<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - D Archives - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16583</guid>
		<title>RE: Mr Fountain's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15822#16583</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/darchives.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter D Archives&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-23-08 11:44am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;Mr Fountain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=506&quot;&gt;RagingBuddhist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=506&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					yeah, the token deal was expensive. I joined it one time and after that stuck with the d'archives part of it for $15. I liked the way the models showed a little attitude when they were shot- they really posed 'in your face style'. almost every model appealed to me. ..  Did you see Brandy? short haired brunnette? very hot. The stoppage of updates was frustrating; though the material that was there I liked a lot... though def limited by the abandonment of updates. I've been a member three times for one month per without regret. The $15 is still pretty good for what i got. Though not a site that I would rebill over and over again..
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15822#16583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:44:12 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15862</guid>
		<title>RE: Mr Fountain's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15822#15862</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/darchives.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter D Archives&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-05-08 04:51pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=506&quot;&gt;RagingBuddhist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=506&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;Mr Fountain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					You were close when you said they hadn't updated since 2004. It seems they just put a new set up. But, before that, yeah, it was '04. And, yeah, we're all here to give our opinions but I can't see what you did here. A site that basically hadn't updated in 4 years gets a 91?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I guess price is a subjective thing too. I've always said that sometimes you have to pay the cost to get what you want and sometimes that price is high but... DAMN! A quick browse through the main site shows me that there's roughly 60-70 pictures per set and 4 tokens to get sets in hi-def. At $25 for 30 tokens, that means it's almost $3.50 to get those 60-70 pictures. I didn't bother to do the math for video - the cost of the pictures alone was enough to make me stop and wonder what these people are thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I found their archives to be pretty tame and very repetitive.  Have they done away with that idiotic MIDI music and gone to live sound? Are the girls actually masturbating now instead of just opening and closing their holes for 4 1/2 minutes? To me, this site seems to go against directly against something you put in your profile - the need  for a site to justify it's cost. In short, is there really anything so hot about this site now that would make it worth hundreds, if not thousands of dollars to download their entire collection?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15822#15862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:51:47 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15452</guid>
		<title>D Archives Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15452</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/darchives.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter D Archives&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:17pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=506&quot;&gt;RagingBuddhist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=506&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Wish I could do a full review&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					They call their archives site &amp;quot;The Attic&amp;quot;. Well... because I think the token system on D'Archives is RIDICULOUS &amp;amp; the Attic is $15 for a month &amp;amp; no rebilling, I took a shot at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality is great. The MIDI files they play instead of live sound matches their token system - absolutely ridiculous! Equally idiotic is the need to enter your user name &amp;amp; password on each download. Download speed is horrible (150-180 k/s) with no use of accelerators allowed AND they limit you to one download at a time. All files - even pictures - come in zips with semi-cryptic names. Plus, you only get 3 preview thumbnails per set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The videos are redundant as hell. To me, it looked like a masturbation site. What it turns out to be are a bunch of young women spreading their legs &amp;amp; playing with their vaginas. Yes - I said vaginas - it's almost that clinical looking. A few get a toy working, a few others decide to pee, some even have a friend with 'em. But, all in all, it's just boring as hell. The Attic is roughly 100 models, each with a few picture sets (some more than a few) &amp;amp; about 2/3 with a video or two. But it's all the same stuff. Raise the skirt or take of the pants, spread the legs...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So... because The Attic appears to be laid out exactly like the main site, I think it'd be safe to assume (despite the hazards of doing so) that it'd be no different in the main site. And for that, I think you'd be either very foolish or have more money than you know what to do with if you sign up there
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darchives.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15452&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15452&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:17:25 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9784</guid>
		<title>D Archives Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9784</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/darchives.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter D Archives&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/darchives/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-04-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:31am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;83&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Plain Jane Pretension&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					An outrageous pay system for a bunch of thunder thighed plain janes that you could photograph yourself at any local nightclub. They have the audacity to sell this stuff by the file, as if you are acquiring something rare and special. P.T. Barnum porn! I know there are some who get a strange kick at seeing &amp;quot;amateurs&amp;quot;, as if they are some sort of different creature. IMO, since they are not professionals, professional prices should not be charged. If ordinary, homely girls are your  bag---go for it!
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darchives.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit D Archives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9784&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9784&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:31:13 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>