PU - Wired Pussy - All Activity

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:51:26 PDT

Wired Pussy (0)

03-26-14 09:51am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (0)

To turboshaft (0):

Thanks for your comments.

I agree that scene length is probably the main factor in them not offering 1920x1080. The file sizes would be huge. As it is, they're large, but some could be near 10GB if they went full 1080p. That would be a huge storage issue for them, and a lot of bandwidth to keep just a few customers happy.

View Thread (2)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:33:24 PDT

Wired Pussy (0)

03-23-14 03:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by turboshaft (0)

To rearadmiral (0):

Great review, rearadmiral!

Can't say I'm a fan of this niche, as it seems to be more about what someone is feeling than can ever really be shown in porn, but Kink has always piqued my curiosity to say the least. And the now dormant Pissing.com made some lovably deviant material in its time.

They do seem to be in love with longer scene lengths on other sites, so maybe that's the reason behind "the lack of 1920x1080." I assume that's the case with this site as well, because you just don't want a 1080i download of an hour-plus long scene.

View Thread (2)

Wired Pussy Comment

Sun, 23 May 2010 15:01:09 PDT

Wired Pussy (0)

05-23-10 03:01pm

COMMENT by Jay G (0)

Excellent support service from Kink.com

When I had a problem with a Kink.com wired pussy video today, I emailed to alert them, expecting to get a reply in the next few days, because I've always had excellent service from Kink.com sites in the past.

Happily. Tyler from the service desk replied in a very short time on a Sunday and the problem was solved!

So used to poor service on many sites, I'm always very impressed with quick and effective replies from sites!

Visit Wired Pussy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: ramscrota's Review

Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:40:28 PST

Wired Pussy (0)

12-31-08 03:40am

REVIEW REPLY by ramscrota (0)

To TrashMan (0):

Hi Trashman. I've re-read my review, and I want to make clear the point your refer to. I stated "Great site that could only be improived marginally"
What I meant (and perhaps should have stated more clearly) is that there is almost nothing they need to improve on. I think the whole tenor of my write up is that I think it's a really good site.
Thanks for pointing it out to me - I'll think a little more carefully next time about how I write things up, to remove any ambiguity!

View Thread (2)

RE: ramscrota's Review

Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:05:55 PST

Wired Pussy (0)

12-28-08 04:05am

REVIEW REPLY by TrashMan (0)

To ramscrota (0):

Improved in what ways?

View Thread (2)