PU - Met Art - New Reviews

Met Art Review

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:47:05 PST

Met Art (7)

02-13-12 11:47am

REVIEW = 92 by tangub (103)

Pros:
Huge archive going back 12 years featuring 2600+ models, almost 11,000 photo sets, nearly 1.2 million photos, 1000+ movies from 236 contributing photographers.
Original exclusive content
At least 4 updates per day 7 days a week
Super high resolution photos up to 8000px and HD1080p videos
Photos in 3 sizes with full set zip download option for each
Multiple streaming and download options for videos
Excellent browse, search and tag features
Constantly adding new models
No download limits or DRM
12 month membership provides excellent value for money
Independent billing by CCBill

Cons:
Regional pricing supplement outside US
Site may be too softcore for some tastes
Lack of clothing or lingerie worn by models in many sets
Most 2 girl sets lack any kind of heat
Occasional photo sets can seem a little overly airbrushed or too glam although this tends to be restricted to a couple of particular photographers.
Videos not very exciting
File sizes not listed for zips and videos

Bottom Line:
It�s difficult to know what one can possibly say about this site that hasn�t already been said many times before. If like me you are in to softcore teen photography sites then this one is probably the ultimate site on the net. Surprising then that given the time Met Art has been online this is my first ever time to subscribe here. I guess the thing that has always deterred me is knowing the sheer volume of content here and the time scale I�d probably need to go through it all knowing that virtually every model is a beauty and I�d probably want to download every photo set. Thanks to the PU half price thanksgiving offer last November I was able to sign up in the knowledge that I would be happy to stick around and enjoy the content for many months at that price.

The site provides plenty of navigation and search features to help you find what you�re looking for. If like me you want to check out every photo set then the easiest way is to just go through the year and month listing from 2005 to the current day. Everything prior to 2005 is classified as �archives�. For those who are more choosey they provide a model index whereby you can display the top rated models or all the models via the A-Z listing. There are a couple of cool features on the model index pages where you can alter the view between headshots and covers and also if you hover your mouse pointer over the �i� next to the models name her personal info and bio will pop up. There is also a further advanced search option whereby you can search models by criteria such as hair colour, eye colour, ethnicity, country, breast size, shaved or unshaved, age, height and weight. You can also add additional gallery criteria such as location or search by photographer. If you like to view all the work of a certain photographer you can easily find all of his/her work from the photographer�s index page.

The models themselves mostly fall in the 18 to 25 age range and are mostly naturally beautiful with few fake tits and tattoos on show. So far I�ve managed to find plenty of content of virtually all my favourite Euro models, the likes of Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat to name a few. Eufrat has over 70 updates here and it�s certainly the biggest collection of her I�ve come across anywhere to date. Other models that have caught my eye so far include Jenya D (a.k.a. Katie Fey) with over 100 updates, Natasha S (a.k.a. Helen of Helen�s Planet) who has become one of my most downloaded models in recent months, Elle B and Mia Sollis a cute freckled redhead and relative newcomer to the site. If you�re looking for non Euro models then yes they do have some here including some ethnic diversity but in terms of the overall content it�s quite a small percentage. I did find some of my favourite American models here like Georgia Jones, Jana Jordan and even the lovely Faye Reagan but disappointingly only 1-2 sets each.

The photos come in 3 different sizes, small 1024px, medium 2048px and the largest size varies quite widely anything from around 3500 to 8000+ pixels on the longest end. Each size comes with a downloadable zip and I like their attention to detail by giving the zips proper file names including the date, photo set name, model name and photographer. They also include the photo set cover in each zip along with a text document listing the model�s info/bio. The photos on the whole look great even at the highest resolution and you get to see the models posing in many stunning outdoor locations, anything from a tropical beach to a snow covered wilderness to an urban city backdrop. You will also find a number of risqu� public nude shoots which looked fun.

Nobody really joins Met Art for the videos and has many others have said quite honestly I found them pretty boring. You can stream them in a choice of 3 resolutions or download them as an mp4 in mobile, 360p, 720p, or HD1080p plus a 720p wmv and avi option. Although they don�t list the file sizes I discovered the 720p mp4 file sizes were about half the size of the equivalent wmv ones with no noticeable difference in the quality.

The Met Live Cams access doesn�t really add any value to the site and is pretty pointless in my opinion unless you�re willing to pay for a private show. Whatever happened to the free live cam shows they used to have when I had a membership to Errotica Archives a few years ago and got Met cam shows included for free. Still have fond memories of being transfixed to my monitor for an hour watching Ashanti on cam�.ahhhh the good old days.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:39:17 PST

Met Art (7)

01-10-12 03:39am

REVIEW = 88 by rearadmiral (141)

Pros:
- Enormous site
- Huge selection of beautiful models
- Models are natural (few fake breasts and tattoos)
- Supports download managers
- No obvious timeouts on downloads
- Good download speeds
- High-resolution photos are stunning quality
- Options for picture quality
- Zips available
- Over 1000 videos
- Videos available in different formats
- Newer videos in HD
- Best search function I�ve ever encountered
- Excellent value

Cons:
- Site may be too softcore for some
- Site is so large it can be a bit overwhelming

Bottom Line:
Why did a guy who likes hardcore videos join a softcore photo site, even after I commented that the site was too soft for me? Simple: they emailed me an offer I couldn�t refuse, so I joined.

I usually take a short while to get used to site navigation and start figuring out how I�ll go at browsing the site and finding stuff I want. I started that here and quickly realized that this really wasn�t like any other site I�ve ever been a member at. This site is HUGE. I normally try to provide accurate details on what a prospective member can expect from a site. So if a site has 500 videos, I�ll tell you that. With this site, the best I can say is that it is enormous. There are many hundreds of models, maybe a thousand even, each with multiple photo shoots and many with video clips. Just choosing a model to look at can be a daunting task.

While on the topic of models, I can�t complain because the type of model on the site is what I look for: young and natural. With a site this size there is lots of variation on body type. I can download the small-breasted lasses while you download the larger-breasted models and neither of us will feel cheated. Same with hair colour. I love redheads and there a dozens of them here. Blondes and brunettes abound. Different ethnicities are represented and there are a few models who are 35 years old.

One thing the models do lack are fake breasts and lots of ink. A vast majority of the models are all natural. Many sport pubic hair even. Remember that?

I should note, because of the above, that the advanced search function is like nothing I�ve ever encountered before. It allows searching for narrow parameters and the site is so large you�re apt to get some returns. Want some pics of a 30 year old Asian with full pubic hair? If it exists on the site it is easy to find. The site would be unmanageable without this excellent tool.

This is primarily a photo site. Anyone thinking of joining this site needs to know that.

The site has been around for many years, and I didn�t sample all of the older material. But I can say this with some confidence: they push the limits of technology now so I have no reason to think that they didn�t then. Photos are available as singles, or in a zipped file. High, medium and low resolutions are available. I didn�t sample the lower two resolutions but the high-res photos are stunning quality at 3744x5616. They�re amazing. Obviously older photos won�t be in that resolution.

There are some videos available and those are mostly videos of the photoshoots. Some of the older videos are horrible quality, but I won�t hold that against them as it isn�t a video site and those were uploaded years ago. Videos are available in streaming (multiple sizes) and downloads (multiple formats). The default is mp4 though wmv is always available too. The standard resolution for videos (all but the oldest stuff) is 1280x720 @ 4,300kb/s. The wmv files are in codec 9 and play at 30 fps. Higher resolutions are not uncommon. Subjectively, these videos look stunning.

Videos tend to be fairly short, with some less than five minutes long.

With the technical stuff, the site is as good as with the artistic stuff. There are multiple updates each day, download speeds are good, download managers are permitted and there are no obvious timeouts on download links.

