PU - XL Girls - All Activity

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:28:40 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-17-12 03:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by BubbaGump (12)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

Hello Buddhist. Thanks for the feedback. I only have two other sites I belong to so only a couple more reviews to do.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:44:02 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 01:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To BubbaGump (12):

Bubba - I've said it more than a few times on here that a good bottom line really makes for a top-notch review. You may be new here, but I'm gonna call you the King of the Bottom Lines! Great job - and keep 'em coming!

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:23:24 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 01:23pm

REVIEW REPLY by BubbaGump (12)

To messmer (123):

hmm..Interesting. I read the reply from the Customer Service rep in that thread.

Not sure what to make of that. Piracy certainly would be a top concern on my mind if I owned a site. However, the 7 week cutoff seems rather arbitrary. Why 7 and not 12, for instance?

My hunch on this is that the explanation is partially true--my opinion only and not to be taken as fact. There are concerns about piracy, but I also suspect this might just be a good business move in terms of bandwidth. I say this as they do not employ this date restriction with photo gallery downloads. I downloaded galleries from stuff dated way back to 2005. There are no restrictions. I assume pirates will go after the photos as well.

So, my guess is that this limit also serves as a practical bandwidth decision that keeps the server from slowing down with folks downloading older videos.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:42:24 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 12:42pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To BubbaGump (12):

Thanks, BubbaGump. With the other sites I referred to it made the downloads of new material possible for 7 weeks (I think) .. see comments at 50plus MILFS ... and then it was no longer downloadable. So anything older than that suddenly was no longer there for the user. Funny way of doing business.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:36:27 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 12:36pm

REVIEW REPLY by BubbaGump (12)

To messmer (123):

Hello.

I don't see anything at Scoreland indicating a limit on downloads. There is no info in the signup screen indicating a limit but it doesn't say 'Unlimited Downloads' either. I do not download much in the way of videos so I didn't even think about this when signing up. If there is a lmit, it's probably snuck in on the fine-print on those user aggreements we always click yes to.

On this subject, something wierd I discovered at XL girls was that some videos did not have a download option at all, while others did. It makes no sense as to why certain videos could not be downloaded. It doesn't appear to be based on when the video was added or any specific content. For instance, a recent XXX action video can be downloaded, whereas a solo video one-month old cannot and vice-versa at places.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:09:04 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 12:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To BubbaGump (12):

Another great and detailed review. I have one question, some of my Score sites (50plus MILFS, 60plus MILFS) have gone to limited downloads of videos. Did they change this site as well?

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:12:11 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 09:12am

REVIEW REPLY by BubbaGump (12)

To otoh (34):

Hi. Thanks, guys.

I try to offer the kind of info I like to see. I try not to overdo a review, but considering we spend money on this stuff, it is certainly worth it to give the straight poop.

I always thought of porn review sites as simply fronts for studios, as a lot do seem to be heavily biased. This site seems pretty objective and fair so far and the members giving reviews are not just someone from the company in disguise.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:53:40 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-16-12 01:53am

REVIEW REPLY by otoh (34)

To BubbaGump (12):

As per the esteemed gaypornolover - another hugely comprehensive review, good to have you on board and look forward to more!

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:25:20 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-15-12 08:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by gaypornolover (14)

To BubbaGump (12):

WOW now this is what I call a review! Well done - love the grades you give too!

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:00:37 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-15-12 05:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by BubbaGump (12)

To Monahan (37):

They do that at scoreland, too. I was offered XLGirls for $19.99 and the Scoreland sub was $39.99.

As I mentioned in my other review, the price is on the high side.

IMO, XL girls should be a subsite to Scoreland. The sites that are offered at Scoreland as subsites are really not that great--basically just older content of some of the classic scoreland models.

View Thread (11)

RE: BubbaGump's Review

Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:25:42 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-15-12 04:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To BubbaGump (12):

At $39.99 per month, this is one of the more expensive sites out there...and yet they have the audacity to offer Scoreland for "just" $19.99 more.

I like the content as described in this review but I would think the webmaster would make a whole lot more money by getting horndogs like me to sign up at $29.99 for the package.

View Thread (11)

XL Girls Comment

Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:20:39 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-15-12 04:20pm

COMMENT by Monahan (37)

Curious Pricing Strategy

The TBP price shows $39.99 per month and a LIMITED trial for $2.99.

That pricing matches what the site says...but they have a small print comment under the trial price on the site that says the trial renews at $29.99.

If that's accurate, it obviously pays to by the trial to get the better price.

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

XL Girls Comment

Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:17:01 PST

XL Girls (2)

02-05-10 10:17am

COMMENT by pornpundit (2)

Not Full trial

I just joined using your site and found that the trial is limited and I was not able to download a thing....not happy

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

XL Girls Comment

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:01:13 PST

XL Girls (2)

01-27-10 10:01pm

COMMENT by malikstarks (8)

Slight Typo here guys

TPB has this listed for $39.99 recurring. It's really still just $29.99 for recurring and $39.99 non-recurring (one-time for the suckers out there who don't know how to cancel)

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: No growth

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:27:35 PST

XL Girls (2)

02-13-09 03:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To fiou (0):

Don't know exactly how big you like them but Brazzersnetwork is relatively inexpensive, has a ton of big chested gals, no DL limits and has reasonable quality. DDF Busty is more expensive but has better quality and no DL limits.

