PU - Met Art - New Reviews

Met Art Review

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:43:05 PDT

Met Art (16)

06-15-08 07:43am

REVIEW = 96 by Mr Fountain (24)

Pros:
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin.

Cons:
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times.

Bottom Line:
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.

I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.

I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.

I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..

I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 29 May 2008 18:09:37 PDT

Met Art (16)

05-29-08 06:09pm

REVIEW = 91 by Wittyguy (29)

Pros:
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM

Cons:
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy

Bottom Line:
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.

I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.

As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.

Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 23 May 2008 17:20:25 PDT

Met Art (16)

05-23-08 05:20pm

REVIEW = 90 by careylowell (6)

Pros:
Top of the line glamour photography...this ct from someone whose been working as a photographer for 22+ years. Some shooters used their real names...try to find that on an American site.

Cons:
With notable exceptions, models tend to be under-fed, size one types.
Just a few non-Whites featured.

Bottom Line:
Remains The Site for soft-core.
Not for those searching for ethnic flesh.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:17:34 PST

Met Art (16)

01-10-08 06:17am

REVIEW = 96 by Denner (138)

Pros:
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam

Cons:
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.

Bottom Line:
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.

As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.

The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!

I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.

It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:01:59 PST

Met Art (16)

12-15-07 02:01am

REVIEW = 98 by jd1961 (78)

Pros:
- High Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Videos, NO DRM
- Beautiful Models
- Endless Amount Of Material
- Very Frequent Updates
- 14 Hours Free Webcam Per Day
- Favorites Folder With Rating System
- Fast Downloads
- No Download Limits

Cons:
- Original Met-Art Sets No Longer Archived
- Some Photo Sets Are Bland

Bottom Line:
This site has really sold me with it's high quality material and very frequent updating. You get 4 brand new sets per day to go along with the massive archive. Photos come in 3 sizes (Roughly 3000+, 2000+, 1024) available in fast downloading zip files corresponding to each size. So many beautiful naked models that not one stands out amongst the bevy of girls. Most Erotic Teens has stepped beyond the strictly teen genre in recent years, but there are no hags here. Some of the sets are nothing but bland statue posing by model wannabees, but with such a wealth of material, it's no big deal to skip past these. As of this review, Met has about 90 videos, the newer ones available in divx, wmv, mpeg, quicktime, mp4 and ipod files. The divx are 1280x720 in size, the wmv 720x576. Naked girls with no hardcore to be seen is what these videos are about. They have a high quality webcam with 7 two hour shows daily where you can chat about anything but sex with the naked girls if you are into that. Unfortunately, the oldest original Most Erotic Teens photo sets are no longer archived here, these are collector's items now. Met-Art is what every porn site should aspire to be. Attractive, erotic, interesting, fun to use, interactive with a bottomless well of material.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:27:34 PST

Met Art (16)

12-14-07 07:27pm

REVIEW = 95 by cblodg (9)

Pros:
+ Very glamorous
+ Tons of picture sets
+ Multiple sets of models
+ Excelent photo quality
+ Navigation is good

Cons:
- Pricy (but well worth it)
- Video quality can be poor
- Many videos are just of the photo shoots
- Often times there will be radio music in the background, but this applies to the previous con.

Bottom Line:
If you're looking for class, then you've found it in MET-Art. This is one of the classiest sites (if not the most classy) on the net! You'll pay a good amount, but its well worth it.

Some of the hottest models around, and not just one or two photo sets, but many of the same the model. The video can be sketchy at times, but the site really isn't about video; its about gorgeous girls being professionally photographed for your viewing pleasure

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:46:20 PST

Met Art (16)

12-10-07 03:46pm

REVIEW = 93 by PosterDude (14)

Pros:
+ Best site in class of glamore
+ High quality photography
+ Pictures in different sizes and zip packs for download
+ Very pretty models
+ Lots of Daily Updates
+ 3 image sizes for download � small, mediem, large
+ good wed design

Cons:
- Videos are boring
- No hardcore or even no spreading
- No response on emails
- Girl-girl photo and video has no sex touching
- Inconsistent shoot quality, photographers not equal
- No information about model
- Small browse pictures should start with lo-res first

Bottom Line:
This is one of few sites I keep constant membership. It is best site on internet for glamore. Photos much better over videos. Videos of dancing and strip tease always to soft and get boring. Site has slowly shown more vagina but still no spreading and always leaves me wanting to see more explicit of model.

