PU - Newbie Nudes - All Activity

RE: spot's Review

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:19:56 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-12-10 10:19am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To spot (0):

Thanks, spot, for taking the time to give me such a thorough assessment of the site. I must have a look at it!

View Thread (6)

RE: spot's Review

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:20:21 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-11-10 11:20am

REVIEW REPLY by spot (0)

To messmer (123):

I have been trying out tangotime for a little bit.

So far its been alright.

1.) Things you post need to get approved first before they become viewable - so someone is actually looking at your material before it gets posted. As an exmaple, I posted a picture and I accidentally put it in the wrong category. The reviewer fixed that before making it public and left a note. As well I posted a duplicate, which the reviewer caught and rejected the post, again with another reason why. So its good that here things are actually moderated.

2.) Even if you are not a paying member, you have access to your own posted content, including the ability to remove it.

3.) Not as many fakers as other sites. I will say though, one
person there was a webcam girl trying to solicit me to get me on yahoo and probably pay for a show or something. But you can report these people and support there will actually do something about it.

4.) Voting system. I don't really care about voting systems in general, but they track people that spam 1 votes on accounts and they give you the ability to reset votes on pictures. This is probably done because they have ALOT of contests that award prizes.

5.) Lots of categories from nude to none nude to better filter what you are looking for.

6.) There is a chat/video interface you get access to if you become a paying member. I tried this a few times and what I dont like is at the bottom of the chat interface were advertisements which would make my antivirus pop up that it may be spam. Take that out and its fine.

7.) If you are the chatty type, I didn't find anything about a user forum there.

Thats about it for now!

View Thread (6)

RE: spot's Review

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:57:21 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-10-10 09:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To spot (0):

Yep.

Pretty much as I expected.

I had a free account, but soon got tired of the faked material.

Cap'n. :0(

View Thread (6)

RE: jacq's Review

Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:19:57 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-09-10 07:19am

REVIEW REPLY by spot (0)

To james4096 (126):

I was curious about this too and after searching their user forum for a little, you'll find the site owners of Newbienudes asked people to check out this site and write reviews:

http://www.newbienudes.com/forum/default...n&d=221020091800

http://www.newbienudes.com/forum/default...&d=2110200916130

The forums there aren't used by the majority of users (come on, they boast 2.3 million users and 2.3 million people are definately not using their forum). So just based on that, its going to be a biased review. When you see comments in their user forum from users who wrote reviews, along the lines of "Hope it contributes something for the site NN", you know its going to be biased. I'm sure people who are no longer members, don't pay anymore, etc aren't going to be asked to post a review somehow lol.

Make a free account yourself and do you own research, then maybe by a premium for a month. Just too much fake accounts, fake posters, and very little moderation when it comes to posting for me to even consider this a genuine "amateur" site anymore. Was much better years ago, but the site owners just don't seem to care about keeping it about genuine amateurs.

View Thread (2)

RE: spot's Review

Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:02:17 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-08-10 12:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To spot (0):

Let me know how good or bad your other site is once you've been there for a bit. I'd really like to find a decent amateur site without all the web crap.

View Thread (6)

RE: spot's Review

Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:49:10 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-08-10 08:49am

REVIEW REPLY by spot (0)

To spot (0):

Well I guess someone must of read my review or didn't like my comments I made on their user forum. I tried logging in to the site and found my account had been deleted. I suspect its probably because of my forum post.

There was a thread started by a former paying user (geekyguy), titled: "Anyone else had enough of the webshit that gets posted here?"

The link to the forum post is: http://www.newbienudes.com/forum/default...10&d=64201012350

I made a comment in the thread that said "Until NN makes it such that you must be verified to post pics, save your money."

Its all good though, I'm going to another site that will actually work to earn my money and moderates posts to keep out all the fake crap.

This is the exact problem with the site. They'll delete my account when an issue is raised exposing the problems. They'd rather spend their time silencing someone by deleting their account, rather than getting rid of users like "cumgirl19" (who is obviously fake), is posting normal pictures, wedding pictures asking for monitor pictures. Then again, "cumgirl19" is a paying customer, so the site owners must oblidge I suppose!

