<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Chelsea Charms - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/chelseacharms/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_287</guid>
		<title>Chelsea Charms Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=287</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chelseacharms/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chelseacharms.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chelsea Charms&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chelseacharms/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chelsea Charms&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:52pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 63&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=39&quot;&gt;BostonPJR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=39&quot;&gt;72&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Photo quality is not bad.  Lots of photos per shoot.  Pretty good detail.&lt;br /&gt;
- Chelsea is by far one of, if not the, biggest girl in the giant bust business.&lt;br /&gt;
- A few good videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Where to start ...&lt;br /&gt;
- Many of the pics are ancient and updates are infrequent.  Bottom line: even with pics going back to 2001, there's not much here.&lt;br /&gt;
- Beware, it's pretty much a topless only site.  I know that the breasts are what we're here for, but that is literally all there is.&lt;br /&gt;
- Nearly all video looks like it was shot with a cell phone.  There were some scenes where she may actually have gotten completely nude and I honestly couldn't even tell.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Fans of giant breast fetish most likely already know who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chelseacharms/&quot;&gt;Chelsea Charms&lt;/a&gt; is.  Probably the biggest of the mammoth breast girls and one of the best looking.  But the site hardly does her justice.  Little more than a fansite, most shoots and videos look like they were done in a hotel room right before some convention.   I like the lady, but I need more than a few dozen photoshoots of her getting topless and smiling at the camera to make it worthwhile.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chelseacharms.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chelsea Charms&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=287&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=287&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:52:39 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>