<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - In The Crack - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23274</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23274</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-10-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4128&quot;&gt;plan b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4128&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Large amount of content&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good visual quality in pics &amp;amp; videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos available up to full 1080p @ 8mbps&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures up to 2000px on the long end with zip downloads&lt;br /&gt;
- Fast, I mean FAST download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple, yet straightforward navigation&lt;br /&gt;
- More frequent update schedule as of July 08&lt;br /&gt;
- Their &amp;quot;tour&amp;quot; allows you to see everything
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very expensive&lt;br /&gt;
- Some pictures cropped to lower pixel resolutions&lt;br /&gt;
- Too much focus on the ass (may be a &amp;quot;pro&amp;quot; for others)&lt;br /&gt;
- No official support for download managers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is my 3rd tour with ITC. I used to buy their videos using their antiquated token system but it got prohibitively expensive. Now that they're all inclusive, I can go back and complete the old video collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you're looking at reviews for this site, you're probably interested in this very unique type of content. Those into &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;artsy&amp;quot; porn need not apply. But if you want nothing left to the imagination, this site is in a world of its own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of models have improved a lot since I was last on their site. But the focus on more professional models means that some of the fresh faces they had in the past aren't likely to crop up again (Rachel &amp;amp; Natasha were my 2 faves).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All their videos are segmented, I didn't list this as either pro or con since everyone will see this a little differently. i.e... I love pissing scenes but not everyone does so it's nice to be able to grab just the videos you're interested in. If you like it all, I've got good news for you. If you have bandwidth, you wont have too many problems downloading the 1080p videos. I routinely saw one megabyte/second avg speeds. A few videos came in _averaging_ 1.8 megabytes/sec which surprised me since that's faster than my connection's theoretical max.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visual quality of videos and pictures are great. My only complaint would be that color saturation tends to be a bit flat in most videos, but some might appreciate the truer, more natural color balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, their &amp;quot;tour&amp;quot; isn't so much a tour. You can actually go in and see all their video/photo shoots with full descriptions of every scene by clicking on the Models link. You just need a membership to access the photos or download videos. What you see is what you get. I wish every site approached acquiring new members this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would make it perfect in their niche? A lower price for one. I think $25/mo is appropriate, even $30 would be acceptable. I'd like to see an even, 50/50 focus on pussy &amp;amp; ass. More clit shots! They have the perfect opportunity to capture what I consider the most elusive view in all of porndom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the high price, I'm letting this one renew.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23274&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23274&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:31:20 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22463</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22463</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-18-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:41pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 94&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;68&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of content available.&lt;br /&gt;
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.&lt;br /&gt;
- Detailed descriptions for each video.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM.&lt;br /&gt;
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.&lt;br /&gt;
- That &amp;quot;fish-eye&amp;quot; lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.&lt;br /&gt;
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Ever imagine what it might be like to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; winking at me on my desktop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can see her eyes too.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22463&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22463&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:41:07 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18414</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18414</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-03-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:01pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3965&quot;&gt;turboshaft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3965&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ CLOSEUP exclusive content! This site lives up to its name&lt;br /&gt;
+ Clear, well-lit photography, w/ newer vids in HD&lt;br /&gt;
+ Hot models (though they certainly don't focus on faces) who get creative: speculums, anal, peeing, toys, veggies...&lt;br /&gt;
+ Photos available to all members, and now, finally, all video as well&lt;br /&gt;
+ Some girl-girl
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Pretty high price&lt;br /&gt;
- More girl-girl needed&lt;br /&gt;
- Closeups this closeup may not be for everyone&lt;br /&gt;
- Took them way too long to drop their token video system&lt;br /&gt;
- Older models have smaller pics
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Love closeup photography? Well, this site is so far in the crack it's practically in the hole; this site takes the genre so far that any closer and these girls' cheeks and lips would be smudging the lens. Their bigger photos (1600x1200, some 2400x1800) are huge, and you can easily end up staring at a crack (or hole) bigger than your monitor, or even real life. You will probably spend a few hours just admiring the pics, or at least getting a detailed lesson on female anatomy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a blessing that they finally dropped their stupid pay-per-view token video system, especially considering the price. The fact that they were doing this for so long - screwing over members who had already paid (and losing potential business) - is probably the biggest reason for not giving them a higher score. I first learned of this site after a friend showed me a video, but I was let down when I found out they were separate from the regular membership. Still, their photography can practically stand on its own, though their vids are also quite entertaining (queefing vags, winking assholes, masturbation, pissing). I personally prefer shorter clips (5-10mins) than longer, boring vids, but it does mean more DLs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think anybody who joins this site already likes this stuff, but there are a few who probably think this is aimed at gynecologists and dermatologists, so it doesn't have universal appeal, but few sites do. For those who do like their porn up close, then this really hits the mark (crack?).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18414&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18414&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:01:18 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17411</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17411</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:34am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 91&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2568&quot;&gt;williamj&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2568&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					When they say In the Crack they mean it!  If your into gyno, in your face closeups of ass and pussy meat you have to tour this site.  These guys worship the ass in both pic's and videos.  If your an ASSMAN your going to love their xxx focus on the ass and shaved cunt.  Nice round and fatty ruby asses. The models are very XXX showing you everything, no holds bar extreme. Hardcore solo masturbation and exhibitionism. The girls lay it all out in the pics and the videos. &lt;br /&gt;
