PU - Sexy Babes - All Activity

RE: tangub's Review

Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:46:07 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

11-02-10 09:46am

REVIEW REPLY by BadMrFrosty (42)

To tangub (101):

Just what I wanted to know, thank you muchly :)

View Thread (3)

RE: tangub's Review

Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:30:57 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

11-02-10 09:30am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (101)

To BadMrFrosty (42):

Well using their search engine i was able to establish that out of 376 videos there are 123 B/G hardcore, 55 Lesbian and and 198 solo. In the photos section 360 B/G hardcore, 338 lesbian and 1969 solo.

View Thread (3)

RE: tangub's Review

Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:48:02 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

11-02-10 06:48am

REVIEW REPLY by BadMrFrosty (42)

To tangub (101):

Nice review :)

How much of the content would you say is hardcore?

View Thread (3)

Sexy Babes Comment

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:02:31 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

12-12-09 07:02am

COMMENT by PinkPanther (44)

How Little Does This Site Care?

I've been banging on Babelicious, so I may as well start bashing the mother ship - it's interesting looking through the comments in PU to see the warnings about their secondary sites shutting down with the webmaster quickly saying "Oh, no - that's not happening."

Well, not only did it happen, but their only updates can be found much better elsewhere earlier posted by their main competition.

The only photo update at Sexybabes.tv yesterday was Samantha Ryan's "blue" set - available at 1 size only. This same set was posted as one of 3 photo sets 2 days earlier by Twisty's in a larger size.

How clueless do you have to be to be posting material that's redundant of your competition, put it out later, and put it out in an inferior quality. Plus you have to come up with your own names for each individual pic that you want to save at SexyBabes.tv since they give them such distinctive names as 001, 002, etc.

They can't be bothered doing anything more than licensing the crap and slapping it onto the site.

"Post today's update" - check - time for a beer

Stick a fork in it - it's done!

Visit Sexy Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:05:09 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-13-08 12:05am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Dude. LOL
You said "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
That is you inviting a response, I gave one, I really do not care what others place as review. So nope your reviews means little to those of us whom think highly of a site that you do not, that is correct. What I was asking is details on why you posted it, and you chose to not give one thats your choice yet again, but as a member ppl will ask questions, says so in the review protocols. Something along the lines of individual opinions etc. And nope know one wants to make you change your score.
They want to know why its what it is, the review did d not say enough.
Thats the point, and in closing you asked "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
Loaded lines like that will get a response usually lol.

Enjoy.
Cybertoad.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:20:57 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-12-08 02:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To Cybertoad (77):

More power to you if you love this website. But these websites did leave a bad taste in my mouth because after going thru a lot of other websites that are better quality like ftv, karup, or clubsandy I admit there's a standard of what I am expecting out of a high quality website. When I review websites, I check out content, easy navigation, quality and exclusiveness of material, themes, and what's most important for any consumer do I come out a satisfied customer? As far as I am concern customer satisfaction really went low. I am still keeping my score. What does it matter if I am giving it a bad score? My opinion is not the end all be all for these websites. Let the customers decide if their going to like it or not. I am just giving them a different perspective that is not as cracked up as other people say it is, and that is just IMHO.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:45:35 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-12-08 09:45am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

There are 5 main reason I rated this site as a 90's since you asked why it was rated.

1. Staying power this site and the network have been producing often and regularly along time.

2. Wow awesome models, not just good but consistently knock outs.

3. Good consistent download speeds.

4. Good selection and surfing.

5. Often updates.

I am not sure why you would rate a site that low is my question, wow a 60's for a site that has been consistently pouring out good adult material for years.
I read yours cons, and well they do not say anything in regards of why its lousy?
What speed video are you seeing ?
Site doesn't guarantee exclusive so why is that a con?
And what about navigation do you see difficult.

My take is your review was very short and is why I think others are asking um mm Why a 60's when there is not much you are saying to support that statement. You are entitled to your opinion in the review, but you are gonna see opposition in rating a site this good in the 60's . That means the site is barely usable in your view including the network wow....
But I respect your right to say what you feel about a site I responded because you asked why others rated it high.

So I answered since I gave a 93.
Still stand by it being a 93.

Cybertoad

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:10:22 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-12-08 06:10am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.

And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:18:01 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-11-08 09:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

And I question your addition

Babelicious = 75 (according to you) plus SexyBabes.tv, which you say is a decent site plus other sites in the network = 69?

