PU - Matt's Models - All Activity

RE: bently's Review

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:20:52 PST

Matt's Models (0)

02-23-11 03:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To mbaya (344):

Agreed.

Unfortunately, they certainly are not the only site guilty of poor / non-existant editing.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (3)

RE: bently's Review

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 02:19:35 PST

Matt's Models (0)

02-23-11 02:19am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To bently (3):

I consider multiple nearly identical photos to be a boring negative. I don't expect blurry pictures, in fact that is a sign of a poorly edited set.

View Thread (3)

RE: bently's Review

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:34:49 PST

Matt's Models (0)

02-18-11 06:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To bently (3):

Are they updating regularly again now?

Cap;'n. :0/

View Thread (3)

Matt's Models Comment

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:57:19 PST

Matt's Models (0)

03-09-10 09:57am

COMMENT by Capn (27)

No updates!

Well looking at the recent update schedule...

Nothing since Christmas.

Call this one dead in the water!

Cap'n. :0(

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Matt's Models Comment

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:17:37 PST

Matt's Models (0)

12-21-09 02:17pm

COMMENT by Capn (27)

Updates?

Updates here seem very sporadic.

It almost makes you wonder if the photographer is getting bored with it?

It is a shame really because he has loads of decent models, even if the photos aren't top notch.

I think the whole site could do with a makeover really.

Cap'n. :0/

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Matt's Models Comment

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:47:17 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

10-20-09 10:47am

COMMENT by somedays (1)

Positive/Negative

This site has a lot going for it. Huge collection. Many popular porn stars in some of their first photo and video shoots. Example: Alison Angel, before she became famous, doing a video shoot with a dildo in her butt.
This site does not seem to update on a regular basis. This comment is being written on 20 Oct. and the last video update was 12 Sep; the last photo update was 7 Oct. BUT - do not let that discourage you. The collection is huge and EXCLUSIVE and the price is low.
Overall, a great value for the money - especially if you like younger models.

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Matt's Models Comment

Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:02:54 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-09 11:02am

COMMENT by Mr Fountain (50)

matts models- 6 months for $49- multi month

I think that being a multimonth member can save money in the long run. This may be an even better way to save than trying to get the best month to month deal. I am a first time member of this site and am not familiar with it- so I passed on it this time. Got to see if I like it first. There is also $8.25 a month for a year. multi monthing may work out better; though I haven;t multi monthed it with any site except for Femjoy's 2 for 1 deal.

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:16:38 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 06:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Try telling that to them - you'll get the same speech they've given before
"This is a very popular site that's been in business for years."
"We do this, we have that"
"You must be doing something wrong"

And yeah - if you can't tell - sites like this rile me up :laughs: Seriously - check out the relpies to reviews and the comments on here and see some of the stuff they've thrown at their users.

View Thread (5)

RE: Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:10:27 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 03:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by Jeffrey99 (27)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

Since I've have never seen this error on any other website before, while using the exact same setup on tons of them, that lead me to believe it is a error with the site.

View Thread (5)

RE: Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:06:22 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 02:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by atrapat (110)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Never been a member of this site but I often use Firefox's DownThemAll and I occasionally get the file mismatch error at other sites. Even for large video files I rarely lose any data: it's nothing but the hassle of having to restart a paused download a couple times. Perhaps a Firefox specific forum or a generic question at the forum here might get you some answers.

View Thread (5)

RE: Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:31:04 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 01:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Send them an email, But, whatever you do, don't insinuate that it's their fault. If you read the reviews and comments here, you'll see that any problem encountered is user error.

View Thread (5)

RE: Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:27:17 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 01:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

If you don't get a decent answer here shortly (I don't know what's causing your problem), I'd say go and post your issue in the forum as more eyes will probably pick up on it there.

View Thread (5)

Matt's Models Comment

Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:58:45 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

06-08-09 12:58pm

COMMENT by Jeffrey99 (27)

Anybody else having alot of size mismatch errors?