View Thread (6)

RE: spot's Review

Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:53:07 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

04-07-10 06:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To spot (0):

I have a free account that I only used once and feel that you are right in your assessment and that the score should be something like ten if that was possible. Pathetic site with way too many fake "amateurs."

View Thread (6)

RE: Reviews Suspended for Now

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:03:41 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 01:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Khan (Staff):

Damn - now I can't write my first 100 score review. This sucks.

View Thread (4)

RE: Reviews Suspended for Now

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:59:56 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 11:59am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Khan (Staff):

I hadn't been paying any attention to it myself. Nice to know that vigilance is here with Khan on the lookout.

View Thread (4)

RE: Reviews Suspended for Now

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:09:35 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 11:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Khan (Staff):

Fine reaction....
Generally I think we've had some exampels of reviews - only now and then, though - where a connection from newer PUs to the webmaster/siteowner seems likely - to put it diplomatic.

With this site things seem to be coordinated.

It's great that TBP obviously read all the reviews thoroughly - and catch those non-serious inputs....

View Thread (4)

RE: Reviews Suspended for Now

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:32:41 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 10:32am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Khan (Staff):

I definitely agree that this is the right move.

View Thread (4)

Newbie Nudes Comment

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:44:10 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 09:44am

COMMENT by Khan (0)

Reviews Suspended for Now

It seems there is an effort by the fans of this site to give it a good showing. We've seen four high score reviews (84+) in two days. It's not unusual for a site with this type with member participation to be loyal fans, however, because of the nature of the site, it's obvious some have a vested interest in the site looking good.

So, for now, we're not accepting any new reviews for this site.

Your anticipated cooperation is appreciated.

Visit Newbie Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Krick's Review

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:07:50 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 08:07am

REVIEW REPLY by Krick (0)

To ace of aces (179):

I'm unsure what you mean by "live preview pics". If you mean free vids, then no. That privilege is reserved for paying members. It is not a cam site. But all member pics are viewable by both guests and members (paying or not).

View Thread (2)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:09:04 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 03:09am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To newbielulu (0):

what`s up here? 5 reviews from new pu`s in a row? all working there ? :)

View Thread (6)

RE: Krick's Review

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:07:12 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-20-09 03:07am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To Krick (0):

are there live preview pics?

View Thread (2)

RE: jacq's Review

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:58:19 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-19-09 05:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by james4096 (126)

To jacq (0):

This has to be coordinated. Why are you guys suddenly flooding Porn Users? Who's idea was this?

View Thread (2)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:14:01 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-18-09 12:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by james4096 (126)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

No, you're right the entire "review" is biased and written to promote the site. I looked at the heated discussion that went on years ago about this site. You were one of the ones who rightfully opposed the shilling reviews for this site by people who were contributors to the site. Khan allowed it, but I think the link disqualifies this review.

Hopefully the staff here have changed their stance on this type of thing. If you ask me, reviews by people(porn users) who pay for the content is what we do here. Reviews by those that contribute content is not what this place is about.

View Thread (6)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:45:23 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-18-09 10:45am

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To james4096 (126):

It wasn't just that. Without any real details, she really doesn't tell anyone much about what they can find on the site. The Pro section and the bottom line both read just like an insider's hype for the site.

View Thread (6)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:20:19 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-18-09 10:20am

REVIEW REPLY by james4096 (126)

To newbielulu (0):

you posted a link to your profile, which really makes it look like you came to promote.

View Thread (6)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:52:57 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-18-09 01:52am

REVIEW REPLY by newbielulu (0)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

No, Sir...just a regular ol'girl whose found a place that I really like and support :)

View Thread (6)

RE: newbielulu's Review

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:24:34 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

10-18-09 12:24am

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To newbielulu (0):

Are you in their sales department?

