<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Suze Randall - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_21323</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21323</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:14pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4505&quot;&gt;runefist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4505&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*outstanding picture sets &lt;br /&gt;
*super &amp;quot;brand name&amp;quot; models&lt;br /&gt;
*photos span suze's entire portfolio, past and present&lt;br /&gt;
*has video page full of exclusive content you usually can't get leagally anywhere else.&lt;br /&gt;
*DRM free
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*most videos prior to 06 are of poor quality&lt;br /&gt;
*odd navigation&lt;br /&gt;
*requests login too much
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					suze randall always has a great eye for beauty and this site shows that. Its better for pics than for video and I think it wasnt till 2006 she started posting exclusive hardcore vids. the vids are hit and miss though, some are good quality with great action, some are just poor movies of her photoshoots with suze moanin in the background about how the models look (sounds like a sick whale if you ask me)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21323&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=21323&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:14:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_21063</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21063</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3310&quot;&gt;Cybertoad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3310&quot;&gt;58&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good site over all, the quality is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
Models are very pretty.&lt;br /&gt;
Great Scenes&lt;br /&gt;
Site was good speed download.&lt;br /&gt;
full picture updates and pic's to match on most downloads.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some areas of the site have not been updated since last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The updates were often but often repeated another release just in a different format, not what I would call a release update.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation was clunky but worked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download speed was average some files very large.&lt;br /&gt;
other sites accomplish the same near quality at lower size file.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site was near a 90, many areas kept me from rating this high quality site higher.&lt;br /&gt;
Real updates would be nice and more areas updated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There appears to be another site being added soon.&lt;br /&gt;
Quality was excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would recommend membership at least a month even though updates are not great, the content is well worth looking at, some of the best quality out there. The sites design and updates keep it from being rated higher for me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to see a better navigation between the two sites net and .com or just combine the one site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21063&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=21063&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:53:19 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18261</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18261</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-31-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:27pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 91&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3595&quot;&gt;Wittyguy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3595&quot;&gt;41&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Suze is a legend&lt;br /&gt;
- Huge Photo Archieve&lt;br /&gt;
- Multiple Download Options&lt;br /&gt;
- Model Search &amp;amp; Index&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Customer Service&lt;br /&gt;
- Hot babes if glamor and/or fetish is your thing&lt;br /&gt;
- Sweet $4.77 full trial
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some photo sets are limited (not showing full suite of photos)&lt;br /&gt;
- Some &amp;quot;pseudo porn&amp;quot; on the old sets&lt;br /&gt;
- You have to hunt for the trial offers&lt;br /&gt;
- Possibly some set rotation but does not appear to happen often&lt;br /&gt;
- No videos (based solely on the trial offer I signed up for)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					(Note:  This is a review for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze.net&lt;/a&gt; only, it does not cover &lt;a href=&quot;http://suzevideo.net&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;suzevideo.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you love huge quantities of quality photos of hot girls then this is the place for you.  If you're not familiar with Suze think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/penthouse/&quot;&gt;Penthouse&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hustler/&quot;&gt;Hustler&lt;/a&gt; as the standard I'm talking about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze.net&lt;/a&gt; a few months ago and just came back and what a difference.  You now get 10 years of photos which means 500+ boy/girl sets, 300+ girl/girl sets, 1600+ centerfolds and hundreds of additional sets.  The sets allow zip and download options of 800, 1024 and 1400 pixels.  The sets prior to '03 generally lack the 1400 option.  The sets generally had 50 - 100 pics each with older ones usually having less than 50.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of this stuff I hadn't seen since the days when a 56k connection was high speed, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jillkelly/&quot;&gt;Jill Kelly&lt;/a&gt; ruled and white guys with names like &amp;quot;Dale DaBoner&amp;quot; swung their stuff.  Depsite the fact that many of the sets were older they didn't seem too dated given the glamor/fetish emphasis of the site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only dislikes were that the older sets had a lot of psuedo (aka nonpenetration porn) and that Suze keeps shifting her trial offers.  