PU - Facial Abuse - All Activity

RE: Deleted Content

Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:54:22 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-22-11 12:54pm

COMMENT REPLY by uscue (39)

To uscue (39):

Nevermind, I think I'm thinking of MeatHoles

View Thread (1)

Facial Abuse Comment

Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:17:47 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-22-11 12:17pm

COMMENT by uscue (39)

Deleted Content

How much of their content is still available? I'm under the impression a lot of their older scenes have been deleted, such as Ricki White, etc

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Login broken,

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:10:52 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

06-20-11 09:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by deac (0)

To deac (0):

I got sent an e-mail saying that I would get a refund in 7-10 business days. Hopefully that works out.

How would I be able to contact Duke if that doesn't work out? Thank's for your reply.

View Thread (2)

RE: Login broken,

Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:45:33 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

06-18-11 06:45am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To deac (0):

I hope by now the log in problem was solved. My experience here is that the site has excellent customer service. Write to Duke, he is the owner.

View Thread (2)

Facial Abuse Comment

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:17:46 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

06-17-11 11:17pm

COMMENT by deac (0)

Login broken,

Like below, after an hour it all stopped working. I sent them a request for a refund but I'm doubtful. How did other people go in situations like this?

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Login no longer works

Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:02:59 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

04-21-11 08:02am

COMMENT REPLY by noche (0)

To popo (0):

Update: I heard from support that my account was "automatically" deleted and that I should receive a refund within 7-10 days. There are now two charges on my credit card and no refunds. I'll update here with info if I find out more.

View Thread (2)

RE: Login no longer works

Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:44:26 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

04-21-11 07:44am

COMMENT REPLY by noche (0)

To popo (0):

Same thing happened to me. Did you get a response from support or ever get back in?

View Thread (2)

Facial Abuse Comment

Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:00:06 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

04-18-11 08:00pm

COMMENT by popo (0)

Login no longer works

purchased the monthly subscription and worked great for the first hour. After that, got kicked off and haven't been able to log in since.

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 06:16:42 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

03-18-11 06:16am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To rearadmiral (141):

I have been a member of this site several times. I did not like that as time passed they seemed to have gotten rougher. I probably will not ever rejoin becasue of this. I agree with the word mysoginistic, as they do things that are degrading and sometimes spiteful, but not erotic. Two things I have to disagree with you about. I felt that by far the most extreme scenes were with the pornstars, not the first timers to porn. Another point is that I felt that having natural looking first timers added to the feel of reality that the HD videos create. You are THERE and the models look like someone you may meet or even know. Yes to each his own, but for me this was a plus. In porn I feel that what the models do is more important than how they look. Just my two cents for what its worth.

View Thread (1)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:25:02 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-10-11 03:25am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

As extreme as it is I'll keep them, if for no other reason that I never purge porn. I did that a couple of times back when digital media was still young and expensive and I came to regret it. Much of my quest for porn has been to find the stuff I purged. It's actually been pretty successful since most of it was movies from the early and mid-nineties.

And I agree that one of the many great things about PU is that there is always a way for members to ask each other questions.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:02:33 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-09-11 07:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rearadmiral (141):

I downloaded a couple of scenes and watched them until the pop shot but none has survived my purge. When all is said and done. I just found that none of the scenes are wood inducing and that's why I watch porn.

I really enjoyed your review and you hit all the important points. If anyone is really curious about what extreme might mean to you then they can always ask you.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:33:57 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-09-11 03:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

My review will be up by the time you read this, and while I wouldn't necessarily recommend this site to anyone, I hope that I kept it objective. My goal would be for someone to look at the reviews (all of them) and get a sense of what is there, plus get a sense of how the site measures up in objective technical stuff. Objectively, the site is great - there is a decent amount of material, the navigation is simple but effective, the download speeds are great, the scenes are well shot, well lit, etc. If someone were to read the reviews and say 'these two guys thought it was too extreme, but they also say the site is decent and not a rip off, then I feel safe joining' then I'm happy with that.

