<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Water Bondage - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_61677</guid>
		<title>Water Bondage Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=61677</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/waterbondage.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Water Bondage&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-23-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:55am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;rearadmiral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;141&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- 274 scenes&lt;br /&gt;
- Approximately 70 scenes available in HD&lt;br /&gt;
- Most available in three formats/sizes&lt;br /&gt;
- Pics available (singles or small sets of zips) &lt;br /&gt;
- Part of the Kink network&lt;br /&gt;
- Good support service (a question was answered via email within a couple of hours on a weekend)&lt;br /&gt;
- Good mix of known and less known models&lt;br /&gt;
- Very high production values&lt;br /&gt;
- Very innovative
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No longer updating&lt;br /&gt;
- No major quality improvements from 2003 until 2007&lt;br /&gt;
- Scenes are no longer dated&lt;br /&gt;
- Last update in 2007 (I think, scenes aren’t dated)&lt;br /&gt;
- No discount price offered
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I had last joined Water Bondage in 2008 and it hasn’t updated since then, but I wanted to get more scenes and higher quality now that I have a faster connection.  The fact that I went back to a site that offered me nothing new probably says a lot about what I think about this site.  For BDSM fans, this is an extremely well done and innovative site that offers lots of material.  Its part of the Kink.com network, which, in my opinion, sets a high standard for other internet porn sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site offers 274 scenes dating back to about 2003.  Older scenes tend to be fairly simple and short, with many at about 15 mins long.  Older scenes are a lot more complex with different setups and are usually over an hour long.  As you would expect, the resolutions for the older videos isn’t great by today’s standards.  The videos are available in two formats: wmv and mp4.  For most of the time the site was updating there was only one resolution of wmv available: 640x480 / 1900kbps.  There are two sizes of mp4s available.  One is for IPods and such, while the other is labeled as ‘best quality.’  I don’t know how to find resolutions for mp4s, but subjectively the larger file wasn’t much better than the SD wmv.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At some point towards when the site stopped updating they did start to offer higher resolution videos.  For most of the last 70 or so updates on the site there is the option of wmv HD at 1280x720 / 7150kbps.  SD is still available, as are the two sizes of mp4.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are pics available too.  The resolutions for these didn’t change through the whole run of the site: they are 1200x865, not bad, but not particularly sharp.  Zips are available, and in the longer scenes the zips are broken down into the themes in the scene.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For all the dated technical issues, this is still a very interesting site.  I’m not aware of any other like it where models undergo BDSM treatment in water.  In most of the videos there are several ‘scenes’ within the video, with bondage while being sprayed with water to machines and toys being used, and in most cases some complete immersion in water tanks while bound.  There is a good mix of models too.  There are surprisingly many A-listers here, as well as some well known fetish models and also some lesser known girls.  There are body types for every taste.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the size of the site, I don’t consider that it isn’t updating to be a serious drawback.  There are issues though: for much of the life of the site there were no real technical improvements until the very end.  One pet peeve of mine too is that the scenes used to be dated, but they aren’t now.  That troubles me since I wonder if Kink is trying to hide the fact that the site isn’t updating.  Finally, Kink doesn’t offer any price discounts for members of other Kink sites like they do with most others.  Paying $30 for a site that doesn’t update seems a bit steep.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But… it is still an amazing site and a decent value considering the quality and quantity.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2720&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=61677&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=61677&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:55:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18841</guid>
		<title>Water Bondage Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18841</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/waterbondage.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Water Bondage&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-11-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:07am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;rearadmiral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;141&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very interesting concept (if this is something you're interested in)&lt;br /&gt;
- Large database of models&lt;br /&gt;
- Many of the models are very beautiful, some appear to be exclusive&lt;br /&gt;
- Reasonable price&lt;br /&gt;
- All segments to a scene are available in one zip file&lt;br /&gt;
- some mainstream porn models take a turn (Sasha Grey, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/danadearmond/&quot;&gt;Dana DeArmond&lt;/a&gt;, Nadia Styles, etc)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- This may sound weird, but the site is often too soft, too playful&lt;br /&gt;
- No sex (I realize that another review has said there is lots of sex, but I've viewed many hours on this site and have yet to see any)&lt;br /&gt;
- some of the scenes can get a bit repetitive&lt;br /&gt;
