<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Amateur Allure - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_60646</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60646</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-18-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:56am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 76&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1999&quot;&gt;HeatherMcXxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1999&quot;&gt;9&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like &quot;silly girl.&quot; (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl &quot;show us&quot; what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: &quot;What are you going to do now?&quot; Model on her knees: &quot;Suck your cock?&quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60646&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=60646&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:56:28 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_60108</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60108</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-02-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:15pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=14747&quot;&gt;haagar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=14747&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ This site features the most incredible attractive girls (around twenties). I don't know how they do it, but all of them cooperate as if they were under a powerful pleasure spell or somekind (must have something to do with that sinister background tune and the bright ring lighting).&lt;br /&gt;
Among the latest killer blond models feature: Sophia (spelled as Sofia) Sutra and Samantha Saint. What an enjoyable feast to see them perform in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, be fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Truly Amazing! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
+ What else? Great make-up and setting. &lt;br /&gt;
+ Large archive: I count 240+ scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+ Among these archived scenes, precious gems can be found like Samantha Sin and Courtney (yeah!).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Only one update per week (on friday). No HD - but it's still ok: 800x450 @ 8Mbit/s (but nowadays we'd appreciate HD badly, right?)&lt;br /&gt;
- Only two formats: WMV and MOV. &lt;br /&gt;
- Old clips are still around - but with ancient formats (320x240) and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)&lt;br /&gt;
- The site owner is struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure): news items have not been updated. But hey? as long as the updates are coming, it's fine by me.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Quality and originality comes with a price. &lt;br /&gt;
Quality also cost energy and resources to make it.&lt;br /&gt;
This relatively small site is amazing with regard to original high quality content. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with the term 'amateur', I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference ;) The girls are hot!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My advice to the site owner: &lt;br /&gt;
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to high res (800x450) to provide better value with minimum effort&lt;br /&gt;
+ Upgrade to HD if possible&lt;br /&gt;
+ Roll longer POV shots while she is on her back (these are really addictive scenes to enjoy!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I give amateurallure a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base. European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60108&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=60108&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 13:15:02 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49439</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49439</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-03-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:28am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12840&quot;&gt;247skizia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12840&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Lots of cute girls, currently the site has roughly 180 different girls on it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Lots of archived content.  Although most girls only do one set, there are a fair number that do 2, 3 or lots of sets.  I'd put the number of actual sets in the 350ish range.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Almost all sets have a pic set that accompanies it, except for the really old sets, and recently they have added a option to download the picset as a zip file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-All vids are shot POV style, which I personally love.  I know it's not some peoples cup of tea, but I'm counting it as a pro.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-All girls swallow, it's kind of the whole reason the site was created in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Most videos available in WMV, MOV and the newest ones are available as a download for your iphone.  Also I like that for all the newer videos you can either download the whole thing, or just the end with the cumshot and swallowing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM, need I say more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-All exclusive content.  No rehashed scenes here.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-It's been said before, the site has a formula.  Talk, Suck, Fuck, Suck, Swallow, Strip, HJ/BJ, Lick off fingers.  It's rarely deviated from, but there are some that are different.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The director (Thomas) uses these weird ring style lights to bring out the girl's eyes.  It's kinda neat the first time you see it, but it gets old... fast.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Being how I like POV, it really annoys me that the site breaks POV for the sex scenes and some of the BJ scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Spermcam, luckily they don't do it as often anymore, but they will cum in a girl's mouth, then get a super closeup of the sperm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-4GB cap per day.  I'm ok with a DL cap, but seeing as how the newer vids are about 500 MBs, that seems restrictive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Older videos are only available in Quicktime, which is a format I dislike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Internally the site is harder to navigate than if you aren't a member, seems weird to me.  It's not hard to navigate, just not as easy as it is if you aren't a member.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is my second time being a member of this site.  