View Thread (6)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:11:18 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

08-09-08 04:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To SuchSluts (0):

Those watermarks are nice and clear .. too clear, because they're in the hair, in the face, on the body, in all the most awful places ... in other words they do get in the way in a most intrusive manner. If someone put them discretely on the bottom right I'd have no problem with them but in the hair, on the body? Other amateur sites do the same thing. Redclouds, voyeur web (I think they're called), world wide wives .. they all got into the awful habit of defacing the pictures of their contributors in a ghastly way by putting the logo either near the person or on her/him. I thought at first the watermarks were meant for those who looked for freebies and that subscribers would get the unblemished picture, but a couple of sample pictures provided by "world wide wives" made me realize that this is standard practice in true amateur circles. I'm shaking my head over this. Who, in their right mind, would want a messed-up picture like that? Well, I guess someone would or the practice would have stopped ages ago. And good luck with your own site. If it's going to be minus watermarks I'll be cheering you on. :-)

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:45:21 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

08-08-08 04:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by SuchSluts (0)

To SurfKing (0):

I wouldn't mind if my post was deleted. I honestly didn't think this was such a serious place, or else I would have just said 'I like Newbie Nudes'. I was only contributing my thoughts. It's weird because we get thousands of compliments on the quality of our pictures. The invite was just to share. We do send pics without watermarks to those we trust won't do as I described to Mess. Our live cam shows don't have water marks either. Sorry to have gotten everyone so upset. We detest spamming by the way.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:22:13 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

08-08-08 04:22pm

COMMENT REPLY by SuchSluts (0)

To messmer (123):

Well Mess, the reason for the watermark is to keep people from posting our pics as their own, or trading them as their own. We have thousands upon thousands of pics and a program that allows us to stamp them. We just stamp them before we post them. Did you mean the watermarks are blurred? If so, they just say suchsluts@mewbienudes.com. Anyway, glad you liked them. We try to keep the watermarks from getting in the way. We are in the process of creating our own site minus the watermarks ;)

Sluts

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:57:46 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-23-08 09:57am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To SurfKing (0):

SurfKing wrote:

"As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know."

I think you might very well be right re. spam but, to tell the truth, that never occurred to me when I read the reply. I just thought of it as the answer of a proud exhibitionist who didn't see any harm in one more voyeur peeking in on her. :-) Too bad the quality of the pictures is so bad, I would have enjoyed a nice, clear, clean (no watermark right across the body!!!) photo or two of the poster.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:56:55 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-23-08 09:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To SurfKing (0):

Surfking remarks: "... and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.

If you'll see Reply #16 & 19 under an earlier Review of this site ... http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10240

... you'll see our ruling on this one.

Again, this kind of site is a bit of an unusual situation. As always, we encourage Users here to use their best judgement when deciding if a fellow Users' remarks are biased.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:17:56 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-23-08 08:17am

COMMENT REPLY by SurfKing (0)

To messmer (123):

You summed it up perfectly when you said it's a community and should be free. The operators should just carry advertising to pay the bills. You are also spot on when you say it should not be listed on TBP- technically it is NOT a porn site.

As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:36:09 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-21-08 02:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To SurfKing (0):

This site is definitely only for a small segment of the porn loving public, despite their claim of having a million and a half active members. It is for dyed-in-the-wool exhibitionists only because even happy voyeurs like myself have one heck of a time finding something of high quality.

I understand that they are amateurs but with today's cameras it should be a piece of cake to take some clear, sharp, appetizing pictures. My apologies to the lady(ies) I just responded to above. I found you personally attractive but the pictures themselves below par for a site that charges a subscription fee.

I still wish all their users loads of luck and pleasure in connection with their sexual preference but maintain that the site should not be listed in TBP. It's a community NOT a porn site and it should be free .. period!

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:13:49 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-21-08 02:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To SuchSluts (0):

I liked what I saw but there was a watermark right across the pictures and they were blurred. I haven't been to this site in ages, didn't bother keeping a record of my user name or password, so the question is: is that confounded mark in all the pictures or just in the freebies?