It's a strange method of scoring a site IMHO

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:14:35 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-11-08 09:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (44):

Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s. But I am respecting their opinions as long as everyone gives me the same courtesy. Anyway I am sticking to my score because I am reviewing these websites as if they were one entity. That is why they are getting a 69 and I am not backing down on my score. After subscribing for years on other high quality pornsites there is a standard and they haven't met that standard at least IMHO.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:52:10 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-11-08 08:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Every member of this forum is, of course, entitled to their own method of scoring a site, but it's hard for me to understand how this network of sites gets a 69 from this user when Babelicious as a stand-alone site would earn a 75, and the user says that SexyBabes.tv is also a worthwhile site - and you get the whole of both sites, not a teaser of one or the other - so I would think that you would then have a base of 75 plus whatever should be given for the addition of SexyBabes.tv - and then you've got some bonus sites as well. It's hard to see that not getting you to 80 at least.

I agree with Exotics that, while you can find stuff in this network that has been posted elsewhere, sometimes in the same week, the higher quality posting of the set is in this network of sites as compared to, say, Twisty's.

The worst thing about this network of sites in my opinion - the navigation between the various sites - the whole thing would be SO much better if they connected it up in a more cohesive way, which they have mentioned as a possibility.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:34:56 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-11-08 08:34am

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To exotics4me (431):

Babelicious isn't bad its the sites that are affiliated with it. I reviewed them together and that's why I said there are only two websites that are really worth your time which were babelicious and sex babes. I have noticed that if you look deeper there are some models like Ember, Swan, Tawney Roberts to name a few on sexy babes.tv that have old footage which are grainy, poor picture qaulity resolution of 320. That is what I meant by lousy footage. I have videos from Sexy Babes for example that I have seen from cyberage.com and their galleries you can get from Karup or ATK. If I was going to review Babelicious on its own it would probably get a 75.

View Thread (9)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:10:48 PST

Sexy Babes (1)

11-11-08 08:10am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.

If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.

View Thread (9)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:00:14 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 11:00am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Denner (227):

Perfect, let's try and see how it goes :-).

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:29:22 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 10:29am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To asmith12 (124):

Good point, bro...
If we all give them a "penalty" - of, yes like 10 points (or whatever) - but something they could "feel" - it's would be a good idea...

Think I'll go with you there - and I'm sure both webmasters and billing-co. will read it...

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:24:56 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 10:24am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Denner (227):

Deal :-). And what do you think about my idea (not sure if you've read it or not) to "penalize" sites with such PRE-CHECKED upsells by deducting, say, 10 points from their ratings (clearly stating that 10 points were deducted for PRE-CHECKED upsell during sign-up)? I'm likely to do it in the future (unless somebody gives me a reason why it's a bad idea), and would like to see more people doing the same thing; I'm not sure, but if webmasters read this site (and at least some do), it MIGHT help.

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:47:56 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 09:47am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To asmith12 (124):

I certainly agree!
And BTW: CCBill has changed their policy towards us non-US users in the currency-matter: same amount equivalent in US-dollars and Euro - and gives me another thumb-up for CCBill - as before. So yes, asmith, let's all vote for CCBill (billing) in the future....

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:01:24 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 03:01am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Denner (227):

But if we shout about it loud enough, don't you think that it could help Epoch (and sites using Epoch) to stop it? After all, if SUBSTANTIAL portion of people will prefer CCBill to Epoch, sites using Epoch will be in disadvantage.

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:09:07 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

10-02-08 01:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To asmith12 (124):

Yes, your're right. It's especially via Epoch.
But then again I always take extra care to look for it when for some reason HAVE to join via Epoch....

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:47:23 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 09:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To badandy400 (103):

> There really is no defense for this practice.
IMHO there are different ways to defend ourselves:
- post BEWARE comments on PU;
- boycott such sites based on the logic that "if site is trying to swindle you one way, they're likely to do it in other ways too";
- MOST IMPORTANT: if hit by such thing, ALWAYS going to your bank and disputing the charge; I was told by banking guy that if some merchant starts to get many disputes, it can become VERY expensive for this merchant, and at some point merchant can even lose his credit card processing license.

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:18:37 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 05:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To asmith12 (124):

When I joined Hustler a while back, one of the very first site I joined, i got hit with this. It was just by chance that I found out that it had happened.

There really is no defense for this practice. It is just a to screw people over when they are all excited to join a site and do not read everything. Seriously though, if I wanted to join the other site they are offering wouldn't go to that site? Or, why not just give access to that site with the membership? Humm...I know....they get more money for nothing this way!

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:32:45 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 11:32am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Denner (227):

> By all means it's certainly NOT only this site but a beware for ALMOST every site.
I don't think that I had ever seen it for CCBill sites, and I think it's ALMOST every Epoch site (that's why I don't normally join Epoch sites, unless they're VERY special). Do you have similar experience?

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:28:32 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 11:28am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Nick C (Webmaster):

At last, webmaster trying to defend this kind of thing, how cute. Then could you please tell us if (as you're saying, I have somewhat different words to describe it) it is "WELL above" and "CLEARLY stated", WHY do you have it PRE-CHECKED?