I'm a pretty new member to the site and really liking it but it seems every file I download, the first time try, downloadthemall using Firefox gives me a "Size Mismatch". It starts the download fine but sometime after the error happens.

Is this happening to anyone else? Is it just a Firefox/DownloadThemAll problem or is this a MattModels problem? Or does anyone even have a clue? LOL

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: $14.95 discount, no more?

Sat, 09 May 2009 09:12:02 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-09-09 09:12am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Happy to help .. glad that worked.

View Thread (3)

RE: $14.95 discount, no more?

Sat, 09 May 2009 09:07:51 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-09-09 09:07am

COMMENT REPLY by Jeffrey99 (27)

To Khan (Staff):

Thanks, Khan. That done the trick. I'm now seeing $14.95 again after clearing Firefoxs private data.

View Thread (3)

RE: $14.95 discount, no more?

Sat, 09 May 2009 06:51:11 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-09-09 06:51am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

I just checked and I'm still seeing the $14.95 special price.

You may need to dump your cache (temporary Internet files) or any cookies associated with that site. Then, visit directly from the link here at PornUsers or TheBestPorn.

If you were outside the US there's a *chance* that the site is using regional pricing but if I'm not mistaken, you're in the US so clearing the history and cookies should do the trick.

Hope that helps

View Thread (3)

Matt's Models Comment

Sat, 09 May 2009 05:47:28 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-09-09 05:47am

COMMENT by Jeffrey99 (27)

$14.95 discount, no more?

Just wondering if the $14.95 discount is not offered anymore? Everytime I try to go to join, I get the normal $29.95 popping up on the join page. Am I the only one having this problem?

Finally thought about giving this site a try but don't think it's worth the regular $25-$30 a month price tag.

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Sights like this

Wed, 06 May 2009 04:12:14 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-06-09 04:12am

COMMENT REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To cucuta (6):

Nubiles is pretty good and similar in content style.

View Thread (2)

RE: Sights like this

Tue, 05 May 2009 18:57:36 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-05-09 06:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To cucuta (6):

You might check out Little Mutt, it is a professional site, but they do have an amateur feel to their content.

View Thread (2)

Matt's Models Comment

Tue, 05 May 2009 18:10:36 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-05-09 06:10pm

COMMENT by cucuta (6)

Sights like this

Can someone tell me the sight that would be most like Matt's models. All I am finding is glam stuff.

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: cucuta's Review

Sun, 03 May 2009 12:45:49 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-03-09 12:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To cucuta (6):

I agree with you the video is fairly lame and one of the areas I wish they would improve on. Although if they did better quality video I would hope they would up their daily cap of 10 gigs a day. But for the price I joined for from paysitediscounts I can't complain about what I got from the site. Pretty solid deal all in all for me.

View Thread (1)

RE: drranger's Review

Sun, 03 May 2009 12:43:02 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-03-09 12:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To badandy400 (103):

I agree with you the quality could use an upgrade even if it is amateur in nature. Also I hate bw caps but they do tell you upfront that its there. I guess with their price point they gotta cut corners somewhere I suppose. Must not do enough volume or something to compete with sites like videobox.

But with the price I paid from paysitediscounts for Matts, I was more than happy last month when I joined even with the cap.

View Thread (3)

RE: solo's only

Sat, 02 May 2009 16:30:54 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-02-09 04:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Douggie (8):

You're a lot more generous than I am - I'm not a fan of giving money to people with attitude issues. And I'd certainly take the threat of a lawsuit - bluff or not - as a bit personal. Besides, it's not like his site is all that novel - there's tons of audition material out there - with better camerawork and no insults.

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Sat, 02 May 2009 14:50:09 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-02-09 02:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by Douggie (8)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

I hear ya. I was just trying to give constructive criticism. The way I look at it now is just like he said. Its his site and he will run it the way he wants (right or wrong). Ill just join when I feel the need to blow 14.00.
I better be careful of what I say...last time he threatened his lawyers on me. LMAO. good luck! want my address?

Nohing personal against the guy. I just see it way too often...the producers/camera people are way more amaturish then the models are. But hey like I said, its his business.

