<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Explicite Art - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22990</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22990</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-03-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:14pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A ton of content, close to 1000 videos, 65000 photos and over 300 models.&lt;br /&gt;
Daily updates (switch between photo and video sets)&lt;br /&gt;
Nice search feature for both models and content.&lt;br /&gt;
Good content variety ranging from fashion shoots, solo masturbation, hardcore, fisting, big toys, anal, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
Models are attractive for the most part and original.  You won't see them all over the web.&lt;br /&gt;
Videos have good download options.&lt;br /&gt;
Fast downloads.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some video and pic sets are no longer available.&lt;br /&gt;
Scenes can be too short at times.&lt;br /&gt;
Cameraman can be annoying in some scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
No screen caps for the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Older videos are lower quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Some unattractive models (usually the older shoots)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I just joined the site again after about 8 months and it just continues to grow.  Not much has changed in that time except for the addition of a lot of new material, but that's ok for the most part.  It remains a very quality site.  Some notes of interest:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  There is a ton of content here, and if you've never been to the site before you will have a field day.  However, I was searching for a few sets I had seen on my previous dalliance with the site and couldn't find them, so some things have been taken off.  I'm not sure how much, but some things have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  There is enough content here to satisy anyone I believe.  I was able to satisfy my craving with all of their fisting and big toy scenes, and someone else could do the same with whatever it is they enjoy seeing.  None of the niches push the other ones to the side and have precedence, there is a good mix of everything in good proportions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.  One thing that I did not enjoy in some of the scenes was the camera man.  I hate it in any scene when the camera man is constantly moving around, or switching the view.  For example, there were more than one scene where a girl is fisting another girl, and the camera is moving from viewing the actual action, to the one girl's face, to the other girl's face, WAY too often.  Also, the viewing angle was constantly changing, making it even more annoying.  Yes it's nice to have some variety, and yes you need to see the girl's face some times too, but not to that extreme.  A good scene in my opinion will have a steady shot on the action 70-80% of the time and the other percent maybe moving around looking at the faces or bodies of the girls.  Also, I think some of the scenes could be longer, and the addition of vidcaps to give an idea of what a video is going to be like would be nice as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.  Another important point to make is two-fold: the models seen on the site I have never seen anywhere else, and they do not re-release old material &amp;quot;remastered&amp;quot;.  The more that sites do that kind of garbage, the more I'm going to compliment sites that do not do it.  All the updates are brand new material which is very refreshing.  I hope that this continues to be the case, and that the sets I mentioned not seeing anymore don't pop back up at some point in a &amp;quot;new update&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great site overall that should meet most people's fancy.  You get a lot here for your membership and it will keep you busy for a while.  Definitely worth checking out if you've never been a member.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22990&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22990&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:14:02 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15941</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15941</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-07-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:59pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3579&quot;&gt;artnoir&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3579&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
- Access to John B Root films&lt;br /&gt;
- Full movies&lt;br /&gt;
- Some beautiful girls&lt;br /&gt;
- Some moviesets are available as photosets&lt;br /&gt;
- Fast server
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Low quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
- No video options&lt;br /&gt;
- Just a handfull of the models are worth the price&lt;br /&gt;
- Most photosets are not available as videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is somewhat akward
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good exclusive contents, but poor video quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15941&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15941&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:59:27 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6963</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6963</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-13-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:28pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1800&quot;&gt;choosy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1800&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content, and lots of it&lt;br /&gt;
- Some gorgeous models&lt;br /&gt;
- Slick site, easy to navigate&lt;br /&gt;
- Great user based model rating system&lt;br /&gt;
- Regular updated&lt;br /&gt;
- Good mix of 'glamour' work with some hardcore action&lt;br /&gt;
- High def videos and pics&lt;br /&gt;
- Choice of high res or low res photos - the high res really are just that (eg 1800x1200)&lt;br /&gt;
- Each new video can be downloaded in a choice of sizes from approx 20 MB up to 100+ MB
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A bit too arty at times&lt;br /&gt;
- Language might be a draw back (if you don't speak French (though the site itself is well translated, all the videos are in French)&lt;br /&gt;
- Some gorgeous models, but a lot of average looking ones too (or am I just too fussy?)&lt;br /&gt;
- Not enough photos in some of the sets&lt;br /&gt;
- Focus isn't too good in some of the high res shots&lt;br /&gt;
- Too expensive to keep membership going monthly
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I joined this site hoping it would be another Karups PC site, lots of great photo sets and videos, with a good dose of hardcore.  A sort of FTV but with some boy-girl action.&lt;br /&gt;
I have unsubscribed happy that I got value for money but a little disappointed that the site wasn't all I though it was going to be.&lt;br /&gt;
