Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_41280 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41280 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newbienudes.jpg" alt="Enter Newbie Nudes" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/"><b>Newbie Nudes</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 10-20-09&nbsp;&nbsp;09:44am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=13">Khan</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=13">0</a>)<br> <br> <b>Reviews Suspended for Now</b><br> <br> It seems there is an effort by the fans of this site to give it a good showing. We've seen four high score reviews (84+) in two days. It's not unusual for a site with this type with member participation to be loyal fans, however, because of the nature of the site, it's obvious some have a vested interest in the site looking good.<br /> <br /> So, for now, we're not accepting any new reviews for this site.<br /> <br /> Your anticipated cooperation is appreciated. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2220"><b>Visit Newbie Nudes</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41280">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41280">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:44:10 PDT pornusers_12652 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12652 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/newbienudes.jpg" alt="Enter Newbie Nudes" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/"><b>Newbie Nudes</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 11-23-07&nbsp;&nbsp;11:20am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428">messmer</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428">123</a>)<br> <br> <b>Not worth the effort!</b><br> <br> All the arguments going on over "is it shilling or not?" if a member of an amateur site recommends it glowingly made me curious enough to become a member of <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/newbienudes/">Newbie Nudes</a>: for all of 15 minutes. <br /> <br /> It is my personal opinion that the ratings given by present contributors to this site are way out of line when one takes a look at what is actually offered there. Forget, for a moment, that larger pictures and videos are available for a hefty price and look at the general make-up of this amateur site: <br /> <br /> The overwhelming majority of the members choose to remain anonymous (for valid reasons) which means faceless body parts all over the place and very few pics where one could actually admire the beauty of the WHOLE woman (and a paid subscription and larger pictures wouldn't change that). When you do come across a "whole person" pic you still have to consider yourself lucky if the face isn't masked somehow.<br /> <br /> In my opinion you would have to be a contributor who gets a thrill from exposing his/her genitalia anonymously, or someone who likes to mingle with fellow exhibitionists, (not that there is anything wrong with it) to give the site more than a fifty! To the uninvolved (non-contributing) voyeur the site isn't worth a second look. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2220"><b>Visit Newbie Nudes</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12652">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12652">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:20:24 PST