I realize the 800lb gorilla in the room with Met Art is that many people see it as being too sterile. It�s as if they stripped the sensuality from their models. I can understand that criticism, but I don�t share it to the same level as some other reviewers. While the site lacks the playfulness that is often found on ALS Scan and FTV Girls, they can be erotic. Where some other solo model sites can be overtly sexual, Met Art is more sensual. There is no hardcore sex on the site at all. I can understand how many would find this simply too soft. I suspect that this is highly subjective though. For example, there is a lot of outdoor posing and posing by and in water which I like so that�s going to improve my perception of the site.

I�m left with an odd conclusion. I can definitely recommend this site: I liked it and I�m glad I joined. But I probably won�t put it on my list of sites to rejoin. The reason for that has nothing to do with the quality of the site or the models. The reason is 100% subjective. For a guy who likes sites like Sinnistar and Public Disgrace I�m way out of my element in Met Art. But if you like stunning quality photos of stunning women you really can�t go wrong with Met Art. You could spend months browsing around the site is so large.

One final note for the photographers: please don�t pose models with farm animals. It�s weird. Actually, make that �don�t pose models with animals.� Period. It�s weird.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:48:09 PST

Met Art (7)

12-30-11 01:48am

REVIEW = 80 by otoh (34)

Pros:
- Lots of beautiful young models
- Good search options/tagging
- Browsing by photographer is useful
- Lots of good lingerie/outfits
- Most sets good resolution
- Amusingly pretentious set names
- Massive archive and approx 4 updates/day

Cons:
- Would prefer a few more mid/late 20s models
- Age search option is daft
- Lingerie doesn't necessarily suit the models
- Some older pics quite low res
- Massive archive is bewildering
- Annoyingly pretentious set names
- Some sets too large
- Lacking in erotic content
- Videos uninspiring and soundtracked to death

Bottom Line:
Met Art has been vaguely on my list of sites to try for a while, mainly because it features work from a couple of photographers I like (I tend to follow photographers rather than models), and last month's special offer gave me the incentive to sign up. There are plenty of other reviews, including TBP, which detail the specific stats on the site, so I'll be a bit more subjective here.

Firstly, the site is vast; there is so much material, so many models, so many photographers, that it's hard to know where to begin. Fortunately, the search options are good; sets are tagged so you can just type in any particular keyword - eg nylon, stockings, etc and get a number of results. Sadly this doesn't work well with multiple keywords, getting sets with any of the words rather than all, but it's still useful. Search is also available on height, age, ethnicity, country, photographer - all useful, although unlike height, where you can search on a range, age is done purely on a single year, so you can only find eg all 25yo models... but it is smart enough to find sets where the model was 25 at the time of the shoot, as opposed to now - potentially a big difference in a site that's been running for a decade or more.

My biggest issue, though - and this is quite personal - is that the material here just isn't exciting. The girls are all stunning but - although there are some exceptions - have little sex appeal to me; the concept of the site seems to be to emphasise the beauty of the models at the expense of any sexuality. Even the models who do hardcore elsewhere seem uninspired here - and the same for the photographers, eg there's quite a bit of material from Michael White and Roy Stuart, both favourites of mine, but it's a toned down version of their other stuff.

Similarly, I'm quite keen on lingerie and nylons; there is actually a lot more nice stuff here than I thought, but most of the models are too young or inexperienced to carry it off; they look dressed up, posed, in it rather than comfortable and sexy.

Reading between the lines of some of the blog posts there, I suspect both model and photographer are constrained by strict guidelines MA put on what can and can't be shown - with a veto on any kind of lascivious behaviour, so there is little teasing, no touching, and rarely even a lewd glance. They may even be getting stricter, since of the sets I did enjoy, most seem to be going back a few years. Even though the photos are of course fully nude, I've genuinely been more turned on by some of the better lingerie catalogues & sites.

As others have noted, the videos here are also insipid; drowned out by supposedly sexy sax music and the like; and unlike the photo sets I didn't really find any worth keeping.

Scoring this puts me in a bit of a quandary. It's a good, well-organised site, with a vast quantity of solid photography and frequent updates; so it would be really unfair to give it less than 80. However, this is PU and I struggle to see it as porn, or even particularly erotic or arousing - It's just too... wholesome, like a glamorous naturist site and I kind of agree with hugow that if you wanted to cure your porn addiction, this could do the job. I'm not even sure about art - to me, art is doing something unusual, creative, pushing some boundaries, which MA doesn't really - but by that definition, my last reviewed site, Juliland, is art, so maybe I'll skip the whole subject :| Anyway, a (very generous) 80 it is.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:59:36 PDT

Met Art (7)

09-22-11 06:59pm

REVIEW = 90 by Cybertoad (77)

Pros:

Fast Downloads
HD Videos Over 1000 not all HD
Over 1 Million photos.
Over 2500 Models
Been in the business 12 years
No Drm
Over 100 Updates a month.

Cons:

Repetitive Content
Lots to navigate through
Over picture& video quality is ok.
$19.99 Membership
Recurring every 30 days at $19.99
$39.99 for 30 days To big of a difference as you can not download the site in a month.

Bottom Line:

This is the top of the line best SoftCore nude site on the planet.

There are varies formats, pic Divx its the best picture format for their production work.
The site is huge with over " ONE MILLION " photos and over 2500 models. There are about 100 updates per months and it one huge site.

I do not want duplicate others reviews on PU and most details are recently covered, so a twist on review here.

The site is very high quality site, the models are gorgeous, I could hardly find one that was not drop dead model material.
Compared with 99% of the websites we review this one has to be the classiest site of all.
They have worked 12 years and respectfully stayed successful in soft-core porn.
Why other sites are reaching to find a new level.
Met Art takes things to a new level in quality nude women.

The look and feel of the site is like going to a high class show in Vegas. The site feel like they are kings of the Softcore and have numerous photographers that get the shots right.
There are gratuitous scenes in the collection, but nothing that would be known as Hardcore.
That said, I am sure many will love the curves and erotic nature in how hey present.
This is not playboy tame, nor hustler slutty, it fits nicely enough to a niche in its own class.

Bottom line:

Price is tad high as you will have to stay a member awhile if you plan on full site collections. They take CCbill and Epoch so thats helpful. I like the navigation as its not that hard to find stuff even though the site is huge.
They appears to be free stuff but never had time to look at it. Site may have similar scenes and format. But hard to avoid in 12 years in business, so why it is in my cons, it is expected.

Toads Take.
Its worth a peak, even for a month. If you have not seen a softcore site or avoided them because you thought you would fall asleep with lube in your hand. Rest assure this site will excite and is erotic enough to peak the interest.

I never finished the site before my subscription ran out. But I have a nice collection
A site that is up 12 years will never get the review it deserves. I tried to give some details that may do that justice if at all possible.

Hope you enjoyed my review.

CT.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 20 May 2011 07:47:36 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-20-11 07:47am

REVIEW = 90 by flst2000us (0)

Pros:
This site is one of the best for online nude photography. The layout is a little weird but there are search abilities and the site offers so much content that it took me the whole month to download the site even with a fast connection.

Cons:
Nothing really bad.. There is some really old content on the site but overall nothing bad to report.

Bottom Line:
I would sign up if I was not already committed to another site as well have majority of the content from the last time I was there.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 15 May 2011 18:38:22 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-15-11 06:38pm

REVIEW = 90 by MisterMark (8)

Pros:
- 100% original content

- Beautiful models

- High standards in their photography

- Good reputation, has stood the test of time

- Solid value, especially with specials

Cons:
- All this great photography ... so what happened with the videos?

- A stong lay out but still has navigation issues and it can be improved on.

- Sometimes, sets seem to disappear in the archives

Bottom Line:
If you love beautiful, nubile models then you have to join Met Art at least one time. There is no hardcore here, nor insertions, but they keep you occupied with a stable of top notch models. This site is for those who appreciate art photography, so it is not always, how should I say ... revealing as some might want.

They update on an acceptable basis and seemingly seek some of the best models out there. Met Art was the first in art-like model photography and they are still at the top but other sites are catching up, namely FEMJOY and MPL Studios. In fact, these three are not that far apart.