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:08:25 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-21-08 09:08am

COMMENT REPLY by SurfKing (0)

To messmer (123):

I have to agree with messmer's initial take on NewbieNudes. I would only recommend a paying membership to someone who is desperate to post pictures of themselves on the net, can't get paid to do it and isn't satisfied with just three pics a day.

I was a paying member (similar situation- a friend talked me into it. The friend later apologized) and over the course of a few weeks found it to be a complete waste of money. There are several issues I had.

First, they do not have 1.6 whatever million members. They've had that many people sign up during their existence, but my estimates are only 20,000 active users. Of those, less than half are posters. When a person deletes their account, (this happens A LOT) they do not lower thier "member" count. A small deception, but a deception.

Second is lack of quality material. Fifty percent of the content is blurry cock close-ups. There are also too many cell phone pics and just plain poorly taken pictures. Paying members can access "high resolution" versions, but I found the standard views far less grainy.

Third is the videos. Several people have told me this is what hooked them- only premium members can view them. I found 1 in 50 or 75 was watchable. The quality of these is usually so bad I can't fully describe it. Poorly edited, (if at all) absurdly short and terribly filmed. Quite a few are webcam/ cell phone captures resulting in unwatchable grainy images.

My fourth issue is more a personal pet peeve. A lot of people would go premium and then saturate the site with terrible pictures. I guess they wanted their money's worth, but I don't want to see 40 pictures every day of a woman I find totally unattractive doing almost the exact same pose in each picture. Slagging through all of the terrible content to find a couple of good pics was hard enough. This made it harder.

I'll make a sub-point to that last one. I found very few posters I liked, but when I did they were short lived. The best ones seemed to be standard members who would post for a week or a month and then delete their account. This was frustrating since quality pictures are so hard to come by on the site.

However, my biggest beef was people posting stolen pics. Being a paying member of a few real porn sites, I routinely recognized pictures that NN members were passing off as themselves. I got so frustrated with seeing material I had paid a lot of money to have access to being shown for free that I complained to NN. They completely blew me off and said that didn't happen on their site. They make it easy to report objectionable material, but not copyrighted images lifed from other sites.

In the end, I can only recommend this site to people desperate to be naked on the net. Even then, just do like 90% of NN posters do: start a standard membership, post 3 pics a day for a month or so and then delete it after you've had your thrill (or when the creepy private messages you'll get become too much).

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:42:04 PDT

Newbie Nudes (0)

07-17-08 03:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by SuchSluts (0)

To messmer (123):

We looove to put ourselves out there and hide nothing. Come have a look-see!

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:46:51 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

12-15-07 10:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by Distant Lover (0)

To messmer (123):

A major attraction of NewbieNudes for me is the Fourm. Although NewbieNudes has over a million members, those who contribute to the Forum are a more limited number, and one can get to know the leading contributors. The Forum feels like a community of co-workers, neighbors, or the residents of a small town where everyone knows everyone else. I like many of the posters who contribute to the Forum. Some I like a great deal. Most I accept. Some I do not like. Nevertheless, everyone has a distinct personality, and contributes to the unique, and uniquely wonderful collective personality of the Forum.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:10:22 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-28-07 04:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by IDoctor99 (0)

To messmer (123):

For the most part I think we agree, but there are a few points I have to comment on.

There are good videos to be found, and no shortage of them. The quality may differ from studio porn, but the content isn't lacking. Just because this is an amateur site doesn't mean quality suffers tremendously; typical point and shoot cameras have 6 megapixels nowadays and video cameras are recording DVD quality movies. Some of the finer details may get lost in the transfer to the computer and eventually to the site, but I think most fans of "amateur" porn are fond of the less than crisp detail in the movies; sort of like some people prefering old black and white photo processing with its inherent grainy softness to modern day digital photo perfection. The lesser quality gives the admirer of amateur porn reasurance that he is, in fact, watching something unique and homemade. For those that prefer that style of video, which can be very hard to find in "mainstream" porn, this site is something near an answered prayer.