IMHO there is ONLY ONE possible reason to have such things PRE-CHECKED: to hope that user isn't careful enough and will press "Subscribe" button without noticing it. And please don't tell me it's done "for my own convenience": if I would want to spend another $30/month, I wouldn't care to take another click to join. But other than that, all other explanations are very welcome.

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:45:28 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 10:45am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To asmith12 (124):

I absolutely agree with asmith about the Beware-warning.
By all means it's certainly NOT only this site but a beware for ALMOST every site.
So it's a question of taking a thorough look at every join-page, because most sites now got this PRE-Checked trials - AND as another warning: If you do not take care you risk a sudden full month member-charge after those 2-3 days....

View Thread (12)

RE: BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:43:39 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 09:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To asmith12 (124):

Asmith, yes we do have a pre-checked for another site, but its WELL above the JOIN button and its CLEARLY stated, not HIDDEN.
Just want to make that clear!

View Thread (12)

Sexy Babes Comment

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:08:08 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

09-30-08 09:08am

COMMENT by asmith12 (124)

BEWARE: Pre-checked trial when signing in

When subscribed, I've got PRE-CHECKED "trial" of another site re-billing automatically at 29.95. BEWARE.

Visit Sexy Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Hardcore

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:49:39 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

07-25-08 05:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To zijaanzicht (0):

Thank you very much for your detailed feedback. I like the more edgy part you mentioned. I'll do a review when I join. Thanks

View Thread (2)

RE: Hardcore

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:39:15 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

07-25-08 01:39am

COMMENT REPLY by zijaanzicht (0)

To TheRizzo (23):

Almost equal but this site has slightly better resolution and a little more edgy b/g scenes that are sometimes very rare even for being leased (if applicable).

I personally like this site more than twisties due to the clarity and less compression artifacts often seen in some sets at Twisties. They appear to no longer show if the other sites update (at least to non-members). My guess is NO and they have simplified the site to the flagship sites.

View Thread (2)

Sexy Babes Comment

Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:04:22 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

07-20-08 03:04pm

COMMENT by TheRizzo (23)

Hardcore

Just wondering how much hardcore content Sexy Babe features? For people that have been a member of this and Twistys, how does the hardcore volume compare between the two?

Visit Sexy Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Cybertoad's Review

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:58:14 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

06-17-08 09:58am

REVIEW REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To Cybertoad (77):

Hi Toadmix.. Many thanks for the review!
With regards to the "no response" from the helpdesk, I'm really sorry about that. Can you please send me the ticket number if you still have it so I can investigate. Also if you still have a problem, email at the email listed here and I will personally take care of it for you!

Also there shouldn't be any broken links, but again, please send them to me so I can investigate and fix if need be!

Thanks again for the review, glad you like the site and hope you continue to do so.

Best regards

Nick - Webmaster

View Thread (1)

RE: Sites Shutting Down?

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:18:26 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-18-08 01:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Nick C (Webmaster):

EuroBabez and Dream Babes are back up and running with all the past missing updates now posted. All seems well.

Up do date sites through today:

Babelicious
Sexy-Babes.tv
DreamBabes
EuroBabez

Inactive sites:

BabesUK (last updated in Dec. 2007)
BabesOnFilm
BikiniBabes
CumminAtYa
RoyalBoobs

View Thread (4)

RE: Sites Shutting Down?

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:03:48 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-18-08 07:03am

COMMENT REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To Monahan (37):

Thanks Monahan, the updates are uploading right now :D

View Thread (4)

RE: Sites Shutting Down?

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:52:53 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-18-08 06:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Nick C (Webmaster):

Nick,

Good to hear and thanks for your response on the member forum as well. Hope all goes well as you are getting back up and running.

View Thread (4)

RE: Sites Shutting Down?

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:33:28 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-18-08 05:33am

COMMENT REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To Monahan (37):

NO we are not shutting down.. The updaters computer corrupted and lost all the updates. We have been busy recoving the data and will be putting the updates up later on today!

Thanks

View Thread (4)

Sexy Babes Comment

Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:40:03 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-17-08 11:40pm

COMMENT by Monahan (37)

Sites Shutting Down?

One by one each of the network's primary sites has stopped updates. The first to go was Babes UK, then Dreambabes and EuroBabez. The only sites still updating are Sexy-Babes.tv and Babelicious. It's secondary sites, Bikini Babes, Babes on Film, Cummin At Ya and Royal Boobs ceased updates a while ago.

No announcements at all so perhaps they are just having trouble with their servers. Or perhaps they're going out of business. Uncharacteristically the sites' Webmaster has stopped responding to posts on the Members' Forum as well.