I'm sure the folks at Met-Art think others copied their style and don't like it. They did. They should take it as a compliment in that they are doing something right. Still the aforementioned sites are neck and neck with the old girl these days

Several of the models have now done hardcore porn but most on the site have not. Met Art continues to get the best models but the competition has closed and that is good for the consumer in that it keeps all parties pumping out good content and contracting models that are top notch.

There is a plethora of different resolutions are available for Met Arts picture sets and they take you to where you can see those lovely golden hairs on the models, giving one the impression they are right there! They have the best overall photos around!

I am not a fan of their videos. They're not bad but they seem a tad too soft in that picture sets are more revealing. You might say, they are li ... lame and need rethinking. They could use some new blood behind those cameras, IMO. On the other hand, they are far from trash, just not what you would expect after seeing their incredible photos.

They've added a live chat area that is well set up if that's your cup of tea but extra charges will apply. As most of you know, some of the talent in chat areas can be in a word scary and by average standards Met Art is on the upper side of the equation but none I have seen are great.

I remember the first time discovering the site and downloaded a lot of sets that have stood the test of time.

Download speeds are fine with a good connection and there is a lot of content to keep you occupied with new discoveries of the flavor of the month.

A classy site, that is a main stay if you like young, tight, natural models.

This is a site that perfectly compliments a harder site and it is especially for those who do not like just any old porn but beauty.

If they master their videos, they'll rock!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:49:22 PDT

Met Art (7)

11-01-10 07:49pm

REVIEW = 84 by graymane (20)

Pros:
I'm not going to go into to technical aspects of the display contents because all that is clearly spelled out in the Best Porn page.
I will say that the image quality on photo sets are as good as it gets. Sharp, crisp and retention friendly with even the highest zoom setting. The number of Models appear endless, that is if you're smart enought to negotiate the dated archives, something I've yet to accomplish.
Models are listed under alphabetically labeled tabs, which I liked.
The most sterling feature, and one sadly absent in many other major sites, is their Flash Player.
This allows one to play the clip before downloading -- something I find essential.Plenty of picture sets with up to and over a hundred frames per set.
The site's reported to have thousands of videos, unfortunately I wasn't able to find them. No DRM or restriction on downloads.
No problems logging in -- as well as enjoying freedom from unexpected shortcomings after doing so.

Cons:
1) Video content, although of excellent quality, as a rule provided poorly orchestrated scenes.
2) As mentioned, I couldn't access the number of videos reported...could've been my ignorance.
3) Picture Images and videos, although offering ample nudity substantially lacked eroticism.
3) Too many closeups dwelling too long on a single scene in the video clips.
4) Sizable watermarks on videos.
5) Archives going back to 2005 produced the same material as offered in 2010. That is to say the number of selections is kind'a limited.

Bottom Line:
I, personally, don't particually care for Met Art.
Although Met Art and Erotica Archives came as a combo at $30, as I've said before that if I had it to go over I'd decline the offer. Both are beautiful sites, but in my mind Met Art is over-rated.
It's fair to say, to the connoisseur, the exquisite photography alone might be worth the cost. But I'm not into precision photography.
The site never delivered what I expected, although, again, it could've been something I wasn't doing; But then again, it shouldnt've been that complicated --even for me.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:10:50 PDT

Met Art (7)

04-29-10 11:10am

REVIEW = 70 by hugow (3)

Pros:
Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings.

Cons:
This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows.

Bottom Line:
After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:44:39 PDT

Met Art (7)

04-14-10 05:44am

REVIEW = 89 by Denner (227)

Pros:
+ Almost a million photos here - and available in top q
+ Maybe the site with the best variation in nude models
+ Quite a lot of models not seen anywhere else - or very rarely
+ Updates - they're up to 4 each day (photosets, mainly)
+ Good price at TBP
+ Good feedback/help from webmaster/webmasters
+ 3 different resolutions for photosets
+ All resolutions have zip for download
+ Ok navigation considering the vast amout of sets/models
+ Quite a lot of new models updating - and different photographers
+ Photosets are still getting more erotic/sensual and less artistic

Cons:
- Videos are still not great, alas - some even just boring. This is a PHOTOSITE - if you have not been here before: do not forget that.
- Even if the navigation is ok, the browsing at model-pages is a bit clumsy - you get a lot of mouse-work here.
- Too many outdoor shoots for my taste
- Boring and not very erotic g/g sets
- Can be a bit repetitive in the long run

Bottom Line:
Been at this rather special and somewhat great site many times over the years - but never stay more than that one month.
The reason is: After spending hours and days searching for those models that - for you - hit the fan - things seems to fade out. Oh, even if you get those four updates each day - everything seems to get more and more repetitive.

BUT still:
This is the place for collectors of fine nude photosets - AND the quality is getting better and better.
Those 5616x3744 high resolution sets are some of the best quality I've seen anywhere - if your're really hooked on those nude top-photosets, this is it.
The best thing about this photodeal here is, that MetArt are getting more and more new photographers - and even if some of the sets can be that repetitive, the variation is better now that the last time I was here some 9 months ago.

Even if the search might be teasing now and then - even for the experienced PU - there's help:
I like the way all (or most) sets have the choice of biography/full cover view/low/mid/high res AND inside the scene you get the choice of this models other sets - a fine plus.

The videos are the same old problem: not very erotic, not very sexy - maybe even boring.
Very Strange - since also MetArt are going for more videos now.
The quality was BAD in the start - it's getting better - but still: forget about the clips here - and even for this video-freak I join only because of the photos. AND, btw: Some newer videos (Evelyn P - 2010/04/13) are - again - in low quality - WHY?
For outside US PUs you'll get a higher price when trying to join the TBP $ 19.95-deal.
But if you write the webmaster, you'll get a link to that special price - I did - and it took about 12 hours to get the link - MetArt cares about their customers - it seems.

Even if I also this time only stay on for a month (and save maybe 20-25 sets, only), I'll certainly be back later this year...

And a final bottom line: Compared to a lot of shitty sites out there: you can always rely on MetArt - no con here.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:14:54 PST

Met Art (7)

01-03-10 08:14pm

REVIEW = 85 by squirrel (6)

Pros:
Enormous content.

High-resolution JPEG files.

Files have unique file names.

Navigation is simple and effective.

Cons:
HUGELY over-rated by TBP.

WAAAY too "arty-farty."

Do you REALLY need half a million pictures of skinny, flat-chested girls standing on the beach, or in some other outdoor location?

Files named by photographer, not by model.

Bottom Line:
I'm just days away from ending a year-long subscription. As others have said, there is a huge amount of non-erotic content. Really, truly, there is probably something in the neighborhood of half a million pictures of "naked girls standing on the beach" -- just hundreds, if not thousands, of sets with nothing more close-up or erotic than a girl just standing there.

Then there are "prop shots" -- if you see a girl standing there holding a bunch of flowers or an orange ball or whatever, you can rest assured that EVERY SINGLE PICTURE in the set will prominently feature that prop.

And so on.

This is "arty-farty" nonsense. And there are TERABYTES of it.

Yes, there is plenty of "good stuff," too. Terabytes of it, too. Your job -- and it will be a substantial amount of "work" -- will be to sort through it all.

The bottom line for me was that I could skip over half or more of the sets, and still walk away with thousands of sets of really good-quality photos. It was just disconcerting, at first, to go through set after set after set of non-erotic "girls standing on the beach" stuff, before I finally found something worth keeping.

Naming sets by the photographer is nonsensical, except that you could use them to sort out the arty-farty photographers from the ones who actually comprehend why people like us pay money to subscribe to sites like these.