I went back because I was offer a 50% discount.  Not that I wouldn't have gone back eventually on my own, but I'm a sucker for a good deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guy who run's the site (Thomas) came up with the idea that girls swallowing is awesome and I agree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a long time I avoided the site because of the Quicktime file format, but after added support for WMV files I quickly joined.  Personally I love the site, the content is great, I have some minor gripes but for the most part I really enjoy the content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Side note is that for many years Thomas was the only person behind the camera, recently it has switched and a new guy (Ray) has started filming about half the scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line is I love this site.  I will end up coming back again and again.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49439&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=49439&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:28:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_36591</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=36591</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-24-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:08am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Very attractive girls, mostly 18-22.&lt;br /&gt;
-Sticks to the niche of pretty girls performing blow jobs with swallowing.&lt;br /&gt;
-179 girls with many having more than one scene.&lt;br /&gt;
-The latest updates can be downloaded as scenes or whole videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-At least one photo set for each video.&lt;br /&gt;
-The archive goes back to 1999.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Only 2 download options-Quicktime and WMV, 800x450, 2177kbps for the most recent update. Decent, but no comparison to the better sites on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
-The scenes are extremely repetitious. The girl sucks his cock, there may be vaginal,and the guy comes in her mouth. Then the camera focuses on the cum in her mouth, the girl strips, shows off her body, gives him a handjob, he comes on her fingers, she licks them off-nice, but every scene is identical.&lt;br /&gt;
-Only one stunt cock, who also is the only cameraman. Sometimes poorly shot videos as a result. The money shot often focuses on her hair, chin, the wall, etc. In all fairness, I couldn't do better. After all, who can film well while coming in a pretty girl's mouth? There is a real need for a real professional photographer.&lt;br /&gt;
-Blabby stunt cock/cameraman.&lt;br /&gt;
-Daily download limit. I was locked out at 6.64GB. No DM support. &lt;br /&gt;
-Boring photosets. Except for the money shot photos, the photos were either not explicit or were diagonals. Useles
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					In 1999, Thomas felt there was a need on the internet for a site featuring blow jobs with swallowing, performed by pretty barely legal age girls. He delivers what he set out to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I think his creativity as well as attention to detail ended at that point. Every scene is virtually a clone of each other. The girls, although nice to look at, are very similar. Almost without exception, they are White, the same age, dressed in similar nice clothes, almost identical makeup, earrings, you name it. Almost no variation even on the most unimportant aspects. Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost half of the videos are available only in Quicktime. He states on the site that when he started in 1999, Quicktime was superior to WMV. It is time to move on and leave Quicktime in the museum of old porn sites. I found that the WMV videos also could not play on my WD Media Player. It is probably an older version of WMV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, not one video I downloaded could be played on my video setup. Even the Arcsoft Video Converter that came with the video player could not convert the files to a format it could play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site has a great concept, but comes across as a site run by an amateur. The girls should be the amateurs, not the site itself. For a stand alone site without any extras or network, this is far too expensive. You can find a better value elsewhere.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=36591&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=36591&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:08:57 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_35708</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35708</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-01-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7304&quot;&gt;oneshrutebuck&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7304&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*gorgeous girls&lt;br /&gt;
*fast downloads&lt;br /&gt;
*lot of content&lt;br /&gt;
*delivers what it promises
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*poorly archived&lt;br /&gt;
*doesn't show the girls naked enough, some girls not at all&lt;br /&gt;
*bad camera angles
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Well worth the one month cost, unfortunately I bought the 3month deal.  I loved looking at just about every girl on the site.  But, I am a boob man at heart and there were too many gorgeous girls that never showed their boobs. Also, I want to see more of the girls body during the action.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35708&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=35708&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_35168</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35168</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-19-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 91&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7192&quot;&gt;tikkit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7192&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ very attractive women&lt;br /&gt;
+ unique visual style, no other site shoots like amateur allure, visually appealing to me at least&lt;br /&gt;
+ all updates can be seen in tour&lt;br /&gt;
+ Thomas just seems to be a cool dude, unlike &amp;quot;counterparts&amp;quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedteens/&quot;&gt;Exploitedteens&lt;/a&gt; or exploitedcollegegirls
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- older videos in quicktime only, I generally don't like quicktime videos&lt;br /&gt;
- pictures not in any type of zip or download manager friendly format&lt;br /&gt;
- sex in each scene is usually way too short&lt;br /&gt;
