Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/allthreesomes/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_504 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=504 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/allthreesomes/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/allthreesomes.jpg" alt="Enter All Threesomes" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/allthreesomes/"><b>All Threesomes</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 01-12-07&nbsp;&nbsp;01:12pm</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 72</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=216">TheConnoisseur</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=216">40</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> This site gives you exactly what it looks like it would. 3-somes, mostly f/f/m. Which is great. This site offers mediocre vid content with hot models. You get 2 per scene. Great. Not many pics, just vid caps. Network access to about 12 sites is great. <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> Too much Mark Wood. Not many scenes. Needs some more work. I would even reccommend some more non-exclusive downloadable content. No updates in a while. Vid quality could be better(MPEG). <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> Not the best 3-some site, but woth a look. Hot girls, decen vid, but poor pic galleries. Network access is a plus of course, but not for $39.95. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=4423"><b>Visit All Threesomes</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=504">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=504">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:12:44 PST