In any case be advised accordingly before signing up.

Visit Sexy Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Gonzo84's Review

Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:35:04 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

06-26-07 01:35am

REVIEW REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To Gonzo84 (5):

Thanks for the review Gonzo!
Sexy babes is almost ready with the new setup.. Just need to get the design completed and we are all set to go :D

View Thread (1)

RE: PinkPanther's Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:56:30 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

06-22-07 03:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by Gonzo84 (5)

To Nick C (Webmaster):

Oooh... A rebuild and beta testing... who gets to test and can it be free??? :-D
I submit my name for being such a good customer over the years... :-D
But seriously, any idea how long this will be? and will you be keeping all the content? (and can you, for the love of all that is holey, get some of the older sets zipped!!!! ;-P)

View Thread (3)

Multiple Site News

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:46:53 PDT

Multiple Sites (10)

06-22-07 10:46am

NEWS by Nick C (34)

Babelicious.com - Now with HD videos!

Yes thats right.. We now have TRUE HD videos inside Babelicious.com featuring out top 10 voted babe GINA!

Members love them and this is proven by the fact that the 2 videos we released of Gina in HD are sitting at no.1 and no.2 in the video top list!

The HD videos are available in 2 versions, as one complete video, and also broken down into multiple parts.

The file format/sizes are as follows :

1280x720 3mb
640x360 2mb

Check out our preview tour to see the some screengrabs from the videos

http://www.babelicious.com/index.php?p=m...d=164&subpage=movies

Also we do have a small sample you can download from our new extended tour.

Here is the link
http://www.babelicious.com/babelicious_videos.html

We are now going to start adding HD videos to Babelicious on a regular basis so If you ever considered joining Babelicious, now is the time to do so :)

See you inside!

Best regards

Nick C
Babelicious.com

View Replies - Add Reply

RE: MrHappy's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 21:00:31 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

05-22-07 09:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To MrHappy (1):

I don't really get the complaint about limited content. This site alone has 5 full photo-set updates and 1 full vid update consistently every week. The archive is also fully available and it pretty dang extensive. The content of the updates tends to be about 1/3 hardcore, 2/3 softer stuff.

Then the fact that it's part of a network of sites means that you're getting multiple updates on most days and at least one update every single day.

That's not terribly limited.

View Thread (2)

RE: MrHappy's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 11:40:11 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

05-22-07 11:40am

REVIEW REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To MrHappy (1):

Thanks for the review. The site are actually different sites, not 1 site split into multiple sites. Each site has its own content that is unique to that site. Anyway, thanks again for your input!

View Thread (2)

RE: PinkPanther's Review

Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:03:15 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-17-07 09:03am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Nick C (Webmaster):

Glad to do so, Nick - I thoroughly enjoy Babelicious!

View Thread (3)

RE: PinkPanther's Review

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:41:09 PDT

Sexy Babes (1)

03-14-07 04:41am

REVIEW REPLY by Nick C (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (44):

PinkPanther, Thanks for taking the time out to review our site, much appreciated.

As you probably are aware, we have noted the navigation niggles on sexy-babes and are currently re-building the complete site so that it functions in a similar way as our newly released Babelicious.com site does.

I'm sure when this is finished, sexy-babes will be taken to a whole new level. It's very exciting! We hope to show you all a beta version for testing as soon as we can!

So thanks again, your comments are valued! Would love you to review Babelicious if you get time!

Best regards

Nick C

View Thread (3)

Multiple Site News

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:36:32 PDT

Multiple Sites (9)

03-14-07 04:36am

NEWS by Nick C (34)

Babelicious is released!

We are proud to announce the launch of our newest and greatest site! BABELICIOUS.COM

We have been working on perfecting this site for many months and it is now finally available for you! The members area runs on an advanced script with many awesome features, feed back from members of our sister site sexy-babes.tv who had beta tested the site was, and is, extremely positive, they love it!

Each photoshoot is available in 3 sizes, up to 4000px. Each pic size is also available in ZIP files and currently we have 2 versions of WMV, 1MB & 2MB. both versions you can a) download or stream in parts or b) download or stream in full

We have categorised EACH photoshoot & EACH video so you can EASILY find what you are looking for with our advanced search funtion.

Each video, photoshoot & model can be voted for which is a great way of showing us what you really like (and dislike!) and you can also interact with us and other members by leaving comments.

Babelicious is updated 7 days per week, and includes FULL access to 8 of our other top rated sites, including Sexy-Babes.tv, Dream Babes, Euro Babes, Babes On Film, Bikini Babes, Babes UK, Cummin� At Ya and Royal Boobs.

Let me know if you have any questions at all!

Best regards

Nick C

View Replies - Add Reply