View Thread (1)

XL Girls Comment

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:37:56 PST

XL Girls (2)

02-12-09 08:37am

COMMENT by fiou (0)

No growth

Well, I was a member a year ago. I've joined again last week and I already have all the videos that were added since last year. Not much content. I was tempted by divinebreasts but there is a daily 500 MBs download limit. Any suggestions of big breasts sites I should try? I am also a member of videobox and it expires soon. Should I try another?

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

XL Girls Comment

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:14:45 PST

XL Girls (2)

02-10-09 01:14pm

COMMENT by fiou (0)

Not that much to download

I was a member a year ago. I have just join again because I love all the models but the video quality is still average. The site mostly tries to sell their DVDs. Downloads can sometimes be slow.

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:24:09 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 10:24am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To pornpundit (2):

Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!

All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.

To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.

Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"

View Thread (5)

RE: Something is wrong here

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:58:24 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 08:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To pornpundit (2):

We've looked at this several times now and don't see a problem. Each time we check, when we enter the id/pw/email and click the "join by credit card" link, it brings up the page where we'd enter CC info.

We can only suggest that you contact the site directly.

Sorry we can't be of more help but again, the site seems to be working fine for us.

View Thread (2)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:46:13 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-15-08 08:46am

COMMENT REPLY by pornpundit (2)

To messmer (123):

Please Sir Get real. If all you have to complain about is the logo...In Any case I appreciate logo's as they help to identify flicks in my collection. Now If only I could join the site at $19.95

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:13:47 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 07:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To messmer (123):

Well there are at least 2 of us that hate it. Its a huge reason for me to cancel for sure. Distracting and ruins the sexual nature of the photos to me. Like I said for free area promo, fine, I understand that. But paying customers shouldn't have to deal with it. A small watermark is perfect. I don't even mind a logo if its transparent and small enough, but I love the sites that just do the year and url in a nice crisp font.

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:47:06 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 06:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To TheRizzo (23):

It's a constant beef of mine, Rizzo. As far as I know all their sites suffer from over-sized logos. It's a puzzle to me that they keep any subscribers at all. Unless I'm too nit-picking about it and other users just aren't bothered by those abominations. I really wish a webmaster would look in on this one and give a reasonable explanation.

View Thread (5)

RE: Company Logo Way Too Big!

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:36:51 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 02:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To messmer (123):

I don't mind it if they do it big on their free promo material but to have that size of watermark on their members content is just ridiculous.

View Thread (5)

XL Girls Comment

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:01:13 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-12-08 01:01pm

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Company Logo Way Too Big!

This is another site where the watermarks are way too big and intrusive, at least in the picture sets. Who wants to stare at a company advertising itself in the most conspicuous places when you've paid to see an unmutilated, unobstructed picture. It's as bad as 40something.mag. The moment they'll reduce their self-promotion I'll be happy to subscribe. The models seem to be fine!

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

XL Girls Comment

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:56:43 PDT

XL Girls (2)

07-10-08 02:56pm

COMMENT by mbaya (344)

not hot

The videos were not clear. In 2008 I expect sharper crisper images. I know this is a big breast site, but the videos focus excessively on touching breasts. If a girl is sexy because of her breasts, the GIRL is sexy. Her breasts make her sexy and should not be the focus. More whole girl emphasis please.

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Something is wrong here

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:39:00 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-08 02:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (40)

To pornpundit (2):

I would have been able to enter my credit card details ... strange isn't it? Have you tried to contact them via mail?

Cheers,
Smut

View Thread (2)

XL Girls Comment

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:29:56 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-08 11:29am

COMMENT by pornpundit (2)

Something is wrong here

UPDATE FOR JULY24 HEY BEST PORN GANG This is oneof my favorite BBW sites and the sign up page still claims that " this ,embership is not available" This is still the only site I've come accross that won't take my money1 HELP! At the present time there seems to be no way to join. Entering the usual info and clicking on any payment method brings up " this membership method is not available" Anyone know what's g
oing on. Help this is the first site that doesn't seem to want to take money! Pornpundit

Visit XL Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:39:52 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-07 05:39am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To sullivan (32):

It was my mistake not to mention that it was a special and day limited discount offer, my apologies and thanks for bringing it up!
If you have any more questions please feel free to ask.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:05:05 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-22-07 05:05am

REVIEW REPLY by sullivan (32)

To roseman (253):

I see; that makes sense now, it was a special and limited-time offer. Cool.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:55:48 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-21-07 10:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To sullivan (32):

At May's end I got an e-mail from Scoreland (I was a previous member of Scorevideos) saying that they celebrate something (If I remember correct some years since they started their company) and they offered special monthly subscription prices discounts.For example you could get access to ScoreLand for 15 USD than 30.Then I tryed XLgirls and noticed that there were a free 7 days trial (special offer as well). These offers where available only for 20 days ( 1 - 20 June , as was written at the e-mail ). Hope that helps.

View Thread (4)

RE: roseman's Review

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:09:38 PDT

XL Girls (2)

06-21-07 09:09am

REVIEW REPLY by sullivan (32)

To roseman (253):

I'm confused by your information about the subscription price for XLGirls:
- the current advertised mo. price is 29.95, not "15 USD"
- there is no FREE 7 Days trial that I have seen anywhere

I hope you can offer evidence for these claims, because they don't match what I've paid in the past or what I can see now.

View Thread (4)