<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Aunt Judy&#39;s - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49323</guid>
		<title>Aunt Judy&#39;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49323</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/auntjudys.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Aunt Judy's&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-29-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:14am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;123&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A plentiful amount of models or varying ages and looks now that AJ and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;Older Women&lt;/a&gt; have been combined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Picture sets are HR, 2000 pixels on the long side, zipped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A movies only section is also part of the deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updates appear to be regular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speed was fairly good for me. All you need for, what is basically, a photo site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very awkward way of naming their sets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No true Hi-Res pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Movies are a disgrace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site navigation and viewing are unnecessarily complicated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation is sticky.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most photo sets are uninspired.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Well, they did it to me again. I got a special Memorial Day offer that took ten dollars off their regular price for one month and, as a lover of mature women, how could I resist, despite previous vows never to subscribe again. What can I say? Hope does spring eternal in the human breast! Maybe they improved in the meantime?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site is still basically second rate when compared to other mature sites. The 2000 pixels long side sets lack the crispness and the ability to count every pore, every hair on a model that is found on just about every other picture site these days. Here, the pictures seem basically enlargements, and that's it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The naming of the picture sets itself is very awkward and it is incomprehensible to me why they would do things this way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's say you find a favorite model and want to download all of her sets. Well, they are all named Eve.zip (example only). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your computer will most likely make sure that they are re-named Eve (1).zip, Eve (2). zip etc. however every picture within every set is named exactly the same. Why would they do that? This requires a lot of renaming, and if you ever make the mistake of unzipping all of them at the same time you will find yourself with an unholy mess. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole set-up is awkward and hard to navigate. Seeing that Aunt Judys, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;Older Women&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;Older Women&lt;/a&gt; movies are now one &quot;super site&quot; why not have everything in one spot and just keep listing the various niches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Want to look at the high res version of a picture in a set? First click on thumbnail of model, then click on thumbnail of the picture you want to look at, within the set. This gives you the small version of the picture you want to study in detail. Now click on that and a new window opens with another small picture you have to click on in order to finally get your so-called HI-RES 2000 pixels long version. So many unnecessary steps. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I would forgive them for every one of their attempts to make it harder for me to navigate and view, if only their picture sets were not so incredibly stiff, lifeless, unimaginative, dull, inept. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As usual, there are exceptions to the rule, but generally speaking their stable of photographers should be fired wholesale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The movies are a farce. I cannot find a bit of difference between their DVD quality movies and their so-called HD quality wmv files. I found, to my great disappointment that their &quot;HD&quot; videos were without exception 640x480 px with a total bitrate of approx. 3300. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now other sites manage to give you a decent picture even with those specifications but trust me, the quality here is really bad. I cannot bear to watch anything I have downloaded so far, especially in full screen.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Low recommendation. They are not ripping you off, but they don't give you top quality either and if you subscribed at their regular price you would pay too much.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=227&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49323&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=49323&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:14:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_41899</guid>
		<title>Aunt Judy&#39;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41899</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/auntjudys.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Aunt Judy's&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-08-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:13am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 73&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3264&quot;&gt;mr smut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3264&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ pictures now have 2000 pixels on the long side&lt;br /&gt;
+ good customer support (my account got unlocked in a few minutes)&lt;br /&gt;
+ good mix of beautiful models of all ages of which some have (intimate) piercings and or tatoos which is IMHO great&lt;br /&gt;
+ models come from the US and Europe too&lt;br /&gt;
+ updates come regular (but could be more)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- navigation is poor compared to other sites in the same niche&lt;br /&gt;
- all new ZIP files are named model_name.zip which forces you to rename them all plus there's no chance to find out which sets are the new ones which is very annoying&lt;br /&gt;
- not many videos and quality is poor&lt;br /&gt;
- I found some ZIP files with broken images (even within the newest updates!)&lt;br /&gt;
- older content still available but only good for collectors that want to have everything from their favourite models&lt;br /&gt;
- DL limit of 10 GB per day.&lt;br /&gt;
- beware that this site offers softcore only and only a few scenes seem to contain insertions of vibrators, dildos and other objects&lt;br /&gt;