Finally, the sheer volume of stuff is just astonishing. It's very easy to fill up a 1-terabyte drive. And it must constitute something beyond a million images, just speaking about the pictures. Choose what you download with care!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:30:06 PDT

Met Art (7)

07-07-09 08:30pm

REVIEW = 92 by oogles (9)

Pros:
+ sets the standard for quality of photos and beautiful women
+ video content
+ frequent updates (a few new sets every day)
+ women are natural: no fake breasts!!!!
+ photos look like a REAL PHOTOGRAPHER took them, not just some creep with a brand new camera
+ models really pose well (no 'deer in headlights')
+ no insertions - personally, I want to see the beautiful women being themselves, not pretending to be turned on with some ridiculous toy
+ MUCH higher quality than typical American porn sites

Cons:
+ most recent models are completely shaved (might not be seen as a con for all)
+it's not very 'artistic' in terms of model poses. Erotic is more accurate (this could be seen as a pro, but the name of the site implies artistic)
+ navigating is rough although search helps, but it's kind of an outdated search system
+ would like to see a little more ethnic diversity. Yes eastern european woman are hot, but other ethnicities are very much under represented.

Bottom Line:
A bit pricey, but worth it. At least for a few months. I have been a member 3 times. After letting my membership lapse for a few months (because I've already been through all the content) I have been going back for more.

If it's your first time, grabbing the year subscription is worth it, but if you've been a member before, take the shorter term or you might be bored.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:45:02 PDT

Met Art (7)

06-19-09 07:45am

REVIEW = 90 by fortherecord777 (0)

Pros:
The content!!!! Is excellent can't say enough of good about it. Its not over the top or trash in anyway. It has a good artistic presents and control. You can see the people involved are very good and maintain a very good consistency from model to model. I like the fact they have movies with the girls and the updates.

Cons:
I do not particularly like shuffling through the massive content database. I have been a long time member and seen a lot. I wish there was a better way to navigate.
The movies addition was great when it happened but now with other sites upping the game in quality, speed, and support its just not good enough. Don't get me wrong they work but often I experience too much buffering and diminishing quality. I don't think it hurts this site at all considering the image gallery is why we all go there in the first place.

Bottom Line:
The best artistic non hardcore gallery collection on the web. If you are expecting to get videobox out of this you are way off and should give it a try anyway. This site has kept me coming back for years.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 10 May 2009 15:56:18 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-10-09 03:56pm

REVIEW = 95 by zzzins (11)

Pros:
+ Features just about the most gorgeous girls on the planet....naked!!! How does that work?!?
+ Huge resolution photo sets
+ Great download manager support with no connection limits
+ All pic sets available in 3 different sizes - all zipped
+ Nice favourites, voting, and model index system
+ Very regular updates
+ Good value for money
+ enormous back catalogue

Cons:
- Some videos are poor (not all though by any stretch)
- No explicit content - a lot of the girls don't even spread :-(
- Like to keep everything? You'll need a few Terabytes of HDD lying around

Bottom Line:
In my eyes the best picture based, non hardcore site on the internet. No question worth the monthly subscription (currently $30 per month, $60 for 3 months or £100 for a year) - 4 updates a day (usually all photo sets but around 10 video updates per month instead of photo setse) - first day of the month is 6 updates.
The site is not explicit, there are no BG sets or insertions of any kind. The odd GG set is tame and not really worth the bother. The real strength of this set is the quality of the models. You know the sort of girl you see in magazines (the sort of girl that doesn't exist in real life - they're just too perfect)? The sort of girl you could never hope to get to first base with let alone any further. Well - Met Art is a strike for the normal guy - a chance to see what these perfect creatures are really like. What's going on under the clothes of a girl with movie star looks. Why these girls take their clothes off for money I have no idea - there's hardly a girl on the site that couldn't earn a perfectly good wage just modeling fully clothed!!

There's a pretty steady influx of new talent too - it's not like they've got a few top quality models to strip and stuck with it - rearely a week goes by without some new knockout talent appearing. And I cant' remember a day going by without at least one new photoset being worthy of...well...worthy of Met Art earning their money from me!!!

The site is quick to navigate with full thumbnails of everything and a full archive going back further than most of us have hard drive space for. Each model is fully indexed so - sea a girl you like? You can easily find all the rest of her content.

The servers are quick and there are no download limits - I set use FDM to run 4 connections and get very few connection issues. Just as well - there's currently around 1Gb new content every single day!

Only slight niggles:
-Video content is often just video of the photoshoots and if not - is often a little too arty for my taste - lots of quick jump edits.
-I'd like a little more info on the models - maybe some interview reels. Most models have a small bio text file but they are VERY short and not really that informative in most cases.
-There's maybe a little too much airbrushing at times but this site is all about perfection so I'm not one to complain about the webmasters going that tiny bit further to float my boat.

I can't recommend this site enough - if you're into art shoots then you'll already be a member, have been a member or have been living in a cave for the last 10 years. If you're into harder stuff then maybe this shou;dn't be you're primary site but...hey...we ALL like beautiful girls yes? They don't get any more beautiful than on Met Art.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:17:26 PDT

Met Art (7)

04-07-09 12:17am

REVIEW = 93 by exotics4me (431)

Pros:
- My new favorite of the picture heavy sites, TBP price of $19.95 is a bargain, as is the year deal of $99.99.
- 4 updates per day
- There could be bigger, but the biggest resolution I'm seeing right now is 3744x5616, all sets are zipped.
- Amount of content is overwhelming, more than I have been able to go through in 3 months.
- After much thought, I consider the lack of many movies a pro. The movies they do have rarely compare to the photo sets.
- Movies are high quality technically and come in DIVX, QT H264, IPOD, WMV and MPEG.
- Navigation is pretty simple to use considering the amount of content.
- DL speed uses about 98% of my max speed

Cons:
- Movies to me are not worth downloading, and if they didn't post them, I wouldn't complain.
- Hard to believe, but some of the g/g sets to me take away from the solo sets.
- If you like anything that has to do with penetration, even solo, this isn't the site for you and wasn't for me a few years ago.

Bottom Line:
Back when I first reviewed Met-Art, I gave it an 80. I felt at that time, I was being nice with that score. If nothing else, the 80 was my way of saying at least everything is high quality and they update consistently.

Things have changed, I hadn't been a member in a year. I joined again and it was like a whole new world opened up to my perverted eyes. There still are sets that I find annoying, poses for example, but I'm finding much more to like now than I did two years ago.

The models range from typical slim models to average weight and bust. There aren't many Daisy DDDD cups here.

I think my change in how I look at this site came about when on a forum of a well-known Euro photographer, I read a post by him that said his sets when viewed told a story and that "some people don't get that story". I looked at Met-Art's sets that way and now will be joining for a year as soon as my monthly subscription runs out.

The resolution size of the pictures is huge. Those high 4000s images are almost like looking at a map! You scroll sideways or up and down and those are really amazing to look at in that much detail.

It probably didn't hurt that I developed myself a crush on Lidiya A and probably 30 other models. Including some of my longtime favorites like Zafira, Eve, Aneta.

My cons for this site are limited to things that I think could/would be cons to others. The videos are photoshoots or biographies/interviews. These are also quite large files. I downloaded one a few days ago that was 500 MB+, and it was nothing more than videoing the photoshoot. I also think the g/g sets are not near as good as the solo sets, though I haven't seen them all.

I am seeing more variety in their models than I had noticed in my earlier review and that helps me add the points to this re-review.

The search feature can be a hassle, at least for me, I'm not real specific in my searches, so I end up with hundreds of results, that is probably more my fault, but I don't know any of the set filenames, so how would I know what to search for using that function? In time, I would guess the search will be more functional for me as I get used to the site and its filenaming.

The locations are usually only second to the models in beauty also. I did run into a few blurry pictures here and there, but I'm not really complaining.

I had thought about sending their webmaster an email to ask a question, but haven't yet, so I don't know how their customer service is. To give an example of how much content there is, my question was going to ask who the model is in the thumbnail over "Your Profile", she is brunette, white lacy top opened to the middle and looks to be a matching skirt. I thought it was Zafira, but it isn't. So, I'm stuck looking through every model's page at the covers, hoping to find out who she is.