I email site with question and do not get emails back. Site used to have to many European girls only but now has more American girls to, that is good. I have joined other glamour sites that try to copy met-art but none beet this site.

Some photographers at Met-art make very good sets and some are not so good sets with blurry and graney pictures. They have good photographers and some bad photographers. They have very nice very large pictures, but sometimes larger pictures show quality weekness of some photographers. Also some photographers sets have no variation that model only stand hole set or model only sit hole set which is not good. I want to see odder poses. Please understand my bad English.

They should do glamore with more open vagina. Hair on vagina is nice but not hair by vagina lips and sometime model never show vagina. To girl sets should have girls touch more and kiss and spread more like real life girls do. It can still be glamore and sexy. Model pages do not give information about model that makes them seem distant and cannot touch.
Best glamore site but not perfect.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:02:01 PST

Met Art (16)

11-18-07 03:02pm

REVIEW = 90 by roadie (5)

Pros:
Excellent quality for the price.
Huge database of very sexy models.
Easy to navigate.
Regular updates.

Cons:
I was a little disappointed in the quality of some of the higher resolution pictures which seemed soft or in some cases to contain grainy elements.
Too many fully shaved models I prefer to see more trimmed or unshaven.

Bottom Line:
Well deserves a top 10 place but not sure it should be ahead of some of its rivals such as Hegre

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 03:14:28 PDT

Met Art (16)

07-28-07 03:14am

REVIEW = 80 by exotics4me (295)

Pros:
- Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month!
- Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end.
- Videos are now HD quality 1280x720
- Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99
- Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else

Cons:
- Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases.
- As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking.
- You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs
- With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks.

Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more!

One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli.

I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased.

Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:14:57 PDT

Met Art (16)

07-21-07 04:14pm

REVIEW = 95 by Schnitzel (29)

Pros:
-Excellent value with yearly option.
-Unlimited downloads.
-No DRM.
-Supports download managers (actually incourages use of them).
-Has great respect for models.
-Huge amount of models, all appear to be 18 and are extremely attractive.
-High definition videos.
-Multiple daily updates.
-Super quality pictures.

Cons:
-Not that many videos.
-Browsing site can be slow (but downloads are fast).
-Some navigation issues (can be hard to find all of a certain models content).

Bottom Line:
Firstly I'd like to say I'm not going to deduct anything from this site in terms of points or cons because it's a softcore site.
This is made clear by the tour and the name of the site, so anyone who joins Met-Art would be ill-informed if they expect hardcore content.
I joined Met-Art recently, for the first time ever; and based soley on the information available in the FAQ and tour, I took out a yearly membership ($99), and It's one of the best decisions I've ever made.
If you look at my reviews, you'll quickly notice I'm not one to use all caps in a sentence, but I'm going to make an exception here:
ALL THE MODELS ARE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING. THE BEST LOOKING TEENS YOU'LL FIND ON THE NET, PERIOD.
Whilst that was out of character, I needed to make it very clear. The people who run this website strive for quality. All of their content is superb. The photo sets are available in low, medium and high resolution to suit your download speed / hard disk capacity, but the high quality pictures are nothing short of spectacular, and they don't have any watermarks.
There are not as many videos on the site, perhaps around 400 at a guess, and not all of them are in high definition, but are all a pleasure to watch.

I'm now running out of space for this review, but this has to be my favourite site so far.

