PU - 1 By Day - All Activity

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:37:09 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-15-08 09:37am

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To Drooler (146):

Yeah this sucks, this site used to be awesome and now I probably won't even join again. No reason to since there aren't any more new girls or shoots. How lame.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:04:26 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-15-08 04:04am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To MargulisAZ (64):

And another thing: They can't even keep the names straight. They have an upcoming hardcore set with Julie Silver but they've got her named Sandra de Marco! (It's another redux, btw. Just thought I'd mention it.)

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:56:17 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-03-08 02:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Another thing thing they do is sit on their butts with the Sunday "casting" updates. It's happened again and again, and it happened this morning, too. (They "post" new updates 4 a.m. my time.)

But, as usual, they hadn't put up the thumbs and the zips don't work, either! (Error msg) I checked at 5:30 a.m. They cheerfully suggest that I check back later. Hmmph.

"Yo, if you're going to post something as updated, make sure it is!"

P-R-O-F-E-S-S-I-O-N-A-L-I-S-M (Thought I'd just spell it out for 'em.)

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:39:34 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-02-08 02:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To Drooler (146):

Blond Sandra Shine....Of course - what a lack of memory for my part: Her own site - well, you can't win them all...

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:33:29 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 04:33am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

Smashing, indeed! I've been not only smitten, but smashed!

Yes, I've also seen Sandra Shine as a blond recently. There's something about these Hungarian girls wanting to change their hair color. Britney (aka Brigitte Hunter) and Bambi switched to brunette (very black, actually, like they couldn't stop until they were absolutely black). And the Czech Veronica DaSouza recently went blond and bigger in the boobies (another completely unnecessary "enhancement").

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:11:46 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 04:11am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To Drooler (146):

Yes, sir - judging from the cover-photo Lola is a smashing brunette!!
BTW: Brunettes - have you seen Sandra Shine has turned blond?
Just found a DDF Prod. -clip, don't know from which site, though.
A bit of a shame: she looks older and less elegant/classy...

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:47:34 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 03:47am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

Hey Denner,
More news, good and bad, since I joined (impulsive me):

Bad:
No zips!
No vids!

Good:
Nice quality pics!
Lots of ASS pics (good for me!)

I was just going through the "telephone" gallery of their "Lola." My God! I had to pick myself back up off the floor!

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:39:50 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 03:39am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To Drooler (146):

Thanks for that tip, Drooler.
Judging by their looks the site seems to have some new models - faces/bodies I don't recall having seen before, anyway.
And names - we can never depend on....

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:12:10 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 03:12am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

Hey, Denner, I know you've been frustrated in the hunt for new stuff.

Well, I just found a new site that looks interesting: walterbosque-art (add the w's and the .com).

It's a pretty large collection, exclusive stuff, Latina, pics to 5000px, some nice looking babes.

$24.95 ("recurring," but that's no matter if you stay for only a month). Billing by CCBill.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:18:31 PDT

1 By Day (17)

08-01-08 01:18am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To MargulisAZ (64):

's right!! I just looked at the Sandra Kalerman "Blue Couch" set (with color uncoordinated green toy) and sure enough, deja vu all over again!

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:34:15 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 07:34pm

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To Drooler (146):

Taking a closer look at the updates recently, it actually looks like ALL OF IT is remastered old material. Yikes, that's really scary if one of the best sites is now no longer updating any new material and models at all. Even the ones that do not say reloaded are old from what I can see.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:45:22 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 01:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To Wittyguy (29):

I would imagine this is probably the main reason sites are doing this, to save money. It makes you look good that you update so much, even though there really isn't much more new content updated than any other site. I don't like it because I've already seen it all and like new material and new girls, but people new to the site or to online porn probably could care less, and don't even know. So unfortunately, it seems to be happening more and more on different site.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:00:15 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 01:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

Wow, that Max 3 video cover is something else with the guy sitting under the "vaginal archway," as it were. Megane looks pretty hot, too.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:44:35 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 11:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (29)

To MargulisAZ (64):

I recently finished a membership at Handsonhardcore and noticed that there was a lot of "remastering" going on there as well. I think it's due in part to the fact that most porn surfers haven't been around all that long and will think it's new and in part saving production money while keeping the updates flowing.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:16:48 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 07:16am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To Drooler (146):

NEW STUFF

BTW Drooler:

You may have seen this - it sure looks good (video-wise) and/but a french site:

http://www.megane-officiel.fr/

She's done a bit at Explicite Art

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:08:13 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 07:08am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Thanks to Drooler - AGAIN - for stating things af they are...(and of course to MargulisAZ for bringing this up about 1 By Day).