- daily DL limit appears to be about 8 gb, though do you really need more than 8 gb in one day?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is one of my favorite sites out there, one of those that I want ALL content on the site saved after my subscription is over.&lt;br /&gt;
(I don't understand those who have recurring monthly subscriptions unless some incentive of a new group of content is available each month)&lt;br /&gt;
Good Scenarios, not cheesy or poorly acted, This is POV porn that actually works! The reason I think is not just because of the models that are in the scenes, but also the format in which it is shot. High quality close ups and no quick cutting from angle to angle. To me, this is one of the most &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; sites out there, Thomas doesn't drone on about how great the girls boobs are, or hard his member is, he just appreciates the situation for what it is, a (usually) very hot girl who is there to enjoy the action.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the sex part is very short compared to most videos on other sites, but here it sort of adds to the atmosphere, you can use your imagination on how long they actually went at it, or what happens in between. &lt;br /&gt;
Obviously, the cumshots/swallows will bring a lot of people in, and it is very well done.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35168&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=35168&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:53:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26044</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26044</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:32am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1747&quot;&gt;The Clyde&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1747&quot;&gt;26&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ High Quality Videos&lt;br /&gt;
+ Videos Available in QT and WMV&lt;br /&gt;
+ Nice Photo Sets&lt;br /&gt;
+ Clean Design&lt;br /&gt;
+ Very attractive &amp;quot;Amatures&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
+ Haven't seen MOST of the Girls&lt;br /&gt;
+ Young Talent that looks like they just stepped off a college campus.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good Customer Support&lt;br /&gt;
+ Cool scene structure and idea&lt;br /&gt;
+ Models really seem to enjoy working with Thomas
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Website does not support DL Managers&lt;br /&gt;
- Photos are not available in Zips&lt;br /&gt;
- Daily (24 hour) Download Limit&lt;br /&gt;
- Download limit is ONLY 4 GB&lt;br /&gt;
- Download limit is NOT apparent when joining site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This website is very good.  I really appreciate the quality of the work, the fresh looking models and the overall quality of the website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not my typical demographic, usually preferring much more &amp;quot;Hardcore&amp;quot; action. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/meatmembers/&quot;&gt;MeatMembers&lt;/a&gt;, Platinum X, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brainpass/&quot;&gt;BrainPass&lt;/a&gt;, JM Productions).  That being said, I really like what this offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This website would have score at least TEN POINTS higher without the download limits.  They should remove the limit and/or reduce the price.  With today's speeds, you can rip through 4GB in an hour.  If they were to have a limit, it should be much higher.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26044&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26044&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:32:41 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_25753</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25753</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:59am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5472&quot;&gt;OMF456&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5472&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Excellent video quality - The best I've ever seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rock solid update schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beautiful girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every scene has at least one full cum swallow
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Maybe 30% of the girls are real amateurs.  Big Con.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every scene is almost exactly the same.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't deep throat the girls enough but it's not a deep throat site so it's not his fault. I just personally wish he would deep throat them more.  :-)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site has been around for a long time.  Probably sometime in the late 90's.  So, he's gotta be doing something right.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;AmateurAllure&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brokeamateurs/&quot;&gt;BrokeAmateurs&lt;/a&gt; are my favorite sites.  AA has been one of my favorites for years.  BA is pretty new I think.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, the girls on AA are so beautiful.  Granted, maybe 30% of them are true amateurs.   Generally that would be a HUGE turnoff to me but they're so pretty that I give AA a pass on it.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's something I've noticed.  I've seen girls on AA who I was able to tell have been on other porn sites but he makes them look so good that it's really hard to tell.  I don't know if it's his make-up person or how they all dress very classy but I think it's pretty cool that he can take a girl who's done a ton of porn and make her appear so great that it's hard to tell.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the way he gives them gentle playfuy slaps on the ass. More erotic than some porn where they just wail on the girl's ass.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge an of some hard ass-slapping.  But, he pulls it off in his own way.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The video quality is the best I've seen.  I love it when they are coming off deep throating his cock and you can see their saliva running down the shaft of his cock.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen some other reviews where people have said certain sites are too expensive.  AA is a little more than some other sites but I think he deserves the extra.  He produces a great product and geesh, you can DL like 150 videos on a one month membership so I don't think any complaints about pricing are appropriate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want quality sites like this one to continue to make a product we enjoy, then be glad to pay for it.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only real cons that I would mention is the repetitiveness of the scenes but not really that big of a deal for me.  Every site has some flaw. If that's the biggest they have then I'm thrilled.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25753&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=25753&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:59:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15247</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15247</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-21-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:56am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some of the most beautiful models I have seen on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