Heed the con's I noted and then Join this site.
I can't recommend it enough if you like beautiful teens and don't require hardcore content.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:26:28 PDT

Met Art (16)

06-11-07 06:26pm

REVIEW = 85 by RobertJason (2)

Pros:
- 100's of extremely cute, mostly young looking, European teens.
- Large 'magazine style' cover page thumbnails (ala FTV) linking to each set.
- A 'Best Of' section.
- Webcam chats daily.
- Almost every European model has been on here, so you can find your favorites.
- Photo quality/options are amazing.
- Attractive, fun, addicting web interface.
- Huge amount of content, could keep you downloading for months.

Cons:
- No indicator of original resolution for photos. In some sets low-res looks original and hi-res looks fuzzy.
- There is no way to search by set rating or model rating.
- Videos of photo shoots are boring
- No personalities present, most videos have music dubbed over the models.

Bottom Line:
For Hi-Res picture lovers or lovers of beautiful European teens, this site is a 100. Unfortunately, I'm learning that Glamor sites aren't my style, mostly because the girls are not turned on, they are only gorgeous. For video lovers, this site is barely a 60. Forgetting all the details, and nit picking, I've rarely seen such beautiful women photographed at such sexy angles. I can see why this site is so popular for photo lovers. I'd love to see the personalities of the girls, even if they speak in another language, it can be very cute. In many sets, the models get naked within 20 pics, more tease would be nice.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 25 May 2007 04:48:31 PDT

Met Art (16)

05-25-07 04:48am

REVIEW = 80 by 4nic8 (14)

Pros:
5 SETS ADDED DAILY
QUALITY PICS
EASY SITE USE

Cons:
EXPENSIVE
TOO SOFTCORE
VIDS NOT WORTHY

Bottom Line:
IN THE END IT IS NOT WORTH THE MONEY. MOST GIRLS ARE PRETTY, FEW ARE HOT. WAY TOO SOFTCORE. FOR MOST SETS YOU REALLY HAVE TO SPEND ALOT OF TIME OPENING EACH SET TO FIND "PINK" SHOTS. IT'S A GOOD SITE IF YOU LIKE THE PLAYBOY FORMAT. BUT, THEN AGAIN... THAT IS WHAT THEY ADVERSTISE. THEY DEFINETLY STAY TRUE TO FORM. SAVE YOUR $$$, YOU'LL GET MORE SKIN OUT OF A VICTORIA SECRET FLYER.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 25 May 2007 03:22:00 PDT

Met Art (16)

05-25-07 03:22am

REVIEW = 85 by IcemanTC (8)

Pros:
- Most beautiful Teens on the net!
- Great and huge collection!
- Updated daily with more than just one Sets
- Great navigation and browser setup.
- Easy .zip downloads.
- Monster Picture Quality!
- Good voting and favourites tool.

Cons:
- Not all girls show their "privates". Guess just 60% do.
- Movies are a little bit too soft for my taste.
- More search options would be good!

Bottom Line:
After all a great site for those who like pretty teens! The girls are really some of the most beautiful you will find on the net.
The only thing I REALLY rate as a Con is, that not all of the girls show their privates... sometimes I get a little bit frustrated, when I look at the set of a wonderful girl and she hides the best part of her body.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:07:51 PDT

Met Art (16)

04-13-07 07:07pm

REVIEW = 90 by luvIzumi (8)

Pros:
HUGE archive of some of the most stunning "teen" (18+....relax!) photography I've ever seen. The quality of the still photography is reminiscent of David Hamilton. If you're in to this type of stuff, I guarantee you've already seen loads of photoshoots from this site and you'll recognize alot of the models. This stuff is just on a whole different level compared to your average "amateur teen" stuff. One model, Valentina, is an absolute goddess in my opinion and I've never seen her anywhere else.

Cons:
Softcore! Softcore! Nothing but friggin softcore! The so-called "girl on girl" videos are more frustrating than anything else. Beautiful to look at, but you'll be yelling at your monitor after 5 minutes in an effort to get them to do something!

The site navigation will make you angry. No question. Particularly because it's such a huge archive. I left the site feeling like I'd probably missed some really good stuff simply because I couldn't find it.

