<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>PU - Nicole Peters - New Reviews</title>
        <description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
        <link>https://www.pornusers.com/review/nicolepeters/</link>
        <copyright>All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.</copyright>
                    <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_83632</guid>
                <title>Nicole Peters Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=83632</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/nicolepeters/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/nicolepeters.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nicole Peters&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/nicolepeters/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nicole Peters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-05-13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:17am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=421&quot;&gt;Monahan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=421&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/nicolepeters/&quot;&gt;Nicole Peters&lt;/a&gt; has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That&amp;#039;s about it for the &amp;quot;Pros&amp;quot; list.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don&amp;#039;t recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It&amp;#039;s conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain&amp;#039;t worth it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is a &amp;quot;throw-in&amp;quot; site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That&amp;#039;s how I became a member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you&amp;#039;ll like Nicole, but as with many &amp;quot;throw-in&amp;quot; sites this one definitely isn&amp;#039;t worth the TBP discounted price of $18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four videos available on the parent site, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt;, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=4879&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nicole Peters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=83632&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=83632&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 10:17:04 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                </channel>
</rss>