<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Scoreland - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_68433</guid>
		<title>Scoreland Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68433</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/scoreland.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Scoreland&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-15-12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:04pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=16297&quot;&gt;BubbaGump&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=16297&quot;&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-- Huge amount of content.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/penthouse/&quot;&gt;Penthouse&lt;/a&gt;.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica. &lt;br /&gt;
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing. &lt;br /&gt;
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.&lt;br /&gt;
-- A little pricey compared to competition. &lt;br /&gt;
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.&lt;br /&gt;
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pros and Cons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scorehd/&quot;&gt;Score HD&lt;/a&gt; to download HD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMO, who would like this site: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who won't like this site: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grades(obviously subjective):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site Navgigation: C-&lt;br /&gt;
Video Presentation Style: A&lt;br /&gt;
Video Quality: A&lt;br /&gt;
Photo Presentations: B+&lt;br /&gt;
Photo Content and Quality: A&lt;br /&gt;
The Models Themselves: A&lt;br /&gt;
Streaming and DL Speeds: A&lt;br /&gt;
Quantity: A+&lt;br /&gt;
XXX Action: C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suggestions for improvement: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=257&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68433&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=68433&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:04:13 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_28775</guid>
		<title>Scoreland Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28775</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/scoreland.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Scoreland&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-21-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:09am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5982&quot;&gt;EroticShot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5982&quot;&gt;18&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was a member of this site for 6-8 months - the key is here is their loyalty program.  I got in at a promotional pricing of $14.95 or $19.95 (not sure) - each month I would get access to 1 more site.  You can't choose just any site - they give you 5 or 6 choices each month - the site you really, really want may not be on that list until the following month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;ScoreLand&lt;/a&gt; is a huge site.  It's a large part of the Score Group's archive of content - which like Big Top Cinema or Pussyman, vivid, etc - shot and filmed a lot, a lot of content.  The focus here is on large-bust models.  You have video content in all their subdivisions like Naughty Newbies, Voluptuous (large women), etc.  You can spend days on end here and not get through all the content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Videos easily number into the hundreds - perhaps 300+ at 100megs all in all.  Photoshoots are extensive as well - I don't remember particularly easy downloads for any of it.  Not sure about zip files for images.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Layout, organization is poor.  Downloads can be slow and are not easy to do en-masse.  You have to work a bit to get the content down.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Go for the loyalty program.&lt;br /&gt;
Go because there are a few models that you love and want to see their work here.&lt;br /&gt;
You can look up most content on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; by model (or go to google and play around with xx model and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;scoreland.com&lt;/a&gt; in the search) - you can see most of the specific content before signing up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; is unique in that this is THEIR content from 2-3 decades of filming and work.  It doesn't get better if you like big bust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Want higher quality - Go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/danni/&quot;&gt;danni.com&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hotbox/&quot;&gt;HOTBOX&lt;/a&gt;) or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze.net&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suze/&quot;&gt;Suze Randall&lt;/a&gt;).  Danni has the big bust queens as well.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=257&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28775&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28775&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:09:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22823</guid>
		<title>Scoreland Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22823</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/scoreland.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Scoreland&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-29-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:42pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4832&quot;&gt;xyzzy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4832&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Well-established name in the industry. You know what content you're getting with this site!&lt;br /&gt;
- Large model archive, including both natural breasts and silicone-pumped monsters&lt;br /&gt;
- Updated nearly every day!&lt;br /&gt;
- Good selection of videos and photos, with different resolution offers&lt;br /&gt;
- Rewards loyalty; you receive extra sites added to your account the longer you stay, featuring more exclusive content. This is a great idea.&lt;br /&gt;
- photo and video clarity is good; even the gonzo-style shoots feel professional and well-shot
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site can be a pain to navigate. Way too many options, menus, etc. Some links don't work or crash. Pages are not consistent; some photoshoots have a completely different layout to others.&lt;br /&gt;
- maximum of 6 downloads at once&lt;br /&gt;
- It's just what you'd expect from reading the magazine. All the photos have pretty much the same style, the language is the same..etc. A little bit of variety would help. &lt;br /&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; don't choose models for their beauty, but for their bustline. Some of them are just, well, ugly. Sorry girls.&lt;br /&gt;
- Varying content on each model. You may browse and find a model you like, only to discover she only has one bad photoset, from 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speed isn't great, for me in the UK. I have a 2Mb/s connection, but sometimes was barely getting 48kb/s, and never more than 500kb/s&lt;br /&gt;
- no complete archive of the Score magazines, which I would have liked to see.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					So, if you're a fan of big boobs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; is obviously the place to be. They've been going for decades now in print, producing the same kind of professional-quality boob pictorials ever since the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say it's definitely worth giving the site a try. There's a large collection of models (albeit some have very little content), new updates every day or so, and loads of content. And the way that they give you an extra site every few weeks is awesome, it's a great incentive to stay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest problem with the site is that it just gets boring after a while. Everything looks the same; the models all use the same poses; the lighting doesn't vary much. Even the hardcore all seems vaguely similar. You find yourself watching the vids and thinking, &amp;quot;why didn't they just change the formula a bit?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I ended up just going through the model list, picking the models I liked the look of, and downloading their content. I barely glanced at the homepage or updates, which is a bad sign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't get me wrong, it's still a professional, entertaining site with great content and regular updates, and it's a must-subscribe if you're a breast fanatic, even if it's just for a month. But after a while, it all just looks the same.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=257&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Scoreland&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22823&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22823&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:08 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