And full disclosure - after all my comments about it being too extreme, there are still some scenes that I plan to download.

View Thread (16)

RE: Joined recently and have had none of the reported problems

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:27:08 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-09-11 03:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To malikstarks (8):

I suspect that you're right on a lot of this. I don't like to make my reviews too subjective because just because I don't like a site doesn't mean it isn't good.

I also agree that there are a lot of women who enjoy rough sex and being dominated. Look at most of what is offered on the Kink.com network. Sites like The Training of O, Sex and Submission, Water Bondage, Public Disgrace all rely on women who like being treated roughly. Society SM and its sister sites are the same.

The physical torment that women are subjected to in the sites I listed above is the same or close to what goes on at Facial Abuse, but the mental element is completely different. On Kink and Society SM I get a stong idea that the women like what is going on, and more importantly that the men recognize that they the degradation and humiliation of the women is just part of the sex play. For Facial Abuse, I get the feeling that these guys genuinely dislike women and see nothing wrong with what they're doing. I get the feeling that when the scene is over at a Kink shoot that people help the woman get back into the real world after an intense BDSM session. At Facial Abuse, my suspicion is that when the scene ends the staff say 'here's your $50 you dumb cunt, now get the fuck out of here.' I may be wrong about that, but if I am it is mostly because site like Kink go out of their way to make it abundently clear that the women are tossed out like garbage. Maybe when the cameras are turned off at Facial Abuse the guys drop the 'douchebag' schtick.

Finally, while I agree that some women (maybe a lot of them) enjoy BDSM and related activities, (Bobbi Starr, Madison Young and Amber Rayne come to mind) I can't imagine that too many women really enjoy the kind of mental abuse dished out at Facial Abuse. But having said that, Amber Rayne did a scene here so what to make of that>

Thanks for the comments. Always great to have a chat about porn.

View Thread (4)

RE: Joined recently and have had none of the reported problems

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:11:59 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-09-11 03:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

So many others did have technical problems with the site that I thought I'd make the specific comment that I didn't have any of those issues. When you and I had a back-and-forth after you wrote your review that was one of my big concerns. If you reported problems I would have stayed away, but since you didn't I took the plunge. Maybe whatever problems other people had have been resolved.

I agree with you that there is good extreme and bad extreme. Read the comment from malikstarks in this thread. I agree with him too. But... there really is good extreme and bad extreme. Where is that line? I don't know. Maybe you and I are just being too subjective and basing this on taste. Maybe it's an age thing in that people younger than us have different media experiences. I still think that The Exorcist is the most scary movie ever made, because when it came out there was nothing like it. For someone in their 30s The Exorcist might seem tame and quaint.

But having said that, I still think that there has to be an objective standard for what is too extreme. And now that I think of it, there is. Most countries would have some criminal law dealing with this kind of material. You and I are both in Canada and I suspect that this material would be found to be illegal if we tried to import it as a DVD. The problem with using the criminal standard to determine whether this is too extreme is that that standard itself uses the :community standard" test. I'd bet you have trouble convincing blue-haired old Baptist ladies anywhere that this stuff isn't extreme, but they'd probably say that about tame mainstream porn too.

I think for me that I'm going to come down to the same test that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter used way back in 1964. To paraphrase him for this discussion, I may not be able to define what is too extreme, but I know it when I see it.

And I see it on this site.

View Thread (4)

RE: Joined recently and have had none of the reported problems

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:16:27 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-09-11 12:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To rearadmiral (141):

I have no problem with it. I strongly believe that there is a large percentage of women who get off on this type of sex. They just won't say so out of fear of being ostracized.

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:43:20 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-08-11 02:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rearadmiral (141):

Yes it is. In their defense they do call their site facial abuse. I would call it simply abuse which is the main theme of most videos.
I only rejoined them because of some of the performers they had on their site. I honestly didn't imagine that these girls would willingly allow themselves to be treated so badly.