As for the isolated body parts, I have to say again; look around some more and you'll have no trouble finding incredibly hot women that hide nothing. In fact, pictures (such as those of my wife) of women wearing masks or pictures that have been censored to hide faces usually don't hold the highest rankings, as the site members prefer posters to not hide thier face. Having been a member there for more than six months, I can honestly say people that hide their faces (through whatever means) aren't the majority.

As far as what the site can offer the average porn viewer, I've been jerking off to porn for more than 20 years. It takes (what I personally feel to be) good porn to get me excited enough to enjoy myself when doing so. It stands to reason I wouldn't be able to get my rocks off every day that I don't have sex with my wife if this site wasn't able to provide me with good porn. It also seems that I would go to other porn sites if this particular one didn't give me enough to supply my masturbatory habit, but I don't. I stay right there at the same one. It has to have something going for it...

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:43:25 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-28-07 11:43am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To IDoctor99 (0):

Thanks for your reasoned response. I can see where you would love the site if you were an exhibitionist, trouble is I'm not. On the surface a "marriage" of exhibitionist and voyeur (like most Porn Users) would appear ideal but I really have a problem with too amateurish a quality of picture and video and have even more of a problem with isolated body parts which, in a true amateur forum, would almost have to be the norm by default because, as you pointed out, these are real people who don't want to put their reputations on the line, therefore I truly understand the necessity to either leave out the face altogether or to mask it in order to make it unrecognizeable.

For you this may be an admirable thing to do, for me, my reaction is to feel cheated, therefore I prefer sites that contain "doubtful" amateurs. In other words those who might be exhibitionists for money but are not (yet) the silicone enhanced, air-brushed Barbie-Doll-like professionals found in Penthouse and Playboy.

Reading between the lines of your post I think both of us agree that because of the innate nature of your favorite site it should not be rated by the average Porn User. Yours is a site where like-minded folks mingle and have a wonderful time in each other's company. And that's fine and deserves a high rating ... if it is treated like a forum and not another Porn Site.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:56:12 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-27-07 07:56pm

COMMENT REPLY by IDoctor99 (0)

To messmer (123):

You present an accurate take on the site in your last paragraph. The site is made up mostly of individuals wanting to be exhibitionists, or those who appreciate people that enjoy being exhibitionists.

As you stated in the last sentence of your observation, for the typical non-contributing member, the site perhaps offers less than what you can find elsewhere on the internet. For those who submit content or those that appreciate this type of content, it is quite possibly the best venue for them.

Also, it takes time to fully discover all this site has to offer. 15 minutes is NOT enough to form a full opinion; especially if using the free membership to do so. I'm sure you're familiar with the phrase "You get what you pay for"... I have a sneaking suspicion that you looked at the first page or two of photos that you were presented with and didn't find much to admire. It takes some time to figure out that you won't see much at all by viewing content that way; you need to search individual categories and search by ratings or popularity. When you do that, you start getting into the good stuff and can be surprised at the quality of the content. It isn't long before you've bookmarked several very hot posters in anticipation of their next contribution.

IF the site is one you would like to be a paying member of, you can get a three year membership for less than 4 dollars a month. True, you have to lay out 120 dollars on the front end, but if the site appeals to you, that 4 dollars a month is money very well spent.

Once you are a paying member, the videos are where its at on this site. Again, the quality and production values aren't what you can find on other typical, mainstream porn sites, but people go to NewbieNudes looking for amateur content, so they are actually getting exactly what they want. To compare the content quality to mainstream porn is an apples to oranges comparison and doesn't really apply.

In regards to the hiding of faces and such; again, the people here are real. They are not earning their living fucking in front of a camera. If they were discovered, serious consequences could be faced, yet they are sensual people who want to expand their sexual activity by sharing themselves with those who wish to watch. I, for one, admire people that hide their identity, and besides, I'm not so much interested in faces anyway. I'm more of a tits and ass man myself. If hidden faces bother you, just keep looking around. The truth is there are hundreds of super hot people with no qualms about getting recognized posting pictures AND videos of themselves.