- I read in one of the WB forums that the site has stopped updating.  There is at least 30GB of material on the site so it will always be a good value, but apparently we won't be getting any more new stuff.  That is the biggest con of all for those of us who like this site.  (I'll have to find Wenona somewhere else...)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I've had a membership at The Training of O and wanted to try another &lt;a href=&quot;http://Kink.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kink.com&lt;/a&gt; site.  This is a very innovative company and it is obvious that they put a lot of effort and money into what they do. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/a&gt; is no exception.  The site is reasonably priced and well laid out.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theme, of course, water and bondage.  The girls are usually tied into various positions and often on custom made bondage equipment.  Most of the girls also do a session in one of the site's several water tanks.  These are really fun to watch, but I find that they can get a bit repetitive and are usually too soft.  The mood is more playful than menacing.  Maye they should let Max Hardcore guest direct a few scenes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tank scenes are a bit repetitive - girl tied up in water.  There are a few scenes where the model is given some 'tasks' which can be as simple as touching her nose to the bottom or retrieving something with her mouth.  These make the scenes more interesting and I wish there was more of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The models are absolutely stunning.  Most are petite, which is fine with me, but there are a few with bigger breasts.  One model deserves special mention - Wenona.  This woman is very beautiful and is worth the price of the membership alone.  She seems to be exclusive to WB&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line is that if you like this kind of thing it is a very good site.  I wish it was a little more rough, but even as soft as it is it is very innovative.  Definitely worth the membership.  I highly recommend it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2720&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18841&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18841&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:07:41 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16577</guid>
		<title>Water Bondage Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16577</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/waterbondage.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Water Bondage&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-23-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:59am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=65&quot;&gt;cerebral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=65&quot;&gt;32&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Fascinating site for those interested in a unique form of bondage/torture - use of water.  Very good content, increasing data base, and improved access to previous episodes.  &lt;br /&gt;
Females on this site are often members of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://Kink.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kink.com&lt;/a&gt; repetoire of attractive models, some of them quite lovely.  They do tend to add new faces to their repetoire, including some that have appeared in other &lt;a href=&quot;http://Kink.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kink.com&lt;/a&gt; sites, e.g. Sandy San Dimas.  Viewer input is a nice touch.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lighting and video quality could be improved.  A few of the models are not good actresses or sufficiently expressive, diminishing the appeal of their segment.  &lt;br /&gt;
Response to viewer comments or suggestions can be slow, or not at all.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Probably the best type of water bondage site available.  Others are starting to make inroads, but so far none is close to challenging &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/a&gt;.  Discount to other &lt;a href=&quot;http://Kink.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kink.com&lt;/a&gt; sites available when subscribing to this one.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2720&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16577&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16577&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:59:54 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2300</guid>
		<title>Water Bondage Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2300</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/waterbondage.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Water Bondage&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/waterbondage/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-20-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:16pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=39&quot;&gt;BostonPJR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=39&quot;&gt;72&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Unique, original content for bondage fans.&lt;br /&gt;
- The models are attractive, expressive ... just sexy as hell.&lt;br /&gt;
- Video features have much improved.  Huge files that are worth the time to download.&lt;br /&gt;
- Scenes are well edited and exciting, and situations are not repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
- Regular updates.&lt;br /&gt;
- Price very reasonable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Few video options for slow connections.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					You'll not find a better produced, bigger budget water bondage site anywhere.  Exotic and wild enough for big fans of bondage, but often tame enough for the causal or curious viewer.  I also love the feedback section, even if it looks a little thrown together.  The Dom/Sub interaction is often playful and chatty, and scenes feature a lot of sex.  Both are often considered unacceptable for “serious” bondage fans.  But for me, I couldn’t really classify that as a con.  Big fan of the site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2720&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Water Bondage&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2300&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2300&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:16:07 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