I saw some personal pictures of a model that accepted to shoot for them and quit a very short time within the shoot because of the horrible treatment she was subjected to. Blood shot eyes and bleeding nose. You'll never see that shoot because she left too early. That's why I will never recommend that site to anyone.

View Thread (16)

RE: Joined recently and have had none of the reported problems

Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:38:37 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-08-11 02:38pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rearadmiral (141):

I had no major technical problem with the site. All my issues were about the content and you are correct in saying that it's extreme and in my view not good extreme but really unpleasant extreme.

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:38:02 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-08-11 02:38pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

pat - based on your review and the conversation we had in the comments section I took out a membership at Facial Abuse. Holy crap you weren't kidding when you said this stuff is extreme! I like hardcore BDSM and I even like some Max Hardcore stuff, but I found this shocking. That really surprised me. This seems to be abuse for the sake of abuse.

View Thread (16)

Facial Abuse Comment

Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:34:49 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

03-08-11 02:34pm

COMMENT by rearadmiral (141)

Joined recently and have had none of the reported problems

I joined Facial Abuse recently and I'm working my way through the material It is a LOT more extreme than I expected it to be. I like BDSM stuff, but this is too extreme for me. Objectively the site is great � lots of material, relatively easy to navigate, good download speeds � but subjectively, this site is probably only for a select group. Be warned - some of this stuff makes Max Hardcore look like a Girl Scout.

I haven't experienced any of the technical issues that people reported here. My log-in works all the time, and I find that download speeds are consistently around 1.3MB/sec. I haven't had to contact customer service for anything yet so I can't comment on that.

I�ll post a full review soon.

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Word of Warning

Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:07:29 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-29-10 07:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To drphil (5):

I will. I also contacted pat362 who wrote a review and while he didn't like the site for subjective reasons, he didn't have the problems you did. I might take the plunge...

View Thread (4)

RE: Word of Warning

Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:03:14 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-29-10 07:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by drphil (5)

To rearadmiral (141):

I did receive a refund and never actually heard from them any reasons nor did they ask me to rejoin at any point. I really wanted to join this site but I can't really see myself trying again and then having the same thing happen, fool me once kind of thing.
If you decide to join, good luck and please let me know how it turns out.

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:48:31 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-29-10 01:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

Thanks Pat.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:54:09 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-28-10 05:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rearadmiral (141):

No problem cancelling my membership. You will receive offers to rejoin them after your membership expires but that's standard for most porn site. I've never joined training of O but the content on Facial Abuse is very similar to public disgrace. The biggest difference is that I got a distinct feeling that Fa is more into hurting the girls and not necessarily in purely physical way but emotionaly as well.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:29:13 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-27-10 08:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

Pat - Thanks for the prompt reply. I am thinking about joining the site. I read yur review and I know what I'm in for. I like some of this stuff, and I know you've probably read some of my past reviews of sites like The Training of O. I like sites where women are submissive, but I also like it where the male dominance isn't over the top. In the Kink sites (The Training of O, Public Discrgace, etc.) it is pretty clear that there is no real abuse going on. That's important to me. Rough sex is one thing, but abusive sex is another. As a fellow Canuck, I'm sure you'll understand the issue that hockey may be a ROUGH game, but it doesn't have to be VIOLENT. That might apply here too.

One other question - do you remember having any problem cancelling your mmembership?

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:54:47 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-27-10 06:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rearadmiral (141):

I didn't have any major problem with the download speeds at the time of my membership. Are you planning on joining them? It's one of those sites that's hard to judge from the outside. You think that some of the content will be good but once inside you find that most of it isn't very good.

I'm sure you know what they are about but in case you don't. The first thing you have to know is that no matter how cute the girl might look. They manage to almost always make them look bad. The scenes are very intense and not necessarily in a good way. There a lot of choking, puking during the BJ part of the scene and that might not be your cup of tea. I won't mention the part about the facial because that's the name of the site. I sometimes have really stupid moments in my life and this was one of them. I really don't like facials so why would I join a site who's motto is exactly that?

