Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/fullbush/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_20705 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20705 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fullbush/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/fullbush.jpg" alt="Enter Full Bush" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fullbush/"><b>Full Bush</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 05-30-08&nbsp;&nbsp;09:44pm</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 65</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613">WeeWillyWinky</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613">70</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> - A lot of content on offer.<br /> - Several good pic sets.<br /> - Zips, but see cons. <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> - No browse features, zero, nada (see BL).<br /> - Small pics: 684x1024 is about the largest.<br /> - Site is still updated, but with sets dating from 2004. This is bullshit.<br /> - Zips for each page within sets instead of all in one. As these sets are dinky in size this is also bullshit.<br /> - Vids look lousy in mpeg or in wmv format, and are sliced into three minute bits. Can't tell you the bitrate since my Realplayer program died and Windows media player doesn't indicate it. <br /> - Some sets are also from <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/">Aunt Judy's</a>. <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> Here's the kicker, folks: On the tour you get search options: you can look at the list of models, and/or search by letter. On the member's page, however, you get nothing of the sort. All the member's area offers is a single page with a giant list of text links for both pics and vids. Good luck if, like me, you were planning on searching for the work of a few photographers whose work you admire, or for a few particular models you've always liked. <br /> <br /> What possible reason could there be to include search options in a guest tour and leave them out in the site proper? This is just plain stupid. Stupid or lazy. Or both. Okay, both. <br /> <br /> To add insult to injury, the site is updating with material that is at least four years old, as far as I can see, and the material is NOT high quality. Some sets have been imported from <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/">Aunt Judy's</a> and, I would guess, from other company sites as well. Not much effort has been put into this site and it is far too expensive. <br /> <br /> Some of the material is good enough that I would recommend a membership IF:<br /> <br /> The welcome page sold the site as an unsearchable and dead-plain archive of older and sub-par material, and if the price were cut in half. Short of these two things, <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fullbush/">Full Bush</a> is pretty much a waste of time and money. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=478"><b>Visit Full Bush</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20705">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20705">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Fri, 30 May 2008 21:44:41 PDT