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Sat, 02 May 2009 07:29:24 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-02-09 07:29am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Douggie (8):

This is funny as shit, Douggie. I thought my joust with Matt was funny (in a pathetic kinda way), but this definitely tops it.

I see the basis is the same. You say something about his site that he doesn't like and the macho comes to the top. The caps come out, as if yelling will make his points valid and yours moot. All the problems are user errors and anything you say is baseless, despite your giving logical explanations for your assertions. And, while we're at it, let's start up some good old-fashioned name calling.

> marred by your jealous, hostile NON FACTS.
> you're a flat our liar.
> because of your SHI**TY equipment
> so much is BS
> Now you retreat.

The defense reminds me of a high school locker room fight. Out yell the other guy. Put him down while inflating your own sense of self-importance. On here, it comes down to is I'm a big time producer and you ain't shit! I live a glamourous life - yours is something less.

I'm well aware that pornuser reviews don't reflect every opinion out in the world, but I do think they show that not much has changed and that there are certain consistent lackings on the site. It would seem to me, since they lead such a glamourous life (why that has to be a part of any discussion on here is beyond me) and, because the site's supposedly been so successful, they could afford to makes some changes. Other sites evolve - this one should too.

View Thread (19)

RE: drranger's Review

Fri, 01 May 2009 23:04:14 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-01-09 11:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To drranger (1):

While I was not overly enthusiastic about this site I would say a 50 is certainly harsh. The bandwidth limit was not "hidden" as I was able to find it fairly easily. Of course I am not for bandwidth restriction.

The site really could use some quality work. There really is no reason the quality is not better, on the fly or not. Of course I do not expect glamor but it could be much better.

Seeing all the new faces and familiar faces long before they were familiar is definitely worth a few points.

As of the last time I was there, the lay out did need some work, I will agree with you there.

View Thread (3)

RE: drranger's Review

Fri, 01 May 2009 18:35:09 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

05-01-09 06:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To drranger (1):

hey man thanks for being a member and thanks for the feedback (although 50% is a little harsh)

the bandwidth limit isn't hidden. its in the terms which can be found several places before joining. the bandwidth limit is 10GB a day. if you are d/l more than 10GB a day you are doing more harm than good.

Matt's Models has over 500Gb of content. videos are stores and served from Amazon's S3 servers all around the world. this costs money. if you are d/l more than 10Gb a day you are costing more than you are paying. sorry for that, i just want to let you know that the porn business is not immune to profit economics.

as far as quality, yes i would have to agree this isn't FemJoy or Hegre-Art. Matt's Models is an amateur models site and the content is shot in that style - often on the fly without much preparation.

what usually happens is Matt gets a call from an agent or a friend saying, "Hey Matt I got this hot chick you wanna shoot her?"

the girl comes over, Matt picks up a camera and shoots her. the video and photos are exclusive to Matt's site, and many of the nearly 900 models will never be seen anywhere else. that's the true value of Matt's Models, not high quality erotic art.

if you'd like to see this process in action, Matt has recently started broadcasting his Studio Cam again. that is, you can watch a LIVE SHOOT right on the website for FREE.

this is exclusive content and its the real deal. if you have doubts, tune into a studio cam session. Matt has been broadcasting 2-3 times a week just for you :)

View Thread (3)

RE: A 90,8 for this site?????????

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:07:16 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

04-30-09 01:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by drranger (1)

To Denner (227):

I am confused. I have never been apprised of a download limit for this site and today my IP was blocked until tomorrow because of bandwith usage. There is nothing on the site indicating bandwith usage limits.

While I am not a fan of the navigation, the quality of the wmvs, or the puny pics, I did like the cheap price to look at amateur talent.

But how the heck is any site worth it when the block you with no notice. Even Reality Kings has let the reviewers and the users know that their is a limit and I can't stand Reality Kings.