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:19:10 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-27-10 06:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To pat362 (233):

Pat - how did you find the download speeds at Facial Abuse? Some people posted comments that it was really slow and those comments were posted before your review. I'm wondering if that got resolved.

Thanks!

View Thread (16)

RE: Word of Warning

Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:01:55 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

12-27-10 06:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To drphil (5):

drphil - did this ever get resolved? I'd like to join this site but your comments and some from others are a pretty big red flag.

Thanks!

View Thread (4)

RE: Word of Warning

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:20:18 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

09-14-10 01:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by Lionheart (47)

To drphil (5):

Sorry to hear that, I joined this website last year and had to problems with it. I hope you don't have to cancel your credit card, it is always a pain to request a new one.

View Thread (4)

Facial Abuse Comment

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:26 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

09-14-10 01:17pm

COMMENT by drphil (5)

Word of Warning

Last week I joined this site through the discount link on thebestporn.com. I have been charged the 19.95 and still have not been able to log in. None of my messages to customer support have been answered and when I try looking up my account I get an error. Yet somehow they managed to get the charging my credit card part right. I am still waiting for a response and hoping that they do not continue charging me after this billing cycle. I will post any changes that occur in regards to this problem.

This evening I checked my credit card statement and it appears that the charge has been removed per my request and hopefully this was just a misunderstanding or glitch. Have not heard from website so unsure of their side of things. Sorry we couldn't do business together but no harm no foul I suppose.

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: pat362's Review

Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:24:13 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

08-06-10 08:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To alexmedia (22):

I didn't find their older content to be as abusive as what they've produced in the last couple of years but it was still pretty extreme hardcore porn. The good thing about joining this site and making a review is that other's won't waste their money on this network. Some of us get burned so that others don't.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:42:33 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

08-06-10 04:42am

REVIEW REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To pat362 (233):

I was a member of that site some months ago. This site has some really abusive and strong BJ scenes, if you are not person who likes such kind of sex probably you should stay away from this site.

PS: personally, I like BJ but I will never be a member of this site anymore.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:04:32 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

07-26-10 08:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To mbaya (344):

My biggest issue is not so much the sites I got with my membership because I knew that ahead of time. It's the way they treat the girls and frankly I can't stand their style of BJ. I don't enjoy watching vomit in anything and that goes double for porn. Vomit=deadwood.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:42:58 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

07-26-10 05:42am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pat362 (233):

This site has changed in what content you get. I first signed up when it was new several years ago and they had just four sites, facialabuse.com,spermsuckers.com, ghettogaggers.com, and ebonycumdumps. Customer service was prompt and definitely first rate. Later they added a few other sites such as latinaabuse.com. Later they added leased content, but at least everything they had was linked together as a network at a reasonable price. Once the recession hit, they started bombarding me with almost constant promotions. I remember once getting 13 emails about a two week promotion. The content got rougher. Customer service became unresponsive. Lately I got an email from them about the promo that you signed up for, and it showed them as based in Cyprus, not the New Jersey address that they had previously. Now I see they have split it all up into several networks, with no access to out of network content. All I see is greed and a declining value for a membership.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:12:33 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

07-24-10 08:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To mbaya (344):

I didn't get access to those sites. They've altered the sites you
get with your membership. I think the last time I was a member you had those sites but not anymore. Of the ones that I got. I would say that only nasty little facials is still updating regularly with actual new content and not leased material.

I took a look at the 3 sites you mentioned and I don't recognize any of these girls so I can't say if they are new. I can say that none of the ones I looked at have had a bigger porn career beyond these sites.

View Thread (16)

RE: pat362's Review

Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:19:58 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

07-24-10 07:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pat362 (233):

Hi Pat,
I have been a member of this site several times, but lately it seems to be a bit too much. I am surprised that you said most of their sites are no longer updating. Did they give up on Spermsuckers, Ghettogaggers and Ebony cumdumps?

