<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Girls Out West - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/girlsoutwest/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14991</guid>
		<title>Girls Out West Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14991</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/girlsoutwest/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/girlsoutwest.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Girls Out West&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/girlsoutwest/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Girls Out West&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:02pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;24&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Excellent Site!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					A comment rather than a review because, looking back at my previous efforts, I find that in my initial rush of excitement at having found something unusual I tend to give sites a higher rating than they deserve .. in my subjective opinion, of course. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first impression of GOW is WOW: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/abbywinters/&quot;&gt;Abby Winters&lt;/a&gt; with spice! I couldn't find glamor and I love that! The models are of the next door, amateur variety and if some aren't as pretty as many might prefer they are fine with me because of their very ordinariness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to posing there's no coyness on the part of the model nor attempt by the photographer to create &amp;quot;artistic&amp;quot; nudes. The poses and talk are often raunchy. It is an anti-pornography site (according to Annie, the webmaster/mistress) because it shuns the artificial glamor (glistening, tanned bodies, fake overblown breasts etc.) of most porn sites. I know that when it comes to a preference to see natural girls presented in a natural setting I'm with her all the way and wish her lots of success. I know it is the first time that I am actually tempted to commit myself long term to any site. The next week or two will tell! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, one extra bonus for me: the picture sets are huge and for once many pics have been taken in a &amp;quot;landscape&amp;quot; format which I prefer. This allows me to weed out the &amp;quot;portraits&amp;quot; and still end up with a continuous set taking the model from fully clothed to completely naked. But, as stated, that's MY bonus, you may not care.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2024&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Girls Out West&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14991&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14991&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:09 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>