- only some information about the models. Even their measurements or a short bio are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
- only a basic comment system and it can take 1 or two days until your comment has been approved
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I quickly reached the DL limit while being at home on a Sunday. The error message I got was misleading to problems with my password being guessed by someone else. I was puzzled to read that my account was blocked for &quot;excessive downloads&quot;. My access to the Internet is not that fast but I managed to download 10 GB during daytime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site itself is quite nice but needs lots of improvement as compared to my favourite site which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allover30/&quot;&gt;AllOver30&lt;/a&gt;. They update more often (from Monday to Saturday) and offer better quality even though they lack some beauties in the age over 60 that Aunt Judys offers.&lt;br /&gt;
More care should be taken when uploading ZIP files to the members area. It's always embarassing to find archives with broken content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My download manager (GetRight) won't work for this site which makes it even harder to hunt for the good content. I experienced that 6 simutaneous connections are the limit so you also have to be careful not to download more than 4 or 5 files in a row because otherwise the site will block further connections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be honest I'll cancel mysubscription soon and may come back in a year or so to give them time to improve and update their site. I'll give AJ 73 points which is the maximum I can give based on the fact that their archive is quite large but it's hard to hunt down the gems :-(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those that like older girls should give it a try but keep in mind that surfing there can be frustrating. If you are after videos then this site won't give you much to look at.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=227&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41899&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41899&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:13:24 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_41385</guid>
		<title>Aunt Judy&#39;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41385</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/auntjudys.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Aunt Judy's&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-22-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:25pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11230&quot;&gt;Ray O&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11230&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Great repository of photos of gals over 30.&lt;br /&gt;
- They use some of the premier photogaphers&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice collection and searchable by name&lt;br /&gt;
- Best Older Model Only site I have seen
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- I would have preferred greater content update in terms of frequency and volume.&lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the photographers and sets are not that good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good site and I have been an on again and off again subscriber.  I would be an always on again if their were more frequent (and greater number) of updates.  Like 8-10 model sets a day would be good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=227&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41385&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41385&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:25:14 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9873</guid>
		<title>Aunt Judy&#39;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9873</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/auntjudys.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Aunt Judy's&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-07-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:17pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;123&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A site that recognizes that beautiful amateurs can be found in an older age bracket. Gives a choice to pick models by category. Lots of mature models.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Picture quality is very uneven. Some of the newer sets aren't bad, some of the older ones I don't bother downloading because they are too small and greyish. An effort is being made by AJ to upgrade old sets but after they do this they aggravatingly remove them from their main site and put them into an AJ Archive that requires an additional subscription fee. Movie quality is horrible almost throughout. Haven't come across a decent one in the three weeks I've been subscribing to the site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some nice, mature amateurs, but you can download the ones that truly appeal to your personal taste in a matter of days. Movies are not worth downloading because the site got stuck in the '90's when it comes to quality. Way overpriced for what you get. Updates are regular but too infrequent. I won't resubscribe.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=227&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9873&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9873&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:17:52 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_722</guid>
		<title>Aunt Judy&#39;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=722</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/auntjudys.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Aunt Judy's&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-18-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:16am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=429&quot;&gt;mudman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=429&quot;&gt;36&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-A lot of pictures.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Quality is unreliable. Can be very good. Can be very bad.&lt;br /&gt;
-One size fits all.&lt;br /&gt;
-Layout a bore.&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates way too few for the price.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you're over 30, then you must be ugly.  God help us all, if this is true.  This seems to be the bread and butter of AuntJudy's.  Frankly, it's a site whose time has come and gone.  Just about any new mature site stands a really good chance of eclipsing AuntJudy's on everything but volume.  If you need lots of so-so undersized pictures, then go there.  It's your money.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=227&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Aunt Judy's&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=722&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=722&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:16:06 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