As you said; this site is for a certain type of person with certain tastes. For the mainstream porn watcher it might not offer much at all on the surface. A closer, more intimate exploration of the site will yeild interesting results. Of that I'm sure.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:11:45 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-26-07 11:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by Distant Lover (0)

To messmer (123):

Most of the photos posted on NewbieNudes do not appeal to me. I find some of them distastefull. Nevertheless, with NewbieNudes there is always the thrill of discovery. Every now and then I see a photograph so beautiful that it takes my breath away. Because so many photographs are posted every day "every now and then" happens frequently.

Also, one can communicate with the pretty ladies in the photos. You don't get that with most web sites.

View Thread (17)

RE: asmith12's Review

Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:23:23 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-25-07 09:23am

REVIEW REPLY by Apple (0)

To asmith12 (124):

this is a totally reasonable review. the best best best pictures tend to hover in the high 8 ratings, because there are evidently people who fly through voting down pictures as they get to the top. also scenarios are more common if you look at individual galleries. i think maybe it doesn't make a ton of sense to have a profile here, because NN isn't *exactly* porn. like you said, asmith... it's more of a community. and, in fact, the home page calls it "amateur nude community."

thanks for giving it a shot, though! :)

View Thread (4)

RE: asmith12's Review

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:09:11 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-24-07 09:09am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Distant Lover (0):

The girls of breathtaking loveliness may be there but are awfully hard to find and chances are when you do find them their faces are masked. The bulk of the pictures is from the breasts, or waist, down and they lack eroticism in their sameness and very amateurish quality. I, too, am not a fan of hard core but there is simply nothing there that would excite or tantalize me erotically. Of course, tastes differ and as asmith12 points out the community aspect might very well make up for what the picture section is lacking. I am glad you have found something that captured your attention, it wouldn't be for me.

View Thread (4)

RE: Distant Lover's Review

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:59:33 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-24-07 08:59am

REVIEW REPLY by Distant Lover (0)

To asmith12 (124):

I would like to point out that while I love NewbieNudes I am not a member of the NN staff. I receive no money or benefits for what I post here or elsewhere about NN.

View Thread (7)

RE: asmith12's Review

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:51:28 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-24-07 08:51am

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Distant Lover (0):

I've tried to make a distinction between photo content and photo quality. And while content can be different (which I've mentioned), technical photo quality (focus, lighting, color balance etc.) just plain sucks (I'm not sure that I've seen one picture with a good technical quality except for those obviously stolen from porno sites).

View Thread (4)

RE: asmith12's Review

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:46:44 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-24-07 08:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Distant Lover (0)

To asmith12 (124):

I simply disagree with you about the quality of the photographs. Sure, a lot of them are unappealing, but some are of breath taking loveliness. I dislike anything that is hard core. Other people, obviously, are attracted to that. One of the many things I love about NewbieNudes is that there is plenty there for everyone and every taste.

The fact that the frequently beautiful women who do submit photographs do so because they enjoy sharing their loveliness and not because they are paid to is an additional source of erotic appeal for me. When the beautiful women in the photographs submit comments and thread on the Forum I am able to appreciate their beautiful minds.

View Thread (4)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:21:34 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-23-07 02:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To jd1961 (95):

Wasn't I thinking the same thing! The type of stuff this site majors in is usually skipped by me for its inferior quality when I look at "amateurs.female" on the usenet. Anyone with a decent news server could find good quality pics in many of the news groups. (Just close your eyes to all the spam that's also found there!) Not to mention all the sites that offer free samples, if you have the patience to look.

View Thread (17)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:11:05 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-23-07 01:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To messmer (123):

This kind of stuff can be had for free all over the net. I don't think a site like this should even be listed at TBP.

View Thread (17)

Newbie Nudes Comment

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:20:24 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-23-07 11:20am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Not worth the effort!

All the arguments going on over "is it shilling or not?" if a member of an amateur site recommends it glowingly made me curious enough to become a member of Newbie Nudes: for all of 15 minutes.

