PU - Velvet Ecstasy - All Activity

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:36:07 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

07-24-08 12:36pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (31)

Site Just OK

I was a member here about 6 months ago and was not all that impressed with it. The pics were good sized (full screen or larger) but they did tend to be grainy as others have noted and the lighting is sort of hit or miss. The still photography wasn't that good either for my tastes. For me, the site was too amateur. By this I mean the models were mostly average and the production not terribly good. For those who like real couple sex then I could see that this might be a turn on but I thought that the production value could be better. I didn't download very much and kept even less.

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:06:14 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-21-08 11:06am

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To exotics4me (299):

Thanks for the review. Just to let you know, I've recently discontinued using Viv Thomas on the site due to over all lack of interest. It's been replaced by Porn-2-Go, which offers much more of everything.

Victor

View Thread (1)

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:56:17 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-18-07 01:56am

COMMENT by exotics4me (299)

I'm liking it

Well, we've had our debates on here about how big a limit should be on daily downloads, and so far on this one, I've been getting around 2.5 gigs per day which will equal out to around 60 gigs for 14.95 and I can definitely deal with that. I believe the limit is 3 gigs. Overall, the content for a amateur site is pretty high quality. This is a good site for those who are married and their spouse likes to watch movies with them. I will post a review in a few weeks, but for now, I'm thinking high 80s, maybe 86-88, which is really good for an amateur site under $15!

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: turismo's Review

Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:15:55 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-07-07 08:15am

REVIEW REPLY by drranger (0)

To Victor (Webmaster):

Whatever. I cancelled. You do have a nice site though. Just the download limit thing....

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:30:10 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-07-07 05:30am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (100)

To turismo (55):

how many videos are downloadable and in which quality?

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:31:24 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-04-07 09:31am

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To drranger (0):

Obviously we can't have control over your point of entry to our site but all of the affiliate linking codes are supposed to guide you to our index page where the link to our terms and conditions is posted.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:38:35 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-04-07 07:38am

REVIEW REPLY by drranger (0)

To Victor (Webmaster):

Does it tell you about download limits when you sign up via REALITYKINGS which is how I entered the site.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:24:12 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-03-07 11:24am

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To drranger (0):

The 2 Gig download limit is clearly listed in our terms and conditions at the entrance to our site. Go to our index page:
http://www.velvetecstasy.com/
then click on terms and conditions:
http://www.velvetecstasy.com/termsandconditions.htm
It's clearly explained in the last paragraph. Thousands of people have read the terms and have joined and have come back for more for over seven years.

As for your comparison to car rentals, not that it's an accurate analogy, but still: almost all car rental companies have mileage limit on their contracts. They can't just stop the cars so they charge extra for overage mileages. We don't cut people off permanently when they download excessively. We block them for only 24 hours to allow for an overall wider bandwidth and faster download speed for all our members.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:20:42 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

12-03-07 09:20am

REVIEW REPLY by drranger (0)

To Victor (Webmaster):

First of all, I take issue with your indicating that someone downloading in excess of 2 gigs a day is abusing a system. When a person signs up, you do not indicate anywhere in your terms or conditions that there will be a download limit. As such, it is open.
If you had indicated that there was a 2 gig limit, I presume many would not have joined.

As an example of what your site does, suppose I go to rent a vehicle while on vacation and the contract does not limit miles. However, when I go to use the vehicle, it stops after 100 miles. Implied in the contract is unfettered use unless stated otherwise.

While I can understand the expense that your site must cost to maintain, it would be appropriate to advise all users when they sign up that you will limit their usage. Your blaming the user for using the product that he purchased is not appropriate.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:30:00 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

11-29-07 10:30am

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To drranger (0):

If we lift the limit completely the overall bandwidth use (and cost) will go up and we will have to increase the membership fee to compensate for it, which is something we are trying to avoid.

If you have no intention of abusing the system there is no need for more than 2 gigs a day download. That's about 15 scenes in a day. No one needs that much porn:) At any rate, the bandwidth seems to have loosened up a bit lately so we've increased the limit to 3 Gigs a day for now.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:06:56 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

11-29-07 09:06am

REVIEW REPLY by drranger (0)

To Victor (Webmaster):

Except I am paying the full monthly fee. Why not put the 2 gig limit on the trial??????