Damn, Drooler and quite a few other PUs - I envy you - because it's a problem for this user: the native language compared to english - like some scandinavian writer just said:
"All the fine language details is lost when you have to speculate about translation" (something like that, anyway).
Well, ok, that's the deal here at this site - so bottom line: I keep working on it..
And yes, I've had the same speculations as Drooler - about 1 By Day:

Has something changed radically - It would be a shame for this once great site - and for us. And foremost: Where are the new girls? The NEW girls/the NEW stuff that is so importend for most serious PUs
1 By Day used to be among the best in that field...

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:05:31 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 04:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To MargulisAZ (64):

This hasn't been lost on me, either. If you look carefully at the little kind of white oval shaped thing on the thumb, it does say "Reloaded" but it isn't nearly as noticeable as the former "Once upon a time, on (insert date here) ..." they were putting on them.

Thing is, there are members from way back in 2002. We've seen every single update since then. And some of us are members of PU. And we know which porn stars are current and which aren't, so put it all together and those who get "reloaded" aren't usually hard to spot.

I look forward to seeing Sandra (blue couch) again tomorrow morning. That one's not even labelled "reloaded" but I think it is. Why? I have photos of the same scene, and when I moused over one, it said it was taken in 2002. Also, the older photos were taken before she got that (completely unneeded) boob job.

I enjoy and appreciate the reloaded stuff because it looks better than the original (usually) and the pic sizes are sometimes MUCH bigger than they were before.

But what I don't like is this shift to labelling content as if it's "new" when it's not. Once someone starts trying to pull it over on you, you never know what they'll do next.

And I wonder what's happened to DDF. We haven't heard from Bela in a while (the webmaster). I get a feeling that something's changed. Are they still hiring new girls? I've been wondering about that, too.

View Thread (18)

RE: No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:33:18 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 03:33am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To MargulisAZ (64):

Agree....
Just ended this term and had that feeling "sneaky".

Been member on and off have quite some years now - and recognize more and more older stuff - It's okay with some remastered stuff with a little better looking videos.
But they overdoing this old stuff - and yes: without clear info.

View Thread (18)

1 By Day Comment

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:48:13 PDT

1 By Day (17)

07-31-08 02:48am

COMMENT by MargulisAZ (64)

No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

** comment updated as of 8/25/08 **

The site has stopped shooting new models and releasing new material. All updates are now old material that is "remastered". Please be aware of this when joining.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Was I just unlucky ?

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:36:20 PDT

1 By Day (17)

06-09-08 12:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by ByteMaster (0)

To Wittyguy (29):

Ok, thanks for the tip. I've looked at the forum but havnt posted anything yet. I will do soon because I've an interesting project I've been working on that I want to share with PU.

View Thread (4)

RE: Was I just unlucky ?

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:31:26 PDT

1 By Day (17)

06-09-08 12:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (29)

To ByteMaster (0):

Your welcome. In case you don't hear back from DDF in the next week or so, I should point out there is a forum thread ("Best / Worst Customer Service") that you could post in. Sometimes webmasters browse through here and that might ring a bell for someone at DDF.

View Thread (4)

RE: Was I just unlucky ?

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:27:27 PDT

1 By Day (17)

06-09-08 12:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by ByteMaster (0)

To Wittyguy (29):

Thanks Wittyguy, I'm sure its just a mistake. The DDF sites do look very good. I will give it a few days, see what happens. I've sent a message to Bela the webmaster via PU, but got no reply yet!

I don't want to do a charge back cause then other sites may reject my credit card number in the future.

View Thread (4)

RE: Was I just unlucky ?

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:18:06 PDT

1 By Day (17)

06-09-08 12:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (29)

To ByteMaster (0):

Sorry to hear about that man. It is a good site. I've never had any problems with the DDF sites so I can't vouch for how good the customer service is or is not (although "not" sounds more like it).