To me, that is a credit to how large the site is and how much content they have, add the very high quality and I have a new favorite photo site, recommended!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:34:10 PDT

Met Art (7)

03-27-09 04:34am

REVIEW = 96 by nutcrackr (8)

Pros:
-Fantastic models
-Varied photographers
-Crisp Clear images
-Large sets
-4 daily updates
-Many new models
-Sensual poses and vibrant sets
-Continual improvements in models and average quality
-Superb Lighting
-Create Galleries
-Re-rate artists and models
-Amazing Value

Cons:
-Recent Majoly (artist) sets
-Some boring videos
-Occasional quality lapse
-Met-cam models moved to private cams
-PSP videos low res

Bottom Line:
The best artistic nude website online, there is no competition for Met-Art because they are easily in a league of their own. The reasons for this are an absolutely huge amount of archived sets and huge collection of models. New models are regularly added with increasing quality. New models that get rated highly are very quickly brought back for follow up photo shoots (usually 2 more). Completely amazing website, one you should check out as you have probably stumbled upon many great sets from them anyway.

Photo quality in the website is extremely good with models, artist and locations being of high standards. Artistic and photo quality is excellent, artists like Voronin and Ingret are masters at lighting and produce superb sets with wonderful colour contrast along with clear high megapixel photos. The actual set locations are great and varied on their own, although there is some reusing of set location there is usually a fair gap between those updates. Models are very attractive but of course people have different likes and dislikes and Met-art has the huge range to cater for anybody. I think there is plenty of variety for new models also.

The site does have a few minor negatives including movies and some artistic �choice�. Movies themselves are up and down, quality is fairly good but content varies from sexy to sterile. In some cases watching videos of existing photosets can be a bad thing. Other times videos are very nicely put together, some videos you can hear the sound of the camera clicking and the artist speaking and this may put off some people who prefer music, although many include music. Older videos tend to be sexier and racier. Another very big issue currently is the artist Majoly who seems to be bringing the quality of the site down, his recent works appear as if he has taken some shots of attractive models in good locations and then passed them through a very aggressive Vaseline filter making them look awful, thankfully most artists are not like this.

Content on the site is almost beyond quick description. There are so many great sets in the archives dating back almost 10 years. They will post up a preview of the four updates coming for the next day. You can rate on each model and each artist and then change your vote at a later stage, which I do quite a bit. There is a brief bio for the model which I think is sufficient, more community feedback, such as commenting on sets or voting on upcoming sets is something to look at. After a year with this site I still check it daily for content. It�s very much worth a yearly membership, especially considering the huge amount of existing photos you may need to download. I�ve still got hundreds of models to rate and I try to rate every new set, which again emphasizes the content and introduction of new models, 39 new models in January 09 alone. Its amazing value and I will continue to subscribe given what I have seen in the past year. I�m glad to be a subscriber.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:26:28 PST

Met Art (7)

02-23-09 11:26am

REVIEW = 85 by GCode (99)

Pros:
- Highest resolution pictures I've ever seen.
- Free public web cams.
- Exclusive content.
- Great navigation.
- Model info.
- Daily updates.

Cons:
- Videos are sub-par in content.

Bottom Line:
What can I say, this site is huge and very popular. The models are plenty and they have such great resolution. However, I want to start with some quirks I have.

Once again, the models range from perfect 10's to lower #'s. However, I've not found a model on the site that didn't have a quality that was totally unattractive. But, you are getting exactly what the site claims it is, showing beauty through camera work. The pictures range from indoors, outside on a beach, in snow, to in a forest. The camera work is superb and the scenery can be breathtaking. But, you have to enter this site knowing you are getting he soft of the softest. I am a lover of softcore and pictures but a lot of these pictures are just too soft for me. Now I know that this is exactly what the site is, I have to state this for others who may be expecting otherwise. You will get girls that are totally naked, even pussy shots, but they are never gonna open that pussy up for you to look at. So, go in to this site knowing you are gonna see a lot of sealed lips :)

The videos range from sub par quality to great hd. However, I almost find the videos pointless. They are videos of the girls doing their photo shoots or just sitting in water naked or dancing around. Rarely will you see a video as a 'strip tease just for you'. Once again, I see the vision that this site has as being a showcase for beauty rather than lewdness but a nice striptease would be great.

The public web cams that are free are great. You can also join private ones at an extra charge. This is a great addition to the site and I can see this as being a main reason to stay with them.

The site navigation is great. Everything is easy to find with a model index which includes info for most. Everything is is in zip format with 3 resolutions, and all of these are still great quality in appearance.

Overall, this site is great for showcasing beauty of younger women. Just remember, the beauty of these women comes through extreme softcore.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:44:02 PST

Met Art (7)

02-07-09 01:44am

REVIEW = 87 by elephant (47)

Pros:
My pros are the vast amount of material, updates galore. The quality of the models is great as theres so many hot women on the site. I liked the free cam, saw one of my fav girls on there Ashanti and chatted with her so that was worth the membership fee alone. chatted with lots of other really cute girls and loved the clean chat rules they have, makes a change and just had a nice feel to it with respecting the model more. Like the search engine feature too.

Cons:
Can be a little boring after a while as lots of sets very repetitive. Don't like the met-models site been seperate as there was certain models sets I didn't get to see as on that site, but hey I could always join that site in the future I guess. Movies were just ok in my view, some nice ones but mainly a little boring.

Bottom Line:
Overall its a great site and still the best of its kind in my opinion, you want cute softcore pics, this is the place to be. Its really come on navigational wise since I was last here a few years ago and updates and fast and furious. I like vids to much to stay a member but made a nice change and got some great sets and discovered some new stunners I'd never seen before which was really nice. I recommend it for your fix of cuties that could be supermodels and finding the real cuties is fun. Maybe wish it was so vast though, never thought I'd complain a site was too big but it just became slightly frustrating trekking through the huge numbers of sets to try and get all I wanted in 1 month, only managed half, so will join again in the future to get the rest.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:41:32 PST

Met Art (7)

01-28-09 02:41am

REVIEW = 83 by propaGhandi (5)

Pros:
· pioneers in nude-art online
· over 700,000 photos
· 610 movies (no hdv)
· 4-7 updates a day
· 1300+ models (primilary teens)
· 120 photographers
· cam-shows

Cons:
· promising covers but average photography
· flip-book styled sets
· site design inflicts browsing experience
· popups are oldschool
· no hdv movies
· can turn into a daily routine

Bottom Line:
Met Art has become a drowning fat mama with a belly full of luscious teens doing softcore only.

If you do not care about boring flip-book style photography or seeking for a specific girl's contents, you're at the right place.

The girls are super but the site itself had frustrated me. A proper redesign and the usage of common technologies would increase the browsing experience drastically.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:21:30 PST

Met Art (7)

01-16-09 03:21am

REVIEW = 86 by bacardiancoke (22)

Pros:
- Extensive collection of sets
- Excellent video quality
- Good choice of pic quality (recent galleries 36 MP+)
- Good range of photographers
- Excellent quality of models (although everybody will have their favourite.)
- Simple navigation
- No DRM
- Good search function
- Good download speed
- Sticks to its principles

Cons:
- Model bios could be a little more detailed
- Perhaps the general theme of the videos could move away from the shoot environment?
- Larger sets are repetitive (almost identical pics one after the other)
- Splitting a single shoot over 3 or more sets is a bit of a con.

Bottom Line:
Will it get your dick hard? Well, if you are a red-blooded hetero man (or bi/gay woman) who appreciates the beauty of teen glamour modelling, then YES, it will.

Will you be cracking one off to it? Well, if you are of a very limited sexual experience, maybe, otherwise no.

Art is the best way of describing it. As a site it really does celebrate beauty of the female form (although in a very biased way) and you will spend a lot time simply staring (and probably wishing that you had these girl's number!!!!!)

You will come away with a renewed perspective of how beautiful women are.