View Thread (16)

RE: They should change the name to Customer Abuse

Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:42:34 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

06-09-10 09:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by ipg386 (0)

To Khan (Staff):

It might be working now, but it wasn't for about half of the one month subscription I paid for and I never got a response to my email to the webmaster until after I canceled and got a generic response asking me to pay them again. Great idea, only give you half of what you pay for then ask you to pay again.

View Thread (2)

RE: They should change the name to Customer Abuse

Sat, 15 May 2010 06:48:54 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

05-15-10 06:48am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To ipg386 (0):

A TBP Editor checked and the site seems to be working correctly. The join page works as well as the members' area.

If you're still having problems with something else, we'll be happy to test further. Guess there's a chance it's a router issue someplace between where you are and where the site is hosted.

View Thread (2)

Facial Abuse Comment

Fri, 14 May 2010 21:57:38 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

05-14-10 09:57pm

COMMENT by ipg386 (0)

They should change the name to Customer Abuse

In the 8 days since I signed up, the site has never worked except for 5 minutes on two occasions. No response from webmaster.

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Torn4do's Review

Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:23:49 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

04-23-10 03:23am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Torn4do (13):

This has been one of my favorite sites. Recently I see the scenes getting even rougher, so I don't know. They have some great scenes though.

View Thread (1)

Facial Abuse Comment

Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:51:26 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

01-15-10 04:51pm

COMMENT by vouivre62 (0)

bandwidth restricted

WARNING! it's new but now they restricted their bandwidth and the download speed become extremely slow

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

Facial Abuse Comment

Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:09:17 PST

Facial Abuse (2)

01-14-10 12:09pm

COMMENT by vouivre62 (0)

download speed is ridiculous slow

i have just subscribed and the download speed today go fast 30ko/s even with internet download manager ! what's going on; i try download with an other website and the speed is normal: 1,4 Mo/S; also anyone had the same problem? it's a shame: the rest time for the file i downloading now is 23 hours!

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: To those who are turned off:

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:40:45 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-17-09 11:40am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To malikstarks (8):

Maybe it's just a matter of taste. Most people probably can't get into this site and a few others will find it totally offensive.

I felt bad after seeing some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are abusive and they probably crossed the line with the girl, but that wasn't the worst part. It's sort of sad that these women(the majority who wouldn't do this in real life) are willing to do this for money. Yes, a lot of women can get into rough sex, maybe a little hair pulling, being called a slut and being slapped on the ass while being fucked hard. Then you have the women who are into truly being dominated, these are usually your S&M chicks and they are unmistakable. IMHO most of the girls on this site are just able to handle extreme scenes if the pay is right. I don't believe that these girls particularly enjoy what goes on. This site is for us sick perverts.

The girls are not fucked up because they let guys choke with them there cocks until they vomit and then have it poured over their head. They problem is that they feel that is the best or only way to make a living.

View Thread (3)

RE: mbaya's Review

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:53:26 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-16-09 01:53am

REVIEW REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To mbaya (344):

Thx for your answer. I like facial but probably it's too extreme for me.

View Thread (6)

RE: To those who are turned off:

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:16:31 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 10:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To mbaya (344):

My comment was not really meant to criticize your review. I think it is a good review and you make a lot of good points. There are just a number of comments in general about the extreme nature of the site, but I don't think it's as bad as some are making it. I don't disagree that many of girls get in over their head, and I didn't realize they did all the shoots the same day. That said I'd have to think that most of them at least have viewed some of the video's from other girls prior to shooting. Many of these girls have made the rounds on other websites (some are hardcore vets). As for the first timers, based on at least some of the stories, they are the ones who contacted the producers (some are referrals from other girls). Also I HAVE seen them back off a bit when it get's to be too much.