- Quality on videos is good enough, 600 on high end, but a nice near 2000 bitrate helps out&lt;br /&gt;
- The site as a whole has a pretty classy feel for the most part, it has almost what I would call, playful curiousity from the girls. &lt;br /&gt;
- The pictures look nice, but see cons&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds are blazing for me, nearly 1,400kb/s&lt;br /&gt;
- Original models, or at least most are for me. Some are known porn stars, but I'm guessing maybe 25% are amateurs. &lt;br /&gt;
- Funny comments from Thomas, though he does get boring after awhile, reminds me a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dreamstash/&quot;&gt;Dream Stash&lt;/a&gt; in that sense.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Price, $33 is just too much, it should be at most $24.95. &lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures are barely reaching 1000 on high end and cannot be downloaded in zip files. &lt;br /&gt;
- Thomas, as funny as he is at times, he seems to be stuck on the same joke from clip to clip. &lt;br /&gt;
- Sex is like Sex by Numbers, nearly every scene follows the exact same pattern, and combined with Thomas' repetitive humor, the site itself becomes repetitive &lt;br /&gt;
- The big one, split movie scenes on older videos. I am at the point that I won't even download these unless it is a favorite actress of mine.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site wowed me right off the bat with the gorgeous models. The site also has a modern look to it, and overall, has a classy look and feel to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there is the content. Sex, blowjobs, and cum in mouth which is swallowed. Everytime. No body cumshots, just right in the mouth and on the face. I'm not a big fan of facials, so this becomes repetitive very fast. Still, the models are gorgeous and they will keep you coming back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pictures are disappointing, such gorgeous women, but no hi-res and no downloadable zips? It makes the pictures virtually useless. The video quality is good enough at 600 high end, near 2000 bitrate, but then there are those split scenes, which are also all but useless to me. I have a strange time with the videos as well. For some reason they are letterboxing on my monitor, not for sure why, but that looks odd and makes me click on the letterbox hoping it will go away. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site still has some models that make it worth joining. It kind of makes you feel like you are on a date with a woman that is out of your league, but you keep spending money on her. The only real cons are the repititive nature of the videos. By the 3rd one, I knew what was going to happen and when. I keep coming back to how beautiful the models are though, and that should be stressed as the #1 Pro that outweighs all of cons. The preview is pretty good, check it out and see if the models catch your eyes like mine, then for one month only it is highly recommended.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15247&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15247&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:56:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8068</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8068</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-13-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:11pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1999&quot;&gt;HeatherMcXxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1999&quot;&gt;9&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models. Thomas recruits some quality girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, some models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Thomas seems like an amiable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can become rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like &amp;quot;silly girl.&amp;quot; (Ay carumba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl &amp;quot;show us&amp;quot; what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that month, though, you'll enjoy lots of gorgeous girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, though it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The music is fascinating to me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and charming personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they're a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8068&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8068&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:11:12 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6325</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6325</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-21-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:28pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=316&quot;&gt;Woodruff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=316&quot;&gt;37&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Strange as it sounds, the site's greatest strength is Thomas.  Not only is he charming enough to put the girls at ease, it's super-hot for example when he matter of factly puts a fully clothed girl on her knees to start sucking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In addition to being cool, many of the girls are pretty hot and not seen elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I especially love the fantasy episodes, where they act out some silly scenario around the blowjob.  Obviously they can't do it all the time, but they do think of some funny ones.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*There are no partial clips, and only some of the episodes are available in WMV as well as QuickTime.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Site design is a little basic: it can be hard to find a specific girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thomas's physical condition and endowment leave something to be desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The name change issue, as has been remarked on elsewhere, is indeed irritating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd prefer he stay away from the gadgets - that &amp;quot;Spermcam&amp;quot; is pretty silly.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The bottom line is this is one of the great porn sites.  As a one-man shop, it's quirky and clunky, but I'm hesitant to recommend a slicker operation.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6325&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6325&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:28:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3116</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3116</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-17-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1167&quot;&gt;Oliver&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1167&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- serves my No1 fetish perfectly: all girls swallow&lt;br /&gt;
