girl-girl videos, to watching a midget or some deformed guy.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:42:30 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-26-09 05:42pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To uscue (35):

And emulating that would make Videobox better?

Uh, no thanks!

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:05:56 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-25-09 09:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To PinkPanther (38):

I haven't been an American Vice fan forever because I hate their site. Because of that, I have no idea how they update now. All I know is when I was a member they had numerous unique DVDs on file (including a series with midgets and some deformed guy). That's what I was talking about.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:04:35 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-24-09 02:04am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To uscue (35):

Funny, when I take a look at American Vice's recent updates, I'm seeing anal, anal, dp, anal, anal, fat girls, anal, inter-racial, anal, anal, Asian, anal - lol

What am I missing that they have that's unique?

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:39:34 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-23-09 05:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To PinkPanther (38):

Yeah and it makes no sense to me. I'm personally not an anal fan, does nothing for me, so I'm tired of seeing all these anal updates. I'd like to see some weird niche's like American Vice has. If Videobox gave uncommond dvds like American Vice, for me it would be perfect.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:07:21 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-22-09 07:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To Denner (200):

It's what their members want - or at least the vocal ones - whenever there's a scene that doesn't include anal, there's always very highly rated comments complaining about that.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:03:48 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-22-09 08:03am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To messmer (57):

Thanks a lot, Messmer - those words are surely welcome.

And - man, quite: Never seen so much anal-material elsewhere, BTW - and why?. Never understood why a major site like this is topping with anal-stuff......

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:54:20 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-22-09 07:54am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To Denner (200):

Excellent review, Denner. You hit the nail right on the head in your cons section. My personal rating for this site would be closer to 80. I just let the four month subscription lapse because I haven't seen anything new and exciting in a long time. There is too much of a pre-occupation with anal and not enough attention paid to fetish and niche material. I know that anal was considered to be a fetish at one time but now, with every second (at least) DVD being anal it's become main stream. Just hope that all the anal lovers will have had their fill soon and we will be able to get something else now and then.

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:33:53 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-22-09 06:33am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To Monahan (34):

'With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.'

It's my main objection to this site - like stated above by Monahan - AND the uncertainess (is that english?) of the quality of videos: You find what looks like a possible favorite - and then you get half-blurred videos - EVEN at the socalled DVD-quality - cannot still get over that fact...

View Thread (12)

RE: Denner's Review

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:25:14 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-21-09 11:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (34)

To Denner (200):

Good review. The search process, as Denner says, is virtually useless. name searches return totally random results. If (a big IF) a model is correctly identified with a correctly spelled name in a scene, you have a better chance finding more of that model's stuff by clicking on the cast name in the scene than if you type the name in the search box.

With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.

The price is right (esp. for the 1 year membership that I purchased), but the frustration I experience in trying to find scenes with specific babes makes the 85 score posted by Denner a bit high. I am more like an 82 myself.

View Thread (12)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:12:27 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-14-09 06:12am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To Denner (200):

OK - so you can upgrade a few ways - when you join, you can choose premium channels - and they'll make very clear what the costs are. If you're looking at a scene in a Premium channel and click "Download", there will be a pop-up that will explain exactly what the costs are and you have the option to close the pop-up or to click through to the upgrade with the costs as specified, or you can click on "Upgrade Now" banner in a premium channel and you will get a pop-up describing what the costs are - and again you can choose to click through to upgrade or close that pop-up.

In every scenario, I believe that they're doing a good job of spelling out the costs with little risk of charges that catch a member by surprise.

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:29:44 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-11-09 12:29am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To Rick (Staff):

Thanks - please see reply to PinkPanther

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:28:54 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-11-09 12:28am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To PinkPanther (38):

Thanks - probably my mistanke - had this impression:
When you go search for, let's say - a certain model - and the results come up, you get those blue spots under some thumbs - and if you press this your're automatically updated and charged an the extra amount.
Also got that impression from another user who actually WAS charged - so I did not want to take the chance by pressing that blue thing.... so how does the updating work from there???

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:40:27 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 05:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To Denner (200):

I joined the EA upgrade and I thought that VB did a good job at making it clear exactly what I was doing when I did it. I believe that it would be difficult for a non-upgrade VB member to be sucked un-knowingly into an upgrade with their current set-up.

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:19:34 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 03:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by videobox (Webmaster)

To Rick (Staff):

Hey Denner,

I read your comments and wanted to clarify a few points you had brought up

Any content from Evil Angel or Vivid is clearly marked with with a badge at the bottom of the box cover or screenshot. You can find this content though search or lists on the site. You can also navigate into these premium areas using the tab navigation. None of the titles on the first page of the tour are Vivid or Evil Angel and we make a point of not seeding the main tour area with these scenes.