I'm a cheap bastard and I eventually found a tgp link that got me into the $4.77 full trial as advertised by TBP. Otherwise, it's hit or miss on the posted trial amounts if you go to the site. Also, a few sets I had seen before lacked all the images available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a full trial of less than $10 you simply can't go wrong.  Basically, this site rocks.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18261&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18261&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:27:27 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13509</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13509</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-13-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:03pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2927&quot;&gt;PosterDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2927&quot;&gt;14&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Nice Pretty Models&lt;br /&gt;
+ Suze is great photographer&lt;br /&gt;
+ Hot Boy/Girl sex with nice cum shots&lt;br /&gt;
+ Can find very low price for membership&lt;br /&gt;
+ Huge amount of pictures
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Bad Members Site Design&lt;br /&gt;
- To much makeup on models &lt;br /&gt;
- Download Video quality very bad&lt;br /&gt;
- Confusing to find models and old shoots and history&lt;br /&gt;
- Picture sizes too small&lt;br /&gt;
- Do not like streaming video. Want better download video.&lt;br /&gt;
- Cannot find some old sets from before
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site much better than 5 years ago. Then I would rate site 70. It was very bad with DRM locked video and different sites to pay for pictures and video.  Now everything for one membership with no DRM.  Suze is old time great photographer and daughter is OK I think. Maybe not quit as good as mom.  For low price of $9,97 USD I tryd site and got some good photo sets.  Pictures sexy but picture quality could be very much better and bigger.  I do not like poor quality download video and was sad about that.  Boy-Girl sex seems real with no fake moaning.  But models to me have to much makeup and seem like porn star sluts.  Site worth low price but then cancel. There are many odder better sites on Internet witdh much better quality pictures and video.  Site getting better. I will look back in 1-2 years.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13509&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13509&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:03:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8094</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8094</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:42am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2272&quot;&gt;navel lover&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2272&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lots of beautiful women, and lots of content.  The photos are excellent quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I wish there were more updates.  I also wish the price was a bit less.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you have the money to spend, this is a great site.  Unfortunately, I am on a budget.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8094&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8094&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:42:35 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8040</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8040</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:59pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;78&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/a&gt;, A True Legend&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM Videos&lt;br /&gt;
-Diverse Genres Of Video&lt;br /&gt;
-Very Good Models&lt;br /&gt;
-Good Download Speed                                -Decent Sized Hi-Res Photos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Site In Need Of Serious Refurbishing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Want To Cancel? Get Ready to Jump Through Hoops
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					 Was a previous member, a few years ago.  Is Suze gone from the site? She has not posted in her forum in a long time, though her daughter has frequently. What a shame, because Suze is the best, she photographs erotically like no other.  What's left of her work is A+ outstanding. The photos are 1280px, not bad. The videos are excellent, covering every genre from softcore to lesbian to all out hardcore, they don't disappoint. No speed problems here, and plenty of hot models to choose from as always. The site's a mess. It's like a broken down old sports stadium where your favorite team plays. Sometimes it's been difficult just to log in. I was irritated by the hassle of canceling. I don't like being nagged about my financial decisions. I'm hoping they are planning to re-do this site so I can join again and do another review. Oh well, at least I still have my original VHS copy of &amp;quot;Miss Passion&amp;quot; ;)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8040&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8040&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:59:12 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7823</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7823</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-05-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;154&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+current offering of $7.77 for 1-week access to both the photo and the video sites&lt;br /&gt;
+huge collection of photos (posing &amp;amp; sometimes toys and/or fetish &amp;amp; HC or lez); 1280px at least as far back as 2005&lt;br /&gt;
+much improved recent gallery pages w/25 thumbs per page&lt;br /&gt;
+enormous number of models, many established and some more recent ones&lt;br /&gt;
+no DRM on the vids&lt;br /&gt;
+”Mega” streaming vids look great (too bad they can’t be saved to disk!)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-navigation is very tricky as you move through different parts of the site&lt;br /&gt;