- before they swallow, there's some nice cumplay&lt;br /&gt;
- nice variations on the swallow theme: sometimes they take cum directly in their mouths, sometimes they lick it off their fingers, sometimes they drink it out of a shotglass, or get fed spoonfulls of cum after a facial&lt;br /&gt;
- very cute, natural girls, many of whom you won't find anywhere else&lt;br /&gt;
- girls are treated fery friendly&lt;br /&gt;
- humurous tone of the dialogues&lt;br /&gt;
- excellent video quality
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- most scenes are cut into 3 clips. I really prefer to be able to download full clips - this is possible with the new movies (starting February 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
- girls should get naked earlier - they mostly undress only in the last quarter of the movie&lt;br /&gt;
- the fuck scenes suffer from the POV perspective, here an additional cameraman could improve the videos&lt;br /&gt;
- very heavy focus on blowjobs and swallows - my biggest pro could of course also be seen as a very one sided pornsite with repetitive content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/a&gt; was actually my very first pornsite I subscribed to (5 yrs ago). I've been back every year since then, mostly for one or two months. I also checked out many other blowjobs sites, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/a&gt; is clearly my favourite.&lt;br /&gt;
Highly Recommended if you're into blowjobs and swallows. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand: if blowjobs and swallos are just something you enjoy on the side, then this site is probably not for you, because you won't get much more. The fuck scenes are short and the whole thing is VERY HEAVILY oriented towards the BJ lover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site has improved considerably in the last years, video quality is getting better and better, scenes can now be downloaded in one big clip, and you can now chose between Quicktime and Mediaplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suggestions for future improvements:&lt;br /&gt;
- more focus on the body of the girls&lt;br /&gt;
- girls naked after the first few minutes&lt;br /&gt;
- occasional fuck scenes filmed by cameraman&lt;br /&gt;
- more two on one scenes&lt;br /&gt;
- scenes with two men would be nice (this is missing completely)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3116&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3116&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:10:05 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2512</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2512</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:12am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=853&quot;&gt;qualsite34&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=853&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lots of horny girl next door types.  Many not seen elsewhere. &lt;br /&gt;
Very similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/rodneymoore/&quot;&gt;Rodney Moore&lt;/a&gt; in style.&lt;br /&gt;
Regular updates and interesting and unusually personal Blog.&lt;br /&gt;
Recent upgrade in quality of videos - Windows Media Files now supported although quality is similar to the Mov files.  Full movie files are also now supported, where before you could only get small clips.&lt;br /&gt;
The download times are very fast.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The videos are done with an annoying fisheye type lens. &lt;br /&gt;
Video quality could use further improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
Photos are below average quality (By todays standards)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Not bad.  One of the better amateur sites out there for videos of never before seen girl next door types.  The score would improve considerably if Thomas were to ditch the fisheye lens and provide HD quality full video files of current and past models.&lt;br /&gt;
See Simons Scans for an example of how to do this.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2512&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2512&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:12:12 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_891</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=891</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-23-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:47pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=429&quot;&gt;mudman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=429&quot;&gt;36&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Visually of a high quality.  If you wish to see it, are looking at it, then it is and clearly.  The images are clean and in focus, not blurry, amber and god knows what.  SInce what is looked at can actually be seen, maybe this isn't porn at all.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-photo could be really, really good, but are halfass.&lt;br /&gt;
-once a week uploads.  Sounds like one a year memberships.&lt;br /&gt;