Be warned though, if you are looking for something to wank off to, you are in the wrong place!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:11:19 PST

Met Art (7)

12-11-08 11:11am

REVIEW = 90 by eightinches (1)

Pros:
The buzz on this site is correct. I'm not particularly a fan of hardcore porn I like hot naked girls. The photography on this site is 5 star. The girls are amazing. You could surf this site everyday for a year and not see everything.

Cons:
I like big boobs and most of these girls while gorgeous are not well endowed. So my score docks them for that. But thats my purgative you might not feel the same why I just want to note that.

Bottom Line:
I haven't found a better deal online it was less than $20 for the month.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:29:22 PST

Met Art (7)

12-09-08 06:29am

REVIEW = 90 by roadie (11)

Pros:
Huge selection of models far too many to get through in one month. So they have helped you chose with sections such as best of Met and an advanced search with 12 search options.With such a huge choice there really has to be something for everyone no matter what your taste.
Models have generally multiple photosets with pictures ranging from high 3328x4992
to low resolution around 768x1024
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model and you get usually 4 updates per day including regular additions of new models.
Movies are streamable and downloadable in a number of options including ipod,Divx, mpeg,real player. With the recent movies being of a much better quality than when I was a member 1yr ago and are now generally HQ 1280x720
There is also a free cam section which is worth a mention but cant comment as I have yet to check it out.

Cons:
The Cons and where they lost the 10 points.
I was amazed at the difference in the quality of the photo sets from one photographer to the next with complete sets ruined with grainy and soft photos. As an example one great model VALENTINA A has a photo set NASCOSTA BY INGRET which is 9th Dec 2008 and the photo quality is terrible. Most photos are soft, grainy and lack sharpness. Compare this to the same model VALENTINA A SPLASH BY RYLSKY 25/10/08 and VALENTINA A
SPRINKLE BY RYLSKY 25/01/07 where the sets are of a much higher quality and so much sharper. You would think quality would improve as time went by yet earlier sets are in some cases much better than the updates and this is not the only example there are many more. Personally I would rather see less updates and maintain the quality. I did of course send them an email but it was never answered. The movies as mentioned are HQ but can be pretty boring and are really a movie of the photoset.

Bottom Line:
Bottom line I had hope after rejoining a year later things would have improved but the photo quality of some photographers has never been addressed and I will wait some time before considering rejoining.
Otherwise it still has one of the largest photo sets to choose from and deserves to be in the top 10 though not necessarily as high as their current rating. They really need to address the quality of some photographers and if they don't sites such as torridart will soon start to give them serious competition as they grow in size and develop their photo sets.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:21:07 PST

Met Art (7)

11-14-08 01:21pm

REVIEW = 97 by lk2fireone (116)

Pros:
Best site on Internet for softcore European models.
Huge selection of models.
Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on
any porn site.
Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site.
Most models have multiple photosets.
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model.
The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site).
With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day.

For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates.
They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models).
Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls).

Cons:
Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls.
Sorry, but that disappoints me.
The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching.
The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site.
This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother.
Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all.
The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it?
Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use.

Bottom Line:
If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain.

This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as:
metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets.
hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art.
domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No
livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:37:23 PST

Met Art (7)

11-13-08 01:37pm

REVIEW = 97 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-outstanding model selection
-large amount of photographers
-models from many diffrent countries
-very good updates(normaly 4 or 5 sets each day)
-site has been doing very good with viedos lately
-no download limits
-photo sets average around 140 pics often more
-models often dont start off nude which makes sets more interesting
-some sets have very artistic look
-most sets have many good shots of the model from various angles
-there is now model info got added sometime in 2008
-huge ammount of pictures something around 600,000 total!
-good amount of models of diffrent bulids, skinny,large breasted,many diffrent skin tones, many models have very nice butts
-for me the site has very fast servers and I have used it on dial-up as well as DSL connections

Cons:
-not all models have a bio yet
-due to there being so many models one that you like may not appear very often
-site layout can be confusing at first
-some viedos are filmed photosets
-cost of site much higher if you pay the monthly cost of $29.95 or $359.40 after a year compared to $99.00 for a year or $8.25 a month.

Bottom Line:
I feel that MET-ART is the best errotic art site on the net. It has the most to offer over any other simular site namely in sheer number of models and cost(if you pay the $99.00 yearly fee).I have been a member of FEMJOY,DOMAI,HeargeArt,and MC Nudes. All of these sites are very good as well but MET-ART is the one that keeps me most happy.AS I said in the cons the site can be a little confusing layout wise but to me its not really a big deal because MET-ART provides what I really like(errotic art) in spades.Another con would be that some viedos are just filmed photosets though I think this is more the artists choice than the sites saying. One artist GONCHAROV has outstanding films that are purely films and there is no camera(photographic)work going on the model is simply moving around as GONCHAROV films. Another con is that sometimes a model may only pose one time and never appear in another set however this quite rare and there are so many models that you are likely to have many favorites and most likely there will be a model that you enjoy pretty much everyday.I see that some people con the site for lacking masturbation ect. I dont agree with this it is not the aim of the site.Masturbation is more like true pornagraphy while MET-ART is errotic art to me those are two diffrent things.This site is for the person with a "sensual" eye one that is most pleased by the female form but not by a direct sexual act. The number one con to me is the pricing. The basic monthly fee adds up to $359.40 if you kept the account open for a year. It is best to try the site for a month and if you like it buy the $99.00 full year fee which ends up being $8.25 a month or the 90 day fee which is cheaper than paying the monthly fee at a higher price for the same timespan. My best advice is to try several errotic sites and find the one that most satisfiies your personal taste. That way you have tried some that you think you like and pick the best one much like when you buy a new car test drive.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:34:20 PDT

Met Art (7)

09-29-08 05:34am

REVIEW = 85 by asmith12 (124)

Pros:
+++ beautiful locations
+++ VARIETY of beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ professional photography
++ variety of outfits
++ free cam
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ convenient navigation

Cons:
-- too much difference between cover page and gallery contents (see explanation below)
-- mood of some models can be better
-- movies are just recording of photoshoots
- resolution selection is not preserved
- obsession with bandwidth for movies (6Mbit/sec WMV is too much for me)
- lack of search

Bottom Line:
I've decided to join Met-Arts mostly because of cover pages of their daily issues, and those are pieces of art, really. But what really surprised and quite disappointed me was that inside their galleries feel quite different from the cover page. Met-Art doesn't "cheat", and "cover" is from the same gallery, but overall feeling is still VERY different. Sure, everybody selects the very best shot for cover page, but IMHO Met-Arts kind of contrast between cover and gallery itself is unusual both for paper magazines and web sites. Fortunately, Met Art has archives and IMHO back in 2006 and earlier this difference WASN'T THAT BIG. In general, I liked old galleries MUCH better. It's both good and bad to know, as on one hand, it means I can find galleries I like more, on the other hand, means that quality of Met-Art galleries (from my subjective perspective) goes downhill :-(.

Another thing that bothered me (and which isn't present on "covers") is mood of the girls. Granted, they're REALLY beautiful, but it is quite clear from the pictures (and videos) that most of them are just doing pretty boring job; I don't mind what they really think, but when it becomes obvious on the picture, then IMHO something is wrong. And again, this wasn't that much of a problem as late as in 2007.

In addition, I shall say that I'm not fond of picture sizes like 3328x4992: I never print such pictures, I don't have monitor that large, and don't think I will ever get one in foreseeable future (monitor with 4992 HEIGHT? even if such a beast exists, I'm afraid even to think how much it costs). I obviously don't mind about such pictures as long as Met-Arts provides lower resolutions, but I don't consider such HUGE pictures as an advantage too. But one thing calls for improvement, and it is that if I've selected "Mid-Res" once, then ALL the galleries shall start to be shown as "Mid-Res" (now they still default to "Hi-Res").

