Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_53814 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=53814 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/wildrose.jpg" alt="Enter Wild Rose Network" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/"><b>Wild Rose Network</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 10-15-10&nbsp;&nbsp;10:41am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5678">Shasta90418</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5678">4</a>)<br> <br> <b>ten years ago maybe</b><br> <br> I first signed up for this site ten years ago, and after trying another look, that seems to be where this site still is. It's a large collection of miniature sites some of which don't even have videos and of those that do, the file sizes are so small and the video quality so poor that you just want to cry out of pity. I'd hate to see what some of the women on the site look like today. Some of them may not even still be living. This site deserves a mercy kill itself. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=392"><b>Visit Wild Rose Network</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=53814">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=53814">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:41:03 PDT pornusers_3076 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3076 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/wildrose.jpg" alt="Enter Wild Rose Network" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/"><b>Wild Rose Network</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 04-15-07&nbsp;&nbsp;06:20pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559">SnowDude</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559">214</a>)<br> <br> <b>Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?</b><br> <br> Last week I commented on a site that was part of a larger network and openly speculated as to whether a network that offered dozens of sites could truly have quality throughout. I've since joined one where I would easily answer, "No." and am now contemplating joining this one, the <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wildrose/">Wild Rose Network</a>.<br /> <br /> It bills itself as the only real amateur network where you get access to all the company's sites and most do appear to be interesting solo girl sites, but again I wonder if you can have too many sites on a network before the number gets too high and little attention is paid to making every site a good one. Certainly some go defunct for reasons other than being terrible, so I doubt any network is good across the board.<br /> <br /> So, again I'm about to jump into the deep end of the pool not knowing what to expect and perhaps I'll be the first one here giving it a go. However, I always like to hear from anyone who has visited any of the sites. I am most excited about one in particular, <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/joyofspex/">JoyofSpex.com</a>, but am trying not to get my hopes up. I spend a lot of time (much more than I should) looking for obscure sites, so I'm really looking for a good one here and the other network sites will just be a bonus if that one site is any good. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=392"><b>Visit Wild Rose Network</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3076">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3076">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:20:13 PDT