<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Rodox - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/rodox/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_526</guid>
		<title>Rodox Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=526</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/rodox/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/rodox.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Rodox&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/rodox/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rodox&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:42pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=314&quot;&gt;studslut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=314&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- FINE SELECTION OF RETRO 70'S SMUT
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- TOO PRICEY!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I really loved my time on this site and would've probably stayed on longer if it were more afforable, but it's most assuredly not. For what you get, it's highway robbery. But I suspect they knew darn well that only a select few retro connoisseurs would make such an investment and set their price point as high as possible to get as much of a return on their output. I'm clearly one of those insatiable guilty ones, but I took everything I could in the month I was subscribed to the site, and I promptly left thereafter. It didn't seem to be growing at any perpetual rate so I couldn't justify playing the game of wait-and-see. Perhaps in a year or so I'll re-join and catch up on what they updated since my departure.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like I stated, it's definitely for guys with an appreciation for the gone days when women were on the pill and a creampie wasn't yet a fetish, but the only way to successfully complete coitus. Not that there are a lot of internal shots on here, but do you get the sense that there was some very serious dick gravy being deposited into those rank hirsute cervices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's all photos too so don't expect any video or anything. But overall I liked the site a lot. It could obviously be bulked up so much more, especially with those hefty entrance fees, but if you're looking for a singular investment then it's worth the price if you raid their catalogue and abort promptly. That is of course, if you're into the carefree sexual proclivites from your folk's heyday. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
75/10
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3706&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Rodox&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=526&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=526&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:42:31 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>