The "brute force" message that comes up suggest that your ip address may be blocked mistakenly or otherwise. Have you tried logging on from another server address?

My only other advice is to keep trying the DDF email. If that doesn't work, you may have to take the slightly embarassing step of contacting your credit card company to contest the charges but, $30 is $30.

View Thread (4)

1 By Day Comment

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:06:33 PDT

1 By Day (17)

06-09-08 08:06am

COMMENT by ByteMaster (0)

Was I just unlucky ?

Hi chaps, I been a visitor to PU for a long time but have never posted. Now I feel must do so.

I joined this site on Friday 6th June 2008 via ccbill. My credit card was approved by ccbill (as it always is, I've joined over 100 sites since 2005 with no problems at all).

The record at ccbill shows I have access to 1by-day for 30 days, which is what I paid for. password, username, subscription ID, amount spent, rebill date etc etc all listed correctly.

My online credit card statement shows that the correct amount of money has been approved (and taken I might add).

My username and password have never worked. Not ONCE, NADA, NOTHING. ZIP.

I've contacted 1by-day via the help section of the website. NO RESPONSE.

I've contacted ccbill, they replied within 10 mins, telling me to contact support@ddfprod.com , which I have. NO RESPONSE.

Now, when I try to log into 1by-day I get a message saying "500 brute force detected"

So, I paid for 30days....27 remaining....and counting down and I've not even downloaded a single lonely jpg image. The site tour looks very nice, guess I'll have to settle for that.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: NOT 29.95$!

Sat, 31 May 2008 05:05:05 PDT

1 By Day (17)

05-31-08 05:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To jbgild (2):

Thx for the heads up. I've forwarded this to the TBP Editors and I'm sure they'll have the listing updated shortly.

View Thread (1)

1 By Day Comment

Fri, 30 May 2008 12:07:33 PDT

1 By Day (17)

05-30-08 12:07pm

COMMENT by jbgild (2)

NOT 29.95$!

This site charges in Euro. And the monthly fee is 24.95 EURO, which is more than 38 $.
Please TBP, get your facts corrected!

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Heavy Makeup Keep in coming

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:00:12 PDT

1 By Day (17)

04-26-08 02:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by pornaficionado (0)

To Rocker (0):

I have to say that I agree. Although I wouldn't necessarily say thick makeup, I like the girls on this site to be made up to be beautiful.
I don't mean to sound too harsh, but some of the girls can be quite plain when seen in their castings without makeup. The makeup artists do a great job in transforming the girls. Sometimes the look is a bit trampy/tarty, but I say "great"!
Having said that, some of the girls are naturally beautiful and heavy makeup can detract from this.

View Thread (1)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:56:48 PDT

1 By Day (17)

04-05-08 12:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (138)

To JBDICK (19):

On the subject Killergram - please just don't take my word for it - but scan the PU for other users view that may differ from mine...
Anyway - 2 of the "old timers" here: turismo and exotics4me - read their reviews too....

Happy hunting.....

View Thread (3)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:03:48 PDT

1 By Day (17)

04-05-08 10:03am

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To Denner (138):

Denner

Thanks. I knew it would be a good thing joining pornusers.com.

My next membership is www.killergram.com. I can't believe I missed that site and there's me thinking I knew about every worthwhile site out there.

Looking forward to drilling into the content on that site soon.

Cheers

View Thread (3)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:30:59 PDT

1 By Day (17)

04-05-08 09:30am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (138)

To JBDICK (19):

Great review - agree with points and all - been at that site several times and it sure is in the Top 20.
BTW - since you're from UK:
Have you checked out Killergram?
Even if I go a lot for easteuropean teens, I really enjoy Killergram with UK-girls - and the scenes are ok - even if they are somewhat sterotype/lookalike....but what the heck.
They now got Lucy Zara, Jem Stone and Rebecca Smyth and a lot others who formerly only did soft...well, I just like that site and goes back there once in a while.
And once again - wellcome to a new serious PU......
Keep up the good thing.

View Thread (3)

RE: Still Euros?

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:04:09 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-29-08 05:04am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To PinkPanther (28):

Yay!

