PU - Glamour Models Gone Bad - New Reviews

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:54:54 PDT

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

06-16-11 03:54am

REVIEW = 83 by The Collector (7)

Pros:
- Massive selection of models and years of updates
- 16 bonus sites
- Zip files for all picture sets
- Newer content is mostly HD
- Amazing price of 9.95 thanks to TBP
- Updates almost every day
- It does have a site search

Cons:
- A lot of the content is old and in low res format
- A lot of the content is non exclusive
- Tho updates are just about daily and are date stamped some does appear to be old or created some time ago and just held for a later release date.
- Most of the content all have the same theme (Girls are in clothes or lingerie, strip, the some go hardcore.) It would be nice to see some fetish latex, classroom fantasy, or out at a club. Mix it up a bit not just all in the same setting.
- Browsing layout is very basic (Nice for some people but I like when the webmaster tries a little bit more to make the lay out look nicer.)

Bottom Line:
Bottom line is that the site is nice and I do not regret it, it has a ton of content and lots of extras. The webmaster even has a post on the side of the members home page to keep you updated with site news. And it is mostly "A" or "B" list models, some sites have a vast selection of models but they are crappy, unknown, or unwanted models. This site seems to be full of favorites. However a lot of the content is older and kind of bland, they have yet to evolve with the times like for example Twistys is a very old site that figured out how to stay hot, fresh, and irresistible where GMGB seems to be stuck in the 1990's but for 10 bucks a month its worth joining.

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:21:28 PST

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

02-18-09 02:21pm

REVIEW = 81 by TrashMan (103)

Pros:
+Pornstar list, but...(see cons)
+Each model page links photos and videos, however...(see cons)
+There is a site search, but...(see cons)
+ZIP downloads for picture galleries and you don't even have to VISIT the gallery page to download them as the ZIP download links are on the homepage
+Every video and gallery has their associated date tag (unlike other sites which remove them off the updates page)
+Update schedule is pretty good (1 pic gallery and 1 video per day), and is certainly better than competition (KarupsPC/HA and ATKGalleria)
+Video downloads available in split and full scene.
+Newer vids are in HD (700x394)
+Content FEELS exclusive (but for the most part it isn't. Lot of Matrix Content vids)
+Comes with a few extra network sites which are good (see bottom line) one of which is completely dedicated Lonnie Waters!!!

Cons:
-Pornstar list is just a list, no headshots, and its just one long list of names, no separate pages for each letter
-Videos on model page is not linked very clearly. There is a text link at the bottom which says "Go to [insert model name]'s videos". Would prefer if they were linked like the pic sets (main image of each gallery is shown on model page)
-Site search does not do string searching, it all searching by tags and genres.
-Videos only available as WMV
-Preview images for videos lacking - only one preview image per video
-Associated image galleries not linked on video page (and vice versa), that is assuming there are galleries which were taking during the video shoot (which is not always the case)
-Stream links are same links as download and therefore don't work in opening embedded WMP in FireFox (they just act as download links)
-Vids and pics have watermarks (albeit subtle ones), moreover it is only recent (all updates on and after Nov 15, 08). Older vids/pics have no watermark

Bottom Line:
Overall a very good site. Its competition is KarupsPC (and KarupsHA), ATKGalleria, PixAndVideo and 1By-Day and unfortunately I'd put it at the bottom of the pile though, but its not like its far off. The content is good, the quality of videos and pictures are good, and I think that the recent addition of watermarks is indication that they are moving away from just republishing content from studios like Matrix Content towards producing their own content (which is a good thing). Their update schedule is certainly better than Karups, and on par with PixAndVideo and 1By-day. They just need to work on layout (which is certainly lacking when compared with the other 4 sites) and improve the site search capabilities.

I am not overly pleased that the HD resolution isn't standard resolutions like 480p (720x480), 720p (1280x720), but its not a deal breaker.

There are a lot of models and a lot of content, so there is definitely something for everyone. Just improve the layout (which hasn't changed in years) and it puts the site right up there.

On another note, there is no bonus material. The "bonus" material is just a bunch of bonus galleries and videos that could otherwise fit in the standard non-"bonus" library. It is a little outdated too.

Site is a little expensive but it is on par with the competition:
GMGB = $25/mo
ATK = $30/mo
PaV = $30/mo
Karups = $30/mo
1By-Day = $35/mo

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:38:22 PDT

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

03-13-08 10:38am

REVIEW = 85 by badandy400 (103)

Pros:
A great deal of conents
Newer pictures are in Hi Def
Newer videos are in Hi Def as well
Gives access to 3 other site
$15/month retention offer
All photos offer zips
Use CCBill

Cons:
Anything but the newest stuff is lower resolution
The zips are named after the gallery, not the model
Connection limit, 24 hour reset

Bottom Line:
The zips are not named with the model's name in it so you have yo rename the zips file. You can have 400 zips with the name "hardcore" or "red bra" for example, but that does not let you who they are!

They do limit the connection to 5 connections according to them, but it is very inconsistent. I have been boot off for downloading with 3 connections max before, and been left alone when downloading 8 at a time. So keep the number of downloads low, this is a good site to use a manager for to limit the simultaneous downloads. The speed is good though for the site, so downloading is not slow coming.

There is a good deal of models here, several hundred! I will try to update this review with actual amount of content shortly. Many of the models can be seen elsewhere, but the content seems to be mostly exclusive.

The customer service does respond to questions within a reasonable time.

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:43:09 PDT

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

09-05-07 09:43am

REVIEW = 77 by Denner (227)

Pros:
Amazing amout of content
A lot of videos and a vast amount of photos.
Zip for photos, but very different sizes - some newer 1380x2000 px - some older a lot lower.
Bonus-sites for Crissy Moran, Lonnie Waters and Natalia Cruze. And another bonus site: Amateur Models Gone Bad.
Zip for photos.

Cons:
Non-exclusive content.
Though Glamour Models Gone Bad has a hugh amount of content, the videos are mostly low/bad quality. Some of the latest ones are good though.
Average price ($24.95) - but still too expensive for what you get.

Bottom Line:
77 is in the higher level of average.
That's what this site/these sites are: Average!

And maybe 77 is too high. But ok, the best thing about this deal is, that you ALSO get access to the bonus-sites of Crissy Moran and Lonnie Waters.

The two big sites: Glamour.. and Amateur... are for certain average.
Most photos I've seen somewhere else - the same goes for the videos. A few good ones from newer dates - and a lot (and I mean A LOT) of lousy quality videos from ealier dates.
There are plenty of stuff to search for, but at Glamour... and Amateur it's foremost photos that would go in the higher league.

I'm a big fan of Crissy Moran and I adore Lonnie Waters. But these sites tends only to photo-fans.
The Crissy site- even if it's apparently official - are only great for photos. The videos are a laughter compared to what you can find other places - mostly bad, bad quality - the same goes for Lonnies site (six videos - and no good quality) - much better videos at Twisty, M and B - and many others.

But ok, the best hit for Crissy-fans are the swell amount of good photos here.

I'd almost put it like this: Forget about all the other non exclusive stuff at these 5 sites in one deal.
And the price: They lower it under the infamous $29.95, but even $24.95 is too expensive for what you get. I've been a member twice before, but this is probably the last time....

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:26:48 PDT

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

06-09-07 12:26pm

REVIEW = 86 by exotics4me (431)

Pros:
- Huge site, especially considering that it comes with two other sites if you sign up through Crissy Moran's site.
- Haven't went through the 1,000+ scenes yet to see if all are, but all of the videos I've downloaded are coming up in 640 resolution. Which according to standards is now considered DVD resolution.
- Tons of models, Eva Angelina, Audrey Bitoni, Anetta Keys, Antianna Amarillo (had trouble finding much of her anywhere else!)
- Got to love a site that says "still no ugly chicks"

Cons:
- Non exclusive content, but I haven't seen most of the content that I have downloaded so far
- Pictures could be bigger

Bottom Line:
I signed up for Crissy Moran's site, and this site and Amateur Models Gone Bad came with it. When I opened this Glamour site for the first time, I was expecting your usual 3rd rate cheap site, only to find out that it could easily stand on its own.
Note, if you have been on many sites like this one, some of this content may not be new to you. I noticed in each review on TBP that each reviewer listed that it isn't exclusive content, but since a lot of my viewing is on individual sites, the content of this many models is new to me. The navigation is very easy to use with a models page that lists each model and shows a good size thumbnail of each. The videos are really nice looking, I have to wonder at what point are we asking too much when a site has over 1,000 videos, and we are still asking for higher than DVD resolution for $24.95.

The pictures could be better/bigger, but they aren't that bad, considering it comes off more as a video site anyway. The good news is that the pictures are available in zip sets and do have upwards of 100 pics per set.

I keep going back to what is and what isn't exclusive, with so many models, I have to think that at least some of it is going to be new to the members. I know that I hadn't found hardly any content of Antianna Amarillo, and found her very attractive, so her section was my first to visit.
Very good site overall, especially if you are a fan of Crissy Moran, and get this site free with hers. I recommend it based on that!

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamour Models Gone Bad Review

Fri, 25 May 2007 04:25:39 PDT

Glamour Models Gone Bad (1)

05-25-07 04:25am

REVIEW = 80 by IcemanTC (8)

Pros:
- Nice models.
- Large collection.
- Hardcore content.
- Good picture quality.

Cons:
- Poor navigation.
- Could need more updates.
- Some updates are really old picture sets.

Bottom Line:
Nice site with many content but after a while it didn't interest me anymore.

Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad - View Replies - Add Reply