PU - Blacks on Blondes - New Reviews

Blacks on Blondes Review

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:43:18 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

09-27-11 01:43am

REVIEW = 79 by Robbi81 (4)

Pros:
- Well known stars
- Good quality video
- downloadable scenes
- network

Cons:
- expensive for the number of sites
- older scenes are not compressed in single scenes
- older scenes are of poor quality
- In the solo girl sites, the scenes are recycled and dead
- plain design

Bottom Line:
It has some really good quality recent scenes and stars. And a good network for the interracial fans. Unfortunately the price will stop some people. The design of the website is rather plain and much to be desired. A major thing for me is that the girl sites(Spring Thomas, Candy Monroe,etc.) the scenes have been recycled (older scenes are redated to appear recent). They have been dead for a while now. This practice is never good for a website to continue to do.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:56:44 PST

Blacks on Blondes (2)

03-05-11 11:56am

REVIEW = 70 by Tom22 (6)

Pros:
* Good quality (but not super high-res) pictures in Zip files
* Full download speed for cable connection
* No problem using download manager
* Server seems well tuned, never �dropped� a download
* Easy Navigation, old style but no problems with site set-up
* Almost all male stars have huge tools and are often matched with petite girls
* Very large network, you will probably need all 30 days to select and download
* Network includes 19 sites
* Video quality is �only� good (camerawork is not so good, resolution is too low)
* Several very cute girls, Kitty, Kennedy Kressler, Alexia Skye, Amai Liu and others
* Good Lighting in most scenes

Cons:
* Poor camerawork, face & ass style, hardly ever see action from proper distance
* Video resolution is too low, best quality is only 640x360
* Logo/watermark too big, very obstructive of view, badly placed and distracting
* Almost every video is about 70% nonsense, 30% action worth viewing
* Way too much emphasis on oral sex, leans toward being a BJ site
* Far too many unnecessary �fades� and shifting to different angles
* Camera movements are mostly way too fast, zooming is at warp speed
* Cameraman sometimes tries to be the star, talks too much
* Girl�s movements into new positions often edited out --- why?
* At $34.99 the membership price is too high considering the competition

Bottom Line:
Seldom have I seen a site that focuses on the face as much as this site. This is supposed to be a porn site --- right? I can see girls faces at the grocery store, I don�t need to pay money and join a site for that.

I, like many here at Porn Users, like to see a girl�s entire body, NOT just her face and her ass. But this is the old porn paradigm that refuses to die. I notice that sites that finally figure it out and break away from this type of camerawork consistently get much better ratings, (from the users anyway).

In my opinion, this type of camerawork is the curse of modern porn, they are still doing it just like they did in the 1970�s. Wake up guys, move the camera back and keep the camera steady. I know YOU can see everything YOU want to, but WE can only see what comes through the camera lens. It�s not that there is never a time for a close-up --- but that time is NOT all the time. And it should not be nearly all the time either.

One silver lining with sites that practice the face & ass camerawork style, is that you at least get a full length glimpse of the girl�s body when they move into another position. But not at this site, they normally edit that part out.

The best thing about this site is it has a good number of petite girls staring with some of the most well endowed men in porn. Its a shame they don�t back the camera up so WE the viewers can see it. Oh well, I guess this old paradigm will never die in the American and Euro porn industries, so I�m off to the Russian sites again where most of them know how to run a camera, like Teen Mega World for example.

Porn camerawork is not rocket science but considering the small percentage of sites that get it right, you would think it was.

1) This site lost 20 points for poor camerawork and editing

2) And lost another 10 points due to a large logo, cameraman won�t shut-up, too much nonsense, too much oral, not enough action and the video resolution is too low

If these things were fixed, it would be an awesome site, as it stands now, its pretty much run of the mill.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Wed, 05 May 2010 14:51:24 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

05-05-10 02:51pm

REVIEW = 78 by sylvern (14)

Pros:
*Great hardcore interracial content in terms of quality and quantity. The penetrations are some of the best you'll see.
*A number of amazing performances by some models on the site, especially the MILFs. Plenty of one-on-one and group action. The models are all attractive and the dicks are huge - there are very few scenes that will fail to get you hot under the collar.
*Frequent updates.
*Access to loads of bonus sites which all have worthwhile content.