View Thread (2)

RE: Still Euros?

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:03:59 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-28-08 06:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (28)

To exotics4me (295):

I believe that they changed this back about 2-3 weeks ago.

View Thread (2)

1 By Day Comment

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:16:58 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-28-08 12:16pm

COMMENT by exotics4me (295)

Still Euros?

Just wondering about the price of 1byday, I was checking it out to see what all new had been added, and noticed on the join page that it says $29.95 per month, with the dollar sign instead of the Euro symbol. I don't know why I would make a big deal about $6, but was curious about it.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: More updates - 3 times instead of two

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:40:01 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-14-08 08:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (28)

To Denner (138):

It looks like they have heard the complaints, because now the prices are adjusted, but are back to being in US dollars.

View Thread (4)

1 By Day Comment

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:57:27 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-14-08 01:57pm

COMMENT by Denner (138)

Reedited stuff and quality

I was a litlle hasty with my praise of the reruns at 1ByDay.
The webmaster said that by april they'd have two fresh and 1 reedited video/photoset daily/nightly. - That promise was ok.
But today the site has gone downhill with too many reruns/reedited videos on behalf of new stuff.
AND those reedited videos are NOT what I hoped for. The file size in both VMW and DIVX are quite large (mostly 300Mb-450Mb) but the quality and sharpness (or rather lack of..)are far from the newer videos at about same size.
I still honor the effort to remake the good ol' stuff, but the video-quality is disappointing.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: More updates - 3 times instead of two

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:42:05 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-12-08 05:42am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To PinkPanther (28):

Yes, too expensive - and even as a european i'm used to $ and hate when they start charging in euros...

View Thread (4)

RE: More updates - 3 times instead of two

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:21:53 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-11-08 09:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (28)

To Denner (138):

That's a good way for them to deal with the need they had to raise their prices to euros. It's still out of my league price-wise, at the moment, but it's a damned fine site.

View Thread (4)

RE: More updates - 3 times instead of two

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:34:11 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-11-08 03:34pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

That sounds awright. I just hope the Mayans were wrong ;)

View Thread (4)

RE: No more make up

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:39:39 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-11-08 09:39am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To DivBZero (13):

Thanks, I need to study up on my photoshop! :D

View Thread (7)

RE: No more make up

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:58:26 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-11-08 08:58am

COMMENT REPLY by DivBZero (13)

To jd1961 (78):

Indeed, Abby Winters is magical! explicite-art also has moments of magic.

RGB -- is red green blue
HSV -- is hue saturation value

These are colour spaces, i.e. a way to describe rendering of colour in a particular medium.

Your views on trollops need a much wider airing. Its clear to me that the very best fun is can be described as getting the girls that absolutely wouldn't be naughty - to be, well rather naughty.

Cheers DivB

View Thread (7)

1 By Day Comment

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:58:31 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-11-08 05:58am

COMMENT by Denner (138)

More updates - 3 times instead of two

I had some thoughts, that 1ByDay is going for more remakes of older material - instead of new. And suspected lack of new material.
Just received a mail from Bela at 1ByDay - here the message is:

"from April the plan is to to have two brand new sets every single day (1by-day and 1by-night) and to also have a third "reloaded" set for you too - so that will mean three updates every single day!"

And one other item, I dig: They ask members which older stuff we want to watch in remake, reedited or simply better quality.
And it's both video and photos-sets!

Not bad, if you ask me....

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Downhill - or lack of new materiel????

Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:06:50 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-09-08 03:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (138)

To Drooler (146):

Exactly...my concern:
That new stuff will be less and the remake of old material will take over. (Like Only 3x for exampel)

Well, I agree with your other point (for me it's videos) about some of the old and fine stuff in new and better quality - and once I fell for the old Katy K-videos. But the remake of one of these videos isn't that much better, so... (maybe the photo-quality is a hit in remake?)
And yeah, just downloaded and watched that Aneta Keys hc-video and yes, that's an old one...

I can live with a lot of remakes of former DDF-material, for sure - and if the Gods, Tao, I Ching, Buddah, a guy named Christ and even a fellow I think goes by the name Mohamed are with us - we'll make it through all those remakes.....

I hope.