It is my personal opinion that the ratings given by present contributors to this site are way out of line when one takes a look at what is actually offered there. Forget, for a moment, that larger pictures and videos are available for a hefty price and look at the general make-up of this amateur site:

The overwhelming majority of the members choose to remain anonymous (for valid reasons) which means faceless body parts all over the place and very few pics where one could actually admire the beauty of the WHOLE woman (and a paid subscription and larger pictures wouldn't change that). When you do come across a "whole person" pic you still have to consider yourself lucky if the face isn't masked somehow.

In my opinion you would have to be a contributor who gets a thrill from exposing his/her genitalia anonymously, or someone who likes to mingle with fellow exhibitionists, (not that there is anything wrong with it) to give the site more than a fifty! To the uninvolved (non-contributing) voyeur the site isn't worth a second look.

Visit Newbie Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Distant Lover's Review

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:04:33 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-20-07 03:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Apple (0):

Maybe it makes sense to leave a comment (but NOT review) titled like "Anybody wants to review this site (membership is FREE)?" - it would allow for unbiased review by somebody from this site (even better - by some known and trusted member of this community). I hope it won't be against PornUsers policies.

View Thread (7)

RE: Distant Lover's Review

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:48:17 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-20-07 02:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by Apple (0)

To asmith12 (124):

just so you know, NN is pretty sensitive to the same thing that's bugging you here. the folks pretty much flock all over anybody who tries to advertise their paid sites and the like. one of the things that is totally incorrect about the information on the NN profile at thebestporn.com is that there is a mandatory charge. actually, you can fully participate without paying a dime. there is just a restriction on # of pics you can post, and on PMs you can send in one day. oh, and you can't watch vids. the pics are all yours, though, as is chat, forum, PMs, etc.

View Thread (7)

RE: IDoctor99's Review

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:55:38 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-20-07 04:55am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

As we've said, this is a bit of an unusual situation. While the user does have input into the site by virtue of his uploading images, we've decided that, for the purpose of our rules, his involvement is not that of someone who has any real control over the site. We're allowing his review but encouraging users, such as yourself, to take his obvious bias into account when you determine if his remarks help you in any way.

Sorry if you don't agree with this course of action but its what we've decided is best in this situation.

View Thread (19)

RE: IDoctor99's Review

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:26:58 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-19-07 08:26pm

REVIEW REPLY by Apple (0)

To RagingBuddhist (45):

"If that isn't someone associated with a site, who is?"

nonetheless, the guy who determines the rules decided this post doesn't violate the rules. BUT, so that i don't just sound like i'm trying to piss anyone off...

YOU, RagingBuddhist, could post pictures of yourself at NewbieNudes, and there would be women (and men, perhaps) who would find you attractive (no matter what you look like) and comment on your pics and make you feel like a million bucks. especially if you get involved at all in the forums, where naked people become de-objectified, thereby making them 100% sexier and 100% more accessible and removing the slight twinge of guilt that the more altruistic of us feel when we look at mainstream porn. and that goes for any of you! it may not be new, but it is revolutionary, imagine a world where all the smarminess and underage-ness was taken out of porn. certainly that wouldn't be for everyone, but i bet it's for a whole lot of us!

View Thread (19)

RE: IDoctor99's Review

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:24:01 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-19-07 03:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (45)

To Khan (Staff):

Khan said:
"[W]e do not allow webmasters or those associated with a site to submit reviews..."

I'm saying:
"Are you serious?"

He came right out and said it - "I post pics and vids there of my wife and I in action..." If that isn't someone associated with a site, who is?.

I thought we were all here to rate porn sites - not for self-promotion. Even if iDoctor99 hadn't mentioned that he and his wife are on the site, I still would've been suspicious of his interest in the site because of the score he gave, along with the lack of details usually left with higher scoring sites.

View Thread (19)

RE: Distant Lover's Review

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:54:01 PST

Newbie Nudes (0)

11-19-07 06:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Distant Lover (0)

To Distant Lover (0):

The best advertisement is a satisfied customer.

View Thread (7)