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:33:05 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

11-21-07 06:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To drranger (0):

Yes. There is a 2 Gig daily download limit. We may remove this limit later if the bandwidth abuse stops. But every time we remove it some people join for the three day trial only and use their download managers to suck up the entire content of the site. Most people, however, hardly download more than 2 gigs a day so they don't even know the limit is there. We have over 140 Gigs of exclusive videos that cost us thousands of dollars to produce and we are not going to give it all away for just $8. That's why the limit is there.

View Thread (11)

RE: turismo's Review

Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:37:36 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

11-21-07 05:37pm

REVIEW REPLY by drranger (0)

To Victor (Webmaster):

But...is there a 2 gig download limit? Otherwise I would join.

View Thread (11)

RE: DpornGuy's Review

Tue, 15 May 2007 08:09:41 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-15-07 08:09am

REVIEW REPLY by DpornGuy (31)

To Victor (Webmaster):

hi. yes sorry, i was referring to the amateur couples updates that occurs every monday. the other update involving a model and yourself skipped my attention since i mostly looked at the sex scenes. either way you're running one of the best sites around at the moment.

View Thread (2)

RE: DpornGuy's Review

Sun, 13 May 2007 22:50:23 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-13-07 10:50pm

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To DpornGuy (31):

It actually updates twice a week with exclusive hardcore videos, twice a week with exclusive nude photos and five times a week with bonus content.

View Thread (2)

RE: turismo's Review

Sun, 13 May 2007 11:26:53 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-13-07 11:26am

REVIEW REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To turismo (55):

I'm really baffled by what you said about the picture and movie quality. Maybe you only downloaded the low res pics and videos. The pictures are all 1024x768 and the videos are available at 640x480 for download. That is about the best there is on the Internet, specially for an amateur site. This is not Met Art or Hegre. We are using ordinary couples and amateur models to show how sexy regular people can be. And we are trying to show the positive side of sex. No fancy glamor make up and expensive sets or big time super porn stars taking gigantic black cocks up their asses at 90 miles an hour. Just normal human beings having sex and enjoying themselves. And we add little artistic twists here and there for added flavor.

Still we realize you just can't please everybody. That's why we have provided the feedback and voting system to see what people want. And we will do everything possible to accommodate. But as for the video quality, we'll have to disagree and insist we are among the best out there.

View Thread (11)

RE: Charges?

Thu, 10 May 2007 17:41:53 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-10-07 05:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by turismo (55)

To Victor (Webmaster):

This matter has now been dealt with in a most satisfactory manner, thanks I appreciate the help

View Thread (3)

RE: Charges?

Wed, 09 May 2007 13:42:12 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-09-07 01:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by turismo (55)

To Victor (Webmaster):

Thanks, your help is appreciated. I carefully worded my comment, I certainly did not mean to imply any dishonesty or deceit, but wanted to warn other potential subscribers of my experience.

View Thread (3)

RE: Charges?

Wed, 09 May 2007 11:00:21 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-09-07 11:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Victor (Webmaster)

To turismo (55):

Sorry to hear you are having problems with the subscription. I assure you we are not practicing any form of hidden or deceitful charges. This is either a technical glitch by CCBill or an oversight when choosing the type of subscription offered. If CCBill fails to resolve your problem please contact us immediately and we will refund the charges.

Victor
Velvet Ecstasy

View Thread (3)

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Wed, 09 May 2007 07:11:48 PDT

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

05-09-07 07:11am

COMMENT by turismo (55)

Charges?

I signed up for a 30 day package, and have received a receipt for a 12 month subscription, having been charged over $100.
I am fortunate that I looked at this receipt - normally I just file them in my email folder in case there is a transaction I don't recognise on my ccard bill.
*Addition*
However, I am happy to report that I emailed the support desk and within 24 hours this problem had been rectified and the charges had been refunded in full - so it would appear that the customer service is excellent

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Rare real couple porn is great!

Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:24:38 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

03-03-07 01:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by bjorn7 (19)

To Pornjackker (35):

I agree. Probably the best authentic amateur porn out there with some big facials which I'm a big fan of.