View Thread (11)

RE: videos

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:10:54 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

04-26-09 01:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To mbaya (344):

This is how they roll? After my exchange with Matt, it seems to me their policy is "Always blame the user". They're quick to mention how much work it takes to keep the site going and yet, going over the reviews here, I get the feeling nothing much has changed here in a long time.

View Thread (4)

RE: A 90,8 for this site?????????

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:50:53 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

09-30-08 06:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Matt Frackas (Webmaster):

Sorry it took some time to reply to this:
First: It's been quite some time since I wrote my review based on a membership way back.
I did not get back again - simply because the site did not appeal to me - at that time.
Maybe things have changed radical and may it's time to take another look....

View Thread (11)

RE: A 90,8 for this site?????????

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:16:56 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

09-24-08 03:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by Matt Frackas (Webmaster)

To Denner (227):

""I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?"

The answer to this question is The Best Porn and all the other review sites that rate Matt's Models so highly, review hundreds if not *thousands* of sites. That's their JOB.

They've seen the good, the bad, the rip offs, fraud and everything under the sun. They know they're business. They have an unbiased perspective.

They rate Matt's Models comparatively & objectively to the entire scope of adult pay sites on the net.

They don't base their reviews on a handful of sites they might have joined, a technical problem, personal taste, or the temperament of the owner :)

- Matt

View Thread (11)

RE: videos

Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:10:22 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

08-20-08 10:10am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pornmaster (Webmaster):

Some videos I was able to download, but most did not. I DO know how to download videos. Thank you for the offer of free months, but I am not interested at this time. I am happy to see that you responded and care about your members-that is good support!

View Thread (4)

RE: videos

Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:57:14 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

08-20-08 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To mbaya (344):

Hey we must have overlooked the ticket.

Sometimes that happens
when you are dealing with
thousands of members, and managing
a site with 900 models on it.

A lot to manage.

Anyways, I didn't see your ticket,
but we generally DO get a download issue
support ticket once or twice a month.

That's one or two issues
out of hundreds of thousands
of downloads a month.

99 times out of a 100
the problem is a user error
or a misunderstanding on how
to right-click for a download.

Email me directly and I'll
get you a free couple of months
so we can resolve the issue.

ryan (at) mattsmodels.com

That's how we roll at Matt's Models ;)

View Thread (4)

RE: videos

Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:12:40 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

08-20-08 04:12am

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (9)

To mbaya (344):

That's a site i will avoid

View Thread (4)

Matt's Models Comment

Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:50:52 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

08-20-08 03:50am

COMMENT by mbaya (344)

videos

I was a member more than a year ago. I contacted Matt that I had trouble downloading many of the videos. When he answered me more than a week later, his answer was that he would check into it. More than two weeks later, no reply and my membership expired. The few videos I did download were a complete waste.

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Matt's Models News

Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:30:23 PDT

Matt's Models

07-13-08 07:30pm

NEWS by pornmaster (5)

New Feedback

We get dozens of these every month. I'll start posting them here..

"Outstanding website much better than bangbus, playboy, and many others! Lots of amateur girls not found anyplace else."

Visit Matt's Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:19:37 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-07-08 09:19am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To IKnoPorn (22):

nice and informative review. more of those pls.

View Thread (6)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:55:22 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 10:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by Matt Frackas (Webmaster)

To Douggie (8):

It wasnt.
It was a slow day, and if there ever is a problem, our hosts, servers page/text us wherever we are, no matter what time of day or night. All systems normal yesterday and not a SINGLE complaint from anybody but YOU...who instead of writing support posted your BS remark here publically.

So. It was either operator error (YOU), somewhere between your IP address and US or you're a flat our liar.

Theres a simple way to determine where the problem lies by doing a trace route from your computer. All you have to do is GOOGLE "How to do a trace route? and Im sure you can now sit around all day long looking for a moment my servers are unreachable.

Im just following rule #3 "Reply Rules" of the PU board:

3. Point out any incorrect facts.

and your "facts" are for some reason consistantly wrong.

Im quite sure if I add up all of yours and send to Rick, you wont be posting here any more Chief.