While VB does allow you to watch 60 second previews of either premium channel using the flash player you are not allowed to DL anything until you join. In fact all of the DL buttons in the tour area clearly state 'join to download'

There are no blind links once you're in the members areas to upsell customers to the premium channels. And, once you do purchase the channel there is a confirmation page.

I am sorry the experience left a negative impression on you. I would be happy to assist you directly if you would like to email me, mikev@videobox.com

Best Regards,

-michael

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:17:18 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 02:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by Rick (Staff)

To Denner (200):

Hey Denner,

We double checked to see if any warning was necessary and didn't find anything wrong with how Videobox was offering their premium channels. There was no pre-checked cross sale and the upsell offer inside the members area is very clear. It all looks separated well in the members area as well.

I'll add a note about the premium channel in the site facts, but it looks legit to us.

Let me know if we're missing anything.

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:43:30 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 12:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by Rick (Staff)

To uscue (35):

Yeah, I've always thought they were clearly marked as premium channel upgrades.

My question to Denner is are they trying to trick users into the upsell? I'm interpreting his comment that users are billed if they attempt to download a video from the members area without a join (upsell) confirmation. But maybe I'm wrong in reading that.

On the Videobox join page, it's very clear that the channels are upgrades. We're still looking into this further, but I've never seen any shady billing practices from them.

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:01:12 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 10:01am

COMMENT REPLY by uscue (35)

To Denner (200):

Yeah they added a new deal with Evil and Vivid about 6 months ago or more. Once you're a member, you rarely (*never it seems to me*) so Vivid or Evil Angel updates. You can click the tab to see those updates and preview the scenes though. But on just the regular VideoBox page, I haven't come across those updates at all in my regular browsing of the website - and I visit multiple times a day to see every update.

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware of cross-sales

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:44:12 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-10-09 09:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Rick (Staff)

To Denner (200):

Hi Denner,

This is the first time I knew of this.

I'm on it man.

View Thread (9)

VideoBox Comment

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:08:11 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 08:08am

COMMENT by Denner (200)

The same old - no difference in quality

How do these guys at Videobox justify that difference/price-ditto between Standard and DVD-quality.
Joined earlier today and went for the DVD-thing (not much price-difference, anyhow) - then downloaded several clips in both Standard AND DVD. Just got a new 'top-machine' here with the best damn video-card (I alomst say: money can buy) - and still - like in the 'old days' - I can't tell/see any difference.
Went for some of the new LEGEND-stuff (latina) - and even in DVD things are blurred.
But ok, some other videos are ok - but the difference between standard and DVD are NONE in viewer-quality.
Still do not get it here at Videobox...your're lucky if the clip is crisp - but in 5 or 6 of 10 it is NOT....

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: They need to rename the site

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:54:28 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 07:54am

COMMENT REPLY by rome476 (0)

To RagingBuddhist (41):

I found that I just couldn't download and store all of the good content from the sites I've belonged to, so it's easier for me to do annual memberships to a couple of megasites like VB and then throw in another site for a month once in awhile from which I do some downloading. (I have about 1.8 T of stored downloads.)

View Thread (5)

RE: What's new...?

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:55:18 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 06:55am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To PinkPanther (38):

Good to hear - thanks....!
No reasons not to try another term here.

View Thread (2)

RE: What's new...?

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:44:55 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 06:44am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (38)

To Denner (200):

I'm afraid that I've never downloaded anything in standard to compare - since I move my files to DVD, I get the largest ones that I can, figuring that they are the best available quality - I'm happy with the quality that I get from VB

View Thread (2)

VideoBox Comment

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:34:53 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 05:34am

COMMENT by Denner (200)

What's new...?

There are always some PUs here - am I wrong...
So:
Have not been a member for almost half a year - took a look at the previews - and again found some really interesting material (wauw - here are some great new latins)
What about video-quality? All those times I've been a member, I never could see much difference in viewing quality between the standard and the DVD resolutions. Not a BIG difference in price, but with some of the 'good ol' material there was NEVER any difference.
What about today?

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: They need to rename the site

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:37:43 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-08-09 03:37am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (41)

To rome476 (0):

To me, this is another one of those sites that are great if you've never been a member before. But, having been there three times in the past, I've already saved a gajillion files of their material. They can add all the features they want and make it as cheap as they want - it still doesn't change their lack of new niche content. But, if what they're putting up satisfies you, by all means, go for it!

View Thread (5)

RE: They need to rename the site

Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:31:07 PST

VideoBox (26)

12-07-09 05:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by rome476 (0)

To RagingBuddhist (41):

I disagree; they have still add new features, keep everything on the site and with the 18 month deal it can't be any cheaper. If you're a porn hound I don't know how you could go without it.

View Thread (5)