PU - Explicite Art - All Activity

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:11:47 PST

Explicite Art (9)

11-18-08 04:11am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To MargulisAZ (64):

are the videos downloadable in one part and is there music in the videos?

View Thread (3)

Explicite Art Comment

Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:45:16 PST

Explicite Art (9)

11-02-08 12:45pm

COMMENT by Sandfly (0)

Same content re-used

I have noticed that this site adverises video files that have been on their site for many months again as "new" updates, which they clearly are not. I suppose this is in an attempt to pad their update log to make it look like there is a contiuous stream of new content.
A pretty underhanded trick, as it leads users to waste download bandwidth downloading things more than once only to discover that they have aleady got it!

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Explicite Art Comment

Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:28 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

09-15-08 03:41am

COMMENT by Jennyrain (0)

Some of the worst camera work anywhere.

So let me say this, I haven't been so frustrated to the point of commenting on this site until now. After being so excited about the Shannya-tweeks update on this site I joined it again for the first time in a while. And of course, it's a complete disaster thanks to the incompetent camera men and editing. On the most recent review on here the member comments on this problem and it is NOT an exaggeration when he says that the camera view tends to change every few seconds, LITERALLY. Do you have any idea how annoying that is, especially when you're trying to get into the action? On the scene I talk about it just gets horrible to the point of vomiting, especially towards the end. Granted I'm not a big fan of fisting, which is what's happening, but probably 75% of the camera shot is on a blowjob instead of the real action. Then even when you get to see what's happening down below, 2-3 seconds later you're back up top again, then below, then up top, then below. Like a damn roller coaster. People, learn to shoot a damn scene with some sense! Keep the same shot for a little while, THEN change it. And shoot where the action is more! Geez! The sad thing is that it's like this on tons of scenes on this site.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:35:09 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

09-15-08 03:35am

REVIEW REPLY by Jennyrain (0)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Great review, let me just point out that Margulis is not joking about the annoying camera men on the videos at times. It truly can be horrid.

View Thread (3)

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:50:59 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

08-04-08 02:50am

REVIEW REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Hello MargulisAZ,

Thanks for this accurate review.

Arnaud

View Thread (3)

RE: SPECIAL OFFER

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:27:55 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-10-08 06:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (32)

To pat362 (32):

Thanks Arnaud. I'll keep my eyes open for it.

View Thread (3)

Explicite Art News

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:23:52 PDT

Explicite Art

07-09-08 05:23am

NEWS by arnaud (7)

Prices and Popups

Hi,

About cost :

3 month access is NON RECURRING
and we also have a 5 month access, NON RECURRING too.

And we do not have exit popups

Arnaud

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: SPECIAL OFFER

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:06:31 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 05:06am

COMMENT REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To pat362 (32):

Hi,

SPECIAL OFFER is coming back soon. Is 5$/3 days a decent price to you?

Arnaud

View Thread (3)

RE: Hush's Review

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:04:15 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 05:04am

REVIEW REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To Hush (1):

Hi,

There are 18 smoking fetish video (and 18 corresponding photosets). They are more easy to find now that i've added a search engine for the videos.

Of course, if you are looking for ONLY smoking fetish videos, you will be disappointed.

Arnaud

View Thread (2)

RE: Not satisfying

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:55:28 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 04:55am

COMMENT REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To Drooler (156):

Hi,

just wanted to let you know that price for full membership is lower now compared to the time the comment above was written.

Slow downloads = it depends on so many factors. You may download slow on explicite-art whereas your neighbor may download the same file fast.

We're hosted at ISPRIME, which is a very good hosting provider, some very popular adult websites are hosted there. Members are usually satisfied with download speed.

Arnaud

View Thread (2)

RE: Site should be renamed

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:47:46 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 04:47am

COMMENT REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To bobbyboy (0):

Hi,

I would say that the definition of "hardcore" may not be the same for every one.

If hardcore = no respect for the girls or girls consider as object/animal, so you're right.

Regarding the actors, most of them have worked in many movies, for most european porn companies. There are not "rookies".

Arnaud

View Thread (2)

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:38:50 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 04:38am

COMMENT REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To Rocker (0):

Hi,

I never noticed the 1800x1200 pics have crappy resolution, and none members complained about it. Everyone has different levels of requirement, but i would not say the resolution is "crappy".

Arnaud

View Thread (3)

RE: artnoir's Review

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:29:08 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-09-08 04:29am

REVIEW REPLY by arnaud (Webmaster)

To artnoir (6):

Hi artnoir.

About low quality videos : i'm quite surprised. Lot's of websites offer poor 320x240 res videos encoded at 300kb/s, ours are available in divx, mpeg, h264, 720x576@2000kb/s.

About "most photosets are not available as videos", i would say "few" photosets are not available as videos ; the oldest ones (maybe 100, whereas there are 950 vids). Because we've been shooting photo and video for each scene at the same time for years now.

What do you mean by "no video options"? there are 5 different formats for almost all the videos (divx, mpeg, mov, ipod, wmv). One can chose the most appropriate i think.

:-)

Arnaud

View Thread (1)

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:46:31 PST

Explicite Art (9)

01-27-08 10:46am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Rocker (0):

Maybe it would be a good idea to ask the TBP administrator to remove this erroneous comment.

View Thread (3)

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:58:49 PST

Explicite Art (9)

01-26-08 11:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Rocker (0):

I noticed that also when I was a member. We don't want McPics; whoppers would be better -- or we'll freak!

McPics can be found at sites like Viewpornstars. 1600px of haloey stuff in washed-out colors.