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:29:35 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 10:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by Douggie (8)

To Matt Frackas (Webmaster):

You have a screw loose dude.
I made an entire post and it got deleted......
I tried your site several times and it wouldnt come up....seems to me it was down

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:06:39 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 10:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Matt Frackas (Webmaster)

To Douggie (8):

ah come on man

are you SURE you dont wanna elaborate about how MattsModels was DOWN yesterday?

What happened? You've never been at a loss for words.

Cat got your tongue?

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:55:23 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 08:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by Douggie (8)

To Matt Frackas (Webmaster):

Wow you got a screw loose dude.

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:20:43 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 08:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by Matt Frackas (Webmaster)

To Douggie (8):

Now you retreat. Like the kid that throws rocks at passers by from a bridge - then runs away.

Last word to you. You've posted little veiled personal attacks and untruths on me and my site for a long time (READ the other recent dudes review if you wanna see how an OBJECTIVE review is worded).

..and I forgot to mention this yesterday.
YOU SAID...(oh you know, just in passing and by the way)
QUOTE:

"Ill reference one that was hideous, well was going to look up her name but *YOUR SITE IS DOWN* "

END QUOTE.

Our site wasnt "down" yesterday or any other day in recent time. (and I already know your response to this so Ill just answer it )

If by some chance because of your SHI**TY equipment, connection, AT&T router had problems etc, YOU REALLY COULDNT reach MattsModels yesterday?, then you could have sent a SUPPORT EMAIL and we could HELP YOU TRACE THE PROBLEM.

Just to let you know, I can PROVE our site wasnt offline yesterday. Telling other users MM is "down" I see as another deliberate attempt to thwart people from joining (I mean they cant very well join if my site is down right Doogie?).

If you make one more false claim (LIBEL) about me and my business on this board, I'll make an effort to have you stopped.

Got that smarty pants? Back to my Bar B Q.

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:26:48 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 06:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by Douggie (8)

To pornmaster (Webmaster):

I just found what matt is so upset about:

A lot of what he said was taken out of context.

using your analogy tho,
Matt's Models IS the Ford of porn.
(we should use that haha)
That is funny. I think theres something better then that out there for the site though.

Thailand is cool. Ive been to bankok well been all over asia.
You seem a little more level headed then Matt....

Laa

View Thread (19)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:45:22 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 05:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To Douggie (8):

yea i think the deal is
criticizing a photographer is like
calling their kid ugly lol

using your analogy tho,
Matt's Models IS the Ford of porn.
(we should use that haha)

MM is a standard staple
that nearly all regular porn
users have joined at some point.

Matt's not trying to build Lamborghini's.
That job is for Hegre, FemJoy, MET, etc.

Matt's Models simply shows you
the newbie porn chicks in as natural
a style as possible.

no glam, no makeup, no overdone set.
just nice, simple videos and some pics.

if you don't like it,
save up for your Lambo :)

Enjoy your 4th too.

I'm in Thailand -
they never heard of it lol

View Thread (19)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:32:44 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 05:32pm

REVIEW REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To IKnoPorn (22):

remastering is a good idea.
we're about a month into that project.

its a 4-6 month project tho
since there's 900 videos and around
2,300 photo sets on the site lol

glad you like Matt's Models!

View Thread (6)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:44:02 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 11:44am

REVIEW REPLY by IKnoPorn (22)

To Matt Frackas (Webmaster):

Hey Matt! The man himself! Thanks for the comments and compliments, that means alot from someone in the business.

Thanks as well for the invitation to discuss fun topics, especially beer! If you aren't already stocked for the holiday, I'd recommend an Arrogant Bastard Ale (or 2 or 3) from Stone Brewing Company, one of my personal favs.

I'm actually going out to the valley today, I wonder if I'll be driving by your house?

I look forward to more exchanges, I may contact you through your website.

Have a good one.

View Thread (6)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:38:32 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 11:38am

REVIEW REPLY by IKnoPorn (22)

To pornmaster (Webmaster):

Hey pornmaster, thanks for the comments. Wow, having to turn down girls that want to be photographed naked, what a cool problem to have! Sounds like Matt has quite the fantasy life.