-some links are incorrect&lt;br /&gt;
-very incomplete update history&lt;br /&gt;
- downloadable videos are too small (even newest post, of Faith Leon, is only 450x338 at best quality)&lt;br /&gt;
-available vid types are inconsistent, and some videos made only for iPod
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I complained in June about this site, but I couldn’t pass up on the very low-cost trial for both the pic site and the video site!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is really two sites, photo and video, and two “sites” yet again (the old one and newer one).  Sometimes there are links from the photo site to the video site, and vice-versa.  New windows open up, and it can get tricky as you browse around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there’s the new models index – a “beta” that contains only part of all the models and then only part of all the content for a given model.  You can click a link to the “old” models list, which leads to text-only lists of pics that are s/ts click-dwnld only, s/ts in zips, some 1024 max, some 1280, but in the very old format of click fwd or back, 10 pics only per page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking “shoot history” brings this HUGE text list of links to shoots by their index numbers ONLY.  (WTF?!)  From there, and only there, you can get a simple html table that lists the entire shoot history for 2007 – the only one you get that makes ANY sense. 2006 and before?  Forget about it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The removal of the complete chronological shoot history is my #1 complaint.   The models list mess is #2.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I do wish they'd get the pics up to at least 1600px.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The streaming mega vids are the biggest improvement:  very HOT SEX in gorgeous color.  Many DNYNAMITE sexy beautiful women in great hardcore!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial price, I do recommend checking this site out, but I hope some day they will finally get ORGANIZED!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7823&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7823&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:31:04 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1030</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1030</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:46pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 87&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=552&quot;&gt;tcman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=552&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-There are photo sets for many well known pornstars from both the past and present.  &lt;br /&gt;
-There are lots of quality hardcore shoots.  &lt;br /&gt;
-Recent photo sets are available in 1280 pixel resolution.  &lt;br /&gt;
-Older sets are occasionally upgraded in quantity of photos and resolution.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Only the most recent photo sets are zipped.&lt;br /&gt;
-Sets older than a few years are limited to a vertical resolution of 768 pixels.  &lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is only category based with no search capabilities.  &lt;br /&gt;
-The photography is sometimes not particularly good; e.g., poorly framed, or generally lacking in creativity.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I would recommend this site to anyone who is primarily interested in seeing pictures of well known pornstars, especially if interested in classic shoots of former stars like Chasey Lain, Lexus Locklear, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/gingerlynn/&quot;&gt;Ginger Lynn&lt;/a&gt;.  For me, I enjoyed the convenience of downloading zip files of the more recent content.  Having to rely on a downloading utility (GetRight) to pull down older sets was a bit tedious.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1030&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1030&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:46:15 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_594</guid>
		<title>Suze Randall Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=594</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/suze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Suze Randall&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:46pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=364&quot;&gt;cantrell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=364&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Fantastic photography
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video quality is average. Some of the content is a  dated. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze.net&lt;/a&gt; has a bias against women being ansolutely naked and adorns them with endless basques and similar antique lingerie to the end.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It's one of the tope ten sites for female beauty. BUT.. When I found it 5 years ago I thought it was fantastic. Now it's been surpassed by Hegre Archives, Stephen J Hicks' stunning DD Girls, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;Met Art&lt;/a&gt; whose combination of quantity and quality is awesome, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/europeanglamourgirls/&quot;&gt;European Glamour Girls&lt;/a&gt; whose video quality is amazing. The role of the pioneer is arduous and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/a&gt; was truly a pioneer. But the competition is ferocious and like Microsoft, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze.net&lt;/a&gt; won't play the central role it once did. If you've never been there I would still recommend it. The photos of Zdenka, Alexus Wilson and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brianabanks/&quot;&gt;Briana Banks&lt;/a&gt; are classics.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=26&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Suze Randall&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=594&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=594&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:46:51 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>