View Thread (2)

RE: Downhill - or lack of new materiel????

Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:50:07 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-09-08 02:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (146)

To Denner (138):

Hey Denner,
A few months ago, Bela told me that they were thinking of starting their "reloaded" sets of older material (in larger sizes and better quality) in April. But they started earlier, on Jan. 1st.

I'm really glad that they're redoing the old photosets and I think the results are really good to excellent. (I have a ton of the old stuff, and some of it, even from 2002, is lower than 1024px and kinda funky.) And that hardcore video of Aneta with James Brosman is also a remastered oldie. Anyway, there are some "reloadables" that I'm really looking forward to!

But the concern I think you're raising is that this reloaded stuff is coming in place of what would be brand new material, and that kind of bugs me, too. If they could have at least one brand new thing each day and two or three of the reloaded stuff the same day, I'd be pretty darn happy. I don't know if they can work at that speed or not.

At the rate they were going when I departed at the end last month, given that they're probably going to redo everything from 2002 to 2005, they won't be done until Jan 2012!

The I Ching and the Mayans both predicted that that's the year the world will end!

Oh, no!

View Thread (2)

1 By Day Comment

Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:25:17 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-09-08 02:25pm

COMMENT by Denner (138)

Downhill - or lack of new materiel????

I would not have guessed this:
But in some ways it seems, that 1ByDay is NOT living up to their fine reputation - anymore.
There are som signs, that this good site is compromising.
Some later sets and videos are edited versions of older stuff.
It's ok that they put up SOME of the old favorites in much better quality - but the sets/videos I've checked out are not MUCH better than the old onces. And that kind of content is increasing.
I just signed up for the 6. 7. or maybe 8th time (don't remember anymore) - but I still expect the best....
(one small comfort: There is a great new (I think) video of Eve Angel)

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: No more make up

Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:23:49 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-07-08 05:23am

COMMENT REPLY by elephant (22)

To DivBZero (13):

Totally agree with you, there are sets which have the girls looking natural and their natural age and others with them caked in porn star glam makeup which does nothing for me.

View Thread (7)

RE: No more make up

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:36:40 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-06-08 11:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (28)

To CactusJack (0):

Yeah, I agree that they use too much make-up - but it's a fairly flat look, which is a hell of a lot more natural than the Kabuki blurring shit that Twisty's has been doing to their models in their exclusive sets. I'm fucking furious about the shitty-ass shoots that Twisty's posted of Andie Valentino. I thought it was the photo shopping, but they claimed that it was the make-up and lighting - whatever it was, they must have thought she was the homeliest woman in the world, the way they covered her gorgeous face all up - pissed me off!

View Thread (7)

RE: No more make up

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:33:33 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-06-08 11:33am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To DivBZero (13):

RGB values? I don't even know what that means. The 1 By Day girls are trollops, brazen, hussies, bad girls your mom and mine told us to stay away from. They prowl the streets as vamps looking for the next man to sink their fangs into. Put your wallet on a chain! Never give them your phone number, or your marriage is history! Get thee to Abby Winters for the "girl next door"!! This is the red zone, and all ye that enter are headed for misery, and death !!!!!

View Thread (7)

RE: No more make up

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:51:04 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-06-08 04:51am

COMMENT REPLY by DivBZero (13)

To jd1961 (78):

JD,

I trust your judgement in most things on this board.

However, when it comes to 1By-Day I think the original comment is valid.

I too like to see the models presentable. To me this means the sort of make-up they would wear to go out for dinner. I understand that there must be some compensation for the camera, but in the 1By-day case is veers too far towards the orange. Just out an image in photoshop and check the RGB values!

Every 10 sets or so they will do a set in natural colours, which I believe has a lot more erotic charge to it.

Thanks

DivB

View Thread (7)

RE: No more make up

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:04:58 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-04-08 01:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To CactusJack (0):

I like make up on a model.

View Thread (7)

1 By Day Comment

Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:11:11 PST

1 By Day (17)

02-03-08 02:11pm

COMMENT by CactusJack (0)

No more make up

There's way too much already. It looks like they dip all their models into a giant vat of orange make-up and then dump a bucket of powder over them before each shoot. My guess is that half of the budget for each shoot is spent on orange body make-up.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply