Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/anabolicvip/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_6891 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6881#6891 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/anabolicvip/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/anabolicvip.jpg" alt="Enter Anabolic VIP" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/anabolicvip/"><b>Anabolic VIP</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 08-11-07 10:56am </td> <td><b>COMMENT REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1810">apoctom</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1810">145</a>)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1648">jd1961</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1648">95</a>):<br /><br /> It seems like a lot of studio sites are the ones holding on to DRM. I think that they are just suckering in the people who don't read reviews like TBP or PU before joining. (Not to mention the price.) What a shame! <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6881#6891"><b>View Thread</b></a> (1)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:56:09 PDT