Cons:
*Content could do with a bit more variety in terms of scenery i.e. try outdoor or pool scenes.
*Membership price is too high for you to be a long term subscriber.
*Site design is a bit ugly and colour combinations could be refined.
*Earlier videos are of poorer quality.
*Search functions could be improved.

Bottom Line:
Some of the best interracial hardcore around, but a few drawbacks prevent it from being considered a top paysite. But it's certainly one to consider if you like explicit scenes of white girls impaled by massive black members.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:29:04 PST

Blacks on Blondes (2)

01-17-10 03:29pm

REVIEW = 82 by Bletch (7)

Pros:
Tons of content what with all the bonus sites.

Something for everyone, well if your into interatial stuff. one on ones, gangbangs, Double Vag etc..

Cancelling was easy (a big plus in my book) via an email to Epoch.

Cons:
Shoddy site design looks nothing like the entrance page.

The "Now filmed in HD" logo on every single preview photo is misleading, less than half of the BoB content is HD and even then, I've seen better from less known sites.

One of the bonus sites inparticular rubbed me the wrong way - Blacks on Cougars. Clicking on some of the models in the preview area reveals some of these scenes aren't available for 3 months down the line :( And yet they still have member ratings!?

Downloading was pretty slow (I'm based in the UK).

Bottom Line:
I actually joined for the Spring Thomas site, but spent most of my time at the Blacks on Blondes site. Took one months membership and at the end, there was still plenty of stuff I hadn't got around to downloading.

Despite all my grumbles, I would join again maybe 6 months from now and I do recommend the site to everyone, especially as none of this stuff is on DVD.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:30:38 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

09-27-09 09:30am

REVIEW = 78 by pat362 (235)

Pros:
-Membership gives you access to 14 other sites.

-Download speed is quite good using I.E and no dowmload manager.

-They have over 1000 videos in the network.

-The sex is all interracial going from mild to intense.

-There are quite a few videos with a little scenarios which adds to the fantasy aspect.

-A good choice of models with a greater emphasis on milf.

-Blacks on Blonde appears to still be updating.

Cons:
-Blacks on blondes and Glory Hole seem to be the only 2 sites still releasing new content. It's difficult to tell because although they give you the release dates on the sites. I don't believe that they are accurate.

-The quality from site to site or from older to newer material is of varying quality.

-The more recent videos can be downloaded whole or in 3 parts but quite alot of the older material on the other sites is in multiple parts.

-Some of the sites do not have the option of downloading the complete set in one file.

Bottom Line:
The main reason why I joined was because you got access to Spring Thomas and Katie Thomas with the membership. I've had my eye on the 3 sites for a long time. I wouldn't have joined them individually but in a package it was difficult to pass up.

I think this a very good join, download all the content you want and then don't comeback for a long time. I'm pretty sure Spring and Katie are no longer updating and most of the other sites are variations of black on blondes.

If you like IR, gangbang, milf, cum swallowing style of sex than you should give these guys a try.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:17:25 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

10-28-07 03:17pm

REVIEW = 78 by asmith12 (124)

Pros:
+ black guys and blondes, as advertised :-)
+ guys have impressive dicks too
+ huge amount of content
+ decent video quality (though, guys, with 1500kBit/s you can do better than 640x480)

Cons:
- swindling attempt (see my comment)
- recent videos have strong 'seen one of them - seen them all' subjective feeling
- models are not exactly gorgeous
- very inconvenient navigation
- no way to see what the video is about without going to pictures (which is a separate section) or home page
- cameraguy work and lighting could be better
- $35/mon price is above average

Bottom Line:
After escaping (as I hope) swindling attempt described in my earlier comment, I signed in with Blacks on Blondes.

At first, I was surprised how inconvenient their navigation is; to see what video is about before downloading I needed to go both to pictures section and home page, and look for the same clip pictures and description.

Second impression was that video quality is not bad, though cameraguy work and lighting could be improved; models aren't exactly top models but mostly are ok.