Bottom line: Met Art is one of VERY few sites on the Net with potential to make erotic ART, but unfortunately it (IMHO) doesn't realize this potential. Also I had a pretty hard time rating it, so to do it, I've compared how much I enjoy it with another softcore site I've recently joined - VirtuaGirlHD (I know it's apples and oranges, but I don't have any better reference). And IMHO MetArt's old galleries are about on par with VirtuaGirlHD (88), and recent ones are significantly lower, about 82, so I've took average (85) as an overall rating.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:43:05 PDT

Met Art (7)

06-15-08 07:43am

REVIEW = 96 by Mr Fountain (50)

Pros:
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin.

Cons:
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times.

Bottom Line:
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.

I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.

I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.

I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..

I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 29 May 2008 18:09:37 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-29-08 06:09pm

REVIEW = 91 by Wittyguy (83)

Pros:
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM

Cons:
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy

Bottom Line:
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.

I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.

As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.

Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 23 May 2008 17:20:25 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-23-08 05:20pm

REVIEW = 90 by careylowell (17)

Pros:
Top of the line glamour photography...this ct from someone whose been working as a photographer for 22+ years. Some shooters used their real names...try to find that on an American site.

Cons:
With notable exceptions, models tend to be under-fed, size one types.
Just a few non-Whites featured.

Bottom Line:
Remains The Site for soft-core.
Not for those searching for ethnic flesh.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:17:34 PST

Met Art (7)

01-10-08 06:17am

REVIEW = 96 by Denner (227)

Pros:
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam

Cons:
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.

Bottom Line:
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.

As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.

The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!

I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.

It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:01:59 PST

Met Art (7)

12-15-07 02:01am

REVIEW = 98 by jd1961 (95)

Pros:
- High Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Videos, NO DRM
- Beautiful Models
- Endless Amount Of Material
- Very Frequent Updates
- 14 Hours Free Webcam Per Day
- Favorites Folder With Rating System
- Fast Downloads
- No Download Limits

Cons:
- Original Met-Art Sets No Longer Archived
- Some Photo Sets Are Bland

Bottom Line:
This site has really sold me with it's high quality material and very frequent updating. You get 4 brand new sets per day to go along with the massive archive. Photos come in 3 sizes (Roughly 3000+, 2000+, 1024) available in fast downloading zip files corresponding to each size. So many beautiful naked models that not one stands out amongst the bevy of girls. Most Erotic Teens has stepped beyond the strictly teen genre in recent years, but there are no hags here. Some of the sets are nothing but bland statue posing by model wannabees, but with such a wealth of material, it's no big deal to skip past these. As of this review, Met has about 90 videos, the newer ones available in divx, wmv, mpeg, quicktime, mp4 and ipod files. The divx are 1280x720 in size, the wmv 720x576. Naked girls with no hardcore to be seen is what these videos are about. They have a high quality webcam with 7 two hour shows daily where you can chat about anything but sex with the naked girls if you are into that. Unfortunately, the oldest original Most Erotic Teens photo sets are no longer archived here, these are collector's items now. Met-Art is what every porn site should aspire to be. Attractive, erotic, interesting, fun to use, interactive with a bottomless well of material.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:27:34 PST

Met Art (7)

12-14-07 07:27pm

REVIEW = 95 by cblodg (9)

Pros:
+ Very glamorous
+ Tons of picture sets
+ Multiple sets of models
+ Excelent photo quality
+ Navigation is good

Cons:
- Pricy (but well worth it)
- Video quality can be poor
- Many videos are just of the photo shoots
- Often times there will be radio music in the background, but this applies to the previous con.

Bottom Line:
If you're looking for class, then you've found it in MET-Art. This is one of the classiest sites (if not the most classy) on the net! You'll pay a good amount, but its well worth it.

Some of the hottest models around, and not just one or two photo sets, but many of the same the model. The video can be sketchy at times, but the site really isn't about video; its about gorgeous girls being professionally photographed for your viewing pleasure

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:46:20 PST

Met Art (7)

12-10-07 03:46pm

REVIEW = 93 by PosterDude (14)

Pros:
+ Best site in class of glamore
+ High quality photography
+ Pictures in different sizes and zip packs for download
+ Very pretty models
+ Lots of Daily Updates
+ 3 image sizes for download � small, mediem, large
+ good wed design

Cons:
- Videos are boring
- No hardcore or even no spreading
- No response on emails
- Girl-girl photo and video has no sex touching
- Inconsistent shoot quality, photographers not equal
- No information about model
- Small browse pictures should start with lo-res first

Bottom Line:
This is one of few sites I keep constant membership. It is best site on internet for glamore. Photos much better over videos. Videos of dancing and strip tease always to soft and get boring. Site has slowly shown more vagina but still no spreading and always leaves me wanting to see more explicit of model.

I email site with question and do not get emails back. Site used to have to many European girls only but now has more American girls to, that is good. I have joined other glamour sites that try to copy met-art but none beet this site.

Some photographers at Met-art make very good sets and some are not so good sets with blurry and graney pictures. They have good photographers and some bad photographers. They have very nice very large pictures, but sometimes larger pictures show quality weekness of some photographers. Also some photographers sets have no variation that model only stand hole set or model only sit hole set which is not good. I want to see odder poses. Please understand my bad English.

They should do glamore with more open vagina. Hair on vagina is nice but not hair by vagina lips and sometime model never show vagina. To girl sets should have girls touch more and kiss and spread more like real life girls do. It can still be glamore and sexy. Model pages do not give information about model that makes them seem distant and cannot touch.
Best glamore site but not perfect.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:02:01 PST

Met Art (7)

11-18-07 03:02pm

REVIEW = 90 by roadie (11)

Pros:
Excellent quality for the price.
Huge database of very sexy models.
Easy to navigate.
Regular updates.

Cons:
I was a little disappointed in the quality of some of the higher resolution pictures which seemed soft or in some cases to contain grainy elements.
Too many fully shaved models I prefer to see more trimmed or unshaven.

Bottom Line:
Well deserves a top 10 place but not sure it should be ahead of some of its rivals such as Hegre

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 03:14:28 PDT

Met Art (7)

07-28-07 03:14am

REVIEW = 80 by exotics4me (431)

Pros:
- Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month!
- Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end.
- Videos are now HD quality 1280x720
- Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99
- Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else

Cons:
- Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases.
- As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking.
- You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs
- With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks.

Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more!

One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli.

I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased.

Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:14:57 PDT

Met Art (7)

07-21-07 04:14pm

REVIEW = 95 by Schnitzel (29)

Pros:
-Excellent value with yearly option.
-Unlimited downloads.
-No DRM.
-Supports download managers (actually incourages use of them).
-Has great respect for models.
-Huge amount of models, all appear to be 18 and are extremely attractive.
-High definition videos.
-Multiple daily updates.
-Super quality pictures.

Cons:
-Not that many videos.
-Browsing site can be slow (but downloads are fast).
-Some navigation issues (can be hard to find all of a certain models content).

Bottom Line:
Firstly I'd like to say I'm not going to deduct anything from this site in terms of points or cons because it's a softcore site.
This is made clear by the tour and the name of the site, so anyone who joins Met-Art would be ill-informed if they expect hardcore content.
I joined Met-Art recently, for the first time ever; and based soley on the information available in the FAQ and tour, I took out a yearly membership ($99), and It's one of the best decisions I've ever made.
If you look at my reviews, you'll quickly notice I'm not one to use all caps in a sentence, but I'm going to make an exception here:
ALL THE MODELS ARE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING. THE BEST LOOKING TEENS YOU'LL FIND ON THE NET, PERIOD.
Whilst that was out of character, I needed to make it very clear. The people who run this website strive for quality. All of their content is superb. The photo sets are available in low, medium and high resolution to suit your download speed / hard disk capacity, but the high quality pictures are nothing short of spectacular, and they don't have any watermarks.
There are not as many videos on the site, perhaps around 400 at a guess, and not all of them are in high definition, but are all a pleasure to watch.

I'm now running out of space for this review, but this has to be my favourite site so far.