View Thread (3)

Explicite Art Comment

Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:21:33 PST

Explicite Art (9)

01-26-08 09:21am

COMMENT by Rocker (0)

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Site should be renamed

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:07:51 PST

Explicite Art (9)

12-03-07 07:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To bobbyboy (0):

Absolutely ridiculous.

View Thread (2)

Explicite Art Comment

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:19:09 PST

Explicite Art (9)

12-03-07 03:19pm

COMMENT by bobbyboy (0)

Site should be renamed

This site has nothing to offer in the way of "hardcore". All the actors lack the qualities necessary. They are just a bunch of amateurs who act like they don't even want to be doing this. They don't do much of anything anyway. The models are not very good looking for the most part. The site is a waste of money as far as I am concerned. Site should be renamed to Explicite Nothing

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: choosy's Review

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:12:40 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

08-28-07 05:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by brixze (0)

To choosy (8):

I think you are right there are many ordinary models here. I am underwhelmed by this site.

View Thread (2)

RE: apoctom's Review

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:16:23 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

08-21-07 10:16am

REVIEW REPLY by Boobs4ever (21)

To apoctom (144):

Nice review may check it out myself when I feel i can afford it ^^

View Thread (1)

RE: choosy's Review

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:06:41 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

08-15-07 12:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To choosy (8):

choosy ask if he may be too fussy about the models standard.
I don't think he is. Earlier (a year or two ago)this site was almost great.
They recently made new design and new this and that.
But the standard of the models and the standard of the videos are not getting better visa versa....

View Thread (2)

RE: Not satisfying

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:31:16 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

08-13-07 03:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by choosy (8)

To Drooler (156):

I'm with you on this site. It is definitely not worth a rating in the 90's, and there are a lot of not really that gorgeous models.
However, I disagree regarding the usability, I thought the site was easy to use and navigate.

View Thread (2)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:24:16 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-10-07 11:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To jd1961 (82):

I've never tried Opera for porn. I do have it on my PC and use it for some sites. I will have to try it out and see how it does. My one big complaint with using Firefox is that when downloading, if you are typing while a file downloads, when it hits 100% finished, it stops you from typing. Not a big deal to most, but I usually type from notes, so I'm not looking at the screen. After five minutes, I look up to see that the last 4 paragraphs I thought I had typed were not typed!

View Thread (2)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:09:17 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-03-07 10:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To exotics4me (301):

I use opera to download there, and get good speeds.

View Thread (2)

RE: SPECIAL OFFER

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:42:41 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-02-07 03:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by apoctom (144)

To pat362 (32):

Great catch. I'm going to take advantage of that offer.

View Thread (3)

Explicite Art Comment

Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:41:42 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

07-01-07 10:41am

COMMENT by pat362 (32)

****SPECIAL OFFER****

I was reading a few users review when I decided to visit the site. Explicite is offering a 3 day full access membership for 5$ from June 29 to July 6. I will write a review later on.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: luvIzumi's Review

Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:45:01 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

06-11-07 07:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To luvIzumi (8):

You're right---Ally rocks! ;-)

View Thread (1)

RE: European

Tue, 15 May 2007 06:31:16 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

05-15-07 06:31am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (146):

While it's true, many sites might qualify for any number of categories, a TBP editor tells me they can only select three (3) for any given site. I'll ask her to look into this one further.

Thanks for the feedback.

View Thread (1)

Explicite Art Comment

Tue, 15 May 2007 06:17:33 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

05-15-07 06:17am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

European

Hey guys at TBP
I guess this site also belongs in your european section (13) - since it's french.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Explicite Art Comment

Sun, 13 May 2007 04:49:09 PDT

Explicite Art (9)

05-13-07 04:49am

COMMENT by Drooler (156)

Not satisfying

I can't see this site being rated in the 90's. I've been a member twice over about 3 years, and even with the recent site redesign, there's too much about it that is below par:

the high price for full membership
the SLOW downloads
the blurriness of photos
the "artsy" and "fetishy" nature of the photos
the overly complicated/confusing navigation (in the NEW design)
the models (some are great, but a lot of them are so-so in looks)

That's my 2 bits. And some people might like the site a lot more than others do, but it's off my list.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Explicite Art Comment

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:51:53 PST

Explicite Art (9)

01-10-07 06:51pm

COMMENT by Bacchus (30)

Great site!

I love the look of the European girls. Very natural and very sexy. Their sex scenes are very believable and it does not look contrived. My only gripe would be that their clips are outdated and they need to have fresh clips updated often.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Hush's Review

Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:36:55 PST

Explicite Art (9)

01-09-07 01:36am

REVIEW REPLY by DpornGuy (31)

To Hush (1):

i agree, this site seems to be more artsy then porn, and the camera work was annoying.

Good review

View Thread (2)

PU - Explicite Art - All Activity

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

Explicite Art Comment

Explicite Art Comment

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

RE: ****SPECIAL OFFER****

Explicite Art News

RE: ****SPECIAL OFFER****

RE: Hush's Review

RE: Not satisfying

RE: Site should be renamed

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

RE: artnoir's Review

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

RE: Big pics, but no resolution.

Explicite Art Comment

RE: Site should be renamed

Explicite Art Comment

RE: choosy's Review

RE: apoctom's Review

RE: choosy's Review

RE: Not satisfying

RE: exotics4me's Review

RE: exotics4me's Review

RE: ****SPECIAL OFFER****

Explicite Art Comment

RE: luvIzumi's Review

RE: European

Explicite Art Comment

Explicite Art Comment

Explicite Art Comment

RE: Hush's Review

RE: SPECIAL OFFER

RE: SPECIAL OFFER

RE: SPECIAL OFFER