<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Nasty Angels - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/nastyangels/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_29207</guid>
		<title>Nasty Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29207</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nastyangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nastyangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nasty Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nastyangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nasty Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-30-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6063&quot;&gt;TalonIcefire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6063&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					None
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Inadequate content updates&lt;br /&gt;
Current updates are older content with new download choices&lt;br /&gt;
Bonus feeds and sites require long term membership&lt;br /&gt;
Too pricey for available content&lt;br /&gt;
Unable to find specific advertised clips&lt;br /&gt;
Nonexclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
Old, unoriginal material
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Near as I can tell, all updated material in the past month are old footage being updated for DIVX downloads. About 30% of the content can be found on others sites. Bonus material requires commitment to access. There are better ways to waste $30.00 USD. Recommend choosing something else.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3022&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nasty Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29207&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=29207&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:53:50 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13327</guid>
		<title>Nasty Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13327</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nastyangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nastyangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nasty Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nastyangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nasty Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-10-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1106&quot;&gt;Pinche Kankun&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1106&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Young couples, Girls are young and hot&lt;br /&gt;
+ Access to Other Websites&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good amateur content&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good downloading speed
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Needs to up date more on movie archives&lt;br /&gt;
- Can be a little confusing when searching for a particular couple
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This website features hardcore amateur couple sex movies/pictures and softcore solo girl pics. Choices seem endless, however there are more picture selections than movie archives. Individuals who endure amateur porn, this is a website you will like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a small disappointment I found when I joined. I basically joined this this website because of a sample movie advertised on its front page, the scene with Kattie and Jim. I selected that archive sample and it brought me to the access page, so I figured if I joined the website, I would get to see that particular scene with Kattie and Jim. After I joined, I never found Kattie and Jim the whole 3 months I was a member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the nice amount and quality of the movie selections, the site does need a little work on making it easier for the user to locate desired content and actual selected archives. Downloading speed is good. Updates for not as frequent as they should occur.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3022&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nasty Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13327&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13327&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:53:30 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>