There are some great picture sets and videos on here, but perhaps not enough really gorgeous models and some of the content is a bit too arty.&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely worth joining for at least a month though.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6963&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6963&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:28:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5600</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5600</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;apoctom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;144&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Over 270 beautiful, young models with photos or videos and 6 updates a week!&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos cover a wide range of tastes (bg, gg, anal, etc.) There's something here for everyone.&lt;br /&gt;
- Huge archive of over 800 videos between 2 and 10 minutes long.&lt;br /&gt;
- Even bigger archive of over 56,000 photos including hi-res photos at 1200x1800.&lt;br /&gt;
- &amp;quot;Temperature Gauge&amp;quot; for all photosets and movies that gives you an idea of how extreme the scene is.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good search feature that can search by model or by activity.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Longer scenes are broken up into 2 or 3 clips and updated separately, sometimes up to a week apart.&lt;br /&gt;
- The price is reasonable for the amount of exclusive content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was fortunate to catch pat362's post about the special trial for the site. I joined only for the trial, but was able to sample the entire site. There are a lot of great-looking young women on the site. (My personal faves are Bulle and Cally.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really liked the Temperature Gauge feature. It ranges from Soft to XXX (1 to 5) and gives a quick idea as to the level of intensity of the scene. My only issue is that some scenes that were rated 4 should have been 5. (Anal sex should count as XXX, no?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most videos are available in a wide variety of formats, including a higher resolution DivX (720 x 576). Downloads were very fast and compatible with download managers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also really liked the fact that the hi-res photos were downloadable in zip format. While not really compressed further, the convenience of downloading 1 file instead of 50 individual JPEGs is huge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I had not seen the $5 trial offer, I probably would never have joined Explicite-Art. I always thought of it as too much glamour photography and not enough hardcore. How I was wrong! There is definitely some XXX-worthy material available. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What prevents me from keeping my membership is the price. A site has to be extremely unique or part of a larger network for me to justify paying $30 a month. Does that mean it's a rip-off? No, but the content and price don't make it a value to me.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5600&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5600&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:53:46 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5580</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5580</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:50am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;32&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The variety offered by this site is amazing.  There are currently 255 models, most have photos and videos.  Both are downloadable in low or hi res.  Download options for most videos are the best I've ever seen: divx, mpeg, wmv, quicktime, and ipod.  Download speed is very fast. The models are mostly newbies ranging in age from 18 to 25, and come in all types from cute to average.  The sex is varied from glamour or solo to hardcore which includes anal, dp, pee, and fisting.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a French site, so if you don't understand the language this may be an issue for you.  Some of the videos could be longer, and I would have loved to have seen more from some of the models. At 29.95 this site is somewhat expensive if you aren't satisfied.  A lower cost trial might be nice.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This may be the best site on the net today in regards to download options for both photos and videos.  The variety and quantity of girls is great.  The only sticking point is the lack of a trial membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5580&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5580&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:50:17 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5527</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5527</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-01-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:29pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;301&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Interesting angle to the site, glamour photography with hardcore thrown in, as well as fetish (urination, smoking, etc..)&lt;br /&gt;
- Big 720x576 resolution on movies&lt;br /&gt;
- Over 250 models, some have upwards of 12 sets of pictures and videos. &lt;br /&gt;
- I believe the price was lowered recently to $29.99, seems to me it had been in the $40 range. &lt;br /&gt;
- Despite not many big name models, there are still 10 or so that are gorgeous.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Movies are too short, maybe Jon has some sort of charm that I don't know about, but girls orgasming in 2 minutes and 12 seconds is a little fast to me. &lt;br /&gt;
- Not enough teasing from the models in the videos, it is bam hit record, naked, orgasm, done.&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures need to be bigger in zip downloads&lt;br /&gt;
- Unless you use Firefox, the download speeds may be slow. I connect with Firefox to 4 clips or zips at a time and get average speed when combining them
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I usually join this site once a year. I really wish they would go back and so something with Ally's videos, she is a really pretty, J-Lo looking model, not in the butt though, just face and hair. Her movies are only available in WMV 320x240. Most of the other models have the 720x576 DIVX versions available. They have more movie options than any site I have seen. But the DIVX files are the best quality of the ones available. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've always found the models on here to be hit or miss. I either really like them, or I don't even want to see a second picture. On a side note, I still am not the least bit for much hair on the female body except the head. Some of these girls do have underarm hair, which will make me skip them everytime. I have even skipped a few on here because of excess pubic hair. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe there are a good 30-40 top level models on here, including the lovely Lucky doing hardcore, Mahe is an excellent erotic model, Ally that has been one of the top models on here is a real looker, I would then say many of the others are plain old ugly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My recommendation is not quite as excited as the score would indicate. I do believe this to be one of the top glamour sites on the internet, but part of glamour is beauty and some of these models aren't close to beauty. I seen the new trial for the next week that is $5, check it out with that trial. I kind of wished I had waited to join and got in on it. I still recommend the site and believe most would like it!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5527&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5527&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:29:20 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4824</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4824</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-11-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:38pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;82&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A Very Good Photographer&lt;br /&gt;