Heed the con's I noted and then Join this site.
I can't recommend it enough if you like beautiful teens and don't require hardcore content.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:26:28 PDT

Met Art (7)

06-11-07 06:26pm

REVIEW = 85 by RobertJason (2)

Pros:
- 100's of extremely cute, mostly young looking, European teens.
- Large 'magazine style' cover page thumbnails (ala FTV) linking to each set.
- A 'Best Of' section.
- Webcam chats daily.
- Almost every European model has been on here, so you can find your favorites.
- Photo quality/options are amazing.
- Attractive, fun, addicting web interface.
- Huge amount of content, could keep you downloading for months.

Cons:
- No indicator of original resolution for photos. In some sets low-res looks original and hi-res looks fuzzy.
- There is no way to search by set rating or model rating.
- Videos of photo shoots are boring
- No personalities present, most videos have music dubbed over the models.

Bottom Line:
For Hi-Res picture lovers or lovers of beautiful European teens, this site is a 100. Unfortunately, I'm learning that Glamor sites aren't my style, mostly because the girls are not turned on, they are only gorgeous. For video lovers, this site is barely a 60. Forgetting all the details, and nit picking, I've rarely seen such beautiful women photographed at such sexy angles. I can see why this site is so popular for photo lovers. I'd love to see the personalities of the girls, even if they speak in another language, it can be very cute. In many sets, the models get naked within 20 pics, more tease would be nice.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 25 May 2007 04:48:31 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-25-07 04:48am

REVIEW = 80 by 4nic8 (14)

Pros:
5 SETS ADDED DAILY
QUALITY PICS
EASY SITE USE

Cons:
EXPENSIVE
TOO SOFTCORE
VIDS NOT WORTHY

Bottom Line:
IN THE END IT IS NOT WORTH THE MONEY. MOST GIRLS ARE PRETTY, FEW ARE HOT. WAY TOO SOFTCORE. FOR MOST SETS YOU REALLY HAVE TO SPEND ALOT OF TIME OPENING EACH SET TO FIND "PINK" SHOTS. IT'S A GOOD SITE IF YOU LIKE THE PLAYBOY FORMAT. BUT, THEN AGAIN... THAT IS WHAT THEY ADVERSTISE. THEY DEFINETLY STAY TRUE TO FORM. SAVE YOUR $$$, YOU'LL GET MORE SKIN OUT OF A VICTORIA SECRET FLYER.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 25 May 2007 03:22:00 PDT

Met Art (7)

05-25-07 03:22am

REVIEW = 85 by IcemanTC (8)

Pros:
- Most beautiful Teens on the net!
- Great and huge collection!
- Updated daily with more than just one Sets
- Great navigation and browser setup.
- Easy .zip downloads.
- Monster Picture Quality!
- Good voting and favourites tool.

Cons:
- Not all girls show their "privates". Guess just 60% do.
- Movies are a little bit too soft for my taste.
- More search options would be good!

Bottom Line:
After all a great site for those who like pretty teens! The girls are really some of the most beautiful you will find on the net.
The only thing I REALLY rate as a Con is, that not all of the girls show their privates... sometimes I get a little bit frustrated, when I look at the set of a wonderful girl and she hides the best part of her body.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:07:51 PDT

Met Art (7)

04-13-07 07:07pm

REVIEW = 90 by luvIzumi (8)

Pros:
HUGE archive of some of the most stunning "teen" (18+....relax!) photography I've ever seen. The quality of the still photography is reminiscent of David Hamilton. If you're in to this type of stuff, I guarantee you've already seen loads of photoshoots from this site and you'll recognize alot of the models. This stuff is just on a whole different level compared to your average "amateur teen" stuff. One model, Valentina, is an absolute goddess in my opinion and I've never seen her anywhere else.

Cons:
Softcore! Softcore! Nothing but friggin softcore! The so-called "girl on girl" videos are more frustrating than anything else. Beautiful to look at, but you'll be yelling at your monitor after 5 minutes in an effort to get them to do something!

The site navigation will make you angry. No question. Particularly because it's such a huge archive. I left the site feeling like I'd probably missed some really good stuff simply because I couldn't find it.

Bottom Line:
The bottom line is, if you like this kind of photography, there is simply no better place to get it. Just go take a tour of the site. If you find yourself having difficulty breathing, you will NOT be disappointed by the members area. On the other hand, if you find yourself looking for the "anal" section, it's time to move on.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:06:43 PDT

Met Art (7)

04-09-07 05:06am

REVIEW = 80 by Coveboy (3)

Pros:
* Stunning women shot beautifully
* Range of image sizes for each gallery
* Huge number of photos in each gallery
* Regular updates
* Some of the greatest puffy nipple models on the net (A personal fav - Koika)
* Great looking locations to match the women
* Good range of hair and skin tones on the girls
* Great variety of natural breasts on offer

Cons:
* Difficult search and navigation options
* Video seems to be a last minute thought
* Girl/Girl shoots and video extremely softcore
* Some video files are massive (200Mb+)
* Good quality videos take too much trawling to find

Bottom Line:
Met-Art is hard to beat for photos of beautiful women in beautiful locations and each shoot gallery provides plenty of images.
Offers plenty for those with the eye for the erotic rather than hardcore and may not be to everyone's taste.
For stimulation and suggestion rather than hardcore action Met-Art is an internet leader.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:51:00 PDT

Met Art (7)

03-27-07 03:51am

REVIEW = 75 by Kittygirl (11)

Pros:
Stunningly beautiful models
Brilliant and artistic still photography
Sophisticated layout

Cons:
Not particularly user-friendly
No hardcore action (well... I haven't found it, anyway - but perhaps we're getting back to that "not user friendly" issue!!!)
Limited billing options
Videos aren't particularly impressive

Bottom Line:
If you like sexy photography with some great-looking ladies, then this is the site for you (I have to say that Koika is damned HOT!!!) Personally, I like my girls to look like they're enjoying themselves; unfortunately most of these ladies look like they're about to trudge off to a family funeral once the shoot's over.
Have noticed a lot of users (specifically guys) like the live cams, so I can recommend that aspect of membership even though it doesn't do much for me.
All in all, I think there are better sites around - but the beautiful, BEAUTIFUL girls do count for something!

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:25:24 PST

Met Art (7)

03-07-07 08:25pm

REVIEW = 95 by PinkPanther (44)

Pros:
Incredible level of updates - usually 4 per day
Great photography really high quality
Multiple sizes of photos - new option this month gives you small, medium or large - this is great!
Zip downloads available in different sizes as well
Good variety of models increasingly - they seem to have gotten away from the all-waif tendency that they had at one time, though there are a LOT of waifish models
Multiple live cam shows a day (6 most days) with hot MetArt models

Cons:
Their vids often aren't very exciting for my tastes
If you're looking for hard-core, definitely don't expect it from this site.

Bottom Line:
This is a tremendous site for lovers of hot young European models. The people who run this site show a desire to give quality in everything they do, from the volume and consistency of their exclusive updates and their cam shows to the increasing quality of their browsing and download features.

Just this month they added a middle size for viewing and downloading that is just perfect for my tastes and added a "next image" viewing mechanism that I've been craving for a while.
Given that their pricing is not higher than other similar sites, it really makes me wonder how they can do this and others cannot.

Since I don't know when I'll find the answer to that particular question, I'll just keep enjoying this truly fine site.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:16:09 PST

Met Art (7)

01-27-07 01:16pm

REVIEW = 94 by Bacchus (30)

Pros:
*Probably the best teen amateur site on the net
*Every girl is absolutely beautiful
*Tons of European models
*Ability to see pics in very high resolution
*Tons of picture content. It never ends!
*Moderate video content

Cons:
*Video content could be more expansive
*Site can be tricky to maneuver
*Hard core videos would be on my wish list

Bottom Line:
*Hands down the creme de la creme of nubile teen picture sites on the internet today. Their content is constantly being updated and the models are supreme. If you are looking for a vast library of vidoes, you may be disappointed.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply