<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Amateurs Gone Bad - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23888</guid>
		<title>Amateurs Gone Bad Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23888</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateursgonebad.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateurs Gone Bad&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:47pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;227&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Tremendous amount of videos and photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Video-quality is still getting better (new ones, of course)&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
Access to four more sites, mainly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/glamourmodelsgonebad/&quot;&gt;Glamour Models Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt; and the great &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/crissymoran/&quot;&gt;Crissy Moran&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Daily updates for the two main sites AGB and GMGB.&lt;br /&gt;
Good mix of both US and Euro models&lt;br /&gt;
Zip for photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Stream for those who dig that
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very slow updates for some bonus-sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/crissymoran/&quot;&gt;Crissy Moran&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lonniewaters/&quot;&gt;Lonnie Waters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Early videos in poor quality&lt;br /&gt;
Only wmv-downloads&lt;br /&gt;
Too many models without video&lt;br /&gt;
Irregular download speed&lt;br /&gt;
Most content non-exclusive
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a site that has grown over the years - both in quantity (of course), and in quality.&lt;br /&gt;
It's part of a &amp;quot;network&amp;quot; where you get five sites - no matter which you join.&lt;br /&gt;
Top pick here is of course &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/glamourmodelsgonebad/&quot;&gt;Glamour Models Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
In the package you also get Crissy Morans official-site (it's called that, anyway), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lonniewaters/&quot;&gt;Lonnie Waters&lt;/a&gt; and Natalia Cruz.&lt;br /&gt;
Joined because of Crissy - here are some tremendous newer videos (most in full files) both solo and hardcore. Those videos are a tresure for Crissy-fans. Crisp quality - between 90 and 270 Mb. Only WMV.&lt;br /&gt;
Lonnie has few videos - bad quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Natalia Crus: average video quality.&lt;br /&gt;
The two main-sites delivers a magnificent amount of material - both videos og photosets. Video-files mostly between 80 and 200 Mb - and again the later are in best quality - early ones just poor.&lt;br /&gt;
Photosets today mostly 1500x1000 and with zip.&lt;br /&gt;
A bit strange difference in models at Glamour and Amateur:&lt;br /&gt;
Amateur has a lot of european models - both video and photosets - whereas the main part of videos at Glamour are US-models, but a lot of euro models for the photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
A somewhat 50/50 deal on hc and sologirl.&lt;br /&gt;
Fine preview inside: videos in smaller part (and full) or stream in smaller part and full. &lt;br /&gt;
This site/sites have been around for a long time and today it has both a lot of content - though most is non-exclusive - and far better quality.&lt;br /&gt;
If your're a serious pornbrowser these sites has a lot to offer in hours and hours of videos of both hc, lez and especially solo-girl nature...&lt;br /&gt;
It's recommended...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3244&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23888&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23888&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:47:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4835</guid>
		<title>Amateurs Gone Bad Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4835</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateursgonebad.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateurs Gone Bad&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:33am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- DVD quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Tons of pictures, over 2,000 sets &lt;br /&gt;
- Comes as a bundle of sites with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/glamourmodelsgonebad/&quot;&gt;Glamour Models Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/crissymoran/&quot;&gt;Crissy Moran&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nataliacruze/&quot;&gt;Natalia Cruze&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lonniewaters/&quot;&gt;Lonnie Waters&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
- Considering the $24.95 price, the sites combined make for a seriously great value&lt;br /&gt;
- Has some older content that most haven't seen before of now famous starlets
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some of these girls aren't amateurs, not for sure if the content was created before they became professionals or not.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not much difference from video to video, positions are similar, even the sequence of positions.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Let me start off by saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/crissymoran/&quot;&gt;Crissy Moran&lt;/a&gt;'s site and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/glamourmodelsgonebad/&quot;&gt;Glamour Models Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt; are good enough together for $24.95, that does not mean the company should stop offering these others though! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had posted awhile back about searching DVD sites for Eva Angelina and Nautica Thorn content, as I like curvy women. There is Nautica content on here, and it is very good. Really, you don't see a lot of Nautica pictures since she is more known for her videos, so these were a nice surprise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also recognized Pavlina, who I've seen on many Euro sites and another nice surprise, a Hispanic model named Ramona. She has been on FTV as well, really pretty, nice hips and butt. It was good to see some hardcore of her. Each of the sites that come together in this package, have decent to above average navigation, though you wonder how long these sites have been up without an update to the look of the sites. I add that simply because if I wasn't a TBP user, and just happened upon the site, it would look outdated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content is fairly repetitive, but then again, as I have said before, it isn't like there are that many positions or settings that we can expect. I'm really nitpicking here because the site really does feel like a &amp;quot;bonus&amp;quot; site since I would have joined for Crissy's site and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/glamourmodelsgonebad/&quot;&gt;Glamour Models Gone Bad&lt;/a&gt;, I guess you could say this site is just the gravy on top of my steak. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good site, I recommend joining through Crissy's site and enjoying all the bonus content!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3244&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4835&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4835&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:33:23 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4092</guid>
		<title>Amateurs Gone Bad Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4092</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateursgonebad.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateurs Gone Bad&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateursgonebad/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-25-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:28am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;IcemanTC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Nice Picturelover site.&lt;br /&gt;
- Large content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Also Hardcore Sets.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- I think nor all is exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
- Some pretty old sets.&lt;br /&gt;
- Poor navigation.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Definetelly worth a look but it couldn't get me to stay a member for more than one month.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3244&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateurs Gone Bad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4092&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4092&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:28:08 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