-cunt and ass worshiping; very strong focus on gyno upclose pics and video&lt;br /&gt;
-tons of pictures, three different series of each girl&lt;br /&gt;
-their style of video is unquie, I found the level of eroticism to be excellent&lt;br /&gt;
-the models are a bit older not teenie...great bodies&lt;br /&gt;
-erotic locations, outfits and posing&lt;br /&gt;
-they deliver what the say... Deep In the Crack
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The videos are broken up into parts no option for a complete download.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you like hot wet cunny, girls being totally xxx and explicit, lots of pussy finger and dildoe fucking and spreading gyno wide, lots of lube, nice amount of anal play, pissing, in your face close-ups of hot cunny... stop reading and join...I was a member previously but this is the first time where all the videos are available for downloading.  Top quality porn...they got themselves a hot site. I don't fluff my ratings.  To get a 90+ from me the porn site really would have to impress me.  I only like solo girl or lezzie sites and I have been a memeber of all the top sites in that catagory and I never rated any of them a 90+. In the Crack is my first 90+ and the girls and site deserved it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17411&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17411&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:34:47 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17113</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17113</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-06-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:12pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3313&quot;&gt;Davit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3313&quot;&gt;46&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Lots of rude, rude (I mean RUDE) anal girls&lt;br /&gt;
-Highly original site, quite unlike any other&lt;br /&gt;
-Technically brilliantly shot movies (seriously some of the best filming in porn I have ever seen)&lt;br /&gt;
-Ditto picture sets&lt;br /&gt;
-Movies available in range of download sizes&lt;br /&gt;
-Nice big archive&lt;br /&gt;
-Despite no official support - DMs do tend to work&lt;br /&gt;
-Responsive customer support
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Girls in the movies tend to lack passion&lt;br /&gt;
-Can get a bit repetitive and boring&lt;br /&gt;
-Not too clear on regularity of updates, or when new ones are due&lt;br /&gt;
-Some of the shots are very very close-up - when you see a pussy or asshole filling the entire screen, it can cease to be sexy, and start to look like a biology lesson&lt;br /&gt;
-No long all-in-one movies - but this is not a big prob - the parts are often several minutes and can be loaded into your media player's playlist for one long continual experience&lt;br /&gt;
-Picture sets have lots of near-identical shots, and need some serious pruning.  Many could easily be a third the size, and be better for it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Imagine you have hired a sexy escort girl to come back to your place to give a private show, just for you.  You're sitting back in your chair, and she stands right in front of you.  She turns round, pulls her panties aside, and parts her ass cheeks to give a birds eye view of her tight asshole getting stretched open.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, that is how many of these movies start, and what a way to start!  The girls often progress to striking all kinds of incredibly rude poses, generally focusing on their anuses.  The camera gets in close, and doesn't miss a thing.  Eventually, the girls masturbate, again with much ass play.  Happily, dildos are not overused - you are as likely to see disappearing fingers as you are vibrators and toys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also a few 2-girl sets inc. sensual massage + ass play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside is, the action often seems contrived, moves at a very leisurely pace, and is very repetitive.  The girls are clearly putting on a show for the viewer - which in itself is not a bad thing.  But they never seem to lose themselves in abandoned passion.  It's much more about showing off their bodies and sexual bits - rude exhibitionism, rather than images of girls masturbating and having fun getting off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The picture sets have some amazing individual pics in them - but too often you will get about 9 pics in a row, all close-ups of an open pussy, and its like playing 'spot the difference'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, top marks for originality.  Ass fans should visit this fine site at least once.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UPDATE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have lowered my score from 89 to 80, having had some time to re-evaluate the material.  This is still within the 'very good' range as this is a very original site.  But I find the passage of time since downloading the content has not been kind.  The movies have become boring to me very quickly; I find myself fast forwarding through too many movies to get to an exiting part.  There's just a lack of passion.  Likewise, the photo sets have too much uninteresting filler, and too many near-identical shots that the webmaster probably couldn't bring himself to edit out.&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: this is a highly original site, but there are still hotter all-girl anal sites out there.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17113&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17113&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:12:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7416</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7416</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-25-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:25pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;154&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ASS is the emphasis here&lt;br /&gt;
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known&lt;br /&gt;
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present&lt;br /&gt;
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!&lt;br /&gt;
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click “models” link, then click a gallery to see it)&lt;br /&gt;
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month&lt;br /&gt;
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200).  Purchase examples:  500 tokens for  $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)&lt;br /&gt;
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43&lt;br /&gt;
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning.  What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time!  Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one).  Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices.  Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates.  Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity.  This is what we call stretching.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists say that porn objectifies women.  This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds.  Our dehumanized pretties include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt;, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt;, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more.  And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Rivera’s toilet session.  (I’ll bet she’s a vegetarian.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin.  It’s hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway.  200-350 photos per gallery is common here.  Why can’t I get my wish?  I do at lots of other sites.  It’s really weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the videos?  Fuck that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95.  I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/&quot;&gt;Karlie Montana&lt;/a&gt;, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice!  Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it.  Boosted the score from 70 to 83.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7416&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7416&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:25:45 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>