-suffers from the same old same old that comes with such a niche focus.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I really liked the clarity of the images both photographic and video, but that doesn't same the site from the sameness of itself and the once a week update.  A nice site to join and then leave after a month.  Don't worry, there are no surprise here, so you won't miss things if you aren't a member for a while.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=891&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=891&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:47:01 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_379</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=379</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-11-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:39am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=46&quot;&gt;casimir&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=46&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very nice, the models are sexy and erotic. Acts aren't brutals. It' a real pleasure to see this beautiful girls in action.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The quality of video isn't all times very good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good site, with very nice and sexy girls, a good site with respect of woman and not vulgar.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=379&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=379&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:39:43 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_311</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=311</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-10-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:44am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=176&quot;&gt;jake07621&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=176&quot;&gt;41&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very pretty women.  Actually, VERY pretty women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the cum swallowing angle.  I find that really sexy and erotic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great improvement adding .wmv as a video selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second go around is really good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The sequences are, in my mind, often overly long and dull.  He usually gets around to two cum shots but it takes too long for the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the girls don't always get totally naked or, even if they do, you don't see a whole lot very often.  The action is always around the blow job and not enough around the girl.  Let's face it, guys like to see naked girls.  Also, some are well known but Thomas changes their names so you can't find them elsewhere.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is an okay site.  It's a bit pricey.  The cum swallowing is good and the girls are pretty, but if you want naked ladies with hot action, there are other better options.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=311&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=311&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:44:04 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_226</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=226</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:43am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=95&quot;&gt;DpornGuy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=95&quot;&gt;36&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice selection of fresh faces&lt;br /&gt;
Some gorgeous women on this site&lt;br /&gt;
Clean simple layout&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality is very high&lt;br /&gt;
Large amount of vids&lt;br /&gt;
regular updates
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Only Quicktime format for vids&lt;br /&gt;
No Screencaps&lt;br /&gt;
Sex is very formula based at times&lt;br /&gt;
Edited scenes ruins some of the scenes&lt;br /&gt;
POV mostly, and Oral mostly&lt;br /&gt;
Videos are filmed using Widescreen HiDef cameras, which makes the video look bad/streched on some displays&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of variety in the sex and style
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a good site, and the models he gets are hands down some of the most beautiful ones to grace an amateur site. Unfortunately though his sexual skills and ideas are pretty dull... everything for the most part is filmed to hide his face, so it's either POV shots or from the side angles, and heavily edited, so allot of times it cuts away from the action very quickly. If you like oral mostly then you'll love this site. The video format is annoying, and the lack of options or screen caps usually means you have to download and hope for the best, which is annoying for people on slower connections. If he'd hire male actors or get a cameraman to help out, then things might get really good...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=226&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=226&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:43:37 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_188</guid>
		<title>Amateur Allure Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=188</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amateurallure.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amateur Allure&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amateurallure/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-08-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:18pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 94&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=52&quot;&gt;Thagnut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=52&quot;&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This was founded by a guy named Thomas who hit the jackpot and has been living the life of Reilly here as a millionaire porn impressario.  I admire and envy him like no other.&lt;br /&gt;
The site is beautiful. He is one of the few in the country who somehow finds a new, gorgeous amateur girl.. almost every week for the last three years(~!).  The site is worth it's weight in gold for all the new talent on display. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, no DRM, so download it all and keep it forever.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1) As usual, the older videos are lower resuloution.&lt;br /&gt;
2) He also uses a fish-eye camera lense for his POV which distorts the video.  It can be irksome.&lt;br /&gt;
3)The videos are in Quicktime, because apparently he's an Apple Mac-nut.  It's no biggie, but I don't prefer it.  He also won't post whole scenes - they usually come in 3 parts.&lt;br /&gt;
4) Thomas seems OK, but you'd better learn to like the sound of his voice.  &lt;br /&gt;
5) This is a great Oral/POV site. Some girls don't even get naked.  Don't expect more.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I don't know why TheBestPorn doesn't like this site.  The guy is kind of a goof, but he doesn't pull any punches.  Ameteur Allure delivers exactly what the intro promises with 200+ scenes and unlike a thousand other sites, has dozens of fantastic, stunning, American girls who do this site and then are never seen again.  &lt;br /&gt;
Their images and horny deeds will burn themselves into the back of your mind forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's worth it at twice the price. 
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=315&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amateur Allure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=188&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=188&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:18:10 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