The third impression was that 'seen one of them - seen them all', which is especially true for the recent clips. After reading positive reviews here on PU I've tried a few clips from the middle, and I should agree with other reviewers that earlier videos were indeed more interesting.

And that was the fourth and final impression of the site: they do have a huge collection, but recently started to move down the hill.

Bottom line: if you're into black guys with big dicks on white girls, and you don't mind high price, it can easily be the site for you.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:14:06 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

04-10-07 03:14pm

REVIEW = 80 by OUMarcus (40)

Pros:
- Huge collection of interracial pics and videos
- Multiple download choices for videos
- Varied content within the limits of the genre
- Nice variety of models appearing on the site

Cons:
- Pretty expensive
- Site organization is pretty poor
- Video and picture updates are posted in pieces; whole videos and picture sets aren't posted all at once

Bottom Line:
If you're looking for an interracial site, this is probably on your list. You can probably find a more inexpensive site, but you'll probably get what you pay for. If you're looking for a huge volume of content, look no further.

I'd recommend this site.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:29:48 PDT

Blacks on Blondes (2)

03-22-07 10:29pm

REVIEW = 81 by uscue (39)

Pros:
The largest IR site on the net
Over 230 videos as of late March, with only 1 or 2 repeat girls
Free trial signup for network sites
High-Res pics, not vidcaps

Cons:
Bad organization/No Search feature
First 70 videos come as short clips or Full download only
No real extras...just this site and cartoons/personals sections that I didn't care for

Bottom Line:
BOB is the longest running and largest IR site on the web. This means the number of videos is probably the largest anywhere (230 full scenes). However, you don't get much of anything else besides the High-Res pics accompanying each set. They give you a free one-day trial to sites like Katie Thomas, Spring Thomas and Glory Hole, but then it's 30 bucks for those too.

The earliest vidz come only as short clips or full 230 MB videos while the latest 160 videos come as short clips or downloadable into three parts, which with this full fill size of 230MB I prefer the three parts. The best videos come in the middle of the lifespan...the earliest just aren't the best quality while the newest aren't too exciting like they used to be. Some faves are Cherry Poppens, Candace Cox, Elise, Jennifer, Kasey Dean, Venus and Honey.

Join if all you want is a plethora of videos as there are plenty to keep you occupied for at least one renewal. Don't expect to use the site for much else though.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blacks on Blondes Review

Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:55:13 PST

Blacks on Blondes (2)

02-03-07 05:55am

REVIEW = 82 by John (6)

Pros:
- Maybe the biggest interracial archive on the net
- Featured material is exclusive and quite various.
- Video quality is high and scenes also come in one-piece only downloadable files

Cons:
- New movies are somewhat not really interesting
- Site design is terribly old-fashioned and heavy
- Some of the girls that are advertised on the homepage are not actually featured in the site

Bottom Line:
Blacks on Blondes used to be the best, biggest and most followed interracial site on the net. Between 2000-2004 it featured most of the best and most famous interracial porn chicks around. In the last few years, though, after a new wave of reality-style interracial sites have emerged BOB's importance in the interracial scenery has diminished, and the guys who run the site started a sudden wave of changes in their style to adapt it to the new trends.
If before the average movie was focused on showing very hard sex in expensive Californian houses with little dialogues and little staged parts (if any), now the main focus is in creating pretending-to-be reality situation with unlikely dialogues.
The quality of the sex, also, has strongly declined, and anal is now rarely featured.

What I find more obnoxious in this new style is the dodgy and explicitely fake reality style. Porn is itself fiction, creating a further layer of (very bad quality) fiction on it just makes everything just not as appealing.
If in the old BoB style making interracial movies was about showing well-endowed black men fucking white girls with their incredible stamina, now it's only about white girls saying "Your big black cock is so much bigger than my white boyfriend's cock" or stuff like that for most of the movie, even when they should just shut up for God's sake.

These comments apart, BoB is still a fairly good quality interracial site, well worth a 1 month subscription.

Visit Blacks on Blondes - View Replies - Add Reply