View Thread (1)

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:59:12 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

03-01-07 09:59pm

COMMENT by Pornjackker (35)

Rare real couple porn is great!

It's always a pleasure coming back as a member to this site.
Seeing real couples have sex beats watching boring POV and
non-exclusive crap porn anyday.

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:28:05 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-22-07 05:28pm

COMMENT by powerman (28)

An alterna gal site that is excellent

I like this site because the people are real and the sex is real - some couples really love each other plus the girls come in all types and all ages but they specialize in alterna geeky, nerdy, chunky, younger girls which I love! But don't let that put you off - these girls - who look like college gals really know how to get it on! Some funny things I have notice in the site - which seem to be standards there:
1. they make the guys shave their heads - lots of bald guys
2. the girls wear black chokers - which is kinda cute.
3. I think the girls smoke weed before the vid shoots because a lot of them have glassy water eyes.
4. They really like bean bags and cushy futons in the studio - everything is filmed onsite in their studios.
With the exception of several gals, you won't find center fold types here - but that is not a bad thing because the girls are cute and the sex is hot, hot, hot! There are several episodes where the girls look really preppy and WASPY who totally rock - and you know you are watching someone's 18+ daughter rebelling and getting her freak on. There is also a politeness and nice feeling about the site - a good thing for a porn site - this is a happy adult site that can actually be good for younger 18+ viewers to actually see what real sex is like between folk who dig each other not some silicone infused sex starlet (not that there is anything wrong with that.)
Go to this site - trust me you will like it! And get your toilet tissue ready.

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:10:39 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-11-07 07:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by BostonPJR (72)

To BostonPJR (72):

lol, you know what i mean.

View Thread (7)

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:55:54 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-11-07 06:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by Bacchus (30)

To BostonPJR (72):

Subscribe? Lol.....

View Thread (7)

Velvet Ecstasy Comment

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:54:12 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-10-07 06:54pm

COMMENT by Bacchus (30)

Nice site

Very amateur. Nice quality of the videos. The amateur couples are really believable and seem to really enjoy each other. Updates are often.

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

Velvet Ecstasy News

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:58:14 PST

Velvet Ecstasy

01-10-07 12:58pm

NEWS by Victor (4)

Updates

Just to let the reviewers and others know, I update the site 5 days a week. Twice a week (not once) with exclusive full scenes, once with real couples and once with amatuer models, at least twice more with exclusive nude photos, and every day with a ton of bonus content. Also, the video quality is constantly improving. You can clearly see the difference between 2006-7 and 2000 videos.

Thanks,
Victor

Visit Velvet Ecstasy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:04:31 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-09-07 11:04am

REVIEW REPLY by DpornGuy (31)

To BostonPJR (72):

you can never have too much porn....;0P

besides, we're not perverts.....we're conessouirs....ehehe...

View Thread (7)

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:46:28 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-09-07 10:46am

REVIEW REPLY by BostonPJR (72)

To DpornGuy (31):

Appreciate the feedback just the same. And is it me or do we probably subscribe to way too much porn?

View Thread (7)

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:32:11 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-09-07 10:32am

REVIEW REPLY by DpornGuy (31)

To BostonPJR (72):

i agree that the older to midway, the vids are pretty rough. The newer vids though are much better quality though. it got a 90 from me because i've been trying to find decent real amateur sites, and they're hard to find. most either don't have much content or just use regular models and pass them off as amateurs, or worse, don't have exclusive content.

It's a taste thing though with this site, some will love it, some will find it boring, some will find it 50/50.

View Thread (7)

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:59:10 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-09-07 09:59am

REVIEW REPLY by BostonPJR (72)

To DpornGuy (31):

Decent point there, I was unimpressed with the content a few months ago, but 106 sets is quite a bit. It's still getting no score of 90 from me. Not with 1998-quality video. But I'll update my review.

View Thread (7)

RE: BostonPJR's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:16:10 PST

Velvet Ecstasy (8)

01-09-07 08:16am

REVIEW REPLY by DpornGuy (31)

To BostonPJR (72):

strange... i must disagree....

in your review you say there's not allot of content, yet i counted and there are approximately 106 sets, and that's just under Real couples! there are the sets where victor has sex with the models, and i didn't count those either....

there's plenty of content on offer here...

View Thread (7)