- Matching Video/Photo Shoots&lt;br /&gt;
- High Res Photos&lt;br /&gt;
- Hardcore Included
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some Of The Models Are Not Very Attractive&lt;br /&gt;
- Some Of The Sets Are Very Bland
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I think John Root is an outstanding erotic photographer, his work stands out from the ordinary porn photographer. He seems to have good control over his models (some photographers seem to let the models ruin the shot), and poses them very well. The female models are usually well made up, and are often very provocative, and Root seems to be able to bring out their nasty side! Most of the models are attractive, with a few being knockouts, but there are some who will make you wonder why he used them. He even has a small section of rejected models, he should have added a few more! The videos are nicely done, and match the photo sets, so you can peek at the photos before deciding to download. Some of the video/photo sets are very ordinary and tame; but a lot of them are smoking! All in all, there is material here that is unique, done by a real pro. ***After being in the site for awhile, I have to upgrade my score. It's not your ordinary porn site***
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4824&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4824&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:38:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3740</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3740</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-10-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:27pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1379&quot;&gt;sub1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1379&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Low cost for 3 day trial ($5.00).&lt;br /&gt;
- Great black and white photography mixed in.&lt;br /&gt;
- High resolution photo format (1800x1200).&lt;br /&gt;
- Explicit indicator (mild to hot) for each photo set.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Poor focus on many of the photos&lt;br /&gt;
- Few Explicit photos&lt;br /&gt;
- Slow (100kbs) to download on broadband account
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The Explicit indicator helps speed up browsing if you're looking for very explicit photos, however only 20% of the photo sets were marked HOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have deleted more than half of the files I've downloaded due to out of focus and non explicit nature of the photos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recommend this site only if you can get in at the $5.00 trial rate.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3740&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3740&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:27:08 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3018</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3018</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-13-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:50pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1213&quot;&gt;luvIzumi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1213&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The reason I joined this site was to see more of one particular model named Ally (If you've been to the site, you know who I mean). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was well worth the price of admission, but now she's retired so there's no new content coming from her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some stunning models that you will not see anywhere else. Beautifully shot content and lots of it. It's hard to explain, but the whole site just has a very unique feel.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A bit more &amp;quot;artsy&amp;quot; than I like. The videos actually have acting and storylines. If you're familiar with Private videos, this stuff is similar.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'd give this site a higher rating if they were still able to deliver new Ally stuff. As it is, the site is a nice change from typical American stuff. Not for everyone, and pretty expensive, but if you want something different, this is a good bet.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3018&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3018&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:50:11 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_362</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=362</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-10-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=221&quot;&gt;DivBZero&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=221&quot;&gt;13&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good Photography, virtually straight from the digital camera to the website.  Photoshoots set up well and a good erotic eye.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Sometimes too mach similar images in a set.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a site with a 'french' view of erotica, which, can sometimes seem offbeat, but actually well worth the membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=362&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=362&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:31:20 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_223</guid>
		<title>Explicite Art Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=223</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/expliciteart.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Explicite Art&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/expliciteart/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:18am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=103&quot;&gt;Hush&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=103&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Nice quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
-decent quantity&lt;br /&gt;
-women are attractive
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Way too expensive&lt;br /&gt;
-Got bored of content quickly&lt;br /&gt;
-marketed smoking fetish content with only one video&lt;br /&gt;
of marginal sf content&lt;br /&gt;
-at times too artistic to enjoy &lt;br /&gt;

					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Do not join for smoking fetish content as there is virtually none. This site has always seemed over-rated to me. At times the camera work was too artistic to enjoy at the primal level. 
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=24&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Explicite Art&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=223&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=223&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:18:57 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>