So you're the site manager? Wow, another cool job.

I don't know if it's possible, but one thing I would recommend to improve the site would be to remaster the old content. I was impressed to see so many models in their "just starting out" phase, and not that I was expecting alot, but was disappointed to see the small images and videos. Of course, 3 or 4 years ago, it would have been awesome, but after being spoiled by so many high end sites and HD quality, the old stuff has a hard time competing.

On the technical side, the site is well organized performs well, nice job!

Have a nice holiday!

View Thread (6)

RE: solo's only

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:01:44 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 11:01am

COMMENT REPLY by Douggie (8)

To pornmaster (Webmaster):

what i can't figure out
is why you keep rebilling
if u dont like the content?

As stated I joined because of the discount. I never rebilled cause its the same old style.

i'm not a goon.
i'm just a webmaster that sees
hundreds of members join or rebill daily.

they must all hate the style too LOL

thats cool. Im glad ur not a goon. Im just trying to express my opionion at a site that was made for it. If matt were to send his forum goon in thats when the bitching and whining would have started.
As stated a million times. I wrote his and several other critiques based on what I felt about the site. I made them IRT the solo videos only. If matt were to look I did say positive things about most of the site but did leave it open for there own interpretation by stating I only watch the solo videos ...I dont look at pictures or girl/boy...girl/girl videos.
Although there are hundreds of website out there. There are only a handful (at best) that have a schedualed and/or consistent turn arround of models. Comparing your site (which has a good turn arround of models) to nearly all of the other sites is irrelevant. Thats like saying a Ford is a better car then a Lambroghini because they sell more of them.

Like I said Im sorry if it hurts Matts feelings. I made an offer to him that would have totally cleared the air.....just one video of the hundreds he has made.
I do realize its an amature site. But normally thats to describe the models...not the staff and from what I have seen here the management.

I also tried to sooth him down by letting him know I have directly sent at least 100 people to his site just for the chantelle video. But he consistantly threw a fit about the fact that I posted something I feel is true on a site that was made for criticism. The fact still remains that there were a lot of people that agreed with me on his forum about the videos.
It seems to me he feels this is a personal attack. IT isnt. Or that Im trying to hurt his business...Im not. In my very first post in his forum. I just offerd some suggestions that may improve the solo videos. I will always feel the same about the suggestions.
Anyway, Have a good 4th.....time to go party!

View Thread (19)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:13:32 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 07:13am

REVIEW REPLY by pornmaster (Webmaster)

To IKnoPorn (22):

funny i thought the same as Matt
which of course is why he's allowed me
to manage his sites for almost 3 years lol

i lived at Matt's house in LA
for half a year and i can tell u
his life is pretty wild.

the naked and crazy chicks
coming in and out and staying over
is one thing but he's always busy too

the drumming, nights in Hollywood,
rubbing elbows with famous people,
oh and Summers spent surfing.

i think his interest in the site
is still as high as it ever was.
the rate of updates is more a reflection
of the lack of decent chicks to shoot.

for every girl Matt shoots
he turns down 3-5 others (or more)
that are butt ugly, fat, etc.

u said many chicks are ugly.
imagine if Matt shot every chick
that came along? LOL

View Thread (6)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:00:43 PDT

Matt's Models (0)

07-04-08 01:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Matt Frackas (Webmaster)

To IKnoPorn (22):

I thought I'd comment on this review as well today just to show Im not a poor sport or unreasonable. Although I may return after the 4th of July and point out of couple of things.

This is (IMHO) a very UNBIASED and REASONABLE critique of my site! Actually a GREAT review overall. (maybe TBP should hire you as a pro critic?).

Even though it has some tough "cons" (which I will address later as I said)....and it doesnt seem like the "reviewer" has some personal vendetta against me! WOW!

Please feel to contact me anytime to discuss surfing, beer, guitar, drums (actually I was a pro drummer and now playing again in a few bands!) porn and my sites.

- Matt

View Thread (6)