I don't know, maybe I'm on the wrong side of it, and I don't want to come across as advocating for abuse. I just think there are a far more girls that go for this stuff than many might believe (and it shows in some of the interviews).For me this site is one that I join maybe a few times a year and only download a handful of scenes, so you may know better than I do.

View Thread (3)

RE: To those who are turned off:

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:27:05 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 09:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To malikstarks (8):

I basically agree, but---. I have been a longtime fan of the sex here, but not necessarily the abuse aspects. My point in my review was that the videos have changed focus in 2009. Yes some get off on being abused, but most of them here apparently do not. While some have shot videos for other sites in the network, most do not. Point B, most of the second or even third videos were made on the same day. This is stated repeatedly on the videos. The temptation here is obviously money, but what is also true is that they sign all the contracts in advance of filming. After the abusive video, the rest of them are relatively easy for the girls. I don't think that proves that the girls are not pushed beyond their limits. My final point is that in most 2009 videos, the models are visibly pissed and say so. When a model says stop, they don't. They may be coached to a degree, but you do see a LOT of very genuine reactions that this is more than they can handle. One thing mentioned on the site quite often is that the videos are real, sometimes very real. They are proud of their well deserved reputation as the most extreme site on the net. In the last year, there has been an evolution on this site away from the erotic. I am very much into this kind of video, so if I feel it is too much that means a lot.

View Thread (3)

Facial Abuse Comment

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:58:18 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 08:58pm

COMMENT by malikstarks (8)

To those who are turned off:

It IS a bit extreme but in fairness I'd just make two points:

1. The girls know what they are getting into. Most of them make appearances on the other network sites with the same guys doing softer stuff (regular blowjobs). Also,I have a feeling they are even "coached" a bit prior to the scene to keep them from bolting. Also, I've seen where the crew will back off a little if they see a girl really can't take it.

2. There are just some girls that really go for this stuff, even more than the guys. Some women just like to be completely dominated sexually from both a physical and mental standpoint.

Case in point: There is one girl who was one of their earlier updates (years ago) who really did get messed up a bit (think her name was "Theresa"). To make matters worse her parents got hold of the video (her dad actually watched it) and they went through the roof, threw the girl out of the house etc.

How do we know this? After seeing the video (and witnessing the fallout) her SISTER (yes Theresa's sister) decided she wanted some of what Theresa had. So she called up the producers and shot a scene a few months ago.(I forgot her name but I saw the scene where she tells the story) Witnessing the "abuse" of her sister and the other girls on the site just got her excited to the point she had to experience it herself. Despite even the outrage of her family. (her story even freaked out the director).

There are just some women (and men) who enjoy being submissive to the extreme. They may not have it all together mentally, but who is to say? I can understand that it may still be a turnoff nonetheless, but I just wouldn't make the mistake of feeling "guilty" about it.

Visit Facial Abuse - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:57:44 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 03:57am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To alexmedia (22):

I like BDSM, but this site is the most abusive one I have ever been a member of. For example kink.com has sites with an obvious BDSM theme, but the models there are treated much better. So far this year, they have 34 updates and have come close to one a week. Unfortunately that doesn't mean that all of them are downloadable yet, as 28 days have not passed for some of them. Further, some are downloadable only in 640x480 with no other options.

View Thread (6)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:51:05 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 03:51am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

The focus has changed. They always had a lot of the abuse that I mentioned, but I did not see it as what the site was about. I have liked their videos in the past, but really just the sex parts. The abuse has just gotten out of hand and is not sexy.

View Thread (6)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:45:35 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-15-09 02:45am

REVIEW REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

The tour page doesn't look like too much abuse. Is it really so extreme?

View Thread (6)

RE: mbaya's Review

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:40:39 PDT

Facial Abuse (2)

10-14-09 09:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To mbaya (344):

Judging only by your review, it seems to me that this material is NOT about sex, but is about violence and abuse.

None for me, thanks.

View Thread (6)