Bottom Line:
The bottom line is, if you like this kind of photography, there is simply no better place to get it. Just go take a tour of the site. If you find yourself having difficulty breathing, you will NOT be disappointed by the members area. On the other hand, if you find yourself looking for the "anal" section, it's time to move on.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:06:43 PDT

Met Art (16)

04-09-07 05:06am

REVIEW = 80 by Coveboy (3)

Pros:
* Stunning women shot beautifully
* Range of image sizes for each gallery
* Huge number of photos in each gallery
* Regular updates
* Some of the greatest puffy nipple models on the net (A personal fav - Koika)
* Great looking locations to match the women
* Good range of hair and skin tones on the girls
* Great variety of natural breasts on offer

Cons:
* Difficult search and navigation options
* Video seems to be a last minute thought
* Girl/Girl shoots and video extremely softcore
* Some video files are massive (200Mb+)
* Good quality videos take too much trawling to find

Bottom Line:
Met-Art is hard to beat for photos of beautiful women in beautiful locations and each shoot gallery provides plenty of images.
Offers plenty for those with the eye for the erotic rather than hardcore and may not be to everyone's taste.
For stimulation and suggestion rather than hardcore action Met-Art is an internet leader.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:51:00 PDT

Met Art (16)

03-27-07 03:51am

REVIEW = 75 by Kittygirl (11)

Pros:
Stunningly beautiful models
Brilliant and artistic still photography
Sophisticated layout

Cons:
Not particularly user-friendly
No hardcore action (well... I haven't found it, anyway - but perhaps we're getting back to that "not user friendly" issue!!!)
Limited billing options
Videos aren't particularly impressive

Bottom Line:
If you like sexy photography with some great-looking ladies, then this is the site for you (I have to say that Koika is damned HOT!!!) Personally, I like my girls to look like they're enjoying themselves; unfortunately most of these ladies look like they're about to trudge off to a family funeral once the shoot's over.
Have noticed a lot of users (specifically guys) like the live cams, so I can recommend that aspect of membership even though it doesn't do much for me.
All in all, I think there are better sites around - but the beautiful, BEAUTIFUL girls do count for something!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:25:24 PST

Met Art (16)

03-07-07 08:25pm

REVIEW = 95 by PinkPanther (28)

Pros:
Incredible level of updates - usually 4 per day
Great photography really high quality
Multiple sizes of photos - new option this month gives you small, medium or large - this is great!
Zip downloads available in different sizes as well
Good variety of models increasingly - they seem to have gotten away from the all-waif tendency that they had at one time, though there are a LOT of waifish models
Multiple live cam shows a day (6 most days) with hot MetArt models

Cons:
Their vids often aren't very exciting for my tastes
If you're looking for hard-core, definitely don't expect it from this site.

Bottom Line:
This is a tremendous site for lovers of hot young European models. The people who run this site show a desire to give quality in everything they do, from the volume and consistency of their exclusive updates and their cam shows to the increasing quality of their browsing and download features.

Just this month they added a middle size for viewing and downloading that is just perfect for my tastes and added a "next image" viewing mechanism that I've been craving for a while.
Given that their pricing is not higher than other similar sites, it really makes me wonder how they can do this and others cannot.

Since I don't know when I'll find the answer to that particular question, I'll just keep enjoying this truly fine site.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:16:09 PST

Met Art (16)

01-27-07 01:16pm

REVIEW = 94 by Bacchus (30)

Pros:
*Probably the best teen amateur site on the net
*Every girl is absolutely beautiful
*Tons of European models
*Ability to see pics in very high resolution
*Tons of picture content. It never ends!
*Moderate video content

Cons:
*Video content could be more expansive
*Site can be tricky to maneuver
*Hard core videos would be on my wish list

Bottom Line:
*Hands down the creme de la creme of nubile teen picture sites on the internet today. Their content is constantly being updated and the models are supreme. If you are looking for a vast library of vidoes, you may be disappointed.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply