PU - XL Girls - All Activity

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:24:09 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 10:24am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (24)

To pornpundit (2):

Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!

All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.

To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.

Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"

View Thread (5)

RE: Something is wrong here

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:58:24 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 08:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To pornpundit (2):

We've looked at this several times now and don't see a problem. Each time we check, when we enter the id/pw/email and click the "join by credit card" link, it brings up the page where we'd enter CC info.

We can only suggest that you contact the site directly.

Sorry we can't be of more help but again, the site seems to be working fine for us.

View Thread (2)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:46:13 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 08:46am

COMMENT REPLY by pornpundit (2)

To messmer (24):

Please Sir Get real. If all you have to complain about is the logo...In Any case I appreciate logo's as they help to identify flicks in my collection. Now If only I could join the site at $19.95

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:13:47 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 07:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (17)

To messmer (24):

Well there are at least 2 of us that hate it. Its a huge reason for me to cancel for sure. Distracting and ruins the sexual nature of the photos to me. Like I said for free area promo, fine, I understand that. But paying customers shouldn't have to deal with it. A small watermark is perfect. I don't even mind a logo if its transparent and small enough, but I love the sites that just do the year and url in a nice crisp font.

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:47:06 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 06:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (24)

To TheRizzo (17):

It's a constant beef of mine, Rizzo. As far as I know all their sites suffer from over-sized logos. It's a puzzle to me that they keep any subscribers at all. Unless I'm too nit-picking about it and other users just aren't bothered by those abominations. I really wish a webmaster would look in on this one and give a reasonable explanation.

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:36:51 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 02:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (17)

To messmer (24):

I don't mind it if they do it big on their free promo material but to have that size of watermark on their members content is just ridiculous.

View Thread (5)

XL Girls Comment

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:01:13 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 01:01pm

COMMENT by messmer (24)

Company Logo Way Too Big!

This is another site where the watermarks are way too big and intrusive, at least in the picture sets. Who wants to stare at a company advertising itself in the most conspicuous places when you've paid to see an unmutilated, unobstructed picture. It's as bad as 40something.mag. The moment they'll reduce their self-promotion I'll be happy to subscribe. The models seem to be fine!

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

XL Girls Comment

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:56:43 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-10-08 02:56pm

COMMENT by mbaya (76)

not hot

The videos were not clear. In 2008 I expect sharper crisper images. I know this is a big breast site, but the videos focus excessively on touching breasts. If a girl is sexy because of her breasts, the GIRL is sexy. Her breasts make her sexy and should not be the focus. More whole girl emphasis please.

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Something is wrong here

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:39:00 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-08 02:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (15)

To pornpundit (2):

I would have been able to enter my credit card details ... strange isn't it? Have you tried to contact them via mail?

Cheers,
Smut

View Thread (2)

XL Girls Comment

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:29:56 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-08 11:29am

COMMENT by pornpundit (2)

Something is wrong here

UPDATE FOR JULY24 HEY BEST PORN GANG This is oneof my favorite BBW sites and the sign up page still claims that " this ,embership is not available" This is still the only site I've come accross that won't take my money1 HELP! At the present time there seems to be no way to join. Entering the usual info and clicking on any payment method brings up " this membership method is not available" Anyone know what's g
oing on. Help this is the first site that doesn't seem to want to take money! Pornpundit

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:39:52 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-07 05:39am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (234)

To sullivan (32):

It was my mistake not to mention that it was a special and day limited discount offer, my apologies and thanks for bringing it up!
If you have any more questions please feel free to ask.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:05:05 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-07 05:05am

REVIEW REPLY by sullivan (32)

To roseman (234):

I see; that makes sense now, it was a special and limited-time offer. Cool.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:55:48 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-21-07 10:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (234)

To sullivan (32):

At May's end I got an e-mail from Scoreland (I was a previous member of Scorevideos) saying that they celebrate something (If I remember correct some years since they started their company) and they offered special monthly subscription prices discounts.For example you could get access to ScoreLand for 15 USD than 30.Then I tryed XLgirls and noticed that there were a free 7 days trial (special offer as well). These offers where available only for 20 days ( 1 - 20 June , as was written at the e-mail ). Hope that helps.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:09:38 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-21-07 09:09am

REVIEW REPLY by sullivan (32)

To roseman (234):

I'm confused by your information about the subscription price for XLGirls:
- the current advertised mo. price is 29.95, not "15 USD"
- there is no FREE 7 Days trial that I have seen anywhere

I hope you can offer evidence for these claims, because they don't match what I've paid in the past or what I can see now.

View Thread (4)